Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Erschienen in: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 5/2017

01.09.2017 | Original Article

Transforming Multidisciplinary Customer Requirements to Product Design Specifications

verfasst von: Xiao-Jie Ma, Guo-Fu Ding, Sheng-Feng Qin, Rong Li, Kai-Yin Yan, Shou-Ne Xiao, Guang-Wu Yang

Erschienen in: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the increasing of complexity of complex mechatronic products, it is necessary to involve multidisciplinary design teams, thus, the traditional customer requirements modeling for a single discipline team becomes difficult to be applied in a multidisciplinary team and project since team members with various disciplinary backgrounds may have different interpretations of the customers’ requirements. A new synthesized multidisciplinary customer requirements modeling method is provided for obtaining and describing the common understanding of customer requirements (CRs) and more importantly transferring them into a detailed and accurate product design specifications (PDS) to interact with different team members effectively. A case study of designing a high speed train verifies the rationality and feasibility of the proposed multidisciplinary requirement modeling method for complex mechatronic product development. This proposed research offersthe instruction to realize the customer-driven personalized customization of complex mechatronic product.
Vorheriger Artikel Designing Visceral, Behavioural and Reflective Products
Nächster Artikel Design Change Model for Effective Scheduling Change Propagation Paths
Literatur
1.
S F Qin, V Dvd, E Chatzakis, et al. Exploring barriers and opportunities in adopting crowdsourcing based New Product Development in manufacturing SMEs. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(6): 1–15.
2.
M Maletz, J G Blouin, H Schnedl, et al. A Holistic Approach for Integrated Requirements Modeling in the Product Development Process. F L Krause, eds. The Future of Product Development-Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 197–207.
3.
H Z Zhang, X Han, R Li, et al. A new conceptual design method to support rapid and effective mapping from product design specification to concept design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 87(5-8): 2375–2389.
4.
R J Jiao, C H Chen. Customer requirement management in product development: A review of research issues. Concurrent Engineering, 2006, 14(3): 173–185.
5.
J M Mclellan, B Morkos, G G Mocko, et al. Requirement modeling systems for mechanical design: a systematic method for evaluating requirement management tools and languages. ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, August 15–18, 2010: 1247–1257.
6.
Z Q Sheng, Y Z Wang, J Y Song, et al. Customer requirement modeling and mapping of numerical control machine[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 7(10): 1-11.
7.
K A Beiter, K Ishii, H Karandikar. Customer requirements management: methodology selection and deployment guide. ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, September 10–13, 2006: 661–672.
8.
C Stechert, H J Franke. Managing requirements as the core of multi-disciplinary product development. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science & Technology, 2009, 1(3): 153–158.
9.
Q Shan, Y Chen. Product Module Identification Based on Assured Customer Requirements. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 15: 5313–5317.
10.
S M Bae, S H Ha, C P Sang. A web-based system for analyzing the voices of call center customers in the service industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005, 28(1): 29–41.
11.
[11]M D Shieh, W Yan, C H Chen. Soliciting customer requirements for product redesign based on picture sorts and ART2 neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008, 34(1): 194–204.
12.
B Zhu, Z Wang, H C Yang, et al. Applying fuzzy multiple attributes decision making for product configuration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2008, 19(5): 591–598.
13.
M G Violante, E Vezzetti. A methodology for supporting requirement management tools (RMt) design in the PLM scenario: An user-based strategy. Computers in Industry, 2014, 65(7): 1065–1075.
14.
O Yaman, B Zhu, U Roy. Towards the development of an ontology-based product requirement model. ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2014: V02BT02A062-V02BT02A062.
15.
W Wei, A Liu, S C Y Lu, et al. Product requirement modeling and optimization method based on product configuration design. Journal of Trauma, 2015, 36(45): 1–5.
16.
M Bakhshandeh, G Antunes, R Mayer, et al. A modular ontology for the enterprise architecture domain. 2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops. IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Sept 9-13, 2013: 5–12.
17.
Y Li, N Narayan, J Helming, et al. A domain specific requirements model for scientific computing: NIER track. IEEE, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA, May 21–28, 2011: 848–851.
18.
A Goknil, I Kurtev, J V Millo. A metamodeling approach for reasoning on multiple requirements models. IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference. IEEE Computer Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 9-13, 2013: 159–166.
19.
M H Eres, M Bertoni, M Kossmann, et al. Mapping customer needs to engineering characteristics: an aerospace perspective for conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design, 2014, 25(1): 1–3, 64–87.
20.
X Lai, M Xie, C K Tan. Optimizing product design using the Kano model and QFD. Engineering Management Conference, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International. Singapore, Oct 18–21, 2004, 3: 1085–1089.
21.
Y C Lee, L C Sheu, Y G Tsou. Quality function deployment implementation based on Fuzzy Kano model: An application in PLM system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2008, 1(1): 48–63.
22.
D M Zhang, L Wang, X Song. The method research for mapping from customer requirements to technical characteristics in QFD. Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC), 2011 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, Deng Feng, China, August 8–10, 2011: 2578–2582.
23.
K Y Chan, T S Dillon, C K Kwong, et al. Using genetic programming for developing relationship between engineering characteristics and customer requirements in new products. IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. IEEE, Beijing, China, June 21–23 2011: 526–531.
24.
M Q Wang, Y S Ma. A systematic method for mapping customer requirements to quality characteristics in product lifecycle[J]. International Journal of Simulation & Process Modelling, 2007, 3(4): 957–960.
25.
Y H Qin, G X Wei. On mapping approach of CN to FR in product family improvement. 2009 International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. IEEE, Zhangjiajie, China, April 11-12, 2009, 3: 794–797.
26.
J Jin, P Ji, Y Liu, et al. Translating online customer opinions into engineering characteristics in QFD: A probabilistic language analysis approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 41(47): 115–127.
27.
N G Sun, Y Y Zhang, X S Mei. A simplified systematic method of acquiring design specifications from customer requirements. Journal of Computing & Information Science in Engineering, 2007, 9(3): 296–297.
28.
R Krishnapillai, A Zeid. Mapping product design specification for mass customization. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2006, 17(1): 29–43.
29.
Y Wang, M M Tseng. A Naïve Bayes approach to map customer requirements to product variants. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2015, 26(3): 501–509.
30.
M Guenov. Covariance structural models of the relationship between the design and customer domains. Journal of Engineering Design, 2008, 19(1): 75–95.
31.
L Yu, L Y Wang, J B Yu. Identification of product definition patterns in mass customization using a learning-based hybrid approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 38(11–12): 1061–1074.
32.
A Mousavi, P Adl, R T Rakowski, et al. Customer optimization route and evaluation (CORE) for product design. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2010, 14(14): 236–243.
33.
C H Chen, L P Khoo, W Yan. PDCS—a product definition and customization system for product concept development. Expert Systems with Applications An International Journal, 2005, 28(3): 591–602.
34.
Y Wang, M M Tseng. Integrating comprehensive customer requirements into product design. CIRP Annals–Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 60(1): 175–178.
35.
E Safavi, M Tarkian, H Gavel, et al. Collaborative multidisciplinary design optimization: A framework applied on aircraft conceptual system design. Concurrent Engineering, 2015, 23: 236–249.
36.
C G Hart, N Vlahopoulos. An integrated multidisciplinary particle swarm optimization approach to conceptual ship design. Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(3): 481–494.
37.
N V Nguyen, M Tyan, J W Lee. A modified variable complexity modeling for efficient multidisciplinary aircraft conceptual design. Optimization & Engineering, 2015, 16(2): 485–505.
38.
D L Allison, C C Morris, J A Schetz, et al. Development of a multidisciplinary design optimization framework for an efficient supersonic air vehicle. Advances in Aircraft & Spacecraft Science, 2015, 2(1): 17–44
39.
Z F Zhang, J J Song, Y Liu, et al. An integrated multidisciplinary design optimization method for computer numerical control machine tool development. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 7(2): 1–9.
40.
S Zaim, M Sevkli, H Camgöz-Akdağ, et al. Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(9): 4464–4474.
41.
P L Biju, P R Shalij, G V Prabhushankar. Evaluation of customer requirements and sustainability requirements through the application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 108: 808–817.
Metadaten
Titel
Transforming Multidisciplinary Customer Requirements to Product Design Specifications
verfasst von
Xiao-Jie Ma
Guo-Fu Ding
Sheng-Feng Qin
Rong Li
Kai-Yin Yan
Shou-Ne Xiao
Guang-Wu Yang
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2017
Verlag
Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society
Erschienen in
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1000-9345
Elektronische ISSN: 2192-8258
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0181-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Design and Dynamic Model of a Frog-inspired Swimming Robot Powered by Pneumatic Muscles

Original Article

Innovation Analysis Approach to Design Parameters of High Speed Train Carriage and Their Intrinsic Complexity Relationships

Original Article

Social Sensors (S2ensors): A Kind of Hardware-Software-Integrated Mediators for Social Manufacturing Systems Under Mass Individualization

Original Article

Experimental Dynamic Analysis of a Breathing Cracked Rotor

Original Article

MapReduce Based Parallel Bayesian Network for Manufacturing Quality Control

Original Article

Challenges and Requirements for the Application of Industry 4.0: A Special Insight with the Usage of Cyber-Physical System

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise