The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Peer reviewing in a new journal: Experiences from the first three years

Comment: Uncertainty in LCIA of toxic releases

David Pennington

Reply: Uncertainty in LCIA of toxic releases

Arnold Tukker

In reply to hertwich & pease, Int. J. LCA 3 (4) 180 — 181, “ISO 14042 restricts use and development of impact assessment”

Manfred Marsmann, Sven Olaf Ryding, Helias Udo de Haes, James Fava, Willie Owens, Kevin Brady, Konrad Saur, Rita Schenck

Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment

Helias A. Udo de Haes, Olivier Jolliet, Göran Finnveden, Michael Hauschild, Wolfram Krewitt, Ruedi Müller-Wenk

How does iso/dis 14042 on life cycle impact assessment accommodate current best available practice?

Helias A. Udo de Haes, Olivier Jolliet

6th international conference: the automotive industry & the environment

Why life cycle impact assessment is now described as an indicator system

J. William Owens

Forthcoming articles (no. 3, may 1999)

Valuation, appraisal, discounting, obsolescence and depreciation

Mark Deakin

Proposal for an integrated approach for the assessment of cross-media aspects relevant for the determination of “best available techniques” bat in the european union

Jutta Geldermann, Christina Jahn, Thomas Spengler, Otto Rentz

Environmental considerations on battery-housing recovery

Wulf-Peter Schmidt, Hans-Martin Beyer

Energy analysis of solar water heating systems in india

Jyotirmay Mathur, Narendra Kumar Bansal

Erratum

Adisa Azapagic, Roland Clift

The 3rd international conference on ecobalance

Mamoru Morimoto

Life cycle assessment: From Adam Smith to Aristotle

David Hunkeler, Ryoichi Yamamoto, Itaru Yasui

Conference reports: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)

Wulf-Peter Schmidt, Hans-Martin Beyer