Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science 4/2015

01.10.2015 | Original Paper

The impact of taxation on international assignment decisions: a principal–agent approach

verfasst von: Jan Thomas Martini, Rainer Niemann

Erschienen in: Review of Managerial Science | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In many industries like consulting or construction, highly qualified employees, i.e., experts or executive managers, have to be assigned to temporary projects. Obviously, the employees’ productivities in the respective projects are crucial for the employer’s optimal assignment decision, but assignment can also be affected by risk-incentive trade-offs. Moreover, taxation can alter the assignment decision, especially if employees are sent abroad as expatriates so that international tax law has to be taken into account. To address these issues simultaneously, we combine a human resource assignment problem with a principal–agent problem of the LEN type. Both wage taxation at the agents’ level and corporate taxation at the principal’s level are integrated. We show that national tax rules, the methods for avoiding double taxation, and the agents’ tax characteristics are important determinants of international assignment decisions. The effects of tax rate variations can be ambiguous and depend on whether the exemption method or the credit method are applied, in particular if agents make differing choices of residence. From a tax policy perspective, the exemption method should be preferred as the tax effects are more transparent and intuitive than under the credit method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
This research gap is rather surprising given current levels of individual and corporate income taxes in OECD countries and the resulting potential tax rate differentials. In the OECD countries, top statutory personal income tax rates were between 15.0 and 60.2 % with an average of 42.5 % in 2012 and corporate tax rates between 12.5 and 39.1 % with an average of 25.5 % in 2013; see OECD (2013a, b).
 
2
See, e.g., Voßmerbäumer (2013) and the references cited therein.
 
3
See, e.g., Niemann (2008) or Ewert and Niemann (2014).
 
4
See Burkhard et al. (2012) for a textbook introduction into assignment problems and Pentico (2007) for a research survey.
 
5
See, e.g., Reiche and Harzing (2011). Suutari and Tornikoski (2001), however, report that low taxes are a crucial determinant of expatriates’ satisfaction with their compensation.
 
6
See Niemann (2008), Niemann (2011), or Voßmerbäumer (2013) for a discussion of gross and net performance measures.
 
7
To see this denote actual effort costs \(\tilde{e}_{ij}/\alpha _{ij}\) and the actual productivity parameter \(\tilde{\pi }_{ij}\). Rescale the unit in which effort is measured according to \(e_{ij} = \sqrt{2/\alpha _{ij}} \tilde{e}_{ij}\), and hence effort costs amount to \(\tilde{e}_{ij}^2/\alpha _i = e_{ij}^2/2\). The job’s return, \(\tilde{\pi }_{ij} \tilde{e}_{ij}\), then amounts to \(\tilde{\pi }_{ij} \sqrt{\alpha _{ij}/2} e_{ij}\). The required rescaling of the productivity parameter is therefore \(\pi _{ij} = \sqrt{\alpha _{ij}/2} \tilde{\pi }_{ij}\).
But, to simplify the analysis and the exposition, the model does not include tax-deductible effort costs nor fixed profits or fixed agent costs.
 
8
See Article 15 No. 2 of the OECD model tax convention. The assumption of a long-term assignment is typically met for expatriates. Moreover, in the construction industry long-term building sites are regularly considered as permanent establishments; cf. Article 5 No. 3 of the OECD model tax convention.
 
9
We assume that a double taxation convention between the home country and the host country exists. Therefore, we neglect the case of unrelieved double taxation.
 
10
In principle, the agent’s decision to move his center of vital interests could be modeled endogenously by productivity coefficients \(\pi _{ij}\) depending on this decision. However, to keep the model simple, we assume an exogenously given center of vital interests.
 
11
See Article 15 of the OECD model tax convention. Throughout the paper we do not take the nationality principle into account. This principle means that taxpayers are taxed according to their citizenship. Except for the U.S., the nationality principle is rarely applied.
 
12
See, e.g., Articles 23A, 23B of the OECD model tax convention. Jacobs et al. (2005) give an international overview of the taxation of expatriates.
 
13
We neglect carrybacks or carryforwards of foreign tax credits and do not distinguish between a worldwide or a per-country limitation. See, e.g., Blouin (2012, pp. 10) for the US case.
 
14
See Articles 15, 24 (2) of the double taxation convention between Austria and the UK and Articles 15, 23 (2) of the double taxation convention between Austria and Germany.
 
