Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Logistics Research
Erschienen in: Logistics Research 4/2013

01.12.2013 | Original Paper

Toward a standardized supplier code of ethics: development of a design concept based on diffusion of innovation theory

verfasst von: Martin C. Schleper, Christian Busse

Erschienen in: Logistics Research | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Supplier codes of ethics have become important instruments for ethical supplier management. They capacitate firms to govern numerous supplier relationships simultaneously toward ethical business conduct. Since many actors nowadays pursue the goal of ethical supplier management, a cascade of codes has emerged. However, this plurality poses multiple problems on its own account, such as lacking effectiveness of some of these codes, restrictions on the development of universally accepted ethical standards, and greenwashing. It also creates operational difficulties and unnecessary procedural costs for firms and is thus inefficient. The aggregated amount of issues suggests the development of a standardized supplier code of ethics as a remedy. Based on diffusion of innovation theory as theoretical lense and as conceptual support, we employ a multi-method research design to develop a design concept for such a standard. We begin with a content analysis of relevant scientific literature on content, adoption, and effectiveness of codes of ethics, in which we also study numerous extant codes and initiatives. It leads to six propositions on key success factors of a standardized supplier code of ethics. We then amend a design science approach to develop a design concept for such a standard that complies with these requirements, with the support of corporate experts from Germany, China, and India. Our results are informative about the content of a standardized supplier code of ethics, and we propose multiple effectiveness- and diffusion-facilitating mechanisms as additional components in the overall design concept. With stakeholders’ further support, the envisioned standard is expected to foster businesses’ corporate social performances around the globe.
Vorheriger Artikel Understanding the robustness of optimal FMCG distribution networks
Nächster Artikel Alike or not? Partner similarity and its outcome in horizontal cooperations between logistics service providers

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
We use this label to refer to a standardzed supplier code of ethics which is yet to be created.
 
2
There was no need to employ specific coding procedures. The reason is that we did not study causal relationships between variables (as one would usually have done in empirical case study research, for example), but sought to design the SCGC as a new artifact.
 
3
We replaced the DOI factor “complexity” with its opposite, “simplicity”, so as to have only positive effects in the causal model that we seek to develop.
 
Literatur
1.
Abbasi A, Chen H (2008) Cybergate: a design framework and system for text analysis of computer-mediated communication. Manag Inf Sys Q 32(4):811–837
2.
Adam AM, Rachman-Moore D (2004) The methods used to implement an ethical code of conduct and employee attitudes. J Bus Ethics 54(3):223–242
3.
Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ (2008) Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: a design science approach. Manag Inf Sys Q 32(4):779–809
4.
Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ, Corbett CJ (2007) A spatiotemporal analysis of the global diffusion of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 certification. Manag Sci 53(3):451–468
5.
Amaeshi KM, Osuji OK, Nnodim P (2008) Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: a boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. J Bus Ethics 81(1):223–234
6.
Arlbjørn JS, de Haas H, Munksgaard KB (2011) Exploring supply chain innovation. Logist Res 3(1):3–18
7.
Bondy K, Matten D, Moon J (2008) Multinational corporation codes of conduct: governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corp Gov Int Rev 16(4):294–311
8.
Bradford M, Florin J (2003) Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. Int J of Acc Inf Sys 4(3):205–225
9.
Bretzke W-R (2011) Sustainable logistics: in search of solutions for a challenging new problem. Logist Res 3(4):179–189
10.
Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Har Bus Rev June:84–92
11.
Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21
12.
13.
Busse C, Wallenburg CM (2011) Innovation management of logistics service providers—review, foundations, and research agenda. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 41(2):187–218
14.
Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):946–967
15.
Carter CR, Jennings MM (2004) The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: a structural equation analysis. J Bus Logist 25(1):145–186
16.
Carter CR, Rogers DS (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(5):360–387
17.
Castaldo S, Premazzi K, Zerbini F (2010) The meaning(s) of trust. A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships. J Bus Ethics 96(4):657–668
18.
Cavanagh GF (2004) Global business ethics: regulation, code, or self-restraint. Bus Ethics Q 14(4):625–642
19.
Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2010) How firms respond to being rated. Strat Manag J 31(9):917–945
20.
Choi TY, Hong Y (2002) Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. J Oper Manag 20(5):469–493
21.
Colwell S, Zyphur M, Schminke M (2011) When does ethical code enforcement matter in the inter-organizational context? The moderating role of switching costs. J Bus Ethics 104(1):47–58
22.
Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Manag Sci 36(2):123–139
23.
Corbett CJ, Kirsch DA (2001) International diffusion of ISO 14000 certification. Prod Oper Manag 10(3):327–342
24.
Crum MR, Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K (1996) An assessment of motor carrier adoption, use, and satisfaction with EDI. Transp J 35(4):44–57
25.
Curkovic S, Sroufe R (2011) Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy. Bus Strat Environ 20(2):71–93
26.
Davis GF, Morrill C, Rao H, Soule SA (2008) Introduction: social movements in organizations and markets. Adm Sci Q 53(3):389–394
27.
Dunne D, Martin R (2006) Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion. Acad Manag Learn Educt 5(4):512–523
28.
Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Environ 11(2):130–141
29.
Easton D (1965) A system analysis of political life. Wiley, New York
30.
Egels-Zandén N, Hyllman P (2007) Suppliers’ compliance with MNCs’ codes of conduct: behind the scenes at Chinese toy suppliers. J Bus Ethics 76(2):207–223
31.
Egels-Zandén N, Wahlqvist E (2007) Post-partnership strategies for defining corporate responsibility: the business social compliance initiative. J Bus Ethics 70(2):175–189
32.
Ehrgott M, Reimann F, Kaufmann L, Carter CR (2011) Social sustainability in selecting emerging economy suppliers. J Bus Ethics 98(1):99–119
33.
Emmelhainz MA, Adams RJ (1999) The apparel industry response to “sweatshop” concerns: a review and analysis of codes of conduct. J Supply Chain Manag 35(3):51–57
34.
Erwin PM (2011) Corporate codes of conduct: the effects of code content and quality on ethical performance. J Bus Ethics 99(4):535–548
35.
36.
Gilbert DU, Rasche A (2007) Discourse ethics and social accountability: the ethics of SA 8000. Bus Ethics Q 17(2):187–216
37.
Gilbert DU, Rasche A (2008) Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives—a stakeholder theory perspective. J Bus Ethics 82(3):755–773
38.
Gordon K, Miyake M (2001) Business approaches to combating bribery: a study of codes of conduct. J Bus Ethics 34(3):161–173
39.
Habermas J (1999) The inclusion of the other: studies in political theory. Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge, MA
40.
Halldórsson Á, Kotzab H, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2009) Supply chain management on the crossroad to sustainability: a blessing or a curse? Logist Res 1(2):83–94
41.
Hansmann R (2010) “Sustainability Learning”: an introduction to the concept and its motivational aspects. Sustain 2(9):2873–2897
42.
Hanson KO, Rothlin S (2010) Taking your code to China. J Int Bus Ethics 3(1):69–80
43.
Harrington SJ (1996) The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions. Manag Inf Sys Q 20(3):257–278
44.
Harris H (2001) Content analysis of secondary data: a study of courage in managerial decision making. J Bus Ethics 34(3/4):191–208
45.
Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):986–1014
46.
Hassink H, Vries M, Bollen M (2007) A content analysis of whistleblowing policies of leading European companies. J Bus Ethics 75(1):25–44
47.
Helin S, Sandström J (2007) An inquiry into the study of corporate codes of ethics. J Bus Ethics 75(3):253–271
48.
Herath T, Rao HR (2009) Protection motivation and deterrence: a framework for security policy compliance in organisations. Eur J Inf Sys 18(2):106–125
49.
Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. Manag Inf Sys Q 28(1):75–105
50.
Hofmann H, Busse C, Bode C, Henke M (2013) Sustainability-related supply chain risks: conceptualization and management. Bus Strat Environ. doi:10.​1002/​bse.​1778
51.
Holloway RE (1977) Perceptions of an innovation: Syracuse University Project Advance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University
52.
Holmström J, Ketokivi M, Hameri A-P (2009) Bridging practice and theory: a design science approach. Decis Sci 40(1):65–87
53.
Hopkins MS (2009) Sustainability and competitive advantage. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(1):19–20
54.
International Labour Organization (1999) A social conscience in the global market place: labor dimensions of codes of conduct, social labeling and investor initiatives. International Labour Organization, Geneva
55.
International Organization for Standardization (2004) ISO 14001. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
56.
James HS Jr (2000) Reinforcing ethical decision making through organizational structure. J Bus Ethics 28(1):43–58
57.
Jiang B (2009) The effects of interorganizational governance on supplier’s compliance with SCC: an empirical examination of compliant and non-compliant suppliers. J Oper Manag 27(4):267–280
58.
Kearns KP (1992) Innovations in local government: a sociocognitive network approach. Knowl Policy 5(2):45–67
59.
Kapstein EB (2001) The corporate ethics crusade. Foreign Aff 80(5):105–119
60.
Kaptein M (2004) Business codes of multinational firms: what do they say? J Bus Ethics 50(1):13–31
61.
Kaptein M (2011) Toward effective codes: testing the relationship with unethical behavior. J Bus Ethics 99(2):233–255
62.
Kaptein M, Schwartz MS (2008) The effectiveness of business codes: a critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. J Bus Ethics 77(2):111–127
63.
Kaptein M, Wempe J (1998) Twelve Gordian knots when developing an organizational code of ethics. J Bus Ethics 17(8):853–869
64.
65.
Klassen RD, Vereecke A (2012) Social issues in supply chains: capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity) and performance. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):103–115
66.
Kolk A, Perego P (2010) Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: an international investigation. Bus Strat Environ 19(3):182–198
67.
Kolk A, van Tulder R (2002) Child labor and multinational conduct: a comparison of international business and stakeholder codes. J Bus Ethics 36(3):291–301
68.
Kolk A, van Tulder R (2002) The effectiveness of self-regulation: corporate codes of conduct and child labour. Eur Manag J 20(3):260–271
69.
Kolk A, van Tulder R, Welters C (1999) International codes of conduct and corporate social responsibility: can transnational corporations regulate themselves? Transnatl Corp 8(1):143–180
70.
Kotzab H, Grant DB, Teller C, Halldórsson Á (2009) Supply chain management and hypercompetition. Logist Res 1(1):5–13
71.
KPMG (2008) Business codes of the global 200: their prevalence, content, and embedding. KPMG Special Services B.V., Netherlands
72.
Krippendorff K (2012) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
73.
Laczniak GR, Inderrieden EJ (1987) The influence of stated organizational concern upon ethical decision making. J Bus Ethics 6(4):297–307
74.
Lee J, Lee Y (2002) A holistic model of computer abuse within organizations. Inf Manag Comput Secur 10(2):57–63
75.
Lenox MJ, Nash J (2003) Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: a comparison across four trade association programs. Bus Strat Environ 12(6):343–356
76.
Li H, Zhang J, Sarathy R (2010) Understanding compliance with internet use policy from the perspective of rational choice theory. Decis Support Sys 48(4):635–645
77.
Locke R, Amengual M, Mangla A (2009) Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Polit Soc 37(3):319–351
78.
Logsdon JM, Wood DJ (2005) Global business citizenship and voluntary codes of ethical conduct. J Bus Ethics 59(1):55–67
79.
Lugli E, Kocollari U, Nigrisoli C (2009) The codes of ethics of S&P/MIB Italian companies: an investigation of their contents and the main factors that influence their adoption. J Bus Ethics 84(1):33–45
80.
Lund-Thomsen P (2008) The global sourcing and codes of conduct debate: five myths and five recommendations. Dev Chang 39(6):1005–1018
81.
Marasco A (2008) Third-party logistics: a literature review. Int J Prod Econ 113(1):127–147
82.
Mathieson K (2007) Towards a design science of ethical decision support. J Bus Ethics 76(3):269–292
83.
Max-Neef MA (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol Econ 53(1):5–16
84.
McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):117–127
85.
Min H, Kim I (2012) Green supply chain research: past, present, and future. Logistics Res 4(1–2):39–47
86.
Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Sys Res 2(3):192–222
87.
Mueller MV, dos Santos VG, Seuring S (2009) The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. J Bus Ethics 89(4):509–523
88.
Murray JY, Kotabe M, Westjohn SA (2009) Global sourcing strategy and performance of knowledge-intensive business services: a two-stage strategic fit model. J Int Mark 17(4):90–105
89.
O’Dwyer B, Madden G (2006) Ethical codes of conduct in Irish companies: a survey of code content and enforcement procedures. J Bus Ethics 63(3):217–236
90.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001) Corporate codes of conduct: expanded review of their contents. Working Papers on International Investment Number 2001/6. Paris: Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs
91.
Oehmen J, De Nardo M, Schönsleben P, Boutellier R (2010) Supplier code of conduct—state-of-the-art and customisation in the electronics industry. Prod Plan Control 21(7):664–679
92.
Pandza K, Thorpe R (2010) Management as design, but what kind of design? An appraisal of the design science analogy for management. Br J Manag 21(1):171–186
93.
Pedersen E (2010) Modelling CSR: how managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. J Bus Ethics 91(2):155–166
94.
Pedersen ER, Andersen M (2006) Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. J Public Aff 6(3/4):228–240
95.
Peffers KEN, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manag Inf Sys 24(3):45–77
96.
Pfohl H-C, Köhler H, Thomas D (2010) State of the art in supply chain risk management research: empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice. Logist Res 2(1):33–44
97.
Preuss L (2010) Codes of conduct in organisational context: from cascade to latticework of codes. J Bus Ethics 94(4):471–487
98.
Ramus CA, Montiel I (2005) When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Bus Soc 44(4):377–414
99.
Rasche A (2009) “A Necessary Supplement”—what the UN global compact is and is not. Bus Soc 48(4):511–537
100.
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, NY
101.
Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of innovations: a cross-cultural approach. Free Press, New York, NY
102.
Rottig D, Koufteros X, Umphress E (2011) Formal infrastructure and ethical decision making: an empirical investigation and implications for supply management. Decis Sci 42(1):163–204
103.
Sandberg E, Åman P (2010) Logistics learning mechanisms and capabilities: towards an understanding of sustainable competitive advantage. Logist Res 2(2):97–108
104.
Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: tight coupling and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev 74(1):63–82
105.
Scharpf F (1999) Governing in Europe: effective and democratic?. Oxford University Press, Oxford
106.
Schminke M, Ambrose ML, Neubaum DO (2005) The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 97(2):135–151
107.
Schwartz MS (2002) A code of ethics for corporate code of ethics. J Bus Ethics 41(1/2):27–43
108.
Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: the critical role of the legal environment. Adm Sci Q 55(3):361–396
109.
Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial, 1st edn. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA
110.
Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA
111.
Sims RR (1992) The challenge of ethical behavior in organizations. J Bus Ethics 11(7):505–513
112.
Sims RR, Brinkmann J (2002) Leaders as moral role models: the case of John Gutfreund at Salomon Brothers. J Bus Ethics 35(4):327–339
113.
Sinding K (2000) Environmental management beyond the boundaries of the firm: definitions and constraints. Bus Strat Environ 9(2):79–91
114.
Singh JB (2006) A comparison of the contents of the codes of ethics of Canada’s largest corporations in 1992 and 2003. J Bus Ethics 64(1):17–29
115.
Singh JB (2011) Determinants of the effectiveness of corporate codes of ethics: an empirical study. J Bus Ethics 101(3):385–395
116.
Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610
117.
Talaulicar T (2009) Barriers against globalizing corporate ethics: an analysis of legal disputes on implementing US codes of ethics in Germany. J Bus Ethics 84(3):349–360
118.
Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 29(1):28–45
119.
Treviño LK (1992) The social effects of punishment in organizations: a justice perspective. Acad Manag Rev 17(4):647–676
120.
Treviño LK, Brown ME (2004) Managing to be ethical: debunking five business ethics myths. Acad Manag Exec 18(2):69–81
121.
Treviño LK, Butterfield KD, McCabe DL (1998) The ethical context in organizations: influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Bus Ethics Q 8(3):447–476
122.
van Aken JE (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J Manag Stud 41(2):219–246
123.
van Aken JE (2005) Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. Br J Manag 16(1):19–36
124.
van Tulder R, Kolk A (2001) Multinationality and corporate ethics: codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. J Int Bus Stud 32(2):267–283
125.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204
126.
Verbos AK, Gerard JA, Forshey PR, Harding CS, Miller JS (2007) The positive ethical organization: enacting a living code of ethics and ethical organizational identity. J Bus Ethics 76(1):17–33
127.
Vogel D (2010) The private regulation of global corporate conduct. Bus Soc 49(1):68–87
128.
Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL (1999) Corporate ethics programs as control systems: influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Acad Manag J 42(1):41–57
129.
Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad Manag J 42(1):539–552
130.
Wenzel M (2004) The social side of sanctions: personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law Hum Behav 28(5):547–567
131.
Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manag Rev 16(4):691–718
132.
World Bank (2003) Company codes of conduct and international standards: an analytical comparison. Vol. 1: apparel, footwear and light manufacturing, agribusiness, tourism. World Bank, Washington, DC
133.
Wright C, Rwabizambuga A (2006) Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: an examination of the equator principles. Bus Soc Rev 111(1):89–117
Metadaten
Titel
Toward a standardized supplier code of ethics: development of a design concept based on diffusion of innovation theory
verfasst von
Martin C. Schleper
Christian Busse
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Logistics Research / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1865-035X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-0368
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-013-0109-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Logistics Research 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Value-creating relationships: focusing on the human level

Original Paper

The role of the law enforcement agencies in transport security, a survey with Swedish operators

Original Paper

Understanding the robustness of optimal FMCG distribution networks

Original Paper

Doctoral dissertations in logistics and supply chain-related areas: 2005–2009

Original Paper

Alike or not? Partner similarity and its outcome in horizontal cooperations between logistics service providers

Original Paper

Examining logistics outsourcing practices in the United States: from the perspectives of third-party logistics service users