Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Transformation of Economic Systems: The Bio-Economy Case

verfasst von : Andreas Pyka

Erschienen in: Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To improve sustainability, the global economic system has to undergo severe transformation processes. This chapter deals with the possibility of an innovation-triggered transformation towards a knowledge-based bioeconomy, which is supposed to overcome the current lock-in into a fossil fuel-based CO2-intensive production. To do this, a Neo-Schumpeterian view is applied that highlights the complex interplay in knowledge-generation and -diffusion processes between firms, consumers and government institutions. By applying the Neo-Schumpeterian approach it becomes obvious that innovation and economic growth are part of the solution and not part of the sustainability problem. The shift from quantitative growth—prevailing in textbook economics—to qualitative development—prevailing in Neo-Schumpeterian economics—makes the difference and affects all agents and institutions in an economic system, which needs to be designed as a dedicated innovation system supporting the transformation towards a knowledge-based bioeconomy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Structural Change, Knowledge and the Bioeconomy
Literatur
Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 253–273.CrossRef
Blewitt, J., & Cunningham, R. (Eds.). (2014). The post-growth project: How the end of economic growth could bring a fairer and happier society. Green House, e-prints, Aston University.
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.CrossRef
Casper, S., Lehrer, M., & Soskice, D. (1999). Can high-technology industries prosper in Germany? Institutional frameworks and the evolution of the German software and biotechnology industries. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 114–139.CrossRef
Deffuant, G., Huet, S., & Amblard, F. (2005). An Individual-based model of innovation diffusion mixing social value and individual benefit. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1041–1069.CrossRef
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.CrossRef
Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (1988). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter.
Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., & Martin, B. R. (Eds.). (2015). The triple challenge for Europe: Economic development, climate change, and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialization – The concept (Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, Vol. 9).
Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499–514.CrossRef
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8), 1257–1274.CrossRef
Green, L., Pyka, A., & Schön, B. (2013). A life-cycle based taxonomy of innovation networks – With focus on public-private collaboration. In F. Gallouj, L. Rubalcaba, & P. Windrum (Eds.), Public-private innovation networks in services (pp. 113–138). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2013). Social innovations in the perspective of Comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. In C. Ruiz Viñals & C. Parra Rodríguez (Eds.), Social innovation – New forms of organization in knowledge-based societies (pp. 29–43). London: Routledge.
Howells, J. (2002). The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition – Does the sailing ship effect exist? Journal of Management Studies, 39(7), 887–906.CrossRef
Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2014). The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 172–180. December 2012.CrossRef
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Hart, Schaffner& Marx.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1998). Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(4), 403–422.CrossRef
Mazzucato, M., & Perez, C. (2015). Innovation as growth policy. In J. Fagerberg, S. Laestadius, & B. R. Martin (Eds.), The triple challenge for Europe: Economic development, climate change, and governance (p. 229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., & Martin, B. R. (2010). Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work). Research Policy, 39, 1011–1023.CrossRef
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University: Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Nyblom, J., Borgatti, S., Roslakka, J., & Salo, M. A. (2003). Statistical analysis of network data – An application to diffusion of innovation. Social Networks, 25(2), 175–195.CrossRef
Pérez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185–202.CrossRef
Pérez, C. (2013). Financial bubbles, crises and the role of government in unleashing golden ages. In A. Pyka & H.-P. Burghof (Eds.), Innovation and finance (pp. 11–25). Milton Park: Routledge.
Pyka, A. (2002). Innovation networks in economics – From the incentive-based to the knowledge-based approaches. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 152–163.CrossRef
Pyka, A. (2017). Die Bioökonomie unter dem Blickwinkel der Innovationsökonomie. In J. Pietzsch (Ed.), Bioökonomie für Einsteiger. Berlin: Springer.
Pyka, A., & Buchmann, T. (2016). Die Transformation zur wissensbasierten Bioökonomie. In W. Burr & M. Stephan (Eds.), Technologie, strategie und organisation (pp. 333–361). Berlin: Springer.
Robertson, M., Swan, J., & Newell, S. (1996). The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 333–360.CrossRef
Sahal, D. (1985). Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Research Policy, 14(2), 61–82.CrossRef
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1943). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.
Unruh, C. G. (2000). Undesrtanding Carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830.CrossRef
Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69–89.CrossRef
Von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode (pp. 39–61). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford University: Press.
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Transformation of Economic Systems: The Bio-Economy Case
verfasst von
Andreas Pyka
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58373-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-58374-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-7_1

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise