Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Replenishing Australia’s Water Future: From Stagnation to Innovation Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Water Entitlements as Property: A Work in Progress or Watertight Now?

verfasst von : Janice Gray, Louise Lee

Erschienen in: Reforming Water Law and Governance

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter considers a seemingly simple question: are water entitlements property? Yet this question is deceptive in its simplicity. The chapter’s focus is water entitlements and licences in the context of water trading in Australia, but it also references other international jurisdictions and suggests that the concerns raised in the Australian context may have relevance for other jurisdictions where water trading is either being relied on, or being considered as a governance tool. In exploring the property question, the chapter briefly outlines three different theories of property and highlights some existing tensions between different analyses of property in order to demonstrate that property is a complex and nuanced concept which may take different forms depending on which justificatory and analytical approaches are employed. The chapter argues that despite property’s popularity in neo-liberal politics and its convenience as a regulatory tool, the impacts of propertisation should be considered very carefully before the proprietary route is embraced. Accordingly, the chapter also discusses statutory property generally and specifically the characterisation of water entitlements/licences under legislation, before considering whether water entitlements need to be characterised as property to support trading. It then explores the possible effects of keeping water entitlements/licences outside the proprietary frame, arguing that such an approach may open up opportunities for a wider range of governance tools.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Environmental Water Transactions and Innovation in Australia
Nächstes Kapitel Regulatory and Economic Instruments: A Useful Partnership to Achieve Collective Objectives?
Literatur
ACIL Tasman and Freehills. (2004). An effective system of defining water property titles. Report to the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and Land & Water Australia.
Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. (1995). Water allocations and entitlements: A national framework for the implementation of property rights in water. Taskforce on COAG Water Reform, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
Alexander, G. S. (2009). The social-obligation norm in American property law. Cornell Law Review, 94(4), 745–819.
Alexander, G., & Penalver, E. (2012). An Introduction to Property Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Australian Government National Water Commission. (2014). 10 years of water wins: Australia’s National water initiative. Commonwealth of Australia.
Babie P., Burdon, P., & Da Rimini, F. (2017). The psychology of property. Paper presented at the 14th Australasian Property Law Teachers Conference, Curtin University, Perth, 26–28 September 2017.
Baron, J. (2014). Rescuing the bundle of rights metaphor in property. University of Cincinatti Law Review, 82(1), 57–102.
Bennett Moses, L. (2008). The applicability of property law in new contexts: From cells to cyberspace. Sydney Law Review, 30(4), 639–662.
Bogojevic, S. (2013). Emissions trading schemes: Markets, states and law. London: Hart Publishing.
Boyle, J. (2002). Fencing off ideas: Enclosure and the disappearance of the public domain. Dædalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 131(2), 639–662.
Carr, H., & Wong, S. (2016). Feminist approaches to property law research. In S. Bright, & S. Blandy (Eds.), Researching Property Law (pp. 164–179). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clarke, A., & Malcolm, R. (2017). The role of property in water regulation: Locating communal and regulatory property rights on the property rights spectrum. In C. Godt (Eds.), Regulatory Property Rights: the transforming notion of property in transnational business regulation (pp. 121–140), Leiden, Boston: Brill/Nijhoff.
Commonwealth of Australia. (1995). Second Report of the Working Group on Water Resource Policy to the Council of Australian Governments, Canberra.
Cooke, E. (2012). Land law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
Dickenson, D. (2007). Property in the body. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dickenson, D. (1997). Property, women and politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Edgeworth, B., Rossiter, C., Stone, M., & Connor, P. (2012). Sackville and Neave, Australian property law (9th ed.). Sydney: Lexis Nexis.
Fagot-Largeault, A. (1998). Ownership of the human body: Judicial and legislative responses in France. In H. Ten Have, J. Welie, & S. Spicker (Eds.), Ownership of the human body: Philosophical considerations on the use of the human body and its parts in healthcare (pp. 115–140). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fisher, D. E. (2004). Rights of property in water: Confusion or clarity. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 21(3), 200–226.
Freyfogle, E. T. (2007). Private property: Correcting the half truths. Planning and Environmental Law, 59(10), 3–11.
Fuller, L. (1958). Positivism and fidelity to law: A reply to professor Hart. Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 630–672.
Grafton, Q., Squires, D., Fox, K. J. (2000). Private property and economic efficiency: a study of a common pool resource. Journal of Economics and Law, 43(2), 679–714, cited in Gray, J., & Lee, L. (2016). National Water Initiative styled water entitlements as property: Legal and practical perspectives. Environmental Planning and Law Journal, 33(4), 284–300.
Gray, J. (2006). Legal approaches to the ownership, management and regulation of water rights from riparian rights to commodification. Tranforming Cultures eJournal, 1(2), 64–96.
Gray, J. (2008). Watered down: Legal constructs, tradable entitlements and the regulation of water. In G. Develeena, H. Goodall, & D. Stephanie (Eds.), Water, sovereignty and borders in Asia and Oceania (pp. 147–168). London: Routledge.
Gray, J., & Gardner, A. (2008). Legal access to sewage and the re-invention of wastewater. AJNRL&P, 12(2), 115–159.
Gray, J. (2011). Mine or ours? Sewage, recycled water and property. In K. Bosselman & V. Tava (Eds.), Water rights and sustainability (pp. 154–172). Auckland: New Zealand Centre for Environmental Law.
Gray, J., Foster, N., Dorsett, S., & Roberts, H. (2017). Property law in New South Wales (4th ed.). Sydney: Lexis Nexis.
Gray, J. (2012). The legal framework for water trading in the Murray Darling Basin: An overwhelming success? Environmental, Planning and Law Journal, 29(4), 328–348.
Gray, K. (1991). Property in thin air. Cambridge Law Journal, 50(2), 252–307.
Gray, K. (2010). Regulatory property and the jurisprudence of quasi-public trust. Sydney Law Review, 32(2), 237–267.
Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 593–629.
Hennessy, M. (2004). Colorado river water rights: Property rights in transition. University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 1661.
Hepburn, S. (2010). Statutory verification of water rights: The ‘insuperable’ difficulties of propertising water entitlements. Australian Property Law Journal, 19(1), 1–22.
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal, 23(16), 28–59.
Honore, A. M. (1999). Ownership. In L. J. Coleman (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of law (pp. 557–597). London: Routledge.
Hughes, N. (2015). Capacity sharing and the future of water property rights. Paper presented at ABARES, Crawford School, ANU seminar, Sydney 17 September 2015.
Hume, D. (1739). A treatise on human nature. In L. A. Selby-Bigge, & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
John Quiggin Opinion and Consulting. (2014). Electricity privatisation in Australia: A record of failure. Report commissioned by the Victorian Branch of the Electrical Trades Union.
Kant, I. (1964). Lectures on Ethics, cited in Cohen, G. A. (1995). Self-ownership, freedom and equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lange, B., & Shepheard, M. (2014). Changing conceptions of the right to water: An eco-socio-legal perspective. Journal of Environmental Law., 26(2), 215.
Laslett, P. (Ed.). (1964). Locke: Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, T., & Jouravlev, A. (1998). Price, property and markets in water allocation. Report prepared for the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Carribbean. Santiago, Chile.
Lueck, D. (2003). First possession as the basis of property. In T. L. Anderson & F. S. McChesney (Eds.), Property rights: Cooperation, conflict and law (pp. 200–226). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Martin, P., & Verbeck, M. (2002). Property rights and property responsibilities. In Property rights and responsibilities: Current Australian thinking. Land and Water Australia.
Marshall, V. (2017). Overturning aqua nullius: Securing Aboriginal water rights. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
McKenzie, M. (2009). Water rights in NSW: Properly property? Sydney Law Review, 31(3), 443–463.
Merrill, T. W. (1998). Property and the right to exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77(4), 730–755.
Morey, K., Grinlinton, M., & Hughes, N. (2015). Australian water market report 2013–14. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, prepared for the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra.
Penner, J. E. (1997). The idea of property in law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Plato, C. 370 BC. Republic. (1993). Trans. R. Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Posner, R. A. (1992). Economic analysis of law (4th ed.). Boston: Little Brown and Co.
Poudhon, P.-J. What is Property? Or, an inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government. (1840). Trans B. R. Tucker. Humboldt Publishing, c 1890.
Rose, C. M. (1992). Women and property: Gaining and losing ground. Virginia Law Review, 78(2), 421–459.
Rose, C. M. (1994). Property and persuasion: Essays on the history, theory, and rhetoric of ownership. Westview Press.
Sax, J. (1999). Playing darts with a Rembrandt: Public and private rights in cultural treasures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Singer, J. W. (2000a). Entitlements: The paradoxes of property. Yale: Yale University Press.
Singer, J. W. (2000b). The edges of the field: Lessons on the obligations of ownership. Massachusetts: Beacon Press.
Singer, J. W. (2014). Property as the law of democracy. Duke Law Journal, 63(6), 1287–1335.
Smith, H. E. (2012). Property as the law of things. Harvard Law Review, 125(7), 1691–1703.
Storey, M. (2006). Not of this Earth: The extraterrestrial nature of statutory property in the 21st century. Australian Resources and Energy Law Journal, 25(1), 51–64.
Waldron, J. (1998). The right to private property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Waldron, J. (1985). What is private property? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 5(3), 313–349.
Walpole, M., & Gray, J. (2010). Taxing virtually everything: cyberspace profits, property law and taxation liability. Australian Taxation Review, 39(1), 39–60.
Wilson, D. (2008). Women, marriage and property in wealthy landed families in Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Armstrong v Winnington Networks Ltd (2013) Ch 156.
Attorney General (NT) v Chaffey (2007) 231 CLR 651.
Australia Rice Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (2001) 48 ATR 498.
Australian Tape Manufacturers Association Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 176 CLR 480.
Commonwealth v WMC Resources Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 1.
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge 36 U.S. 420 (1837).
Davies v Littlejohn (1923) 34 CLR 174.
Friendswood Development Co v. Smith- Southwest Industries Inc 576 OS/ W/ 2d 21. 22 (Tex 1978).
ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (2009) 240 CLR 140.
Milirrpum v Nabalco (1971) 17 FLR 141.
Minister for Primary Industry and Energy v Davey (1993) 47 FCR 15.
Moore v Regents of University of California, 51 Cal, 3rd 120, 793, P. 2d, 271 Cal. Rptr. 146 (1990).
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (1965) 1 AC 1175.
Pacific Film Laboratories v Commissioner of Taxation (1970) 121 CLR 154.
R v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327.
Telstra Corporation Limited v The Commonwealth of Australia (2008) 234 CLR 210.
Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479.
Wik Peoples v State of Queensland (1996) 187 CLR 1.
Metadaten
Titel
Water Entitlements as Property: A Work in Progress or Watertight Now?
verfasst von
Janice Gray
Louise Lee
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Reforming Water Law and Governance

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8976-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-8977-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8977-0_5