Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Traditional Communities

verfasst von : Shinji Yamashige

Erschienen in: Economic Analysis of Families and Society

Verlag: Springer Japan

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the following two chapters, we turn to the economic analysis of a community, which we defined in Chap. 1 as a network of people who are not motivated to seek profits. The family we discussed in the last two chapters is an example of the community, but communities extend beyond families.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Couples without children may be categorized as new communities because they are usually connected by strong wills. However, children and parents are connected by chance and thus should be categorized as traditional communities.
 
2
New communities such as NPOs and NGOs, on the other hand, are often well defined by laws.
 
3
It is usually more difficult than in new communities, where relationships are more formal and formal rules to induce cooperation are more easily introduced thanks to the strong wills and laws that bind the members.
 
4
Normal goods are goods whose demand increases with the increase in disposable income.
 
5
The definition of Pareto efficiency (c.f. footnote 2 in Chap. 2) will be satisfied by fixing the utility of an individual and maximizing the utility of the other individual under the resource constraint.
 
6
The numerator represents the increase in utility due to a small increase in public goods G, while the denominator represents the increase in utility due to a small increase in private goods \(x_i\). Thus, if we divide the former by the latter we can calculate the quantity of private goods \(x_i\) we need to achieve the increase in utility caused by additional public goods G.
 
7
The result may be well-explained if we consider that individuals think that they made their contribution to public goods through tax payment, thus reducing their private provision.
 
8
See Warr (1982) and Bergstrom et al. (1986) for more details and discussions.
 
9
Although we omit the proof, we recommend readers who are interested in the theoretical researches to try solving a proof based on Fig. 6.2.
 
10
Some analyses show that whether crowding-out effects or crowding-in effects occur depends on how governments provide public goods. See, for example, Rege (2004).
 
11
See, for example, Rose-Ackerman (1986), Khanna and Sandler (2000), Payne (2001) and Heutel (2009).
 
12
However, this is not the unique Pareto efficient allocation. For example, \((g^{**}_1, x^{**}_1, g^{**}_2, x^{**}_2) = (2, 1, 1, 2)\) is an allocation that satisfies the conditions \(x_1 + x_2 =3\) and \(G \equiv g_1 + g_2 = 3\). There are infinite Pareto efficient resource allocations.
 
13
In Sect. 6.3.4 below we depict a model of evolutionary games in which the long-run relationship is not necessary to prevent selfish behavior.
 
14
See Sect. 2.​3.​2 for “iriaichi.
 
15
The detectives were said to be given some rights to judge the violator and were allowed to charge fines in the form of either money or sake (a Japanese rice wine) to cover the cost of the policing activities.
 
16
In Japanese local communities, the “punishment system based on the norm” was established and used to induce cooperative behavior. The “voluntary punishment” discussed here has also been frequently used. With the weakening traditional local communities, the society may have to rely on the voluntary punishment of some people to discourage socially undesirable actions. However, the arguments here suggest that such voluntary punishment may be disappearing as rational individuals find it costly to impose. As the last resort, the Japanese society may have to use the legal process more. However, recently there seem to be some social attempts at applauding and admiring socially desirable actions such as volunteering and social contributions. If voluntary praise for desirable actions is more effective than punishment for undesirable ones, and if the cost of praising others is lower than that of punishing others, society may succeed in expelling socially undesirable actions. Such a mechanism may be effective in the new communities as we discuss in the next section.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abreu, D. (1988). On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Econometrica, 56, 383–396.CrossRef Abreu, D. (1988). On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Econometrica, 56, 383–396.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Andreoni, J. (1988). Privately provided public-goods in a large economy-the limits of altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 57–73.CrossRef Andreoni, J. (1988). Privately provided public-goods in a large economy-the limits of altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 57–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. R. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.CrossRef Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. R. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bliss, C., & Nalebuff, B. (1984). Dragon-slaying and ballroom dancing: The private supply of a public good. Journal of Public Economics, 25(1–2), 1–12.CrossRef Bliss, C., & Nalebuff, B. (1984). Dragon-slaying and ballroom dancing: The private supply of a public good. Journal of Public Economics, 25(1–2), 1–12.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 373, 209–216.CrossRef Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 373, 209–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heutel, G. (2009). Crowding out and crowding in of private donations and government grants. NBER Working Papers 15004. Heutel, G. (2009). Crowding out and crowding in of private donations and government grants. NBER Working Papers 15004.
Zurück zum Zitat Khanna, J., & Sandler, T. (2000). Partners in giving: The crowding-in effects of UK Government grants. European Economic Review, 44(8), 1543–1556.CrossRef Khanna, J., & Sandler, T. (2000). Partners in giving: The crowding-in effects of UK Government grants. European Economic Review, 44(8), 1543–1556.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. London: Heinemann. Kropotkin, P. (1902). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. London: Heinemann.
Zurück zum Zitat Manzoor, S., & Straub, J. (2005). The Robustness of Kingma’s crowd-out estimate: Evidence from new data on contributions to public radio. Public Choice, 123, 463–476.CrossRef Manzoor, S., & Straub, J. (2005). The Robustness of Kingma’s crowd-out estimate: Evidence from new data on contributions to public radio. Public Choice, 123, 463–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Payne, M. (2001). Measuring the effect of federal research funding on private donations at research universities: Is federal research funding more than a substitute for private donations? International Tax and Public Finance, 8(5–6), 731–751.CrossRef Payne, M. (2001). Measuring the effect of federal research funding on private donations at research universities: Is federal research funding more than a substitute for private donations? International Tax and Public Finance, 8(5–6), 731–751.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rege, M. (2004). Social norms and private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6(1), 65–77.CrossRef Rege, M. (2004). Social norms and private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6(1), 65–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986). Do government grants to charity reduce private donations? In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy (pp. 313–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986). Do government grants to charity reduce private donations? In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy (pp. 313–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi, R., & Somanathan, E. (1996). The evolution of social norms in common property resource use. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 766–788. Sethi, R., & Somanathan, E. (1996). The evolution of social norms in common property resource use. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 766–788.
Zurück zum Zitat Warr, P. G. (1982). Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. Journal of Public Economics, 19, 131–138.CrossRef Warr, P. G. (1982). Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. Journal of Public Economics, 19, 131–138.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Warr, P. G. (1983). The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income. Economics Letters, 13, 207–211.CrossRef Warr, P. G. (1983). The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income. Economics Letters, 13, 207–211.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe, Y., & Hojo, H. (1975). Forest Iriai and Village Structure. University of Tokyo Press. (in Japanese). Watanabe, Y., & Hojo, H. (1975). Forest Iriai and Village Structure. University of Tokyo Press. (in Japanese).
Metadaten
Titel
Traditional Communities
verfasst von
Shinji Yamashige
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Verlag
Springer Japan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55909-2_6

Premium Partner