Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3.  Topoi in Neuromarketing Ethics

verfasst von : Cristian Ducu

Erschienen in: Ethics and Neuromarketing

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Neuromarketing is one of those emerging fields that promise a lot, but are also surrounded in controversy. It promises to offer a privileged access to the most intimate emotions and unconscious thoughts, which should serve as an undisputed background for effective marketing practices. It promises to be successful where traditional market research techniques and tools failed. But this does not come cheap: a lot of public figures, philosophers and neuroscientists expressed multiple concerns regarding the ethical and legal implications of the neuromarketing research and applications. The aim of this study is to map these ethical concerns and provide a series of elements which can help both researchers and practitioners clarify the ethical limits of their work. The chapter contains two major sections and some brief closing remarks. The first one contains two major distinctions which will serve as basis for the entire ethical discussion in the next section: neuromarketing as both a field of research and applications and neuromarketing ethics as research ethics and as ethics of brain research. The second section is dedicated to a quasi-comprehensive presentation of the ethical challenges of neuromarketing. These topoi are divided in three categories: ethics of neuromarketing research (overclaiming; research conduct—informed consent, protection of vulnerable research participants, paying participants; data practices—research design and scientific validity, confidentiality, research dual use; publication practices—authorship, cherry-picking and salami-slicing, research transparency); ethics of neuromarketing technologies (no harm; privacy; incidental findings); and ethics of neuromarketing applications (manipulative and deceptive marketing practices; exacerbating the emotional factor).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
He is the first researcher whose work in what we now call neuromarketing was featured in mass media. In 1991, BBC TV’s Tomorrows World covered extensively Dr. Lewis’ technology called MindScan, a basic EEG device, and his “Index of Cortical Arousal”, an interpretation matrix.
 
2
A press release from June 3, 2002, announced that BrightHouse Institute for Thought Sciences, an advertising company from Atlanta, USA, “made a giant step in the Neuromarketing industry by identifying sections of the brain that respond to preferences” (“Brighthouse Institute for Thought Sciences …” 2002).
 
3
The barrier between the physical processes in the brain and what we call thinking, thoughts, ideas, preferences and so on—mental processes—is still the main problem of any neuroscience investigation. Stating, without any reasonable doubt, that x activations of the brain represent the t thought is nonsensical because it implies that we can establish a direct link between those two elements, which so far neurosciences were unable to do. We are still in the guessing business, where, based on previous localised experiments, we eliminate certain functions and infer that the remaining activations represent what we were looking for (an emotion, a thought, a word, etc.). It will also mean that we can discriminate among the myriad of functions we assign to specific brain regions.
 
4
In many countries, the funding programmes have specific regulations for research conducted on human and animal subjects. The USA and Europe are pioneers in this respect.
 
5
The notable exception is France, where Law no. 2011-814 of July 7, 2011, title VII (“Neuroscience and Neuroimaging”), introduced in the bioethics national regulation a new article, no. 16-14, which makes legal only those neuroimaging techniques that serve a medical, scientific or judiciary purpose. Commercial use of neuroimaging is not explicitly banned, but it is excluded by the previous legal phrasing.
 
6
For example, in the USA: the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the so-called Common Rule or HHS 45 CFR part 46); Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues 2011. In Europe: Oviedo Convention from 1997 (Council of Europe 1997), the European Textbook on Ethics in Research (European Commission 2010), and all the local and institutional regulations concerning ethics in research.
 
7
Declaration of Helsinki, paragraphs 9 and 17; Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences 2002.
 
8
For further details, see the survey conducted by USC Annenberg Center for the Digital Future and Bovitz Inc. on online privacy among millennials: http://​annenberg.​usc.​edu/​news/​around-usc-annenberg/​online-privacy-over-findings-usc-annenberg-center-digital-future-show.
 
9
Illes et al. (2002) were mentioning that when she and her colleagues were writing their paper there was no “systematic analysis of incidental findings in research EEG, MEG, PET, or SPECT”. Meanwhile, this hasn’t changed. I didn’t manage to find any study approaching incidental findings in brain imaging, though there are studies related to incidental findings in the use of PET and SPECT on other areas of the human body (e.g. lungs for lung cancer studies).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ariely D, Berns GS (2010) Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nat Rev Neurosci 11(4):284–292CrossRef Ariely D, Berns GS (2010) Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nat Rev Neurosci 11(4):284–292CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bhushan V, Saha G, Lindsen J, Shimojo S, Bhattacharya J (2012) How we choose one over another: predicting trial-by-trial preference decision. PLoS One 7(8):e43351CrossRef Bhushan V, Saha G, Lindsen J, Shimojo S, Bhattacharya J (2012) How we choose one over another: predicting trial-by-trial preference decision. PLoS One 7(8):e43351CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bielby (2008) Competence and vulnerability in biomedical research. Springer Bielby (2008) Competence and vulnerability in biomedical research. Springer
Zurück zum Zitat Brownsword R (2012) Regulating brain imaging: questions of privacy, informed consent, and human dignity. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 223–244 Brownsword R (2012) Regulating brain imaging: questions of privacy, informed consent, and human dignity. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 223–244
Zurück zum Zitat Canli T (2006) When genes and brains unite: ethical implications of genomic neuroimaging. In: Illes J (ed) Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 169–183 Canli T (2006) When genes and brains unite: ethical implications of genomic neuroimaging. In: Illes J (ed) Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 169–183
Zurück zum Zitat Canli T, Brandon S, Casebeer W, Crowley PI, DuRousseau D, Greely HT, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Neuroethics and national security. Am J Bioeth 7(5):3–13CrossRef Canli T, Brandon S, Casebeer W, Crowley PI, DuRousseau D, Greely HT, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Neuroethics and national security. Am J Bioeth 7(5):3–13CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cîrneci D, Angheluță AV, Gheorghe D (2014) The use of neuromarketing in the study of brand related mental processes. Case study—Romanian food brands. Int J Econ Pract Theories 4(2):331–342 Cîrneci D, Angheluță AV, Gheorghe D (2014) The use of neuromarketing in the study of brand related mental processes. Case study—Romanian food brands. Int J Econ Pract Theories 4(2):331–342
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards SJL (2012) Protecting privacy interests in brain images: the limits of consent. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 245–260CrossRef Edwards SJL (2012) Protecting privacy interests in brain images: the limits of consent. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 245–260CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eijkholt M, Anderson JA, Illes J (2012) Picturing neuroscience research through a human rights lens: imaging first-episode schizophrenic treatment-naïve individuals. Int J Law Psychiatry 35(2):146–152CrossRef Eijkholt M, Anderson JA, Illes J (2012) Picturing neuroscience research through a human rights lens: imaging first-episode schizophrenic treatment-naïve individuals. Int J Law Psychiatry 35(2):146–152CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farah MJ (2002) Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 5(11):1123–1129CrossRef Farah MJ (2002) Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 5(11):1123–1129CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farah MJ (2005) Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn Sci 9(1):34–40CrossRef Farah MJ (2005) Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn Sci 9(1):34–40CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fitz NS (2013) Neuroethics in neurosciences series: three visions of diversity in neuroethics. Kopf Carrie, no. 78 Fitz NS (2013) Neuroethics in neurosciences series: three visions of diversity in neuroethics. Kopf Carrie, no. 78
Zurück zum Zitat Fuchs T (2006) Ethical issues in neuroscience. Curr Opin Psychiatry 19:600–607CrossRef Fuchs T (2006) Ethical issues in neuroscience. Curr Opin Psychiatry 19:600–607CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garnett A, Whiteley L, Piwowar H, Rasmussen E, Illes J (2011) Neuroethics and fMRI: mapping a fledgling relationship. PLoS One 6(4):1–7CrossRef Garnett A, Whiteley L, Piwowar H, Rasmussen E, Illes J (2011) Neuroethics and fMRI: mapping a fledgling relationship. PLoS One 6(4):1–7CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grossman RI, Bernat JL (2004) Incidental research imaging findings. Pandora’s costly box. Neurology 62:849–850CrossRef Grossman RI, Bernat JL (2004) Incidental research imaging findings. Pandora’s costly box. Neurology 62:849–850CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haber SN (2011) Neuroanatomy of reward: a view from the ventral striatum. In: Gottfried JA (ed) Neurobiology of sensation and reward. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 235–261CrossRef Haber SN (2011) Neuroanatomy of reward: a view from the ventral striatum. In: Gottfried JA (ed) Neurobiology of sensation and reward. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 235–261CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hubert M, Kenning P (2008) A current overview of consumer neuroscience. J Consum Behav 7(4–5):272–292CrossRef Hubert M, Kenning P (2008) A current overview of consumer neuroscience. J Consum Behav 7(4–5):272–292CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Illes J, Bird SJ (2006) Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 30(10):1–7 Illes J, Bird SJ (2006) Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 30(10):1–7
Zurück zum Zitat Illes J, Racine E (2005) Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am J Bioeth 5(2):5–18CrossRef Illes J, Racine E (2005) Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am J Bioeth 5(2):5–18CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Illes J, Desmond JE, Huang LF, Raffin TA, Atlas SW (2002) Ethical and practical considerations in managing incidental findings in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Cogn 50:358–365CrossRef Illes J, Desmond JE, Huang LF, Raffin TA, Atlas SW (2002) Ethical and practical considerations in managing incidental findings in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Cogn 50:358–365CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Illes J, Kann D, Karetsky K, Letourneau P, Raffin TA, Schraedley-Desmond P, Koening BA, Atlas SW (2004a) Advertising, patient decision making, and self-referral for computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Intern Med 164:2415–2419CrossRef Illes J, Kann D, Karetsky K, Letourneau P, Raffin TA, Schraedley-Desmond P, Koening BA, Atlas SW (2004a) Advertising, patient decision making, and self-referral for computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Intern Med 164:2415–2419CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Illes J, Kirschen MP, Karetsky K, Kelly M, Saha A, Desmond JE, Raffin TA, Glover GH, Atlas SW (2004b) Discovery and disclosure of incidental findings in neuroimaging research. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:743–747CrossRef Illes J, Kirschen MP, Karetsky K, Kelly M, Saha A, Desmond JE, Raffin TA, Glover GH, Atlas SW (2004b) Discovery and disclosure of incidental findings in neuroimaging research. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:743–747CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Illes J, Rosen AC, Huang L, Goldstein RA, Raffin TA, Swan G, Atlas SW (2004c) Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research. Neurology 62:888–890CrossRef Illes J, Rosen AC, Huang L, Goldstein RA, Raffin TA, Swan G, Atlas SW (2004c) Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research. Neurology 62:888–890CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Illes J, Racine E, Kirschen MP (2006) A picture is worth 100 words, but which 1000? In: Illes J (ed) Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 148–168 Illes J, Racine E, Kirschen MP (2006) A picture is worth 100 words, but which 1000? In: Illes J (ed) Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 148–168
Zurück zum Zitat Ison MJ, Mormann F, Cerf M, Koch C, Fried I, Quian Quiroga R (2011) Selectivity of pyramidal cells and interneurons in the human medial temporal lobe. J Neurophysiol 106(4):1713–1721CrossRef Ison MJ, Mormann F, Cerf M, Koch C, Fried I, Quian Quiroga R (2011) Selectivity of pyramidal cells and interneurons in the human medial temporal lobe. J Neurophysiol 106(4):1713–1721CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kang J-H, Kim SJ, Cho YS, Kim S-P (2015) Modulation of alpha oscillations in the human EEG with facial preference. PLoS One 10(9):e0138153CrossRef Kang J-H, Kim SJ, Cho YS, Kim S-P (2015) Modulation of alpha oscillations in the human EEG with facial preference. PLoS One 10(9):e0138153CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ (1999) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. J Am Med Assoc 281(1):36–39CrossRef Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ (1999) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. J Am Med Assoc 281(1):36–39CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kiesel D (1984) Subliminal seduction. ABA J 70:25–27 Kiesel D (1984) Subliminal seduction. ABA J 70:25–27
Zurück zum Zitat Kim BS, Illes K, Kaplan RT, Reiss A, Atlas SW (2002) Incidental findings on pedriatic MR images of the brain. Am J Neuroradiol 23:1674–1677 Kim BS, Illes K, Kaplan RT, Reiss A, Atlas SW (2002) Incidental findings on pedriatic MR images of the brain. Am J Neuroradiol 23:1674–1677
Zurück zum Zitat Korn D (2001) Medical privacy in the information age: ethical issues, policy solutions. In: Humber JM, Almeder RF (eds) Privacy and health care. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 103–129CrossRef Korn D (2001) Medical privacy in the information age: ethical issues, policy solutions. In: Humber JM, Almeder RF (eds) Privacy and health care. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 103–129CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435(7042):673–676CrossRef Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435(7042):673–676CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn S, Gallinat J (2013) Does taste matter? How anticipation of cola brands influences gustatory processing in the brain. PLoS One 8(4):e61569CrossRef Kuhn S, Gallinat J (2013) Does taste matter? How anticipation of cola brands influences gustatory processing in the brain. PLoS One 8(4):e61569CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lever A (2012) Neuroscience v. privacy? A democratic perspective. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 205–222 Lever A (2012) Neuroscience v. privacy? A democratic perspective. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 205–222
Zurück zum Zitat Levy N (2007) Neuroethics. Challenges for the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef Levy N (2007) Neuroethics. Challenges for the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lindstrom M (2008) Buyology. Truth and lies about why we buy. Double Day, New York Lindstrom M (2008) Buyology. Truth and lies about why we buy. Double Day, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Logothetis NK (2008) What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 45(6976):869–878CrossRef Logothetis NK (2008) What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 45(6976):869–878CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marks JH (2010a) A neuroskeptic’s guide to neuroethics and national security. AJOB Neurosci 1(2):4–12CrossRef Marks JH (2010a) A neuroskeptic’s guide to neuroethics and national security. AJOB Neurosci 1(2):4–12CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marks JH (2010b) Neuroconcerns: some responses to my critics. AJOB Neurosci 1(2):W1–W2CrossRef Marks JH (2010b) Neuroconcerns: some responses to my critics. AJOB Neurosci 1(2):W1–W2CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matthews S (2015) Neuromarketing: what is it and is it a threat to privacy? In: Clausen J, Levy N (eds) Handbook of neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1627–1645 Matthews S (2015) Neuromarketing: what is it and is it a threat to privacy? In: Clausen J, Levy N (eds) Handbook of neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1627–1645
Zurück zum Zitat Morse SJ (2012) Diminished capacity, neuroscience, and just punishment. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 155–182 Morse SJ (2012) Diminished capacity, neuroscience, and just punishment. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 155–182
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy ER, Illes J, Reiner PB (2008) Neuroethics of neuromarketing. J Consum Behav 7:293–302CrossRef Murphy ER, Illes J, Reiner PB (2008) Neuroethics of neuromarketing. J Consum Behav 7:293–302CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Plassman H, Ramsoy TZ, Milosavljevic M (2012) Branding the brain: a critical review and outlook. J Consum Psychol 22(1):18–36CrossRef Plassman H, Ramsoy TZ, Milosavljevic M (2012) Branding the brain: a critical review and outlook. J Consum Psychol 22(1):18–36CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pop A, Dabija DC, Iorga A (2014) Ethical responsibility of neuromarketing companies in harnessing the market research—a global exploratory research. Amfiteatru Econ 16(35):26–40 Pop A, Dabija DC, Iorga A (2014) Ethical responsibility of neuromarketing companies in harnessing the market research—a global exploratory research. Amfiteatru Econ 16(35):26–40
Zurück zum Zitat Racine E, Illes J (2006) Neuroethical responsibilities. Can J Neurol Sci 33:269–277CrossRef Racine E, Illes J (2006) Neuroethical responsibilities. Can J Neurol Sci 33:269–277CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Racine E, Bar-Ilan O, Illes J (2006) Brain imaging. A decade of coverage in the print media. Sci Commun 28(1):122–143CrossRef Racine E, Bar-Ilan O, Illes J (2006) Brain imaging. A decade of coverage in the print media. Sci Commun 28(1):122–143CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richmond S (2012) Brain imaging and the transparency scenario. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 185–204CrossRef Richmond S (2012) Brain imaging and the transparency scenario. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards SJL (eds) I know what you’re thinking. Brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 185–204CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rodrigues R (2015) Principles and approaches in ethics assessment: dual-use in research. Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation—SATORI, European Commission’s seventh framework programme (FP7/2007–2013), grant agreement no. 612231. http://satoriproject.eu/media/1.g-Dual-use-in-research.pdf Accessed 20 Feb 2016 Rodrigues R (2015) Principles and approaches in ethics assessment: dual-use in research. Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation—SATORI, European Commission’s seventh framework programme (FP7/2007–2013), grant agreement no. 612231. http://​satoriproject.​eu/​media/​1.​g-Dual-use-in-research.​pdf Accessed 20 Feb 2016
Zurück zum Zitat Roskies A (2002) Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35:21–23CrossRef Roskies A (2002) Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35:21–23CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang YY, Tang R (2016) Cultural neuroscience of moral reasoning and decision-making. In: Absher JR, Cloutier J (eds) Neuroimaging personality, social cognition, and character. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 279–287 Tang YY, Tang R (2016) Cultural neuroscience of moral reasoning and decision-making. In: Absher JR, Cloutier J (eds) Neuroimaging personality, social cognition, and character. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 279–287
Zurück zum Zitat Tieu M (2007) Neuroethics: the law and the person. Bioethics Res Notes 19(3):1–7 Tieu M (2007) Neuroethics: the law and the person. Bioethics Res Notes 19(3):1–7
Zurück zum Zitat Ulman YI, Cakar T, Yildiz G (2014) Ethical issues in neuromarketing: “I consume, therefore I am!”. Sci Eng Ethics 21(5):1271–1284CrossRef Ulman YI, Cakar T, Yildiz G (2014) Ethical issues in neuromarketing: “I consume, therefore I am!”. Sci Eng Ethics 21(5):1271–1284CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Laan LN, De Ridder DTD, Viergever MA, Smeets PAM (2012) Appearance matters: neural correlates of food choice and packaging aesthetics. PLoS One 7(7):e41738CrossRef Van der Laan LN, De Ridder DTD, Viergever MA, Smeets PAM (2012) Appearance matters: neural correlates of food choice and packaging aesthetics. PLoS One 7(7):e41738CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent D (2015) I hope I don’t intrude. Privacy and its dilemmas in nineteenth-century britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford Vincent D (2015) I hope I don’t intrude. Privacy and its dilemmas in nineteenth-century britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Weisstub DN (1998) The ethical parameters of experimentation. In: Weisstub DN (ed) Research on human subjects: ethics. Law and social policy. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 1–35 Weisstub DN (1998) The ethical parameters of experimentation. In: Weisstub DN (ed) Research on human subjects: ethics. Law and social policy. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 1–35
Zurück zum Zitat Yarkoni T, Poldrack RA, Nichols TE, Van Essen DC, Wager TD (2011) Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat Methods 8:665–670CrossRef Yarkoni T, Poldrack RA, Nichols TE, Van Essen DC, Wager TD (2011) Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat Methods 8:665–670CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Topoi in Neuromarketing Ethics
verfasst von
Cristian Ducu
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45609-6_3