Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Theory and Decision 2/2014

01.02.2014

Theory and implementation of coalitional analysis in cooperative decision making

verfasst von: Haiyan Xu, D. Marc Kilgour, Keith W. Hipel, Edward A. McBean

Erschienen in: Theory and Decision | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Stability definitions for describing human behavior under conflict when coalitions may form are generalized within the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution and algebraic formulations of these definitions are provided to allow computer implementation. The more general definitions of coalitional stabilities relax the assumption of transitive graphs capturing movements under the control of decision makers, either independently or cooperatively, and allow the convenient expansion to the case of coalitions of the four basic individual stabilities consisting of Nash stability, general metarationality, symmetric metarationality, and sequential stability. To permit the various coalitional stabilities to be efficiently calculated and conveniently encoded within a decision support system, algebraic expressions for the coalitional stabilities are provided in this research. Furthermore, a range of the theorems establish the mathematical credibility of employing the innovative algebraic approach to conflict resolution when coalitions are present. Finally, a conflict over the proposed exportation of bulk water from Lake Gisborne within the Canadian Province of Newfoundland and Labrador is modelled and analyzed to illustrate the practical application of the different coalitional stabilities and the strategic insights they provide.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abouelaoualim, A., Das, K. Ch., Faria, L., Manoussakis, Y., Martinhon, C., & Saad, R. (2008). Paths and trails in edge-colored graphs. Theoretical Computer Science, 409, 497–510.CrossRef Abouelaoualim, A., Das, K. Ch., Faria, L., Manoussakis, Y., Martinhon, C., & Saad, R. (2008). Paths and trails in edge-colored graphs. Theoretical Computer Science, 409, 497–510.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aumann, R. J., & Hart, S. (1994). Handbook of game theory with economic applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Aumann, R. J., & Hart, S. (1994). Handbook of game theory with economic applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution. New York: Wiley. Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., & Wang, L. (2002). Gisborne water export conflict study. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Water Resources Environment Research 1 (pp. 432–436). Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., & Wang, L. (2002). Gisborne water export conflict study. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Water Resources Environment Research 1 (pp. 432–436).
Zurück zum Zitat Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003). A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 1: Model formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 33(1), 42–55.CrossRef Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003). A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 1: Model formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 33(1), 42–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003). A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 2: Analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 33(1), 56–66.CrossRef Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003). A decision support system for interactive decision making, Part 2: Analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 33(1), 56–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1979). Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 805–817.CrossRef Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1979). Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 805–817.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: models and resolution. New York: Wiley. Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: models and resolution. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Godsil, C., & Royle, G. (2001). Algebraic graph theory. New York: Springer.CrossRef Godsil, C., & Royle, G. (2001). Algebraic graph theory. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gondran, M., & Minoux, M. (1979). Graphs and algorithms. New York: Wiley. Gondran, M., & Minoux, M. (1979). Graphs and algorithms. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Hipel, K. W., & Fraser, N. M. (1991). Co-operation in conflict analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 43(181), 206. Hipel, K. W., & Fraser, N. M. (1991). Co-operation in conflict analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 43(181), 206.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffman, A. J., & Schiebe, B. (2001). The edge versus path incidence matrix of series-parallel graphs and greedy packing. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 113, 275–284.CrossRef Hoffman, A. J., & Schiebe, B. (2001). The edge versus path incidence matrix of series-parallel graphs and greedy packing. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 113, 275–284.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of metagames and political behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of metagames and political behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Zurück zum Zitat Inohara, T., & Hipel, K. W. (2008a). Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution. Systems Engineering, 11, 343–359. Inohara, T., & Hipel, K. W. (2008a). Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution. Systems Engineering, 11, 343–359.
Zurück zum Zitat Inohara, T., & Hipel, K. W. (2008b). Interrelationships among noncooperative and coalition stability concepts. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 17(1), 1–29. Inohara, T., & Hipel, K. W. (2008b). Interrelationships among noncooperative and coalition stability concepts. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 17(1), 1–29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilgour, D. M., Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W. (1990). A decision support system for the graph model of conflicts. Theory and Decision, 28(3), 289–311.CrossRef Kilgour, D. M., Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W. (1990). A decision support system for the graph model of conflicts. Theory and Decision, 28(3), 289–311.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (1987). The graph model for conflicts. Automatica, 23(1), 41–55.CrossRef Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (1987). The graph model for conflicts. Automatica, 23(1), 41–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (2001). Coalition analysis in group decision support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 159–175.CrossRef Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (2001). Coalition analysis in group decision support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 159–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, K. W., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Fang, L. (2004). Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 34(4), 507–520.CrossRef Li, K. W., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Fang, L. (2004). Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 34(4), 507–520.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36, 48C49.CrossRef Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36, 48C49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nash, J. F. (1951). Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286–295.CrossRef Nash, J. F. (1951). Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiny, A. K., & Pujari, A. K. (1998). Computation of prime implicants using matrix and paths. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(2), 135–145.CrossRef Shiny, A. K., & Pujari, A. K. (1998). Computation of prime implicants using matrix and paths. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(2), 135–145.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Deeman, M. A. (1997). Coalition formation and social choice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef van Deeman, M. A. (1997). Coalition formation and social choice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, H., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (2009). Matrix representation of solution concepts in multiple decision maker graph models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 39(1), 96–108.CrossRef Xu, H., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (2009). Matrix representation of solution concepts in multiple decision maker graph models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 39(1), 96–108.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, H., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Chen, Y. (2010). Combining strength and uncertainty for preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers. Theory and Decision, 69(4), 497–521.CrossRef Xu, H., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Chen, Y. (2010). Combining strength and uncertainty for preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution with multiple decision makers. Theory and Decision, 69(4), 497–521.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2010a). Matrix representation and extension of coalition analysis in group decision support. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 60, 1164–1176.CrossRef Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2010a). Matrix representation and extension of coalition analysis in group decision support. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 60, 1164–1176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2010c). An integrated algebraic approach to conflict resolution with three-level preference. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 216, 693–707.CrossRef Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2010c). An integrated algebraic approach to conflict resolution with three-level preference. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 216, 693–707.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Kemkes, G. (2010b). Using matrices to link conflict evolution and resolution in a graph model. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 318–329.CrossRef Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Kemkes, G. (2010b). Using matrices to link conflict evolution and resolution in a graph model. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 318–329.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2011). Matrix representation of conflict resolution in multiple-decision-maker graph models with preference uncertainty. Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN), 20(6), 755–779.CrossRef Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2011). Matrix representation of conflict resolution in multiple-decision-maker graph models with preference uncertainty. Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN), 20(6), 755–779.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & EdwardA, Mc Bean. (2013). Theory and application of conflict resolution with hybrid preference in colored graphs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 989–1003.CrossRef Xu, H., Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & EdwardA, Mc Bean. (2013). Theory and application of conflict resolution with hybrid preference in colored graphs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 989–1003.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zagare, F. C. (1984). Limited-move equilibria in \(2 \times 2\) games. Theory and Decision, 16, 1–19.CrossRef Zagare, F. C. (1984). Limited-move equilibria in \(2 \times 2\) games. Theory and Decision, 16, 1–19.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Theory and implementation of coalitional analysis in cooperative decision making
verfasst von
Haiyan Xu
D. Marc Kilgour
Keith W. Hipel
Edward A. McBean
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Theory and Decision / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-013-9363-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Theory and Decision 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Stronger utility

Premium Partner