Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 5/2014

01.07.2014

Trust based negotiation bargaining game model for bandwidth management algorithms

verfasst von: Sungwook Kim

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, Multi-hop Relaying Network (MRN) has gained wide acceptance as a next step towards future radio networks. MRN can extend the service area as well as improve the performance of wireless networks. To exploit the multi-hop relaying operation, an important issue is how to properly control wireless bandwidth. In this paper, a new bandwidth management scheme is proposed for MRNs. By integrating the random arrival rule and Nash bargaining model, the proposed scheme adaptively controls the wireless bandwidth to maximize network efficiency. In our scheme, trust value and bargaining powers are decided according to the Bayesian inference and real-time negotiation process, respectively. This approach can make the network system be close to the optimized network performance. To prove the effectiveness of the proposed scheme, a simulation has carried out. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme in comparison with other existing schemes.
Vorheriger Artikel A survivable routing protocol for two-layered LEO/MEO satellite networks
Nächster Artikel Directed information dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Long, L., & Hossain, E. (2007). Multihop cellular networks: potential gains, research challenges, and a resource allocation framework. IEEE Communications Magazine, 45(9), 66–73.CrossRef
2.
Yongsuk, P., & Eun-Sun, J. (2007). Resource-aware routing algorithms for multi-hop cellular networks. In International conference on multimedia and ubiquitous engineering, pp. 1164–1167.
3.
Sungwook, K., & Pramod, K. V. (2004). An integrated adaptive bandwidth management framework for QoS sensitive multimedia cellular networks. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, 53(3), 835–846.
4.
Chun, Y., & Lee, J. (2007). On the convergence of the random arrival rule in large claims problems. International Journal of Games Theory, 36, 259–273.CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
5.
Hyunggon, P., & van der Schaar, M. (2007). Bargaining strategies for networked multimedia resource management. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55(7), 3496–3511.CrossRefMathSciNet
6.
Kazuya K., Koji Y., Hidekazu M., & Susumu, Y. (2008), Fair channel and route selection algorithm using Nash bargaining solutions in multi-hop radio networks. In IEEE international workshop on wireless distributed networks, pp. 1–5.
7.
Zheng-Ai, B., & Jun-Zhou, L. (2007). A cooperative game theory based coalitional agent negotiation model in network service. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4402/2007, 447–458.
8.
Sierra, C., Faratin, P., & Jennings, N. R. (1997). A service-oriented negotiation model between autonomous agents. In MAAMAW-97, pp. 17–35.
9.
Sun, T., Zhu, Q., Li, S., & Zhou, M. (2007). Open, dynamic and continuous one-to-many negotiation system. BIC-TA, 2007, 87–93.
10.
Huining, H., Yanikomeroglu, H., Falconer, D. D., & Periyalwar, S. (2004). Range extension without capacity penalty in cellular networks with digital fixed relays. In IEEE GLOBECOM, pp. 3053–3057.
11.
Newton, M., Thompson, J. S., & Naden, J. M. (2008). Wireless systems resource allocation in the downlink of cellular multi-hop networks. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 19(3), 299–314.CrossRef
12.
Virapanicharoen, J., & Benjapolakul, W. (2005). Fair-efficient guard bandwidth coefficients selection in call admission control for mobile multimedia communications using framework of game theory. IEICE Transactions, E88-A(7), 1869–1880.
13.
Chen, X., Li, B., & Fang, Y. (2005). A dynamic multiple-threshold bandwidth reservation (DMTBR) scheme for QoS provisioning in multimedia wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 4(2), 583–592.CrossRef
14.
Kim, S. (2011). Cellular network bandwidth management scheme by using Nash bargaining solution. IET Communications, 5(3), 371–380.CrossRef
15.
Nan, F., Siun-Chuon, M., & Mandayam, N. B. (2004). Pricing and power control for joint network-centric and user-centric radio resource management. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 52(9), 1547–1557.CrossRef
16.
Wang, X., & Schulzrinne, H. (2005). Incentive-compatible adaptation of internet real-time multimedia. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 417–436.CrossRef
17.
Ginde, S., Neel, J., & Buehrer, R. M. (2003). A game-theoretic analysis of joint link adaptation and distributed power control in GPRS. In IEEE vehicular technology conference, pp. 732–736.
18.
Long, C., Zhang, Q., Li, B., Yang, H., & Guan, X. (2007). Non-cooperative power control for wireless ad hoc networks with repeated games. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(6), 1101–1112.CrossRef
19.
Luo, C., Ji, H., & Li, Y. (2009). Utility-based multi-service bandwidth allocation in the 4G heterogeneous wireless access networks. In IEEE WCNC, pp. 1–5.
20.
Niyato, D., & Hossain, E. (2008). A noncooperative game-theoretic framework for radio resource management in 4G heterogeneous wireless access networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(3), 332–345.CrossRef
21.
Liu, J,. Shen, L., Song, T., & Wang, X. (2009). Demand-matching spectrum sharing game for non-cooperative cognitive radio network. In International conference on wireless communications & signal processing (WCSP) 2009, pp. 1–5.
22.
Malanchini, I., Cesana, M., & Gatti, N. (2009). On spectrum selection games in cognitive radio networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM 2009, pp. 1–7.
23.
Chen, Q.-B., Zhou, W.-G., Chai, R., Tang, L., & Zhao, Y.-L. (2010). A noncooperative game-theoretic vertical handoff in 4G heterogeneous wireless networks. International Conference on Communications and Networking, 2010, 1–5.MATH
24.
Dramitinos, M., & Lassous, I. G. (2009). A bandwidth allocation mechanism for 4G. In European wireless technology conference 2009 (EuWIT 2009), pp. 96–99.
25.
Zouridaki, C., Mark, B. L. Hejmo, M., & Thomas, R. K. (2005). A quantitative trust establishment framework for reliable data packet delivery in MANETs. In ACM SASN’05, pp. 1–10.
26.
Changiz, R., Halabian, H., Yu, F. R., Lambadaris, I., & Tang, H. (2010). Trust management in wireless mobile networks with cooperative communications. EUC, 2010, 498–503.
27.
Wen, S, & Wu, H. (2012). A novel resource allocation scheme for station area. In IEEE Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing (WiCOM’ 2012), pp. 1–4.
28.
Ayyadurai, V., Moessner, K., & Tafazolli, R. (2011). Multihop cellular network optimization using genetic algorithms. IEEE network and service management (CNSM), pp. 1–5.
Metadaten
Titel
Trust based negotiation bargaining game model for bandwidth management algorithms
verfasst von
Sungwook Kim
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-013-0652-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Wireless Networks 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Stochastic spectrum handoff protocols for partially observable cognitive radio networks

OriginalPaper

Vertical handoff decision in 4G wireless networks using multi attribute decision making approach

OriginalPaper

Loss-based proportional fairness in multihop wireless networks

OriginalPaper

A new routing scheme to reduce traffic in large scale mobile ad-hoc networks through selective on-demand method

OriginalPaper

A QoS aware joint design for wireless mesh networks

OriginalPaper

Directed information dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise