Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introducing Executive-Management Decisions Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. Verifying Efficacy: HiTEM Inc.

verfasst von : Victor Tang, Kevin Otto, Warren Seering

Erschienen in: Executive Decision Synthesis

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter is an introduction to Part III, the third step in our presentation of our paradigm and prescriptive methodology. This first chapter of Part III is our first real business-enterprise case study executed in the field. Whereas in Part II, we used the ADI system dynamics model as a surrogate to verify functionality, we now go to field in the real word to verify efficacy. Functionality and efficacy demonstrate that our methodology works.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Verifying Functionality: Maximizing Annual Operating Income (AOI)
Nächstes Kapitel Verifying Efficacy: Yokozuna Project
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
Literatur
AIAG. (2002). Measurement systems analysis (MSA). Reference Manual (3rd ed.). Troy: The Automotive Industries Action Group.
Arkes, H. R. (2001). Overconfidence in judgmental forecasting. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Ashton, A. H. (1985). Does consensus imply accuracy in accounting studies of decision making? The Accounting Review, 60(2), 173–185.
Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). Cambridge: UK.
Benzin, N. K. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Boje, D. M., & Mirninghan, K. (1982). Group confidence pressures in iterative decisions. Management Science, 28(10), 1187–1196.CrossRef
Camerer, C. F. (1981). The validity and utility of expert judgment. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business.
Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34(7), 571–582.CrossRef
Einhorn, H. J. (1974). Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 562–571.CrossRef
Fischhoff, B. (1999). Debiasing (Chapter 31). In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristic and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, R. B. (1998). Consensus by identifying extremists. Theory and Decision, 44, 293–301.CrossRef
Hastie, R. (1986). Experimental evidence on group accuracy. Review essay in information pooling and group decision making. In Proceedings of the Second University of California, Irvine, Conference on Political Economy. JAI Press.
Hastie, R., & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychology Review, 112(2), 494–508.CrossRef
Hoaglin, D. C., & Welsch, R. E. (1978). The hat matrix in regression and ANOVA. The American Statistician, 32(1), 17–22.
Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research methods in social relations. South Bank, VIC: Thomson Learning.
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of conclusions. Assessment and Evalutation, 12(10), 1–8.
IAG. (2002). Measurement systems analysis (MSA). Reference Manual (3rd edn.). Troy: The Automotive Industries Action Group.
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fishoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.
Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 69–81.CrossRef
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Bridging individual, interpersonal, and institutional approaches to judgment and decision making: The impact of accountability on cognitive bias. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
March, J. G. (1997). Understanding how decisions happen in organizations. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mest, D. P., & Plummer, D. (2003). Analysts’ rationality and forecast bias: Evidence from sales forecasts. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 21, 103–122.CrossRef
Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 89–106.CrossRef
Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36(4), 876–910.CrossRef
Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Otto, K. N., & Wood, C. (2001). Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Phadke, M. S. (1989). Quality engineering using robust design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique. In J. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting (pp. 125–144). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Rowe, G., Wright, G., & McColl, A. (2005). Judgment change during Delphi-like procedures: The role of majority influence, expertise, and confidence. Technological forecasting and social change, 72(4), 377–399.CrossRef
Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1992, Winter). Managing overconfidence. In Sloan Management Review.
Simon, H. A. (1991, February). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125–134.CrossRef
Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sniezek, J. A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 124–155.CrossRef
Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1), 1–28.CrossRef
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Taguchi, G., Chowdury, S., & Taguchi, S. (2000). Robust engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 3(3), 253–258.CrossRef
Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 371–377.CrossRef
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
Yousuf, M. I. (2007). Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 1–8.
Metadaten
Titel
Verifying Efficacy: HiTEM Inc.
verfasst von
Victor Tang
Kevin Otto
Warren Seering
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Executive Decision Synthesis

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63024-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63026-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63026-7_7

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise