nach oben

Erschienen in:

2012 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. Understanding IS Theory: An Interpretation of Key IS Theoretical Frameworks Using Social Cognitive Theory

verfasst von : Kevin Carillo

Erschienen in: Information Systems Theory

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Past research studies have introduced a multitude of theoretical models and constructs when investigating individual behavior. We have now reached a point where the IS discipline requires cohesive guidance to make sense of such a large number of theoretical considerations, as well as to assist in identifying theories that have the potential to shed new light on the complex interaction of technology and behavior. The aim of the present chapter is to use Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) as a meta-level framework to organize the theoretical models and constructs used in the IS literature, so as to provide a clear and integrated depiction of the state of our theoretical knowledge. First, a thorough review of the IS literature which used SCT was performed. Second, the major behavioral theoretical models used in IS research were also reviewed. This literature is mapped into the SCT framework, thus highlighting the main successes but also pitfalls of past research. Future research directions are then identified and discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Intention-Based Models: The Theory of Planned Behavior Within the Context of IS

Nächstes Kapitel The Potential of Critical Realism in IS Research

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy: An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418.CrossRef

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRef

Amin, H. (2007). Internet banking adoption among young intellectuals. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1.

Ball, D. M., & Levy, Y. (2008). Emerging educational technology: Assessing the factors that influence instructors’ acceptance in information systems and other classrooms. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(4), 431.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. In S. Rashman (Ed.), Advances in behavioral research and therapy (pp. 237–269). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13, 623–649.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communications. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 269–290.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.CrossRef

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.CrossRef

Bhattacherjee, A., Perols, J., & Sanford, C. (2008). Information technology continuance: A theoretic extension and empirical test. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(1), 17.

Bock, G.-W., Kankanhalli, A., & Sharma, S. (2006). Are norms enough? The role of collaborative norms in promoting organizational knowledge seeking. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 357–367.CrossRef

Bolt, M. A., Killough, L. N., & Koh, H. C. (2001). Testing the interaction effects of task complexity in computer training using the social cognitive model. Decision Sciences, 32(1), 1.CrossRef

Cantor, J. (1994). Fright reactions to mass media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carillo, K. D. (2010). Social cognitive theory in IS research – Literature review, criticism, and research agenda. Communications in computer and information science, information systems, technology and management, 54. Springer.

Chang, S.-C., & Lu, M. T. (2004). Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(3), 21.CrossRef

Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26.CrossRef

Chin, W. W., & Marcolin, B. L. (2001). The future of diffusion research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 32(3), 7–12.CrossRef

Chung, S. H., Schwager, P. H., & Turner, D. E. (2002). An empirical of students’ computer self-efficacy: Differences among four academic disciplines at a large university. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(4), 1.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189.CrossRef

Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145.CrossRef

Compeau, D. R., & Meister, D. B. (1997). Measurement of perceived characteristics of innovating: A reconsideration based on three empirical studies. Presented at a workshop of the diffusion interest group on information technology, Atlanta, GA, December 13, 1997.

Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. R. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45–63.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRef

Davis, S. A., & Bostrom, R. P. (1993). Training end-users: An experimental investigation of the role of the computer interface and training methods. MIS Quarterly, 17, 61–86.CrossRef

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information System Research, 3(1), 60–95.CrossRef

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

Downey, J. P., Rainer, R. K., Jr., & Bartczak, S. E. (2008). Explicating computer self-efficacy relationships: Generality and the overstated case of specificity matching. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 20(3), 22–40.CrossRef

Fagan, M. H., Neill, S., & Wooldridge, B. R. (2004). An empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support, and usage. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 95.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

George, J. F. (2004). The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing. Internet Research, 14(3), 198.CrossRef

Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.CrossRef

Guriting, P., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Borneo online banking: Evaluating customer perceptions and behavioral intention. Management Research News, 29(1/2), 6.CrossRef

Halawi, L., & McCarthy, R. (2006). Which theory applies: An analysis of information systems research. Issues in Information Systems, 7, 252–256.

Hasan, B. (2006). Effectiveness of computer training: The role of multilevel computer self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(1), 50.CrossRef

Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Information Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 76–88.CrossRef

Hasan, B., & Ali, J. H. (2004). An empirical examination of a model of computer learning performance. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(4), 27.

Hasan, B., & Ali, J. H. (2006). The impact of general and system-specific self-efficacy on computer training learning and reactions. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, 9(1), 17.

Havelka, D. (2003). Predicting software self efficacy among business students: A preliminary assessment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(2), 145.

Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139.

Henry, J. W., & Stone, R. W. (1999). The impacts of end-user gender, education, performance, and system use on computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Southern Business Review, 25(1), 10.

Hernandez, J. M. C., & Mazzon, J. A. (2007). Adoption of internet banking: Proposition and implementation of an integrated methodology approach. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(2), 72–88.CrossRef

Holden, G. (1991). The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Work in Health Care, 16, 53–93.CrossRef

Hsu, M. H., Chiu, C. M., & Ju, T. L. (2004). Determinants of continued use of the WWW: An integration of two theoretical models. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 104(8/9), 766.CrossRef

Hung, S.-Y., & Liang, T. P. (2001). Effect of computer self-efficacy on the use of executive support systems. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 101(5/6), 227.CrossRef

Jawahar, I. M., & Elango, B. (2001). The effect of attitudes, goal setting and self-efficacy on end user performance. Journal of End User Computing, 13(2), 40.CrossRef

Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1–23.CrossRef

Johnson, R. D., & Marakas, G. M. (2000). Research report: The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition - toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 403.CrossRef

Kamhawi, E. M. (2008). System characteristics, perceived benefits, individual differences and use intentions: A survey of decision support tools of ERP systems. Information Resource Management Journal, 21(4), 66–83.CrossRef

Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K.-K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113.

Karsten, R., & Schmidt, D. (2006). Business student computer self-efficacy: Ten years later. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(4), 445.

Kim, Y. H., Kim, D. J., & Hwang, Y. (2009). Exploring online transaction self-efficacy in trust building in B2C e-commerce. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 21(1), 37–59.CrossRef

Klein, R. (2007). An empirical examination of patient-physician portal acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 751–760.CrossRef

Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E., Jr. (2006). Practice makes a difference: Experience and e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 24(1), 25.

Langford, M., & Reeves, E. (1998). The relationships between computer self-efficacy and personal characteristics of the beginning information systems students. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 38(4), 41.

Langlois, M. A., Petosa, R., & Hallam, J. S. (1999). Why do effective smoking prevention programs work? student changes in social cognitive theory constructs. Journal of School Health., 69(8), 326–331.CrossRef

Lee, Y.-C. (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5), 517–541.CrossRef

Lee, Y.-K. (2007). Understanding e-learning consumers: The moderating effects of gender and learner diversity. Journal of American Academy of Business, 11(1), 223.

Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 657.

Liang, T. P, & Chen, D. N. (2003). Evolution of information systems research. In Proceedings of Pacific Asian conference on information systems (pp. 257–269), Adelaide, Australia.

Liu, Z., Min, Q., & Ji, S. (2008). A comprehensive review of research in IT adoption. In 4th international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing (WiCOM’08) (pp. 1–5), Dalian, China.

Looney, C. A., Valacich, J. S., & Morris, M. J. (2006). Paradoxes of online investing: Testing the influence of technology on user expectancies. Decision Sciences, 37(2), 205.CrossRef

Lu, H.-P., & Hsiao, K. L. (2007). Understanding intention to continuously share information on weblogs. Internet Research, 17(4), 345–361.CrossRef

Lucas, H. C. (1975). Behavioral factors in system implementation. In R. L. Schultz & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), Implementing operations research/management science. New York: American Elsevier.

Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2005). The role of internet self-efficacy in the acceptance of web-based electronic media records. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 17(1), 38.CrossRef

Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward a clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126–163.CrossRef

Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.CrossRef

Noguera, J. H., & Watson, Edward F. (2004). Effectiveness of using an enterprise system to teach process-centered concepts in business education. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17(1), 56.CrossRef

Oyedele, A., & Simpson, P. M. (2007). An empirical investigation of consumer control factors on intention to use selected self-service technologies. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(3), 287–306.CrossRef

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.

Park, Y., & Chen, J. V. (2007). Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(9), 1349–1365.CrossRef

Parraga, I. M. (1990). Determinants of food consumption. Journal of American Dietetic Association, 90, 661–663.

Pearson, J. M., & Pearson, A. M. (2008). An exploratory study into determining the relative importance of key criteria approach. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 115, 155.

Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness of basic IT training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401.CrossRef

Ranganathan, C., & Jha, S. (2007). Examining online purchase intentions in B2C E-commerce: Testing an integrated model. Information Resource Management Journal, 20(4), 48–64.CrossRef

Ratten, V., & Ratten, H. (2007). Social cognitive theory in technological innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 90–108.CrossRef

Reid, M. (2008). Integrating trust and computer self-efficacy with TAM: An empirical assessment of customers’ acceptance of banking information systems (BIS) in Jamaica. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In J. Cacioppo & R. Petty (Eds.), Social Psychophysiology (pp. 153–76). New York: Guilford Press.CrossRef

Schunk, D. H. (2000). Coming to terms with motivation constructs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 116–119.CrossRef

Shen, J., & Eder, Lauren B. (2009a). Exploring intentions to use virtual worlds For business. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 10(2), 94.

Shen, J., & Eder, Lauren B. (2009b). Intentions to use virtual worlds for education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 225.

Sheng, Yi Hua Philip, Michael Pearson, J., & Crosby, L. (2003). Organizational culture and employees’ computer self-efficacy: An empirical study. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(3), 42.CrossRef

Shivers-Blackwell, S. L., & Charles, A. C. (2006). Ready, set, go: Examining student readiness to use ERP technology. Journal of Management Development, 25(8), 795–805.CrossRef

Srite, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Galy, E. (2008). Does within-culture variation matter? An empirical study of computer usage. Journal of Global Information Management, 16(1), 1–25.CrossRef

Stone, R. W., & Henry, J. W. (2003). The roles of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in influencing the computer end-user’s organizational commitment. Journal of End User Computing, 15(1), 38.CrossRef

Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewé, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26, 381–396.CrossRef

Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In H. E. Howe (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values (pp. 195–259). Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.CrossRef

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143.CrossRef

Thompson, R., Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. (2006). Intentions to use information technologies: an integrative model Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 18(3), 25–46.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425.

Wang, H.-Y., & Wang, Yi-Shun. (2008). Gender differences in the perception and acceptance of online games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 787–806.CrossRef

Wang, Yi-Shun, Wang, Yu-Min, Lin, H.-H., & Tang, Tzung-I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501.CrossRef

Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 201–226.CrossRef

Williams, K. E., & Bond, M. J. (2002). The roles of self-efficacy, outcome expectancies and social support in the self-care behaviors of diabetes. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 7, 127–141.CrossRef

Williams, M. D., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., & Schwarz, A. (2009). Contemporary trends and issues in IT adoption and diffusion research. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 1–10.CrossRef

Wise, J. B. (2002). Social cognitive theory: A framework for therapeutic recreation practice. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 36(4), 335–351.

Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384.

Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146.CrossRef

Yi, M. Y., & Im, K. S. (2004). Predicting computer task performance: Personal goal and self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(2), 20.CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Titel: Understanding IS Theory: An Interpretation of Key IS Theoretical Frameworks Using Social Cognitive Theory
verfasst von: Kevin Carillo
Verlag: Springer New York
Buch: Information Systems Theory
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9706-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4419-9707-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9707-4_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner