Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Seeking Alternative Connections Between Civilisation and Security Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. The Individualisation of Security: A New Architecture for International Security

verfasst von : Sarah da Mota

Erschienen in: NATO, Civilisation and Individuals

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As the most decisive and influential normative trend of post-Cold War international security, the Individualisation of Security has progressively re-oriented security policies and their related discourses and rationales from the state to the individual. The Individualisation of Security has entailed the reformulation of security policies and the very conduct of war, reconfiguring them around a different conception of life-valuation that has the Liberal individual at its core. Through the strong ideological and biopolitical stances of humanitarianism, the Individualisation of Security has produced an international discourse of discipline and normalisation, according to which a conduct that is respectful of individuals should be held as natural for all states. This illustrates the extension of the civilising power through international organisations and can be considered as another stage of the civilising process coming from the West.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Post-Cold War NATO: New Ways and Reasons for Coexistence
Nächstes Kapitel The Individualisation of Security Within NATO
Fußnoten
1
The next chapter, especially dedicated to NATO’s missions in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, and Afghanistan, will approach this issue in more depth.
 
2
The “subject of security” is the actual and practical recipient of a given security policy, independently of its referent object.
 
3
As a matter of fact, those concepts and expressions were very well accepted and adopted in the codes of conduct of many international organizations, NGO’s, and foreign policies of some states such as Canada, Japan and Norway—concerning human security, mostly—because they were rooted in positive and progressist moral values, as they also generated important financial support (Ramel, 2003; Shusterman, 2006; Suhrke, 1999).
 
4
The ICISS’ formulation of R2P entails a three-fold conception of responsibility as (1) the state being responsible for the safety and welfare of their citizens; (2) the state being responsible to the international community to fulfil this duty; (3) other states may intervene to protect a population in another defaulting state regarding the first two responsibilities (Weber, 2009: 586–587).
 
Literatur
Adler, E. (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.CrossRef
Appiah, A. K. (2007 [2006]). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. London, New Delhi, Johannesburg: Penguin Books.
Barnett, M. (2005). Humanitarianism Transformed. Perspectives on Politics, 3(4), 723–740.CrossRef
Bellamy, A. J. (2004). Ethics and Intervention: The ‘Humanitarian Exception’ and the Problem of Abuse in the Case of Iraq. Journal of Peace Research, 41(2), 131–147.CrossRef
Bellamy, A. J., & Williams, P. (2011). The New Politics of Protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect. International Affairs, 87(4), 825–850.CrossRef
Bilgin, P. (2003). Individual and Societal Dimensions of Security. International Studies Review, 5, 203–222.CrossRef
Booth, K. (1991). Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies, 17(4), 313–327.CrossRef
Booth, K. (2005). Critical Security Studies Series. Boulder, CO & London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Bunde, T., & Noetzel, T. (2010). Unavoidable Tensions: The Liberal Path to Global NATO. Contemporary Security Policy, 31(2), 295–318.CrossRef
Burgess, P. J. (2011). The Ethical Subject of Security. London and New York: Routledge.
Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2010). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chandler, D. (2001). Universal Ethics and Elite Politics: The Limits of Normative Human Rights Theory. The International Journal of Human Rights, 5(4), 72–89.CrossRef
Chandler, D. (2002). From Kosovo to Kabul (and Beyond): Human Rights and International Intervention. London: Pluto Press.
Chandler, D. (2004). The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping, 11(1), 59–81.CrossRef
Chandler, D. (2008). Human Security: The Dog That Didn’t Bark. Security Dialogue, 39(4), 427–438.CrossRef
Chesterman, S. (2011). ‘Leading from Behind’: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention After Libya. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers.
Cohen, R. (2001). From Individual Security to International Stability. In R. Cohen & M. Mihalka (Eds.), Cooperative Security: New Horizons for International Order, The Marshall Center Papers, No. 3. Garmisch-Partenkirchen: George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies.CrossRef
Delanty, G. (2003). The Making of a Post-Western Europe: A Civilizational Analysis. Thesis Eleven, 72, 8–25.
Dillon, M., & Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2008). Biopolitics in the 21st Century: An Introduction. Review of International Studies, 34, 265–292.CrossRef
Donnelly, J. (1998). Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization? International Affairs, 74(1), 1–24.CrossRef
Duffield, M. (2008). Global Civil War: The Non-Insured, International Containment and Post-Interventionary Society. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 145–165.CrossRef
Dumont, L. (1983). Essais sur l’individualisme. Paris: Seuil.
Evans, G., & Sahnoun, M. (2002). The Responsibility to Protect. Foreign Affairs, 81(6), 99–110.CrossRef
Finnemore, M. (1996). Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (pp. 153–185). New York: Columbia University Press.
Foucault, M. (2000). Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 3, J. D. Faubion, Ed., R. Hurley et al., Trans.). New York: New Press.
Foucault, M. (2003 [1997]). Society Must Be Defended. New York: Picador.
Gasper, D., & Gomez, O. A. (2015). Human Security in Practice: ‘Personal Security’, ‘Citizen Security’ and Comprehensive Mappings. Contemporary Politics, 21(1), 100–116.CrossRef
Guilhot, N. (Ed.). (2011). The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the ICISS. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.
Jabri, V. (2007). War and the Transformation of Global Politics. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Jervis, R. (2011). Morality, Policy and Theory. The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. N. Guilhot (pp. 33–53). New York: Columbia University Press.
Kaldor, M., Albrecht, U., Chinkin, C., Dervis, K., Dwan, R., Giddens, A., et al. (2004). A Human Security Doctrine for Europe: The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities. Spain: Barcelona.
Krause, K., & Williams, M. C. (1997). Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Moore, R. R. (2002). European Security – NATO’s Mission for the New Millennium: A Value-Based Approach to Building Security. Contemporary Security Policy, 23(1), 1–34.CrossRef
Peoples, C., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2010). Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
Piiparinen, T. (2012). McDonaldisation of Sovereignty: A Foucauldian Analysis of Responsibility to Protect. Global Society, 26(4), 473–493.CrossRef
Ramel, F. (2003). La sécurité humaine: une valeur de rupture dans les cultures stratégiques du Nord? Etudes Internationales, 34(1), 79–104.CrossRef
Rothschild, E. (1995). What Is Security? DAEDALUS: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 124(3), 53–98.
Shusterman, J. (2006). An Interview with the Human Security Unit. Human Security Journal, 2, 97–103.
Suhrke, A. (1999). Human Security and the Interests of States. Security Dialogue, 30(3), 265–276.CrossRef
Tjalve, V. S. (2011). Designing (De)Security: European Exceptionalism, Atlantic Republicanism and the ‘Public Sphere’. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 441–452.CrossRef
United Nations Development Program. (1994). Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Walker, R. B. J. (1997). The Subject of Security. In K. Krause & M. C. Williams (Eds.), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (pp. 61–81). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Watson, S. (2011). The ‘Human’ as Referent Object?: Humanitarianism as Securitization. Security Dialogue, 42(1), 3–20.CrossRef
Weber, P. (2009). Too Political or Not Political Enough? A Foucauldian Reading of the Responsibility to Protect. The International Journal of Human Rights, 13(4), 581–590.CrossRef
Wyn Jones, R. (1999). Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Metadaten
Titel
The Individualisation of Security: A New Architecture for International Security
verfasst von
Sarah da Mota
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
NATO, Civilisation and Individuals

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74408-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-74409-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74409-4_8

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise