Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Information Systems Frontiers
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers 6/2023

18.01.2023

Workgroup Collective Efficacy to Information Security Management: Manifestation of its Antecedents and Empirical Examination

verfasst von: Chul Woo Yoo, Inkyoung Hur, Jahyun Goo

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Is collective agency important for information security management? Drawing on social cognitive theory, this paper proposes four efficacy-shaping factors as antecedents of workgroup collective efficacy and examines its influence on workgroup information security effectiveness. For empirical analysis, a structural model is proposed with theoretical support. 306 individual responses were collected from 33 branch offices of a law enforcement organization in South Korea. Our results support the focal hypotheses that workgroup collective efficacy has significant positive relationships with its antecedents as well as workgroup information security effectiveness. This indicates that the exercise of collective agency is important in enhancing information security effectiveness in organizations. Further theoretical and practical implications will be discussed.
Vorheriger Artikel From Groups to Communities: A Resource Mobilization Theory Perspective on the Emergence of Communities

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Anderson, S. L., & Betz, N. E. (2001). Sources of social self-efficacy expectations: their measurement and relation to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 98–117.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.CrossRef
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. PrenticeHall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. The Guilford Press.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.CrossRef
Baron, R. A. (1990). Environmentally Induced positive affect: its impact on self-efficacy, task performance, negotiation, and conflict 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(5), 368–384.CrossRef
Bhattacherjee, A., & Hikmet, N. (2008). Reconceptualizing organizational support and its effect on information technology usage: evidence from the health care sector. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 69–76.
Bulgurcu, B., Cavusoglu, H., & Benbasat, I. (2010). Information security policy compliance: an empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 523–548.CrossRef
Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., & Zhou, J. (2005). Collective efficacy as a measure of community. Proceedings of The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–10). ACM.
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234.CrossRef
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482.CrossRef
Cram, W. A., D’Arcy, J., & Proudfoot, J. G. (2019). Seeing the forest and the trees: a meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security policy compliance. MIS Quarterly, 43, 2.CrossRef
Da Veiga, A., & Eloff, J. H. (2010). A framework and assessment instrument for information security culture. Computers & Security, 29(2), 196–207.CrossRef
DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1035.CrossRef
Giordano, A. P., Patient, D., Passos, A. M., & Sguera, F. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of collective psychological ownership: the validation of a conceptual model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(1), 32–49.CrossRef
Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472–485.CrossRef
Gist, M. E. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 787–805.CrossRef
Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of applied psychology, 74(6), 884.CrossRef
Goddard, R. D. (2001). Collective efficacy: a neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 467.CrossRef
Goddard, R. D., & Goddard, Y. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 807–818.CrossRef
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13.CrossRef
Goo, J., Yim, M. S., & Kim, D. J. (2014). A path to successful management of employee security compliance: An empirical study of information security climate. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(4), 286–308.
Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 307–338.CrossRef
Herath, T., & Rao, H. R. (2009a). Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 47(2), 154–165.CrossRef
Herath, T., & Rao, H. R. (2009b). Protection motivation and deterrence: A framework for security policy compliance in organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 106–125.
Hofmann, D. A. (2004). Issues in multilevel research: Theory development, measurement, and analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hsu, J. S. C., Shih, S. P., Hung, Y. W., & Lowry, P. B. (2015). The role of extra-role behaviors and social controls in information security policy effectiveness. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 282–300.CrossRef
Huber, G. P. (1996). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Sage.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306.CrossRef
Johnston, A., Di Gangi, P., Howard, J., & Worrell, J. (2019). It takes a village: understanding the collective security efficacy of employee groups. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(3), 186–212.CrossRef
Johnston, A. C., & Warkentin, M. (2010). Fear appeals and information security behaviors: an empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 548–566.CrossRef
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783–808.CrossRef
Kang, D., & Hovav, A. (2020). Benchmarking methodology for information security policy (BMISP): artifact development and evaluation. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(1), 221–242.CrossRef
Kankanhalli, A., Teo, H. H., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2003). An integrative study of information systems security effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 23(2), 139–154.CrossRef
Kavanagh, D. J., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9(5), 507–525.CrossRef
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229.CrossRef
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations: Review update. Wiley.
Kozub, S., & McDonnell, J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 23(2), 120–129.
Lee, Y., & Chen, A. N. (2011). Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 269–308.CrossRef
Lowry, P. B., & Moody, G. D. (2015). Proposing the control-reactance compliance model (CRCM) to explain opposing motivations to comply with organisational information security policies. Information Systems Journal, 25(5), 433–463.CrossRef
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883.CrossRef
Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–558.
Mulvey, P. W., & Klein, H. J. (1998). The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1), 62–87.CrossRef
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946.CrossRef
Puhakainen, P., & Siponen, M. (2010). Improving employees’ compliance through information systems security training: an action research study. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 757–778.CrossRef
Ranganath, K. A., Spellman, B. A., & Joy-Gaba, J. A. (2010). Cognitive “Category-Based Induction” research and social “Persuasion” research are each about what makes arguments believable a tale of two literatures. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 115–122.CrossRef
Safa, N. S., Von Solms, R., & Furnell, S. (2016). Information security policy compliance model in organizations. Computers & Security, 56(1), 70–82.CrossRef
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martínez, I. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups an experimental study. Small Group Research, 34(1), 43–73.CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.CrossRef
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.CrossRef
Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.CrossRef
Tu, Z., Turel, O., Yuan, Y., & Archer, N. (2015). Learning to cope with information security risks regarding mobile device loss or theft: an empirical examination. Information & Management, 52(4), 506–517.CrossRef
Vance, A., Siponen, M., & Pahnila, S. (2012). Motivating IS security compliance: insights from habit and Protection Motivation Theory. Information & Management, 49(3/4), 190–198.CrossRef
Vroblefski, M., Chen, A., Shao, B., & Swinarski, M. (2007). Managing user relationships in hierarchies for information system security. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 408–419.CrossRef
Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Lawler, J. J., & Shi, K. (2004). The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(4), 515–530.CrossRef
Wang, J., Gupta, M., & Rao, H. R. (2015). Insider threats in a financial institution: analysis of attack-proneness of information systems applications. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 91–112.CrossRef
Warkentin, M., Johnston, A. C., & Shropshire, J. (2011). The influence of the informal social learning environment on information privacy policy compliance efficacy and intention. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 267–284.CrossRef
Xu, Y., Fiedler, M. L., & Flaming, K. H. (2005). Discovering the impact of community policing: The broken windows thesis, collective efficacy, and citizens’ judgment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(2), 147–186.
Yazdanmehr, A., & Wang, J. (2016). 'Employees’ information security policy compliance: a norm activation perspective. Decision Support Systems, 92, 36–46.CrossRef
Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146–169.CrossRef
Yoo, C. W., Goo, J., & Rao, H. R. (2020). Is cybersecurity a team sport? A multilevel examination of workgroup information security effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 907–931.CrossRef
Yoo, C. W., Sanders, G. L., & Cerveny, R. P. (2018). Exploring the influence of flow and psychological ownership on security education, training and awareness effectiveness and security compliance. Decision Support Systems, 108(1), 107–118.CrossRef
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329.CrossRef
Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587–596.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Workgroup Collective Efficacy to Information Security Management: Manifestation of its Antecedents and Empirical Examination
verfasst von
Chul Woo Yoo
Inkyoung Hur
Jahyun Goo
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10367-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

Information Systems Frontiers 6/2023 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Advancing the Understanding of the Role of Responsible AI in the Continued Use of IoMT in Healthcare

OriginalPaper

Is There a Place for Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Pandemics? A Tale of Two Countries

OriginalPaper

Responsible Artificial Intelligence as a Secret Ingredient for Digital Health: Bibliometric Analysis, Insights, and Research Directions

EditorialNotes

Responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Digital Health and Medical Analytics

OriginalPaper

Role of Risks in the Development of Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the Digital Healthcare Domain

OriginalPaper

Does Social Capital Arise from Enterprise or Public Social Media Use? A Model of Social Media Antecedents and Consequences

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise