nach oben

International Journal of Social Robotics

Erschienen in:

01.08.2016 | Continuing Education

Using Theatre to Study Interaction with Care Robots

verfasst von: Elizabeth Jochum, Evgenios Vlachos, Anja Christoffersen, Sally Grindsted Nielsen, Ibrahim A. Hameed, Zheng-Hua Tan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper describes an innovative approach for studying interaction between humans and care robots. Using live theatrical performance, we developed a play that depicts a plausible, future care scenario between a human and a socially assistive robot. We used an expanded version of the Godspeed Questionnaire to measure the audiences’ reactions to the robot, the observed interactions between the human and the robot, and their overall reactions to the performance. We present our results and propose a methodology and guidelines for using applied theatre as a platform to study human robot interaction (HRI). Unlike other HRI studies, the subject of our research is not the user who interacts with the robot but rather the audiences observing the HRI. We consider the technical and artistic challenges of designing and staging a believable care scenario that could potentially influence the perception and acceptance of care robots. This study marks a first step towards designing a robust framework for combining applied theatre with HRI research.

Vorheriger Artikel Matching Robot KASPAR to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Therapy and Educational Goals

Nächster Artikel Transitional Wearable Companions: A Novel Concept of Soft Interactive Social Robots to Improve Social Skills in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Katevas K, Healey PG, Harris MT (2015) Robot Comedy Lab: experimenting with the social dynamics of live performance. Front Psychol 6:1253CrossRef

Knight H (2011) Eight lessons learned about non-verbal interactions through robot theater. In: Social robotics, pp 42–51

Hayashi K, Kanda T, Miyashita T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2008) ROBOT MANZAI: robot conversation as a passive-social medium. Int J Humanoid Rob 5(01):67–86CrossRef

Zeglin G, Walsman A, Herlant L, Zheng Z, Guo Y, Koval MC, Srinivasa SS (2014) HERB’s Sure Thing: A rapid drama system for rehearsing and performing live robot theater. In: 2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp 129–136

Hoffman G, Kubat R, Breazeal C (2008) A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor. In: The 17th IEEE International symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2008), pp 354–359

Lin CY, Tseng CK, Teng WC, Lee WC, Kuo CH, Gu HY, Fahn CS (2009) The realization of robot theater: Humanoid robots and theatric performance. In: international conference on advanced robotics (ICAR 2009), pp 1–6

Duncan BA, Murphy RR, Shell D, Hopper AG (2010) A midsummer night’s dream: social proof in HRI. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp 91–92

Dyer E, O’Harra B, Timbers A (2007) In media res: why multimedia performance? PAJ J perform Art 29(3):15–29CrossRef

Jochum E, Millar P, Nunez D (in press) Sequence and chance: design and control methods for entertainment robots. J Robot Auton Syst

10.

Jochum E, Schultz J, Johnson E, Murphey TD (2014) Robotic puppets and the eningeering of autonomous theater. In: Laviers A, Egerstedt M (eds) Controls and art: inquiries at the intersection of the subjective and the objective. Springer, New York, pp 107–128CrossRef

11.

Vallor S (2011) Carebots and caregivers: sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the 21st century. J Philos Technol 24:251–268CrossRef

12.

Sharkey N, Sharkey A (2010) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40CrossRef

13.

Simmons R, Makatchev M, Kirby R, Lee MK, Fanaswala I, Browning B, Forlizzi J, Sakr M (2011) Believable robot characters. AI MAG 32(4):39–52

14.

Scassellati B, Admoni H, Mataric M (2012) Robots for use in autism research. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14:275–294CrossRef

15.

Short E, Swift-Spong K, Greczek J, Ramachandran A, Litoiu A, Grigore EC, Levonisova S (2014) How to train your dragonbot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play. In: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2014), pp 924–929

16.

Taylor P (2003) The applied theatre. Heinemann Drama, London

17.

Etherton M, Prentki T (2006) Drama for change? Prove it! Impact assessment in applied theatre. J Appl Theatre Perform 11(2):139–155

18.

Gouaillier D, Hugel V, Blazevic P, Kilner C, Monceaux J, Lafourcade P, Marnier B, Serre J, Maisonnier B (2008) The NAO humanoid: a combination of performance and affordability. CoRR, arXiv:0807.3223

19.

Bartneck C, Croft E, Kulic D (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Social Robot 1(1):71–81CrossRef

20.

Rabbitt S, Kazdi A, Scassellati B (2014) Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clin Psychol Rev 35:35–46CrossRef

21.

Jeong S, Santos KD, Graca S, O’Connell B, Anderson L, Stenquist N, Breazeal C (2015) Designing a socially assistive robot for pediatric care. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children, pp 387–390

22.

Johnson D, Cuijpers R, Juola J, Torta E, Simonov M, Frisiello A, Beck C (2014) Socially assistive robots: a comprehensive approach to extending independent living. Int J Social Robot 6(2):195–211CrossRef

23.

Bemelmans R, Gelderblom G, Jonker P, De Witte L (2012) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13(2):114–120CrossRef

24.

Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Sys 432:143–166CrossRefMATH

25.

Feil-Seifer D, Matarić M (2005) Defining socially assistive robotics. In: Proceedings of the international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Chicago, IL

26.

Young J, Hawkins R, Sharlin E, Igarashi T (2009) Toward acceptable domestic robots: applying insights from social psychology. Int J Social Robot 1(1):95–108CrossRef

27.

Fernandez JMA, Bonarini A (2013) Towards an autonomous theatrical robot. In: 2013 humaine association conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII), pp 689–694

28.

Lin C, Cheng L, Huang C, Chuang L, Teng W, Kuo C, Gu H, Chung K, Fahn C (2012) Versatile humanoid robots for theatrical performances. Int J Ad Robot Syst 10(1)

29.

Dixon S (2004) Metal performance: humanizing robots, returning to nature, and camping about. Drama Rev 48(4):15–46CrossRef

30.

Baltus G, Fox D, Gemperle F, Goetz J, Hirsch T, Magaritis D, Montemerlo M, Pineau J, Roy N, Schulte J, Thrun S (2000) Towards personal service robots for the elderly. In: Proceedings of the workshop on interactive robots and entertainment (WIRE 2000), 25, p 184

31.

Hoffman G (2011) On stage: robots as performers. In: RSS 2011 Workshop on human-robot interaction: perspectives and contributions to robotics from the human sciences (1)

32.

Prendergast M, Saxton J (2009) Applied theatre: international case studies and challenges for practice. Intellect Ltd., Bristol

33.

Vlachos E, Jochum E, Schärfe H (2016) Head orientation behavior of users and durations in playful open-ended interactions with an android robot. In: Cultural robotics: robots as participants and creators of culture (LNAI)

34.

Vlachos E, Schärfe H (2014) Social robots as persuasive agents. In: Meiselwitz G (ed) Social computing and social media, pp 277–284

35.

Fogg BJ (2003) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

36.

Broadbent E, Peri K, Kerse N, Jayawardena C, Kuo I, Datta C, Macdonald B (2014) Robots in older people’s homes to improve medication adherence and quality of life: a randomized cross-over trial. In: International conference on social robotics (ICSR 2014), LNAI 8755, pp 64–73

37.

Boal A (1993) Theatre of the oppressed. Theatre Communications Group, New York

38.

Aron A, Melinat E, Aron E, Vallone R, Bator R (1997) The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: a procedure and some preliminary findings. Pers Soc Psychol B 23(4):363–377CrossRef

39.

Walters M, Marcos S, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K (2013) An interactive game with a robot: People’s perceptions of robot faces and a gesture based user interface. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conf. adv. computer-human interactions, pp 123–128

40.

Vlachos E, Scharfe H (2015) An open-ended approach to evaluating Android faces. In: The 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2015), pp 746–751

41.

Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

42.

Ho C, MacDorman K (2010) Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: developing and validating an alternative to the godspeed indices. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1508–1518CrossRef

43.

Tahir Y, Rasheed U, Dauwels S, Dauwels J (2014) Perception of humanoid social mediator in two-person dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp 300–301

Titel: Using Theatre to Study Interaction with Care Robots
verfasst von: Elizabeth Jochum
Evgenios Vlachos
Anja Christoffersen
Sally Grindsted Nielsen
Ibrahim A. Hameed
Zheng-Hua Tan
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2016
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0370-y

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Understanding Therapists’ Needs and Attitudes Towards Robotic Support. The Roboterapia Project

Social and Assistive Robotics in Dementia Care: Ethical Recommendations for Research and Practice

New Friends: Social Robots in Therapy and Education

Enhancing Emotional Facial Expressiveness on NAO

Matching Robot KASPAR to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Therapy and Educational Goals

Integrating Robot Support Functions into Varied Activities at Returning Hospital Visits

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten