Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 1/2020

05.03.2018

The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms

verfasst von: Michael Sheppard

Erschienen in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Discretionary slack, along with entrepreneurial orientation (EO), are vital to the growth and long-term survival of small firms. This research combines a Penrosian view of growth with structural contingency theory to develop and test a conceptual model of the relationship between slack and growth. Using a survey of Canadian firms with fewer than 50 employees, the study finds that discretionary slack has positive effect on growth which is fully mediated by EO. In addition, the analysis confirms a positive reciprocal effect of a feedback loop between growth and slack. The study controls for, and considers the effects of, firm age, size and industry knowledge intensity. This research contributes valuable insights for further development of firm growth theory, specifically in relation to small firms. The study is also important for policy development given that: a) small firms have the potential to contribute more than larger firms to job creation but may not due to early exit; b) firms exhibiting even modest growth more than double their chances of survival; and, c) those firms that survive grow fast. This study contributes to the literature on firm growth and informs small business leaders. It also provides policy makers with practical insights to facilitate their role in supporting the growth and survival of small firms that make such an important contribution to the economy.
Vorheriger Artikel Benefiting from economic crisis? Strategic orientation effects, trade-offs, and configurations with resource availability on SME performance
Nächster Artikel Entrepreneurship and risk-taking in a post-disaster scenario

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
The social cost of failure of the largest of firms (those considered “too big to fail”) resulted in government bailouts of several US banks in the late 2000’s. At the opposite end of the spectrum of firm size, bankruptcy protection enables risk-sharing between entrepreneurs and the task environment.
 
2
The constructs measured by this survey include firm strategies as well as financial information therefore it was critical that the respondent have knowledge of and access to this information. For this reason, the recruitment letters were sent to the key contact in the organisation, normally the president, CEO, owner or other executive.
 
Literatur
Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120.
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 93–117).
Arend, R. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’relationship. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 33–57.
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.
Atuahene-Gima, K., Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2005). The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 464–482.
Autio, E., Sapienza, H., & Almeida, J. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research - conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Bentzen, J., Madsen, E. S., & Smith, V. (2012). Do firms’ growth rates depend on firm size? Small Business Economics, 39(4), 937–947.
Bernstein, I. H., & Nunnally, J. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Oliva, TA, Oliver, RL, & MacMillan, IC (1992). A catastrophe model for developing service satisfaction strategies. Journal of Marketing, 56, 83–95.
Birch, D. G. (1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bourgeois, L. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, (6), 29–40.
Bradley, S. W., Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Swinging a double-edged sword: The effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5), 537–554.
Canada, I. (2009). Key small business statistics. Ottawa: Industry Canada.
Cassia, L., & Minola, T. (2012). Hyper-growth of SMEs: toward a reconciliation of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic resources. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(2), 179–197.
Chiu, Y.-C., & Liaw, Y.-C. (2009). Organizational slack: is more or less better? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(3), 321–342.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.
Criscuolo, C., Gal, P. N., & Menon, C. (2014). The dynamics of employment growth: New evidence from 18 countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2.
Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner, R. A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565–574.
Dasí, À., Iborra, M., & Safón, V. (2015). Beyond path dependence: Explorative orientation, slack resources, and managerial intentionality to internationalize in SMEs. International Business Review, 24(1), 77–88.
Eberhart, R. N. (2012). Failure is an option: Failure barriers and new firm performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modelling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–78.
George, G. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661–676.
Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361.
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46, 1251–1271.
Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651–661.
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.
Jin, B., Jung, S., & Jeong, S. W. (2017). Dimensional effects of Korean SME’s entrepreneurial orientation on internationalization and performance: the mediating role of marketing capability. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 195–215.
Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 814–829.
Kelloway, E. K. (2014). Using Mplus for structural equation modeling: a researcher's guide. Sage Publications.
Krasniqi, B. A., & Mustafa, M. (2016). Small firm growth in a post-conflict environment: the role of human capital, institutional quality, and managerial capacities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1165–1207.
Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Weaver, K. M. (2013). Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 273–291.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387–401.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations.
Meade, A., Watson, A., Kroustalis, C. (2007). Assessing common methods bias in organizational research. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.
Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791.
Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873–894.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.
Moreno, A. M., & Casillas, J. C. (2007). High-growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: a discriminant analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(1), 69–88.
Morissette, E., Ostrovsky, F., & Picot , Y. (2004). Relative wage patterns among the highly educated in a knowledge-based economy. Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series (Statistics Canada)(2004232e).
Mosakowski, E. (2002). Overcoming resource disadvantages in entrepreneurial firms: When less is more. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 106–126). Oxford: Wiley.
Mousa, F.-T., & Chowdhury, J. (2014). Organizational slack effects on innovation: the moderating roles of CEO tenure and compensation. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(2), 369–383.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.
OECD. (2008). Measuring entrepreneurship: A digest of indicators. Paris: OECD.
O'Farrell, P. N., & Hitchens, D. M. (1988). Alternative theories of small-firm growth: a critical review. Environment and Planning A, 20(10), 1365–1383.
Omri, A., & Ayadi-Frikha, M. (2014). Constructing a mediational model of small business growth. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 319–342.
Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425–438.
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: how today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business.
Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse - introduction. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209.
Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In In competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc..
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514.
Seneta, E. (2006). Path analysis. In S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan, C. B. Read, & B. Vidakovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (pp. 6016–6018). Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B., & Tansik, D. A. (1988). Antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 601–614.
Swoboda, B., & Olejnik, E. (2016). Linking processes and dynamic capabilities of international SMEs: the mediating effect of international entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 139–161.
Tan, J. (2003). Curvilinear relationship between organizational slack and firm performance:: Evidence from Chinese state enterprises. European Management Journal, 21(6), 740–749.
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory: Transaction publishers.
Troilo, G., De Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2014). More innovation with less? A strategic contingency view of slack resources, information search, and radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 259–277.
Wales, W. J., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 895–923.
Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 357–383.
Wefald, A. J., Katz, J. P., Downey, R. G., & Rust, K. G. (2010). Organizational slack and performance: The impact of outliers. Journal of Applied Business Research, 26(1), 1.
Wennberg, K., & Holmquist, C. (2008). Problemistic search and international entrepreneurship. European Management Journal, 26(6), 441–454.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Wiersma, E. (2017). How and when do firms translate slack into better performance? The British Accounting Review, 49(5), 445–459.
Wiklund, J. (2006). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms, 7(3), 141–155.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Where to from here? EO-as-experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 925–946.
Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Business Economics, 32(4), 351–374.
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995.
Wong, C., & Law, K. S. (1999). Testing reciprocal relations by nonrecursive structural equation models using cross-sectional data. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 69–87.
Zahra, S. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285.
Zahra, S., & Covin, J. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship performance relationship – a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.
Zahra, S., Sapienza, H., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.
Metadaten
Titel
The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms
verfasst von
Michael Sheppard
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Elektronische ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0498-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Benefiting from economic crisis? Strategic orientation effects, trade-offs, and configurations with resource availability on SME performance

OriginalPaper

To belong or not to belong, that is the question?! Explorative insights on liminal gender states within women’s STEMpreneurship

OriginalPaper

Exploring the differences in early-stage start-up valuation across countries: an institutional perspective

OriginalPaper

Women entrepreneurship in STEM fields: literature review and future research avenues

OriginalPaper

Guanxi and risk-taking propensity in Chinese immigrants’ businesses

OriginalPaper

Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship: what researches and approaches?

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise