Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Grid Authentication: A Memorability and User Sentiment Study Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Understanding Perceptions: User Responses to Browser Warning Messages

verfasst von : Heather Molyneaux, Irina Kondratova, Elizabeth Stobert

Erschienen in: HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With changes in interfaces resulting from the proliferation of IOT devices and new technologies such as self-driving vehicles, user reactions to browser messages may also change. This paper reviews the literature on user reactions to browser warnings, with emphasis on screen size and form factors. The literature indicates that browser warning message design, habituation, awareness of risk and screen size are aspects that effect user perception of risk. This article surveys the findings while noting challenges and proposed solutions to support effective provision of and user compliance with browser security warnings as well as important user study design considerations for future work – in particular, future work on the effect of screen size on user perception of browser warnings.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Social Preferences in Decision Making Under Cybersecurity Risks and Uncertainties
Nächstes Kapitel Understanding Parents’ Concerns with Smart Device Usage in the Home
Literatur
1.
Mell, P., Kent, K., Nusbaum, J.: Guide to malware incident prevention and handling. US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology 800-83. Gaithersburg, Maryland (2005)
2.
Souppaya, M., Scarfone, K.: Guide to malware incident prevention and handling for desktops and laptops. NIST Special Publication 800-83 (2013)
3.
4.
Borger, W., Iacono, L.L.: User perception and response to computer security warnings. In: Weisbecker, A., Burmester, M., Schmidt, A. (eds) Mensch und computer 2015 Workshopband Stuttgart: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, pp. 621–646 (2015)
5.
Jorgensen, Z., Chen, J., Gates, C.S., Li, N., Proctor, R.W., Yu, T.: Dimensions of risk in mobile applications: a user study. In: CODASPY 2015, San Antonio, Texas, pp. 49–60, 2–4 March 2015
6.
Virilis, N., Mylonas, A., Nikolaos, T.: Security busters: web browser security vs. rogue sites. Comput. Secur. 52, 90–105 (2015)
7.
Fagan, M., Khan, M., Buck, R.: A Study of user’s experiences and beliefs about software update messages. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 504–519 (2015)CrossRef
8.
Balebako, R., Schaub, F., Adjerid, I., Acquisti, A., Cranor, L.F.: The impact of timing on the Salience of smartphone app privacy notices. In: SPSM 2015, Denver, Colorado, pp. 63–74, 12 October 2015
9.
Carpenter, S., Zhu, F., Kolimi, S.: Reducing online identity disclosure using warnings. Appl. Ergon. 45(5), 1337–1342 (2014)CrossRef
10.
Herzberg, A, Jbara, A: Security and identification indicators for browsers against spoofing and phishing attacks. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 8(4), 16 (2008)CrossRef
11.
Dong, X., Clark, J., Jacob, J.: Defending the weakest link: phishing websites section by analysing user behaviours. Telecommun. Syst. 45(2–3), 215–226 (2010)CrossRef
12.
Junger, M., Montoya, L., Overink, F.-J.: Priming and warnings are not effective to prevent social engineering attacks. Comput. Hum. Behav. 66, 75–87 (2017)CrossRef
13.
Silic, M., Back, A.: The dark side of social networking sites: understanding phishing risks. Comput. Hum. Behav. 60, 35–43 (2016)CrossRef
14.
Böhme, R., Köpsell, S.: Trained to accept? a field experiment on consent dialogs. In: CHI 2010, Atlanta Georgia, pp. 2403–2406, 10–15 April 2010
15.
Reeder, R., Felt, A., Consolvo, S., Malkin, N., Thompson, C., Egelman, S.: An experience sampling study of user reactions to browser warnings in the field. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2018)
16.
Alsharnouby, M., Alaca, F, Chiasson, S.: Why phishing still works: user strategies for combating phishing attacks. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 82(10), 69–82 (2015)CrossRef
17.
Iuga, C., Nurse, J., Erola, A.: Baiting the hook: factors impacting susceptibility to phishing attacks. Hum.-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 6(1), 8 (2016)
18.
Purkait, S., Kumar De., S, Suar, D.: An Empirical investigation of the factors that influence internet user’s ability to correctly identify a phishing website. Inf. Manage. Comput. Secur. 22(3), 194–234 (2014)CrossRef
19.
Mamonov, S., Renbunan-Fich, R.: The impact of information security threat awareness on privacy-protective behaviors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 83, 32–44 (2018)CrossRef
20.
Marforio, C., Masti, R.J., Soriente, C., Kostianinen, K., Capkun, S.: Evaluation of personalized security indicators as an anti-phishing mechanism for smartphone applications. In: CHI 2016 #chiforgood, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 540–551 (2016)
21.
Schechter, S., Dhamija, R., Ozment, A., Fischer, I.: The emperor’s new security indicators: an evaluation of website authentication and the effect of role playing on usability studies. In: IEEE Symposium on Security (2007)
22.
Kelley, T., Bertenthal, B.I.: Attention and past behavior, not security knowledge, modulate users’ decisions to login to insecure websites. Inf. Comput. Secur. 24(2), 164–176 (2016)CrossRef
23.
Fagan, M., Khan, M.M.H., Nguyen, N.: How does this message make you feel? a study of user perspectives on software update/warning message design. Hum.-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 5(1), 36 (2015)CrossRef
24.
Modic, D., Anderson, R.: Reading this may harm your computer: the psychology of malware warnings. Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 71–79 (2014)CrossRef
25.
Anderson, B.B., Jenkins, J.L., Vance, A., Kirwan, C.B., Eargle, D.: Your memory is working against you: how eye tracking and memory explain habituation to security warnings. Decis. Support Syst. 92, 3–13 (2016)CrossRef
26.
Bitton, R., Finkelshtein, A., Sidi, L., Puzis, R., Rokach, L.: Taxonomy of mobile users’ security awareness. Comput. Secur. 73, 266–293 (2018)CrossRef
27.
Goel, D., Jain, A.K.: Mobile phishing attacks and defense mechanisms: state of art and open research challenges. Comput. Secur. 73, 519–544 (2018)CrossRef
28.
Shah, R., Patil, K.: Evaluating effectiveness of mobile browser security warnings. ICTACT J. Commun. Technol. 7(3), 1373–1378 (2016)
29.
Virvilis, N., Tsalis, N., Mylonas, A., Gritzalis, D.: Mobile devices: a phisher’s paradise. In: 2014 11th International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT), pp. 1–9. IEEE, August 2014
30.
Raptis, D., Tselios, N., Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.: Does size matter? investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ oerceieved usability, effectiveness and efficiency. In: Mobile HCI, pp. 127–136. ACM (2013)
31.
Chin, E., Felt, A.P, Sekar, V., Wagner, D.: Measuring user confidence in smartphone security and privacy. In: Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), Washington DC, pp. 1–16, 11–13 July 2012
32.
Redmiles, E.M., Zhu, Z., Kross, S., Kuchhal, D., Dumitras, T., Mazurek, M.L.: Asking for a friend: evaluating response biases in security user studies. In: CCS2018. Toronto ON, 15–19 October 2018
Metadaten
Titel
Understanding Perceptions: User Responses to Browser Warning Messages
verfasst von
Heather Molyneaux
Irina Kondratova
Elizabeth Stobert
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22350-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-22351-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22351-9_11