15
See Articles 15, 23 (2) of the double taxation convention between Croatia and Austria and Articles 15, 23 (2) of the double taxation convention between Croatia and Germany.
 
16
We neglect deduction limits like Section 162 (m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. For the economic effect of deduction limits see, e.g., Halperin et al. (2001) and Göx (2008) for the U.S. case or Voßmerbäumer (2012) for the current discussion in Germany.
 
17
See Burkhard et al. (2012, §§1.2, 4). In particular, the costs in the canonical LSAP formulation associated with the assignment of agent i to job j can be defined as \(-(1-\tau _j) P_{ij} + \max _{i,j} (1-\tau _j) P_{ij}\).
 
18
For a discussion of reservation utilities before and after taxes see Niemann (2008, 2011), and Voßmerbäumer (2013).
 
19
See, for example, Niemann (2008, 2011), Voßmerbäumer (2013), and the references cited there.
 
20
Income from the home country as well as the exemption-with-progression method are neglected here.
 
21
Dutta and Reichelstein (Dutta and Reichelstein 1999, p. 239), Dutta and Zhang (Dutta and Zhang 2002, p. 74), and Wagenhofer (Wagenhofer 2003, p. 293), among others, make the same assumption.
 
22
See, e.g., Spremann (1987) in the pre-tax case and Niemann (2008) or Ewert and Niemann (2014) in the after-tax case.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Blouin J (2012) Taxation of multinational corporations. Found Trends Acc 6:1–64CrossRef Blouin J (2012) Taxation of multinational corporations. Found Trends Acc 6:1–64CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhard R, Dell’Amica M, Martello S (2012) Assignment problems, 2nd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, PhiladelphiaCrossRef Burkhard R, Dell’Amica M, Martello S (2012) Assignment problems, 2nd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, PhiladelphiaCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dam K, Perez-Castrillo D (2006) The principal–agent matching market. Front Theor Econ 2:1–34CrossRef Dam K, Perez-Castrillo D (2006) The principal–agent matching market. Front Theor Econ 2:1–34CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutta S, Reichelstein S (1999) Asset valuation and performance measurement in a dynamic agency setting. Rev Acc Stud 4:235–258CrossRef Dutta S, Reichelstein S (1999) Asset valuation and performance measurement in a dynamic agency setting. Rev Acc Stud 4:235–258CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutta S, Zhang XJ (2002) Revenue recognition in a multiperiod agency setting. J Acc Res 40:67–83CrossRef Dutta S, Zhang XJ (2002) Revenue recognition in a multiperiod agency setting. J Acc Res 40:67–83CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2011) Proposal for a council directive on a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB). COM(2011) 121 European Commission (2011) Proposal for a council directive on a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB). COM(2011) 121
Zurück zum Zitat Ewert R, Niemann R (2014) A theory of tax avoidance – managerial incentives for tax planning in a multi-task principal-agent model. CESifo Working Paper No. 4851 Ewert R, Niemann R (2014) A theory of tax avoidance – managerial incentives for tax planning in a multi-task principal-agent model. CESifo Working Paper No. 4851
Zurück zum Zitat Fellingham JC, Wolfson MA (1985) Taxes and risk sharing. Acc Rev 40:10–17 Fellingham JC, Wolfson MA (1985) Taxes and risk sharing. Acc Rev 40:10–17
Zurück zum Zitat Göx RF (2008) Tax incentives for inefficient executive pay and reward for luck. Rev Acc Stud 13:452–478CrossRef Göx RF (2008) Tax incentives for inefficient executive pay and reward for luck. Rev Acc Stud 13:452–478CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Halperin RM, Kwon YK, Rhodes-Catanach SC (2001) The impact of deductibility limits on compensation contracts: a theoretical examination. J Am Tax Assoc 23(Supplement):52–65CrossRef Halperin RM, Kwon YK, Rhodes-Catanach SC (2001) The impact of deductibility limits on compensation contracts: a theoretical examination. J Am Tax Assoc 23(Supplement):52–65CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hemmer T (2004) Lessons lost in linearity: a critical assessment of the general usefulness of LEN models in compensation research. J Manag Acc Res 16:149–162 Hemmer T (2004) Lessons lost in linearity: a critical assessment of the general usefulness of LEN models in compensation research. J Manag Acc Res 16:149–162
Zurück zum Zitat Holmström B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55:303–328CrossRef Holmström B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55:303–328CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs OH, Spengel C, Endres D, Elschner C, Höfer R, Schmidt O (2005) International taxation of expatriates—survey of 20 tax and social security regimes and analysis of effective tax burdens on international assignments. Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft, Frankfurt Jacobs OH, Spengel C, Endres D, Elschner C, Höfer R, Schmidt O (2005) International taxation of expatriates—survey of 20 tax and social security regimes and analysis of effective tax burdens on international assignments. Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft, Frankfurt
Zurück zum Zitat Martini JT, Niemann R (2013) The impact of taxation on international assignment decisions: a principal–agent approach, CESifo Working Paper No. 4323 Martini JT, Niemann R (2013) The impact of taxation on international assignment decisions: a principal–agent approach, CESifo Working Paper No. 4323
Zurück zum Zitat Martini JT, Niemann R, Simons D (2014) Management incentives under formula apportionment – tax-induced distortions of effort and compensation in a principal-agent setting. arqus Working Paper No. 168 Martini JT, Niemann R, Simons D (2014) Management incentives under formula apportionment – tax-induced distortions of effort and compensation in a principal-agent setting. arqus Working Paper No. 168
Zurück zum Zitat Niemann R (2008) The effects of differential taxation on managerial effort and risk taking. Finanz Arch Public Financ Anal 64:273–310CrossRef Niemann R (2008) The effects of differential taxation on managerial effort and risk taking. Finanz Arch Public Financ Anal 64:273–310CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Niemann R (2011) Asymmetric taxation and performance-based incentive contracts. CESifo Working Paper No. 3363 Niemann R (2011) Asymmetric taxation and performance-based incentive contracts. CESifo Working Paper No. 3363
Zurück zum Zitat Pentico DW (2007) Assignment problems: a golden anniversary survey. Eur J Oper Res 176:774–793CrossRef Pentico DW (2007) Assignment problems: a golden anniversary survey. Eur J Oper Res 176:774–793CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reiche S, Harzing AW (2011) International assignments. In: Harzing AW, Pinnington AH (eds) International human resource management, 3rd edn. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 185–226 Reiche S, Harzing AW (2011) International assignments. In: Harzing AW, Pinnington AH (eds) International human resource management, 3rd edn. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 185–226
Zurück zum Zitat Shapley LS, Shubik M (1971) The assignment game I: the core. Int J Game Theory 1:111–130CrossRef Shapley LS, Shubik M (1971) The assignment game I: the core. Int J Game Theory 1:111–130CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Spremann K (1987) Agent and principal. In: Bamberg G, Spremann K (eds) Agency theory, information, and incentives. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–37CrossRef Spremann K (1987) Agent and principal. In: Bamberg G, Spremann K (eds) Agency theory, information, and incentives. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–37CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suutari V, Tornikoski C (2001) The challenge of expatriate compensation: the sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction among expatriates. Int J Hum Resour Manag 12:389–404CrossRef Suutari V, Tornikoski C (2001) The challenge of expatriate compensation: the sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction among expatriates. Int J Hum Resour Manag 12:389–404CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Voßmerbäumer J (2012) Effizienzwirkungen einer Regulierung von Managergehältern durch das Steuerrecht. arqus Working Paper No. 125 Voßmerbäumer J (2012) Effizienzwirkungen einer Regulierung von Managergehältern durch das Steuerrecht. arqus Working Paper No. 125
Zurück zum Zitat Voßmerbäumer J (2013) Incentive effects and the income tax treatment of employer-provided workplace benefits. Rev Manag Sci 7:61–84CrossRef Voßmerbäumer J (2013) Incentive effects and the income tax treatment of employer-provided workplace benefits. Rev Manag Sci 7:61–84CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wagenhofer A (2003) Accrual-based compensation, depreciation, and investment decisions. Eur Acc Rev 12:287–309CrossRef Wagenhofer A (2003) Accrual-based compensation, depreciation, and investment decisions. Eur Acc Rev 12:287–309CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfson MA (1985) Tax, incentive, and risk-sharing issues in the allocation of property rights: the generalized lease-or-buy problem. J Bus 58:159–171CrossRef Wolfson MA (1985) Tax, incentive, and risk-sharing issues in the allocation of property rights: the generalized lease-or-buy problem. J Bus 58:159–171CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of taxation on international assignment decisions: a principal–agent approach
verfasst von
Jan Thomas Martini
Rainer Niemann
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Review of Managerial Science / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0134-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Review of Managerial Science 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner