Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This study explores how ELL students’ parents participated in a blog-mediated English language arts curriculum in a second grade classroom at a U.S. urban school, and how they supported their children’s learning of school-based writing. Adopting ecological perspectives on technological affordances, this study views digital literacy as discursive practices that are shaped by one’s social, cultural, and political access, as well as material access. The findings indicate that parents used blogging to support their children’s academic and social goals, bringing expanded audiences and meaningful purposes to school writing. However, their linguistic and cultural capital related to Web 2.0 technologies generated different levels of participation and affordances. The study contends that parental involvement through Web 2.0 technologies needs to be critically examined, in consideration of discursive factors operating in the contexts in which those technologies are used.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Attewell, P. (2001). Comment: The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education,74(3), 252–259. CrossRef
Attewell, P. (2003). Beyond the digital divide. In P. Attewell & N. Seel (Eds.), Disadvantaged teens and computer technologies (pp. 15–34). Munster: Waxmann.
Auerbach, S. (2002). “Why do they give the good classes to some and not to others?” Latino parent narratives of struggle in a college access program. Teachers College Record,104(7), 1369–1392. CrossRef
Becker, H. J. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: Children’s access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology,10(2), 44–75. CrossRef
Bourdieu, P. (Ed.). (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology,22, 723–742. CrossRef
Carreon, G. P., Drake, C., & Barton, A. C. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal,42, 465–498. CrossRef
Clark, K. (2005). Serving underserved communities with instructional technologies giving them what they need, not what you want. Urban Education,40(4), 430–445. CrossRef
Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. Westport, CN: Bergin & Garvey.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dodge, A., Husain, N., & Duke, N. (2011). Connected kids? K–2 children’s use and understanding of the Internet. Language Arts,89(2), 86–98.
Dorner, L., Orellana, M., & Li-Grining, C. (2007). “I helped my mom”, and it helped me: Translating the skills of language brokers into improved standardized test scores. American Journal of Education,113(3), 451–478. CrossRef
Dyson, A. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write. New York: Teachers College Press.
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research (NCELTR).
Fleming, N. (2012). Schools are using social networking to involve parents. Education Week,32(11), 16–17.
Gallant, L., Irizarry, C., Boone, G., & Ruiz-Gordon, B. (2010). Spanish content on hospital websites: An analysis of U.S. hospitals’ in concentrated Latino communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,15, 552–574. CrossRef
Garcia, A., Seglem, R., & Share, J. (2013). Transforming teaching and learning through critical media literacy pedagogy. LEARNing Landscapes,6(2), 109–123.
García-Sánchez, I., Orella, M., & Hopkins, M. (2011). Facilitating intercultural communication in parent–teacher conferences: Lessons from child translators. Multicultural Perspectives,13(3), 148–154. CrossRef
Gebhard, M., Shin, D., & Seger, W. (2011). Blogging, systemic functional linguistics, and L2 academic literacies in an urban elementary school. CALICO Journal,28(2), 278–307. CrossRef
Gebhard, M., & Willett, J. (2008). Supporting teacher learning and the academic literacy development of ELLs in changing times. The Journal of Staff Development,29(1), 41–45.
Gebhard, M., Willett, J., Jimenez, J., & Piedra, A. (2010). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers’ professional development, and ELLs’ academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibbs, M., Dosen, A., & Guerrero, R. (2009). Bridging the digital divide changing the technological landscape of inner-city Catholic schools. Urban Education,44(1), 11–29. CrossRef
Gorski, P. (2009). Insisting on digital equity reframing the dominant discourse on multicultural education and technology. Urban Education,44(3), 348–364. CrossRef
Haymann, S. J., & Earle, A. (2000). Low-income parents: How do working conditions affect their opportunity to help school-age children risk? American Educational Research Journal,37, 833–848. CrossRef
Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement—Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences,13, 161–164. CrossRef
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parent involvement in children’s education: Why does it a make a difference? Teachers College Record,97, 310–331.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research,67(1), 3–42. CrossRef
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Whitaker, M. (2010). The parent involvement process: Implications for literacy. In K. Dunsmore & D. Fisher (Eds.), Bringing literacy home (pp. 53–82). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Jackson, L., Samona, R., Moomaw, J., Ramsay, L., Murray, C., Smith, A., & Murray, L. (2007). What children do on the Internet: Domains visited and their relationship to sociodemographic characteristics and academic performance. CyberPsychology & Behavior,10(2), 182–190. CrossRef
Jasis, P., & Ordoñes-Jasis, R. (2012). Latino parent involvement: Examining commitment and empower in schools. Urban Education,47(1), 65–89. CrossRef
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, M., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. In D. John & T. Catherine (Eds.), An occasional paper on digital media and learning. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
Johnson, O. (2008). Ecology in educational theory: Thoughts on stratification, social mobility & proximal capital. The Urban Review,40(3), 227–246. CrossRef
Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Bell, S. M. (2006). Closing the digital divide: Update from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Research,100(1), 52–60. CrossRef
Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Cabuk, B. (2004). Digital equity: New findings from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(4), 383–396. CrossRef
Jung, J. Y. (2008). Internet connectedness and its social origins: An ecological approach to postaccess digital divides. Communication Studies,59(4), 322–339. CrossRef
Kahne, J., Lee, N., & Feezell, J. (2012). Digital media literacy education and online civic and political participation. International Journal of Communication,6, 1–24.
Kao, G. (2004). Parental influences on the educational outcomes of immigrant youth. International Migration Review,38, 427–450. CrossRef
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Introduction: digital literacies—concepts, policies and practices. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Lareau, A. (1994). Parent involvement in schooling: A dissenting view. In C. Fagnano & W. Werber (Eds.), School family and community interaction: A view from the firing lines (pp. 61–73). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Lareau, A. (2001). Linking Bourdieu’s concept of capital to the broader field: The case study of family–school relationships. In B. J. Biddle (Ed.), Social class, poverty, and education: Policy and practice (pp. 77–100). New York: Routlege/Falmer.
Lawson, M. A. (2003). School–family relations in context: Parent and teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Education,38, 77–133. CrossRef
Lee, N. (2010). Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL,22(2), 212–227. CrossRef
Lee, J., & Bowen, N. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap in elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal,43, 193–218. CrossRef
Madden, M. (2013). Data to live by: Understanding the social media and technology landscape. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Marshall, M. (2006). Parent involvement and educational outcomes for Latino students. Review of Policy Research,23(5), 1053–1075. CrossRef
McNeal, R. B, Jr. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital. Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces,78(1), 117–144. CrossRef
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: The Jossey-Bass.
Morrell, E. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. New York: Routledge.
Myers, G. (2010). The discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012). Number and Internet access of instructional computers and rooms in public schools: 1995–2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social features. Harvard Educational Review,66(1), 60–92. CrossRef
Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Ortiz, R., Green, T., & Lim, H. (2011). Families and home computer use: Exploring parent perceptions of the importance of current technology. Urban Education,46(2), 202–215. CrossRef
Pena, C. C. (2000). Parent involvement: Influencing factors and implications. Journal of Educational Research,94, 42–54. CrossRef
Peterson, S. S., & Ladky, M. (2007). A survey of teachers’ and principals’ practices and challenges in fostering new immigrant parent involvement. Canadian Journal of Education,30(3), 881–910. CrossRef
Rainie, L., & Spooner, T. (2001). Hispanics and the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Ramirez, A. Y. (2003). Dismay and disappointment: Parental involvement of Latino immigrant parents. The Urban Review,35(2), 93–110. CrossRef
Reich, J., Murnane, R., & Willett, J. (2012). The state of wiki usage in U.S. K-12 schools: Leveraging Web 2.0 data warehouses to assess quality and equality in online learning environments. Educational Researcher,41(1), 7–15. CrossRef
Rhodes, J. A., & Robnolt, V. J. (2009). Digital literacies in the classroom. In L. Christenbury, R. Boomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 153–169). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Schaller, A., & Rocha, L. (2007). Maternal attitudes and parent education: How immigrant mothers support their child’s education despite their own low levels of education. Early Childhood Education Journal,35(5), 351–356. CrossRef
Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shin, D. (2006). ESL students’ computer-mediated communication practices: Context configuration. Language Learning & Technology,10(3), 65–84.
Shin, D. (2014). Web 2.0 tools and academic literacy development in a U.S. urban school: A case study of a second grade English language learner. Language and Education,28(1), 68–85. CrossRef
Shin, D., & Cimasko, T. (2008). Multimodal design and second language composition: New tools, traditional norms. Computers and Composition,25(4), 373–458. CrossRef
Sobel, A., & Kugler, E. G. (2007). Building partnerships with immigrant parents. Educational Leadership,64(4), 62–66.
Stewart, M. (2014). Social networking, workplace, and entertainment literacies: The out-of-school literate lives of newcomer adolescent immigrants. Literacy Research and Instruction,53, 347–371. CrossRef
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Stylianides, A., & Stylianides, G. (2011). A type of parental involvement with an isomorphic effect on urban children’s mathematics, reading, science, and social studies achievement at kindergarten entry. Urban Education,46(3), 408–425. CrossRef
The Children’s Partnership. (2003). Online content for low-income and underserved Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
Turney, K., & Kao, G. (2009). Barriers to school involvement: Are immigrant parents disadvantaged? The Journal of Educational Research,102(4), 257–271. CrossRef
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordances: Social interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133–153). New York: Oxford University Press.
van Lier, L. (2002). Ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Walker, J., Wilkins, A., Dallaire, J., Sander, H., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. (2005). Parental involvement: Model revision through scale development. The Elementary School Journal,106(2), 85–104. CrossRef
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education,34(1), 179–225. CrossRef
Watkins, C. (2009). The young and the digital: What the migration to social network sites, games, and anytime, anywhere media means for our future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Watkins, C. (2011). Digital divide: Navigating the digital edge. International Journal of Learning and Media,3(2), 1–12. CrossRef
Willett, J., Harman, R., Lozano, M. E., Hogan, A., & Rubeck, J. (2007). Generative routines: Using the everyday to create dynamic learning communities for English language learners. In L. Verplaetse & N. Migliacci (Eds.), Inclusive pedagogy for English language learners: Research informed practices (pp. 33–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zickhur, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American life project.
- Web 2.0 Technologies and Parent Involvement of ELL Students: An Ecological Perspective
- Springer Netherlands
Best Practices für Web-Exzellenz im Online-Handel/© venimo | Fotolia