Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. When Human Visual Performance Is Imperfect—How to Optimize the Collaboration Between One Human Operator and Multiple Field Robots

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider a robotic field exploration and classification task where the field robots have a limited communication with a remote human operator, and also have constrained motion energy budgets. We then extend our previously proposed paradigm for human–robot collaboration (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446, 2015 [4]), (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, 2016 [5]) to the case of multiple robots. In this paradigm, the robots predict human visual performance, which is not necessarily perfect, and optimize seeking help from humans accordingly (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446, 2015 [4]), (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, 2016 [5]. More specifically, given a probabilistic model of human visual performance from (Cai and Mostofi, Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446, 2015 [4]), in this chapter we show how multiple robots can properly optimize motion, sensing, and seeking help. We mathematically and numerically analyze the properties of robots’ optimum decisions, in terms of when to ask humans for help, when to rely on their own judgment and when to gather more information from the field. Our theoretical results shed light on the properties of the optimum solution. Moreover, simulation results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed approach and confirm that it can save resources considerably.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Note that robot \(k_1\) and robot \(k_2\) can be the same robot or two different robots.
 
2
This lemma is similar to the second condition of Lemma 12.1 of our previous work [4] as it concerns only one robot.
 
3
Bandwidth usage is taken proportional to the number of questions.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2009) Convex Optimization. Cambridge university press, CambridgeMATH Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2009) Convex Optimization. Cambridge university press, CambridgeMATH
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Branson S, Wah C, Schroff F, Babenko B, Welinder P, Perona P, Belongie S (2010) Visual recognition with humans in the loop. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision, pp 438–451 Branson S, Wah C, Schroff F, Babenko B, Welinder P, Perona P, Belongie S (2010) Visual recognition with humans in the loop. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision, pp 438–451
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke J, Murphy R, Coovert M, Riddle D (2004) Moonlight in miami: field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1–2):85–116CrossRef Burke J, Murphy R, Coovert M, Riddle D (2004) Moonlight in miami: field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1–2):85–116CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai H, Mostofi Y (2015) To ask or not to ask: a foundation for the optimization of human-robot collaborations. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446 Cai H, Mostofi Y (2015) To ask or not to ask: a foundation for the optimization of human-robot collaborations. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, pp 440–446
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai H, Mostofi Y (2016) Asking for help with the right question by predicting human performance. In: Proceedings of robotics: science and systems Cai H, Mostofi Y (2016) Asking for help with the right question by predicting human performance. In: Proceedings of robotics: science and systems
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai H, Mostofi Y (2016) A human-robot collaborative traveling salesman problem: robotic site inspection with human assistance. In: Proceedings of the American control conference Cai H, Mostofi Y (2016) A human-robot collaborative traveling salesman problem: robotic site inspection with human assistance. In: Proceedings of the American control conference
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao M, Stewart A, Leonard N (2008) Integrating human and robot decision-making dynamics with feedback: models and convergence analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1127–1132 Cao M, Stewart A, Leonard N (2008) Integrating human and robot decision-making dynamics with feedback: models and convergence analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1127–1132
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chipalkatty R (2012) Human-in-the-loop control for cooperative human-robot tasks. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology Chipalkatty R (2012) Human-in-the-loop control for cooperative human-robot tasks. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias MB, Kannan B, Browning B, Jones E, Argall B, Dias MF, Zinck M, Veloso M, Stentz A (2008) Sliding autonomy for peer-to-peer human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent autonomous systems, pp 332–341 Dias MB, Kannan B, Browning B, Jones E, Argall B, Dias MF, Zinck M, Veloso M, Stentz A (2008) Sliding autonomy for peer-to-peer human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent autonomous systems, pp 332–341
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Martello S, Toth P (1990) Knapsack problems: algorithms and computer implementations. Wiley, New YorkMATH Martello S, Toth P (1990) Knapsack problems: algorithms and computer implementations. Wiley, New YorkMATH
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Meriçli Ç, Veloso M, Akin H (2011) Task refinement for autonomous robots using complementary corrective human feedback. Int J Adv Robot Syst 8(2):68CrossRef Meriçli Ç, Veloso M, Akin H (2011) Task refinement for autonomous robots using complementary corrective human feedback. Int J Adv Robot Syst 8(2):68CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Srivastava V (2012) Stochastic search and surveillance strategies for mixed human-robot teams. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara Srivastava V (2012) Stochastic search and surveillance strategies for mixed human-robot teams. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart A, Cao M, Nedic A, Tomlin D, Leonard N (2012) Towards human-robot teams: model-based analysis of human decision making in two-alternative choice tasks with social feedback. Proc IEEE 100(3):751–775CrossRef Stewart A, Cao M, Nedic A, Tomlin D, Leonard N (2012) Towards human-robot teams: model-based analysis of human decision making in two-alternative choice tasks with social feedback. Proc IEEE 100(3):751–775CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Toris R, Suay H, Chernova S (2012) A practical comparison of three robot learning from demonstration algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 261–262 Toris R, Suay H, Chernova S (2012) A practical comparison of three robot learning from demonstration algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp 261–262
Metadaten
Titel
When Human Visual Performance Is Imperfect—How to Optimize the Collaboration Between One Human Operator and Multiple Field Robots
verfasst von
Hong Cai
Yasamin Mostofi
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40533-9_12

Neuer Inhalt