Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quantitative Marketing and Economics 4/2018

09.08.2018

You get what you give: theory and evidence of reciprocity in the sharing economy

verfasst von: Davide Proserpio, Wendy Xu, Georgios Zervas

Erschienen in: Quantitative Marketing and Economics | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We develop an analytical framework of peer interaction in the sharing economy that incorporates reciprocity, the tendency to increase (decrease) effort in response to others’ increased (decreased) effort. In our model, buyers (sellers) can induce sellers (buyers) to exert more effort by behaving well themselves. We demonstrate that this joint increased effort can improve the utility of both parties and influence the market equilibrium. We also show that bilateral reputation systems, which allow both buyers and sellers to review each other, are more responsive to reciprocity than unilateral reputation systems. By rewarding reciprocal behavior, bilateral reputation systems generate trust among strangers and informally regulate their behavior. We test the predictions of our model using data from Airbnb, a popular peer-to-peer accommodation platform. We show that Airbnb hosts that are more reciprocal receive higher ratings and that higher rated hosts can increase their prices. Therefore, reciprocity affects equilibrium prices on Airbnb through its impact on ratings, as predicted by our analytical framework.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
3
Following a similar reasoning, we can show that the ratings on both systems positively relate to the host’s weight on reputation and that the unilateral review system responds more to the reputation weight, βh.
 
4
ϕ(ωi) decreasing with ωi implies that guests give hosts providing worse service strictly higher ratings. ϕ(ωi) constant over ωi implies guests give all hosts the same rating regardless of quality.
 
5
For example, a guest may choose not to disclose her rating after a bad experience. However, a guest does not rate a bad experience better than a good one. Therefore, the rating a guest discloses still weakly reveals the quality of her experience.
 
9
To read reviews a host left for past guests, one has to: a) find out who the past guests were by looking at the host profile and checking which guests left a review for the host, b) look up the Airbnb profiles of each of these guests, and c) manually scan each guest profile to locate a review left for the guest by the host in question. We assume that the vast majority of Airbnb users do not engage in this behavior.
 
10
An alternative and equivalent way to prove proposition 2 would be to remove the term βiri from the ex-post utility of guest i in Eq. 11 and then solve the optimization problem.
 
11
Note that since P1 is common knowledge, assuming rh, i = vhxi or rh, i = vhxiP1 is exactly the same for our analysis.
 
12
Note that even under the assumption that hosts are able to infer guests’ 𝜃, all hosts, and in particular professional hosts, who have a higher weight on reputation would select those guests with higher 𝜃 in order to reduce the probability of receiving a lower rating.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, M., & Magruder, J. (2012). Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. The Economic Journal, 122(563), 957–989.CrossRef Anderson, M., & Magruder, J. (2012). Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. The Economic Journal, 122(563), 957–989.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.CrossRef Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blanchard, S.J., Carlson, K.A., Hyodo, J.D. (2016). The favor request effect: Requesting a favor from consumers to seal the deal. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 985–1001.CrossRef Blanchard, S.J., Carlson, K.A., Hyodo, J.D. (2016). The favor request effect: Requesting a favor from consumers to seal the deal. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 985–1001.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Charness, G. (2004). Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(3), 665–688.CrossRef Charness, G. (2004). Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(3), 665–688.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dellarocas, C., & Wood, C.A. (2008). The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Science, 54 (3), 460–476.CrossRef Dellarocas, C., & Wood, C.A. (2008). The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Science, 54 (3), 460–476.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edelman, B. (2017). The market design and policy of online review platforms. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(4), 635–649.CrossRef Edelman, B. (2017). The market design and policy of online review platforms. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(4), 635–649.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Einav, L., Farronato, C., Levin, J. (2016). Peer-to-peer markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 615–635.CrossRef Einav, L., Farronato, C., Levin, J. (2016). Peer-to-peer markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 615–635.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315.CrossRef Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farronato, C., & Fradkin, A. (2018). The welfare effects of peer entry in the accommodation market: The case of Airbnb. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research. Farronato, C., & Fradkin, A. (2018). The welfare effects of peer entry in the accommodation market: The case of Airbnb. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181.CrossRef Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fradkin, A., Elena G., David H. (2017). The determinants of online review informativeness: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Fradkin, A., Elena G., David H. (2017). The determinants of online review informativeness: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb.
Zurück zum Zitat Godes, D., & Silva, J.C. (2012). Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science, 31(3), 448–473.CrossRef Godes, D., & Silva, J.C. (2012). Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Science, 31(3), 448–473.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRef Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Horton, J. (2015). Reputation inflation: Evidence from an online labor market. Horton, J. (2015). Reputation inflation: Evidence from an online labor market.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review, 76 (4), 728–741. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review, 76 (4), 728–741.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine, D.K. (1998). Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(3), 593–622.CrossRef Levine, D.K. (1998). Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(3), 593–622.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luca, M. (2016). Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Luca, M. (2016). Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com.
Zurück zum Zitat Malmendier, U., Velde, V.L.T., Weber, R.A. (2014). Rethinking reciprocity. Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 849–874.CrossRef Malmendier, U., Velde, V.L.T., Weber, R.A. (2014). Rethinking reciprocity. Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 849–874.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281–1302. Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281–1302.
Zurück zum Zitat Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of ebay’s reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 127–157. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of ebay’s reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 127–157.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotemberg, J.J. (2006). Altruism, reciprocity and cooperation in the workplace. Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, 2, 1371–1407.CrossRef Rotemberg, J.J. (2006). Altruism, reciprocity and cooperation in the workplace. Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, 2, 1371–1407.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seiler, S., Yao, S., Zervas, G. (2018). Causal inference in word-of-mouth research. Methods and results. Seiler, S., Yao, S., Zervas, G. (2018). Causal inference in word-of-mouth research. Methods and results.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobel, J. (2005). Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(2), 392–436.CrossRef Sobel, J. (2005). Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(2), 392–436.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tadelis, S. (2016). Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1), 321–340.CrossRef Tadelis, S. (2016). Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1), 321–340.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yoganarasimhan, H. (2013). The value of reputation in an online freelance marketplace. Marketing Science, 32(6), 860–891.CrossRef Yoganarasimhan, H. (2013). The value of reputation in an online freelance marketplace. Marketing Science, 32(6), 860–891.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., Byers, J. (2015). A first look at online reputation on airbnb, where every stay is above average. Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., Byers, J. (2015). A first look at online reputation on airbnb, where every stay is above average.
Zurück zum Zitat Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., Byers, J.W. (2017). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 687–705.CrossRef Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., Byers, J.W. (2017). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 687–705.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
You get what you give: theory and evidence of reciprocity in the sharing economy
verfasst von
Davide Proserpio
Wendy Xu
Georgios Zervas
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Quantitative Marketing and Economics / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1570-7156
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-711X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-018-9201-9