nach oben

Erschienen in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Theoretical and Legal Conditions of Spatial Management Systems

verfasst von : Maciej J. Nowak, Przemysław Śleszyński, Paulina Legutko-Kobus

Erschienen in: Spatial Planning in Poland

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The chapter will present how the spatial management system's problem is recognized and distinguished in the literature on the subject in various European countries. Such issues were classified, and their scale (national/supranational) was carried out. The key points from the analyzed perspective, including the local view of spatial policy, as well as the issue of social participation in spatial planning, were considered in particular. The characteristics of the leading European models of spatial management systems and the solutions adopted within these models, especially those relating to the scope of applying individual spatial policy tools, will match the classification made in this way. The chapter mainly focuses on such issues as the role of local spatial development plans in the spatial development system, public participation, integrated development planning, public interest, and flexibility in spatial planning. The context of informal institutions in spatial planning will also be considered. The optimal (effective, rational, efficient) way of addressing these issues in the spatial management system is also related to legal conditions analysis. Therefore, the chapter will also analyze how specific legal regulations can deal with spatial management systems' problems and challenges: the role of these regulations, which thematic areas they should undertake, and which should not.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Determinants of Planning Practice in Poland

Alfasi N, Migdalovich E (2020) Losing faith in planning. Land Use Policy 97:104790.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104790

Alfasi N, Portugali J (2007) Planning rules for a self-planned city. Plan Theory 6(2):164–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207077587CrossRef

Alterman R (2010) Takings international: a comparative perspective on land use regulations and compensation rights. American Bar Association, Chicago

Altrock U, Güntner S, Huning S, Peters D (2016) Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states—Between adjustment and reinvention. In: Altrock U, Güntner S, Huning S, Peters D (eds) Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states. From adjustment to reinvention. Routledge, London-New York, pp 1–18

Angiello G (2020) Toward greener and pandemic-proof cities: Italian cities policy responses to Covid-19 pandemic. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 13(2):271–280. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/7047CrossRef

Ardiansah A, Fahmi S (2018) The implementation of the law on spatial planning in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 175:012079.https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012079

Berisha E, Cotella G, Janin-Rivolin U, Solly A (2020) Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: A European typology. Eur Plan Stud 29(1):181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295CrossRef

Boschetto P (2020) Covid-19 and simplification of urban planning tools. The residual plan. TeMA—Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, Special Issue:9–16. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6845

Brueckner JK (2009) Government land use interventions: An economic analysis. In: Lall SV, Freire M, Yuen B (eds) Urban land markets: improving land management for successful urbanization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–23CrossRef

Budiyono H, Firmansyah A, Neta Y (2018) Harmonization of village development planning law in Lampung Coastal in the spatial planning regime. J Law Policy Glob 70:16–23

Cantos JO (2010) Spatial planning processes, territorial planning law and flood risk in the region of Valencia (Spain). In: Menoni S (ed) Risks challenging publics, scientists and governments. CRC Press, London, p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10825

Chiodelli F, Moroni S (2017) Planning, pluralism and religious diversity: Critically reconsidering the spatial regulation of mosques in Italy starting from a much debated law in the Lombardy region. Cities 62:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.004CrossRef

Choi C, Kang B (2014) Network analysis for the connectivity between spatial planning law and environment law and its implications. Journal of Environmental Policy 13(2):39–63CrossRef

Darin M (2016) Spatial planning law as controller of city space utilization in the sustainable development context. J Law Policy Glob 56:109–116

de Olde C (2015) Moving forward comparative planning studies: Beyond planning cultures and institutionalism. Paper presented at the RC21 International Conference on ‘The ideal city: between myth and reality. Representations, policies, contradictions and challenges for tomorrow's urban life’, Urbino (Italy), 27–29 August 2015. http://www.rc21.org/en/conferences/urbino2015/. Accessed 4 August 2021

Debrunner G, Hartmann T (2020) Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing. Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities. Land Use Policy 99:104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104993

Ehrlich MV, Hilber CAL, Schöni O (2018) Institutional settings and urban sprawl: Evidence from Europe. J Hous Econ 42(C):4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2017.12.002

ESPON (2009) ESPON Project 2.3.2. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies From EU to Local Level. Final Report. ESPON, European Commission, Luxembourg. https://www.espon.eu/programme/projects/espon-2006/policy-impact-projects/governance-territorial-and-urban-policies. Accessed 4 August 2021

European Commission (1999) The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Luxembourg

Faludi A (2018) Historical Institutionalist account of European spatial planning. Plan Perspect 33(4):507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2018.1437554CrossRef

Fürst D (2009) Planning cultures en route to a better understanding of the planning process? In: Knieling J, Othengrafen F (eds) Planning cultures in Europe. Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. Routledge, London: 23–38

Getimis P, Reimer M, Blotevogel H (2014) Conclusion: multiple trends of continuity and change. In: Reimer M, Getimis P, Blotevogel H (eds) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. Routledge, London, pp 278–305

Haase A (2020) Covid-19 as a social crisis and justice challenge for cities. Frontiers in Sociology 5:583638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.583638

Hamdan M (2020) Law enforcement on the issuance of construction permits violating spatial planning in Medan City. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 452:012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012073

Hendler P (2015) The history of spatial planning and land use in South Africa. In: The Urban Land Paper Series—Volume 1. South African Cities Network, Braamfontein, p 21–33. Available at https://www.sacities.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Urban-Land-Series-Vol-1-Released-2015-3.pdf. Accessed 6 December 2021

Hoch C (2019) Pragmatic spatial planning. Practical Theory for Professionals. Routledge, London

Hołuj A (2018) Economic and ecological externalities in spatial planning. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica 4(336):137–155. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.336.09CrossRef

Irwin EG, Bockstael NE (2001) The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. Am J Agric Econ 83(3):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00193CrossRef

Janin-Rivolin U (2012) Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Plan Pract Res 27(1):63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181CrossRef

Kiessling N, Putz M (2020) Assesing the regional governance capacities of spatial planning: The case of the canton of Zurich. Reg Stud Reg Sci 7(1):183–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1776631CrossRef

Kok N, Monkkonen P, Quigley JM (2014) Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: an intra-metropolitan analysis. J Urban Econ 81(C):136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.03.004

Lai S, Leone F, Zoppi C (2020) Covid-19 and spatial planning. TeMA—Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, Special Issue:231–246. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6846

Larsson G (2006) Spatial planning systems in Western Europe: An overview. IOS Press, Amsterdam

MacFeely S (2016) Opportunism over strategy: a history of regional policy and spatial planning in Ireland. Int Plan Stud 21(4):377–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2016.1162403CrossRef

Markowski T (2010) Planowanie przestrzenne i instrumenty jego realizacji w świetle teorii ułomnych rynków. In: Lorens P, Martyniuk–Pęczek J (eds) Zarządzanie rozwojem przestrzennym miast. Wydawnictwo Urbanista, Gdańsk

Markowski T (2013) Teoria sprawiedliwości i interes publiczny jako podstawa budowania regulacyjnego systemu planowania przestrzennego: konceptualizacja problemu. Studia KPZK 153(1):12–23

Matsushita T, Meguro K, Kubota A (2018) Comparative study of planning history, spatial development and sociological significance of the back alley in Yangon and Singapore. Paper presented at The 18th International Planning History Society Conference, Yokohama (Japan), July 2018. Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268414901.pdf. Accessed 06 Dec 2021

Moroni S (2007) Planning, liberty and the rule of law. Plan Theory 6(2):146–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207077586CrossRef

Moroni S, Buitelaar E, Sorel N, Cozzolino S (2020) Simple planning rules for complex urban problems: Toward legal certainty for spatial flexibility. J Plan Educ Res 40(3):320–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18774122CrossRef

Müller- D (2015) The present move to reforms in spatial planning should also include the forest law. Schweiz Z Forstwes 166(4):223–225. https://doi.org/10.3188/szf.2015.0223

Muñoz D, Salas IM, Cuadrado JB (2017) International comparison of the changing dynamics of governance approaches to land development and their results for public value capture. Cities 71:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.012

Muñoz D, Tasan-Kok T (2010) Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. Eur Plan Stud 18(7):1097–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191

Muñoz D (2014) Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing. Eur Urban Reg Stud 21(1):60–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412440543

Nadin V (2012) International comparative planning methodology: Introduction to the theme issue. Plan Pract Res 27(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928CrossRef

Nadin V, Fernández-Maldonado A, Zonneveld W, Stead D, Dąbrowski M, Piskorek K, Sarkar A, Schmitt P, Smas L, Cotella G, Rivolin U, Solly A, Berisha E, Pede E, Seardo B, Komornicki T, Goch K, Bednarek-Szczepańska M, Degórska B, Szejgiec-Kolenda B, Śleszyński P, Lüer C, Böhme K, Nedovic-Budic Z, Williams B, Varghese J, Colic N, Knaap G, Csák L, Faragó L, Mezei C, Kovács I, Pamer Z, Reimer M, Münter A (2018) COMPASS—Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe Applied Research 2016–2018 Final Report. ESPON, European Commission, Luxembourg

Nadin V, Stead D (2008) European spatial planning systems, social, models and learning. disP—The Planning Review 44(172):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001

Nadin V, Stead D, Dąbrowski M, Fernandez-Maldonado AM (2020) Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Reg Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363CrossRef

