Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

What Makes a Good UX Questionnaire? User-Centered Scorecard Development

verfasst von : Seunghyun “Tina” Lee, Melody Ivory

Erschienen in: Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Numerous standardized questionnaires like the System Usability Scale and Net Promoter Score have been developed to provide reliable and valid measurement of subjective satisfaction. Few studies, however, examine the perceived usability and preferences of questionnaires by the raters or end users themselves. In this study, 20 participants evaluated different types of questionnaires as well as ranked and discussed their subjective preferences for them. We found that 65 % of participants chose the questionnaire with enhanced design features (e.g., color-coded ratings, user experience examples, and specific/global comments) as well as measurement of user experience beyond usability as the most preferred questionnaire, while 80 % of participants chose the questionnaire that measured user experience with semantic-differential rating scales as the least preferred. Based on participant feedback, we provide several questionnaire design recommendations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. Usabiltiy Eval. Ind. 189–194 (1996) Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. Usabiltiy Eval. Ind. 189–194 (1996)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Reichheld, F.F.: The one number you need to grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81, 46–54 (2003) Reichheld, F.F.: The one number you need to grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81, 46–54 (2003)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lund, A.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface 8(2), 3–6 (2001)MathSciNet Lund, A.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface 8(2), 3–6 (2001)MathSciNet
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, J., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Human Centered Design, HCII 2009, pp. 94–103. Springer, Berlin (2009) Lewis, J., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Human Centered Design, HCII 2009, pp. 94–103. Springer, Berlin (2009)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tullis, T.S., Stetson, J.N.: A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In: Usability Professional Association Conference, pp. 1–12 (2004) Tullis, T.S., Stetson, J.N.: A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In: Usability Professional Association Conference, pp. 1–12 (2004)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauro, J.: SUPR-Q: a comprehensive measure of the quality of the website user experience. J. Usability Stud. 68–86 (2015) Sauro, J.: SUPR-Q: a comprehensive measure of the quality of the website user experience. J. Usability Stud. 68–86 (2015)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A., Norman, K.L.: Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 213–218 (1988) Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A., Norman, K.L.: Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 213–218 (1988)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6, 574–594 (2008)CrossRef Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6, 574–594 (2008)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256 (1990) Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256 (1990)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Resmini, A., Rosati, L.: Pervasive Information Architecture: Designing Cross-Channel User Experiences. Elsevier Inc., Burlington (2011) Resmini, A., Rosati, L.: Pervasive Information Architecture: Designing Cross-Channel User Experiences. Elsevier Inc., Burlington (2011)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Finstad, K.: The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. J. Usability Stud. 185–188 (2006) Finstad, K.: The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. J. Usability Stud. 185–188 (2006)
Metadaten
Titel
What Makes a Good UX Questionnaire? User-Centered Scorecard Development
verfasst von
Seunghyun “Tina” Lee
Melody Ivory
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41661-8_28

Premium Partner