Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 2/2020

25.06.2019

Who is Willing to Help Robots? A User Study on Collaboration Attitude

verfasst von: Andrea Vanzo, Francesco Riccio, Mahmoud Sharf, Valeria Mirabella, Tiziana Catarci, Daniele Nardi

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In order to operate in human-populated environments, robots need to show reasonable behaviors and human-compatible abilities. In the so-called Symbiotic Autonomy, robots and humans help each other to overcome mutual limitations and complete their tasks. When the robot takes the initiative and asks the human for help, there is a change of perspective in the interaction, which has not yet been specifically addressed by HRI studies. In this paper, we investigate the novel scenario brought about by Symbiotic Autonomy, by addressing the factors that may influence the interaction. In particular, we introduce the “Collaboration Attitude” to evaluate how the response of users being asked by the robot for help is influenced by the context of the interaction and by what they are doing (i.e., ongoing activity). We present the results of a first study, which confirms the influence of conventional factors (i.e., proxemics) on the Collaboration Attitude, while it suggests that the context (i.e., relaxing vs. working) may not be much relevant. Then, we present a second study, carried out to better assess the influence of the activity performed by the humans in our population, when (s)he is approached by the robot, as an additional and more compelling characterization of context (i.e., standing vs. sitting). While the experimental scenario takes into account a population with distinctive characteristics (i.e., academic staff and students), the overall findings of our studies suggest that the attitude of users towards robots in the setting of Symbiotic Autonomy is influenced by factors already known to influence robot acceptance while it is not significantly affected by the context of the interaction and by the human ongoing activity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In Study 2, the robot approaches the all the experimenters within the “Personal” Proxemics setting.
 
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Coradeschi S, Saffiotti A (2006) Symbiotic robotic systems: humans, robots, and smart environments. IEEE Intell Syst 21(3):82–84CrossRef Coradeschi S, Saffiotti A (2006) Symbiotic robotic systems: humans, robots, and smart environments. IEEE Intell Syst 21(3):82–84CrossRef
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer K, Yang S, Mok B, Maheshwari R, Sirkin D, Ju W (2015) Initiating interactions and negotiating approach: a robotic trash can in the field. In: AAAI symposium on turn-taking and coordination in human–machine interaction, pp 10–16 Fischer K, Yang S, Mok B, Maheshwari R, Sirkin D, Ju W (2015) Initiating interactions and negotiating approach: a robotic trash can in the field. In: AAAI symposium on turn-taking and coordination in human–machine interaction, pp 10–16
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Graaf MM, Ben Allouch S (2014) Expectation setting and personality attribution in hri. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, HRI ’14, pp 144–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559796 de Graaf MM, Ben Allouch S (2014) Expectation setting and personality attribution in hri. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, HRI ’14, pp 144–145. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​2559636.​2559796
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall ET (1966) The Hidden Dimension: man’s use of space in public and private. The Bodley Head Ltd, London Hall ET (1966) The Hidden Dimension: man’s use of space in public and private. The Bodley Head Ltd, London
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Koay KL, Syrdal DS, Ashgari-Oskoei M, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K (2014) Social roles and baseline proxemic preferences for a domestic service robot. Int J Soc Robot 6:469–488CrossRef Koay KL, Syrdal DS, Ashgari-Oskoei M, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K (2014) Social roles and baseline proxemic preferences for a domestic service robot. Int J Soc Robot 6:469–488CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitsunaga N, Smith C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2008) Adapting robot behavior for human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 24:911–916CrossRef Mitsunaga N, Smith C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2008) Adapting robot behavior for human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 24:911–916CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mumm J, Mutlu B (2011) Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot Interaction, ACM, HRI ’11, pp 331–338 Mumm J, Mutlu B (2011) Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot Interaction, ACM, HRI ’11, pp 331–338
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nikolaidis S, Ramakrishnan R, Gu K, Shah J (2015) Efficient model learning from joint-action demonstrations for human-robot collaborative tasks. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, HRI ’15, pp 189–196 Nikolaidis S, Ramakrishnan R, Gu K, Shah J (2015) Efficient model learning from joint-action demonstrations for human-robot collaborative tasks. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, HRI ’15, pp 189–196
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal S, Veloso M (2012) Mobile robot planning to seek help with spatially-situated tasks. In: Proceedings of the 26th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, AAAI’12, pp 2067–2073 Rosenthal S, Veloso M (2012) Mobile robot planning to seek help with spatially-situated tasks. In: Proceedings of the 26th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI Press, AAAI’12, pp 2067–2073
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal S, Biswas J, Veloso M (2010) An effective personal mobile robot agent through symbiotic human–robot interaction. In: International conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2010), vol 1, pp 915–922 Rosenthal S, Biswas J, Veloso M (2010) An effective personal mobile robot agent through symbiotic human–robot interaction. In: International conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2010), vol 1, pp 915–922
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Song H, Restivo M, van de Rijt A, Scarlatos LL, Tonjes D, Orlov A (2015) The hidden gender effect in online collaboration: an experimental study of team performance under anonymity. Comput Hum Behav 50:274–282CrossRef Song H, Restivo M, van de Rijt A, Scarlatos LL, Tonjes D, Orlov A (2015) The hidden gender effect in online collaboration: an experimental study of team performance under anonymity. Comput Hum Behav 50:274–282CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Syrdal DS, Koay KL, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K (2007) A personalized robot companion?—the role of individual differences on spatial preferences in hri scenarios. In: The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2007, pp 1143–1148 Syrdal DS, Koay KL, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K (2007) A personalized robot companion?—the role of individual differences on spatial preferences in hri scenarios. In: The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2007, pp 1143–1148
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Takayama L, Pantofaru C (2009) Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2009, IROS 2009, pp 5495–5502 Takayama L, Pantofaru C (2009) Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2009, IROS 2009, pp 5495–5502
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Torta E, Cuijpers RH, Juola JF (2011) A model of the user’s proximity for bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, HRI ’11, pp 273–274 Torta E, Cuijpers RH, Juola JF (2011) A model of the user’s proximity for bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, HRI ’11, pp 273–274
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters ML, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Koay KL, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2009) An empirical framework for human–robot proxemics. In: Proceedings of the symposium on new frontiers in human–robot interaction, Edinburgh, Scottland, pp 144–149 Walters ML, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Koay KL, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2009) An empirical framework for human–robot proxemics. In: Proceedings of the symposium on new frontiers in human–robot interaction, Edinburgh, Scottland, pp 144–149
Metadaten
Titel
Who is Willing to Help Robots? A User Study on Collaboration Attitude
verfasst von
Andrea Vanzo
Francesco Riccio
Mahmoud Sharf
Valeria Mirabella
Tiziana Catarci
Daniele Nardi
Publikationsdatum
25.06.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00571-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

International Journal of Social Robotics 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.