Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This article reexamines the living arrangements of children following their parents’ divorce, using Wisconsin Court Records, updating an analysis that showed relatively small but significant increases in shared custody in the late 1980s and early 1990s. These changes have accelerated markedly in the intervening years: between 1988 and 2008, the proportion of mothers granted sole physical custody fell substantially, the proportion of parents sharing custody increased dramatically, and father–sole custody remained relatively stable. We explore changes in the correlates of alternative custody outcomes, showing that some results from the earlier analysis still hold (for example, cases with higher total family income are more likely to have shared custody), but other differences have lessened (shared-custody cases have become less distinctive as they have become more common). Despite the considerable changes in marriage and divorce patterns over this period, we do not find strong evidence that the changes in custody are related to changes in the characteristics of families experiencing a divorce; rather, changes in custody may be the result of changes in social norms and the process by which custody is determined.
Bartfeld, J. (2011). Shared placement: An overview of prevalence, trends, economic implications, and impacts on child well-being (Report to the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families). Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 393–438. CrossRef
Borooah, V. K. (2002). Logit and probit: Ordered and multinomial models (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Brown, P., Roan, C. L., & Marshall, J. L. (1994). Sample design, Wisconsin Child Support Demonstration Project. Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
Buehler, C., & Gerard, J. M. (1995). Divorce law in the United States: A focus on child custody. Family Relations, 44, 439–458. CrossRef
Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. R. (1998). Who gets custody? Demography, 35, 147–157. CrossRef
Clarke, S. C. (1995). Advance report of final divorce statistics, 1989 and 1990 (Monthly Vital Statistics Report 43(9, Suppl.)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Cook, S. T., & Brown, P. R. (2006, May). Recent trends in children’s placement arrangements in divorce and paternity cases in Wisconsin (Report to the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, Bureau of Child Support). Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
Donnelly, D., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Who has joint custody? Class differences in the determination of custody arrangements. Family Relations, 42, 57–60. CrossRef
Fairlie, R. W. (2005). An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 30, 305–316.
Fox, G. L., & Kelly, R. F. (1995). Determinants of child custody arrangements at divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 683–708. CrossRef
Grall, T. S. (2013). Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2011 (Current Population Reports P60-246). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Hakovirta, M., & Rantalaiho, M. (2011). Family policy and shared parenting in Nordic countries. European Journal of Social Security, 13, 247–266.
Juby, H., Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (2005). Sharing roles, sharing custody? Couples’ characteristics and children’s living arrangements at separation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 157–172. CrossRef
Kelly, R. F., & Rinaman, W. C. (2003). The structure and prediction of classes of divorce settlements involving dependent children in a national sample. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 38(3/4), 1–29. CrossRef
Livingston, G., & Parker, K. (2011). A tale of two fathers: More are active, but more are absent (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Social & Demographic Trends.
McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children fare under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607–627. CrossRef
Melli, M. S., & Brown, P. R. (1994). The economics of shared custody: Developing an equitable formula for dual residence. Houston Law Review, 31, 543–584.
Meyer, D. R., & Carlson, M. J. (Forthcoming). Family complexity: Implications for policy and research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Mnookin, R., & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Review, 88, 950–997. CrossRef
Pleck, J. H. (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (3rd ed., pp. 66–103). New York, NY: Wiley.
Smyth, B., & Rodgers, B. (2011). Strategic bargaining over child support and parenting time: A critical review of the literature. Australian Journal of Family Law, 25, 210–235.
Smyth, B., Rodgers, B., Son, V., Allen, L., & Vnuk, M. (2012). Separated parents’ knowledge of how changes in parenting-time can affect child support payments and family tax benefit splitting in Australia: A pre-/post-reform comparison. Australian Journal of Family Law, 26, 181–213.
Teachman, J. D., & Polonko, K. (1990). Negotiating divorce outcomes: Can we identify patterns in divorce settlements? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 129–139. CrossRef
Weiss, Y., & Willis, R. (1985). Children as collective goods and divorce settlements. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 268–292. CrossRef
- Who Gets Custody Now? Dramatic Changes in Children’s Living Arrangements After Divorce
Daniel R. Meyer
Patricia R. Brown
Steven T. Cook
- Springer US