Newman P, Thornley A (1996) Urban planning in Europe. International competition, national systems and planning projects. Routledge, London-New York

Nowak M (2017) The role and effects of case—Low in spatial competition. An analysis of selected cases. Biuletyn KPZK PAN 265:172–180

Nowak M, Gagakuma D, Blaszke M (2020) Spatial management systems in Ghana and Poland—Comparison of solutions and selected problems. World of Real Estate Journal. Świat Nieruchomości 1(111):59–77. https://doi.org/10.14659/WOREJ.2020.111.04

Pisano C (2020) Strategies for post-COVID cities: An insight to Paris En Commun and Milano 2020. Sustainability 12(15):5883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155883CrossRef

Purkarthofer E, Humer A, Mattila H (2021) Subnational and dynamic conceptualisations of planning culture: the culture of regional planning and regional planning cultures in Finland. Plan Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772CrossRef

Reimer M, Getimis P, Blotevogel H (2014) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective. In: Reimer M, Getimis P, Blotevogel H (eds) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. Routledge, London-New York, pp 1–20CrossRef

Runhaar H, Driessen PPJ, Soer L (2009) Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: an assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environ Plann B Plann Des 36(3):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34052CrossRef

Santos A, Virtudes A (2020) Spatial planning system: Acomparative analysis East-Timor/Portugal. IOP ConfSer Earth Environ Sci 609:012097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012097

Savini F (2016) Don’t blame public law: The legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Plan Rev 87(4):459–479. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.29CrossRef

Segura S, Pedregal B (2017) Monitoring and evaluation framework for spatial plans: a Spanish case study. Sustainability 9(10):1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101706CrossRef

Shandas V, von Haaren C, Shimizu H, Alterman R, Lovett AA (2019) Perspectives from outside the EU: The influence of legal and planning frameworks on landscape planning. In: von Haaren C, Lovett AA, Albert C (eds) Landscape planning with ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, p 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1681-7

Slaev AD, Kovachev A, Nozharova B, Daskalova D, Nikolov P, Petrov P (2019) Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The relevance of the liberal approach in planning. Plan Theory 18(4):448–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219848472CrossRef

Śleszyński P, Kowalewski A, Markowski T, Legutko P, Nowak M (2020) The contemporary economic costs of spatial chaos: evidence from Poland. Land 9:214. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9070214

Stead D (2021) Conceptualizing the policy tools of spatial planning. J Plan Lit 36(3):297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992283CrossRef

Stead D, de Vries J, Tasan-Kok T (2017) Planning cultures and histories: Influences of the evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns. In: Stead D, de Vries J, Tasan-Kok T (eds) Planning cultures and histories. The evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns, Routledge, Londyn, p 1–6

Steele W, Ruming K (2012) Flexibility versus certainty: Unsettling the land-use planning Shibboleth in Australia. Plan Pract Res 27(2):155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.662670CrossRef

van Straalen FM (2013) The relationship between land policy and spatial planning: An explanatory history of the interaction of land policy and spatial planning in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the International Academic Association on Planning, Law and Property Rights, Portland, OR (USA), 13–15 February 2013. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/the-relationship-between-land-policy-and-spatial-planning-an-expl. Accessed 06 December 2021

Tarakçı S, Türk ŞŞ (2020) Shaping of flexibility in urban renewal legal sources in Turkey and its effect on practices. International Journal of Architecture and Planning 8(2):652–671. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.131CrossRef

Tewdwr-Jones M (2004) Spatial planning: Principles, practices and cultures. Journal of Planning Law 57(5):560–569

Vanheusden B (2010) The relation between spatial planning law and soil remediation law. J Eur Environ Plan Law 7(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/161372710X12676263561755CrossRef

Waterhout B, Faludi AKF, Stead D, Zonneveld W, Milder J, Nadin V (2009) Reinventing spatial planning in a borderless Europe: emergent themes. Paper prepared for the 23rd Congress of the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP) ‘Why can’t the future be more like the past’, Liverpool, UK, 15–18 July 2009. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:bd32c582-e0a7-4725-883a-52e50a13f0fc. Accessed 4 August 2021

Williams R, Wood B (2018) Urban land and property market in The United Kingdom. Routledge, LondonCrossRef

Yenice MS (2012) Planning history and spatial development of Konya City, Erciyes University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 28(4):343–350. Available at http://fbedergi.erciyes.edu.tr/index.php/fen-bilimleri-dergisi/article/view/249. Accessed 6 December 2021

Titel: Theoretical and Legal Conditions of Spatial Management Systems
verfasst von: Maciej J. Nowak
Przemysław Śleszyński
Paulina Legutko-Kobus
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Spatial Planning in Poland
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96938-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-96939-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96939-4_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"