nach oben

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Erschienen in:

01.08.2012 | Original Article

What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?

verfasst von: Stewart Russell, Nils Markusson, Vivian Scott

Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Excerpt

Great expectations have come to be pinned on carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology in a short time, and progress is being made on several fronts including the continued building of the academic knowledge base. Yet looking back at the period since the IPCC (2005) Special Report on CCS, it is striking that many of the longstanding major questions about the prospects for CCS remain unanswered. They include continuing debates on choices among component technologies, on capital and operational costs, on long-term financing through carbon markets, and indeed on the overall feasibility and role of CCS as a large-scale climate mitigation measure. Crucially, the political resolve behind CCS also remains shaky. Increasing amounts of public funding for demonstration projects have been awarded, allowing growing numbers of demonstration projects to progress to more advanced stages of planning. However, confirmation of future funding beyond demonstration has become increasingly elusive following the global recession. Advances have been made in terms of designing and clarifying legal regimes for CCS, for example in the EU. But several legal barriers remain to be resolved, with for instance ratification of the amendments to the London Protocol and OSPAR still needed to enable some projects to proceed. The practical viability and maturity of the technology remain uncertain. …

Vorheriger Artikel Valuing power plant flexibility with CCS: the case of post-combustion capture retrofits

Nächster Artikel Embedding CCS infrastructure into the European electricity system: a policy coordination problem

Alstom (2010) CCS pilot at AEP mountaineer. Available at http://www.power.alstom.com/home/media_centre/newsroom/2010/_files/file_63225_39408.pdf

Borup M, Brown N, Konrad K et al (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Tech Anal Strat 18(3/4):285–298CrossRef

Brown N, Michael M (2003) A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Tech Anal Strat 15(1):3–18CrossRef

Clarke A, Fujimura J (eds) (1992) The right tools for the job: at work in twentieth century life sciences. Princeton, Princeton University Press, US

Collins HM (1988) Public experiments and displays of virtuosity: the core-set revisited. Soc Stud Sci 18(4):725–748CrossRef

Collins H, Pinch T (1993) The golem: what everyone should know about science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

CO2Sense Yorkshire (2010) A carbon capture and storage network for Yorkshire and the Humber: pre-front end engineering study

DECC (2010) CCS demonstration competition. UK Department of Energy and Climate Change. Available at http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/energy_mix/ccs/demo_comp/demo_comp.aspx

de Coninck H, Stephens J, Metz B (2009) Global learning on carbon capture and storage: a call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energ Pol 37:2161–2165CrossRef

Det Norske Veritas (2009) European CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) demonstration project network: draft knowledge sharing protocol. Available at http://www.ccsnetwork.eu/eventDocs/Knowledge%20Sharing%20Protocol%20Draft.pdf. Cited 12 February 2010

Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res Pol 11:147–162CrossRef

Downer J (2007) When the chick hits the fan: representativeness and reproducibility in technological tests. Soc Stud Sci 37(1):7–26CrossRef

EBN & Gasunie (2010) CO₂ transport and storage strategy. Available at http://www.ebn.nl/files/ccs_advice_ebn-gasunie_eng.pdf

European Commission (2010) NER300. Available at http://www.ner300.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/DRAFT-NER300-Decision.pdf

European Union (2009) European economic recovery plan. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:200:0031:0045:EN:PDF

Feenstra CFJ, Mikunda T, Brunsting S (2010) What happened in Barendrecht? Case study on the planned onshore carbon dioxide storage in Barendrecht. Energy Research Centre for the Netherlands & Global CCS Institute, the Netherlands

Fleck J (1993) Configuration: crystallising contingency. Int J Hum Factor Man 3(3):15–36CrossRef

Geels FW (2005) Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technol Forecast Soc 72(6):681–696CrossRef

Gibbins J, Chalmers H (2008) Carbon capture and storage. Energ Pol 36(12):4317–4322CrossRef

Global CCS Institute (2009) Status of carbon capture and storage projects globally: strategic analysis of the global status of carbon capture and storage: report 1. Canberra

Global CCS Institute (2010) The status of CCS projects interim report. Canberra

Gough C, McLachlan C, Shackley S (2004) The public perceptions of carbon capture and storage. Tyndall Centre Working Paper 44, UMIST, Manchester

Gough C, Taylor I, Shackley S (2002) Burying carbon under the sea: an initial exploration of public pinion. Energ Environ 13(6):883–900CrossRef

Ha-Duong M, Gaultier M, de Guillebon B (2010) Social aspects of Total’s Lacq CO₂ capture, transport and storage pilot project. Available at http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/52/05/62/PDF/HaDuong.ea-2010-LacqCaseStudy-ForGHGT10Proceedings-compressionSansPerte.pdf

Hendry C, Harborne P, Brown J (2010) So what do innovating companies really get from publicly funded demonstration projects and trials? Innovation lessons from solar photovoltaics and wind. Energ Pol 38:4507–4519CrossRef

Huijts NMA, Midden CJH, Meijnders AL (2007) Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energ Pol 35(5):2780–2789CrossRef

IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III, Geneva

Itaoka K, Saito A, Akai M (2005) Public acceptance of CO₂ capture and storage technology: a survey of public opinion to explore influential factors. In: Greenhouse gas control technologies 7. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 1011–1019

Kling R (1992) Audiences, narratives, and human values in social studies of technology. Sci Technol Hum Val 17(3):349–365CrossRef

Lipponen J (2010) IEA—progress of CCS must be speeded up. Carbon Capture Journal (17)

MacKenzie D (1989) From Kwajalein to Armageddon? testing and the social construction of missile accuracy. In: Gooding D, Pinch T, Schaffer S (eds) The uses of experiment: studies in the natural sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 409–436

MacKenzie D (2006) An engine, not a camera: how financial models shape markets. MIT Press, Cambridge

Markusson N (2008) How ready is ‘capture ready’? Carbon Capture Journal (4)

Markusson N, Haszeldine S (2010) “Capture ready” regulation of fossil fuel power plants: betting the UK’s carbon emissions on promises of future technology. Energ Pol 38:6695–6702CrossRef

Markusson N, Ishii A, Stephens J (2011) The social and political complexities of learning in CCS demonstration projects. Global Environ Chang 21(2):293–302CrossRef

Meadowcroft J, Langhelle O (eds) (2009) Caching the carbon: the politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

Michael M (2001) Futures of the present: from performativity to prehension. In: Brown N, Rapert B, Adam B et al (eds) Contested futures: a sociology of prospective techno-science. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 21–39

Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305(5686):968–972CrossRef

Pinch T (1993) “Testing–one, two, three … testing!”: toward a sociology of testing. Sci Tech Hum Val 18(1):25–41CrossRef

Pinch T, Bijker W (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc Stud Sci 14:399–444CrossRef

Rai V, Victor D, Thurber M (2010) Carbon capture and storage at scale: lessons from the growth of analogous energy technologies. Energ Pol 38(8):4089–4098CrossRef

Rip A, Schot J (2002) Identifying loci for influencing the dynamics of technological development. In: Sørensen K, Williams R (eds) Shaping technology, guiding policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 145–162

Rosental C (2005) Making science and technology results public: a sociology of demos. In: Latour B, Weibel P (eds) Making things public: atmospheres of democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge

Rubin ES, Chen C, Rao A (2007) Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO₂ capture and storage. Energ Pol 35:4444–4454CrossRef

Russell S, Williams R (2002) Social shaping of technology: frameworks, findings and implications for policy. In: Sørensen K, Williams R (eds) Shaping technology, guiding policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 37–131

Scrase I, Watson J (2008) UK policy on carbon capture and storage: squaring coal use with climate change? Sussex Energy Group Policy Briefing 3

Scrase I, Watson J (2009) Strategies for the deployment of CCS technologies in the UK: a critical review. Energy Procedia 1:4535–4542CrossRef

Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage (2010) CCS world map. SCCS, Edinburgh. Available at www.geos.ed.ac.uk/sccs/storage/storageSitesFree.html

Shackley S, Gough C (eds) (2006) Carbon capture and its storage: an integrated assessment. Ashgate, Aldershot

Shackley S, Reiner D, Upham P, de Coninck H, Sigurthorsson G, Anderson J (2009) The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: an assessment of the key determining factors part 2. The social acceptability of CCS and the wider impacts and repercussions of its implementation. Int J Greenh Gas Con 3(3):344–356CrossRef

Shackley S, Thompson M (2011) Lost in the mix: will the technologies of carbon dioxide capture and storage provide us with a breathing space as we strive to make the transition from fossil fuels to renewables? Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0071-3

Shapin S, Schaffer S (1985) Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Smith W (2009) Theatre of use: a frame analysis of information technology demonstrations. Soc Stud Sci 39:449–480CrossRef

Spinardi G (2008) Ballistic missile defence and the politics of testing: the case of the US ground-based midcourse defence. Sci Publ Pol 35(10):703–715CrossRef

Terwel BW, Harinck F, Ellemers N, Daamen DD (2009) Competence-based and integrity-based trust as predictors of acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS). Risk Anal 29(8):1129–1140CrossRef

Tollefson J (2011) Low-cost carbon-capture project sparks interest. Nature 469(7330):276–277CrossRef

Total (2009) Total Lacq CCS pilot. Available at http://www.total.com/en/special-reports/capture-and-geological-storage-of-co2/capture-and-geological-storage-of-co2-the-lacq-demonstration-200969.html

Unruh G, Carrillo-Hermosilla J (2006) Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energ Pol 34(10):1185–1197CrossRef

Van Alphen K, Hekkert W, Turkenburg WC (2009) Comparing the development and deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies in Norway, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada and the United States: an innovation system perspective. Energ Procedia 1(1):4591–4599CrossRef

Van Lente H, Rip A (1998) Expectations in technological developments: an example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency. In: Disco C, van der Meulen BJR (eds) Getting new technologies together. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp 195–220

Vattenfall (2010) Bridging to the future, newsletter on carbon capture & storage at Vattenfall, http://www.vattenfall.com/en/ccs/file/Bridging_to_the_future___December_2010__PDF_1190_kb__16635845.pdf

Vergragt PJ (2009) CCS: the next technological lock-in? a case study from the Netherlands. Paper to ISA Conference, New York

Vergragt P, Markusson N, Karlsson H (2011) CCS, BECCS and the escape from carbon lock-in, Global Environ Chang 21(2):282–292.CrossRef

Williams R, Stewart J, Slack R (2005) Social learning in technological innovation: experimenting with information and communication technologies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

ZEP (2008) EU demonstration programme for CO2 capture and storage (CCS): ZEP’s proposal. European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants (ZEP)

Titel: What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?
verfasst von: Stewart Russell
Nils Markusson
Vivian Scott
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2012
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9313-y

Springer Professional

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Integrated assessment of CCS in the German power plant sector with special emphasis on the competition with renewable energy technologies

Embedding CCS infrastructure into the European electricity system: a policy coordination problem

Valuing power plant flexibility with CCS: the case of post-combustion capture retrofits

Carbon dioxide capture and storage: Seven years after the IPCC special report

Promising synergies to address water, sequestration, legal, and public acceptance issues associated with large-scale implementation of CO2 sequestration

Exploring CCS community acceptance and public participation from a human and social capital perspective