Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Design of On-Line Electric Vehicle (OLEV) Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2011 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Towards a Performance Measurement System for Lean-Oriented NPD Processes

verfasst von : M. Taisch, D. Corti, S. Terzi

Erschienen in: Global Product Development

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Lean thinking has been successfully applied to manufacturing and operations environments and many case studies and research papers have extensively been published. The same remark cannot be made for lean application to the New Product Development (NPD) process. Some efforts in Lean Product Development exist, but, until today, with the tools available, it is impossible to say if a NPD process is lean or not, and actually how much lean is. A kind of gap exists in the applicability of lean into the NPD process and this chapter aims at filling this gap, contributing to NPD performance measurement getting a leanness process. The paper proposes a Performance Measurement System, derived from the Balanced Scorecard approach, for measuring a NPD and its leanness. The proposed framework is under development within the LeanPPD European project.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Using Systems Analysis Techniques to Understand the Relationships Between Skills, Effort and Learning
Nächstes Kapitel A Framework for Assessing the Reliability of Mechatronic Systems
Literatur
1.
Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. (2003) Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press, New York, NY.
2.
McManus, H. (2004) Product Development Value Stream Mapping, Lean Aerospace Initiative. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
3.
Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S. (2000) Product Design and Development. Irwin McGraw- Hill, New York, NY.
4.
Saren, M.A. (1984) A classification and review of models of intra-firm innovation process. Research and Development Management, 14(1):11–24.
5.
Cooper, R., Edgett, S.J. (2008) Maximizing productivity in product innovation. Research Technology Management, 51(2):47–58.
6.
Bowersox, D.J., Carter, P.J., Monczka, R.M. (1985) Materials logistics management. The International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 15:27–35.
7.
Haque, B., James-Moore, M., Broughton, T. (2001) Definition and characterisation of a lean product introduction system. UK Lean Aerospace Initiative, University of Warwick.
8.
Liker, J.K., Morgan, J. (2006) The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process, and Technology. Productivity Press, New York, NY.
9.
Huthwaite, B. (2004) The Lean Design Solutions: A Practical Guide to Streamlining Product Design and Development. Institute for Lean Innovation, Michigan.
10.
11.
Kaplan, R.S. (1984) The evolution of management accounting. Accounting Review, 59:340–418.
12.
Miller, J.G. (1990) Lessons of the 80’s, challenges for the 90’s: Research issues for the Manufacturing Roundtable. Boston University School of Management.
13.
Kerr, S. (2003) HBR case study: The best-laid incentive plans. Harvard Business Review, 81(1):27–33.
14.
Mintzberg, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
15.
Zairi, M., Sinclair D. (1995) Business process re-engineering and process management: A survey of current practice and future trends in integrated management. Business Process Re-Engineering & Management Journal, 33:3–16.CrossRef
16.
Maskell, B.H. (1991) Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies. Productivity Press, Cambridge.
17.
Melnyk, S.A., Douglas M.S., Swink M. (2004) Metrics and performance measurement in operations management: Dealing with the metrics maze. Journal of Operations Management, 22:209–217.CrossRef
18.
Cross, K.F., Lynch, R.L. (1988) The SMART way to define and sustain success. National Productivity Review, 8(1):23–33.CrossRef
19.
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1996) The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
20.
Neely, A.D., Adams, C., Crowe, P. (2001) The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2):6–12.CrossRef
21.
Bititci, U.S. (1995) Modelling of performance measurement systems in manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 42(22):137–114.CrossRef
22.
Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1987) New products: What separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4:169–184.CrossRef
23.
Griffin, A., Page, A.L. (1993) An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10:291–308.CrossRef
24.
Griffin, A., Page, A.L. (1996) PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13:478–496.CrossRef
25.
Loch, H.C., Tapper, S. (2002) Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19:185–198.CrossRef
26.
Driva, H., Pawar, K.S., Menon, U. (2000) Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 63(2):147–159.CrossRef
27.
Pillai, A., Joshi, A., Rao, K.S. (2002) Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment. International Journal of Project Management, 20:165–177.CrossRef
28.
Humphreys, P., Huang, G., Cadden, T. (2005) A web-based supplier evaluation tool for the product development process. Industrial Management & Data System, 105:147–163.CrossRef
29.
Chen, C.C., Yeh, T.M., Yang, C.C. (2006) Performance measurement for new product development: A model based on total costs. International Journal of Production Research, 44(21):4631–4648.CrossRef
30.
Swink, M. (2003) Completing projects on time: How project acceleration affects new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20:319–321.CrossRef
31.
Nixon, B. (1998) Evaluating design performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(7):814.CrossRef
32.
Kerssens-van Drongelen, I., Bilderbeek, J. (1999) R&D performance measurement: More than choosing a set of metrics. R&D Management, 29:35–46.CrossRef
33.
Tatikonda, M.V., Rosenthal, S.R. (2000) Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in product innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4):401–425.CrossRef
34.
Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.MATH
Metadaten
Titel
Towards a Performance Measurement System for Lean-Oriented NPD Processes
verfasst von
M. Taisch
D. Corti
S. Terzi
Copyright-Jahr
2011
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Global Product Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15972-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-15973-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2011

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_65

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise