Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications 3/2016

01.04.2016 | Original Article

TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment

verfasst von: Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri

Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A single-valued neutrosophic set is a special case of neutrosophic set. It has been proposed as a generalization of crisp sets, fuzzy sets, and intuitionistic fuzzy sets in order to deal with incomplete information. In this paper, a new approach for multi-attribute group decision-making problems is proposed by extending the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution to single-valued neutrosophic environment. Ratings of alternative with respect to each attribute are considered as single-valued neutrosophic set that reflect the decision makers’ opinion based on the provided information. Neutrosophic set characterized by three independent degrees namely truth-membership degree (T), indeterminacy-membership degree (I), and falsity-membership degree (F) is more capable to catch up incomplete information. Single-valued neutrosophic set-based weighted averaging operator is used to aggregate all the individual decision maker’s opinion into one common opinion for rating the importance of criteria and alternatives. Finally, an illustrative example is provided in order to demonstrate its applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New York Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New York
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brans JP, Vinvke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Brans JP, Vinvke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445–455CrossRefMATH Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445–455CrossRefMATH
4.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9CrossRefMATH Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9CrossRefMATH
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Boran FE, Genc S, Kurt M, Akay D (2009) A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 36(8):11363–11368CrossRef Boran FE, Genc S, Kurt M, Akay D (2009) A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 36(8):11363–11368CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pramanik S, Mukhopadhyaya D (2011) Grey relational analysis based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for teacher selection in higher education. Int J Comput Appl 34(10):21–29 Pramanik S, Mukhopadhyaya D (2011) Grey relational analysis based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach for teacher selection in higher education. Int J Comput Appl 34(10):21–29
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, RehobothMATH Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, RehobothMATH
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct 4:410–413MATH Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct 4:410–413MATH
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye J (2013) Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 42(4):386–394MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Ye J (2013) Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 42(4):386–394MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye J (2013) Single valued neutrosophic cross entropy for multicriteria decision making problems. Appl Math Model 38:1170–1175MathSciNetCrossRef Ye J (2013) Single valued neutrosophic cross entropy for multicriteria decision making problems. Appl Math Model 38:1170–1175MathSciNetCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014) Entropy based grey relational analysis method for multi-attribute decision-making under single valued neutrosophic assessments. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 2:102–110 Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014) Entropy based grey relational analysis method for multi-attribute decision-making under single valued neutrosophic assessments. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 2:102–110
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014) A new methodology for neutrosophic multi-attribute decision making with unknown weight information. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 3:42–52 Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2014) A new methodology for neutrosophic multi-attribute decision making with unknown weight information. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 3:42–52
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang HY, Wang JQ, Chen XH (2014) Interval neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making problems. Sci World J. doi:10.1155/2014/645953 Zhang HY, Wang JQ, Chen XH (2014) Interval neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making problems. Sci World J. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​645953
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye J (2014) A multi-criteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:2459–2466MATH Ye J (2014) A multi-criteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:2459–2466MATH
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi P, Liu P (2013) An extended TOPSIS method for the multi-attribute decision making problems on interval neutrosophic set. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 1:63–70 Chi P, Liu P (2013) An extended TOPSIS method for the multi-attribute decision making problems on interval neutrosophic set. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 1:63–70
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaderi SF, Azadeh A, Nokhandan BP, Fathi E (2012) Behavioral simulation and optimization of generation companies in electrical markets by fuzzy cognitive map. Expert Syst Appl 39:4635–4646CrossRef Ghaderi SF, Azadeh A, Nokhandan BP, Fathi E (2012) Behavioral simulation and optimization of generation companies in electrical markets by fuzzy cognitive map. Expert Syst Appl 39:4635–4646CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Smarandache F (2005) Neutrosophic set: a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. Int J Pure Appl Math 24:287–297MathSciNetMATH Smarandache F (2005) Neutrosophic set: a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. Int J Pure Appl Math 24:287–297MathSciNetMATH
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu P, Wang Y (2014) Multiple attribute decision making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Comput Appl 25:2001–2010CrossRef Liu P, Wang Y (2014) Multiple attribute decision making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Comput Appl 25:2001–2010CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dezert J (2002) Open questions in neutrosophic inferences. Mult Valued Log Intern J 8:439–472MathSciNetMATH Dezert J (2002) Open questions in neutrosophic inferences. Mult Valued Log Intern J 8:439–472MathSciNetMATH
Metadaten
Titel
TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment
verfasst von
Pranab Biswas
Surapati Pramanik
Bibhas C. Giri
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Neural Computing and Applications / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1891-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Neural Computing and Applications 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner