Skip to main content

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

55. Weighted Voting Systems

verfasst von : Hainan Zhang

Erschienen in: Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics

Verlag: Springer London

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Voting is an ancient method for a group such as a meeting or an electorate to make a collective decision or express an opinion after some discussions, deliberations, or election campaigns. Participants who give an option or choose a candidate are called voters; therefore, a simplest voting system consists certain number of qualified voters and candidates. The most common application in weighted voting systems is, for example, the US Electoral College, where the number of electoral votes for each state is based upon its population. This chapter states the modeling of threshold weighted voting systems and the dynamic analysis of two terms including indecisive effect and known/unknown inputs. The system reliability models presented in the chapter are based on the assumptions that the system operates as two types of input values (0, 1) and three types of output values (0, 1, x) with three types of errors, and the components are unequally weighted and subject to three failure-modes (stuck-at-0, stuck-at-1, stuck-at-x). For any weighted voting system, a decision rule is required although different rules may result different system performance in terms of the system reliability. For instance, the current decision rule of US Electoral College is who wins the election obtaining at least 270 electoral votes, which results four former US presidents won the elections with less national populate votes than their opponents in history.
In general, the weighted voting system (WVS) consists of n units assigned with individual weights, each of which provides a binary decision (0 or 1) or abstains (x) from voting. A generic decision rule can be defined as the system output is 1 if the cumulative weight of all 1-opting units is at least a prespecified threshold τ of the cumulative weight of all nonabstaining units. If the indecisive effect is considered, weights of abstaining units can be added in the decision rule such as the system output is 1 if the cumulative weight of all 1-opting units is at least a prespecified threshold τ of the sum of all nonabstaining units and prespecified indecisive parameter θ of all abstaining units. The system fails if the generated output is not equal to its original input. Recent research results indicate that, under specified assumptions, multiple approaches can be used to quantify the reliability of the weighted voting system. This chapter demonstrates the development of decision rules and the evolution of approaches of generating reliability function. Some related works are addressed to provide a full picture of WVS, and some future works are proposed to attract attentions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pham, H.: Reliability analysis of digital communication systems with imperfect voters. Math. Comput. Model. 26(4), 103–112 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Pham, H.: Reliability analysis of digital communication systems with imperfect voters. Math. Comput. Model. 26(4), 103–112 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gianaris, W.: Weighted voting in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Fordham International Law Journal. 14(4), 910–945 (1990) Gianaris, W.: Weighted voting in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Fordham International Law Journal. 14(4), 910–945 (1990)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Haghtalab, N., Noothigattu, R., Procaccia, A.D.: Weighted voting via no-regret learning. In: Proceeding of 32nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1055–1062 (2018) Haghtalab, N., Noothigattu, R., Procaccia, A.D.: Weighted voting via no-regret learning. In: Proceeding of 32nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1055–1062 (2018)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Livieris, I., Kanavos, A., Tampakas, V., Pintelas, P.: A weighted voting ensemble self-labeled algorithm for the detection of lung abnormalities from X-rays. Algorithms. 12(3), 64 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Livieris, I., Kanavos, A., Tampakas, V., Pintelas, P.: A weighted voting ensemble self-labeled algorithm for the detection of lung abnormalities from X-rays. Algorithms. 12(3), 64 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitin, G.: Analysis and optimization of weighted voting systems consisting of voting units with limited availability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73(1), 91–100 (2001)CrossRef Levitin, G.: Analysis and optimization of weighted voting systems consisting of voting units with limited availability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73(1), 91–100 (2001)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Pham, H., Malon, D.M.: Optimal design of systems with competing failure modes. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 43, 251–254 (1994)CrossRef Pham, H., Malon, D.M.: Optimal design of systems with competing failure modes. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 43, 251–254 (1994)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pham, H.: Reliability analysis for dynamic configurations of systems with three failure modes. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 63(1), 13–23 (1999)CrossRef Pham, H.: Reliability analysis for dynamic configurations of systems with three failure modes. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 63(1), 13–23 (1999)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lucas, W.: Measuring power in weighted voting systems. In: Political and Related Models Modules in Applied Mathematics. Springer (1983)MATH Lucas, W.: Measuring power in weighted voting systems. In: Political and Related Models Modules in Applied Mathematics. Springer (1983)MATH
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitin, G.: Asymmetric weighted voting systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 76(2), 205–212 (2002)CrossRef Levitin, G.: Asymmetric weighted voting systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 76(2), 205–212 (2002)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz, H., Paterson, M., Leech, D.: Efficient algorithm for designing weighted voting games. In: IEEE International Multitopic Conference, pp. 1–6 (2007) Aziz, H., Paterson, M., Leech, D.: Efficient algorithm for designing weighted voting games. In: IEEE International Multitopic Conference, pp. 1–6 (2007)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordmann, L., Pham, H.: Reliability of decision making in human-organizations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. Hum. 27(4), 543–549 (1997)CrossRef Nordmann, L., Pham, H.: Reliability of decision making in human-organizations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. Hum. 27(4), 543–549 (1997)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Posner, E., Sykes, A.: Voting rules in international organizations. Chic. J. Int. Law. 15(1), 195–228 (2014) Posner, E., Sykes, A.: Voting rules in international organizations. Chic. J. Int. Law. 15(1), 195–228 (2014)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordmann, L., Pham, H.: Weighted voting systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 48(1), 42–49 (1999)CrossRef Nordmann, L., Pham, H.: Weighted voting systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 48(1), 42–49 (1999)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie, M., Pham, H.: Modeling the reliability of threshold weighted voting system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87(1), 53–63 (2005)CrossRef Xie, M., Pham, H.: Modeling the reliability of threshold weighted voting system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87(1), 53–63 (2005)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, H., Pham, H.: Modeling reliability of threshold weighted indecisive voting systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 7(1), 35–41 (2020)CrossRef Zhang, H., Pham, H.: Modeling reliability of threshold weighted indecisive voting systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 7(1), 35–41 (2020)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitin, G., Lisnianski, A.: Reliability optimization for weighted voting system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(2), 131–138 (2001)CrossRef Levitin, G., Lisnianski, A.: Reliability optimization for weighted voting system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(2), 131–138 (2001)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnforff-Nielsen, O.E., Cox, D.R.: Asymptotic Techniques for Use in Statistics. Springer, Boston (1989)CrossRef Barnforff-Nielsen, O.E., Cox, D.R.: Asymptotic Techniques for Use in Statistics. Springer, Boston (1989)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitin, G.: Optimal unit grouping in weighted voting systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72(2), 179–191 (2001)CrossRef Levitin, G.: Optimal unit grouping in weighted voting systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72(2), 179–191 (2001)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Long, Q., Xie, M., Ng, S.H., Levitin, G.: Reliability analysis and optimization of weighted voting systems with continuous states input. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(1), 240–252 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Long, Q., Xie, M., Ng, S.H., Levitin, G.: Reliability analysis and optimization of weighted voting systems with continuous states input. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(1), 240–252 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Foroughi, A., Aouni, B.: New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 19(4), 495–520 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Foroughi, A., Aouni, B.: New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 19(4), 495–520 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun, L., Han, C.Z.: Dynamic weighted voting for multiple classifier fusion: a generalized rough set method. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 17(3), 487–494 (2006)CrossRefMATH Sun, L., Han, C.Z.: Dynamic weighted voting for multiple classifier fusion: a generalized rough set method. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 17(3), 487–494 (2006)CrossRefMATH
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitin, G.: Weighted voting systems: reliability versus rapidity. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 89(2), 177–184 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRef Levitin, G.: Weighted voting systems: reliability versus rapidity. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 89(2), 177–184 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Q., Zhang, H.: Weighted voting system with unreliable links. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 66(2), 339–350 (2017)CrossRef Liu, Q., Zhang, H.: Weighted voting system with unreliable links. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 66(2), 339–350 (2017)CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sah, R.: Fallibility in human organizations and political systems. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(2), 67–88 (1991)CrossRef Sah, R.: Fallibility in human organizations and political systems. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(2), 67–88 (1991)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Weighted Voting Systems
verfasst von
Hainan Zhang
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Verlag
Springer London
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7503-2_55

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.