Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cognitive Processing
Erschienen in: Cognitive Processing 1/2012

01.02.2012 | Research Report

A common computational process in cueing and conjunction search tasks

verfasst von: KangWoo Lee, Hyunseung Choo

Erschienen in: Cognitive Processing | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The question of whether Posner’s beam is the same as Treisman’s glue is addressed to construct a computational model that integrates both target and cue information. The cueing and conjunction search tasks are conducted to analyze a common process that may be underlying the tasks. The dynamic interaction between target and cue information produces attentional benefit- and cost-based in the cueing task. Furthermore, the search order for target candidates in a conjunction search task is determined through the integration of target and cue information, which is basically the same as in the cueing task. Our simulations suggest that consistency (or validity) is considered as a computational process that may be commonly involved in the both tasks.
Vorheriger Artikel Hindsight bias and causal reasoning: a minimalist approach
Nächster Artikel The role of temporal properties on the detection of temporal violations: insights from pupillometry

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Briand KA (1998) Feature integration and spatial attention: more evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 24(4):1243–1256CrossRef
Briand KA, Klein RM (1987) Is posner’s “beam” the same as treisman’s “glue?" on the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 13(2):228–241PubMedCrossRef
Cameron EL, Tai JC, Carrasco M (2002) Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity. Vis Res 42(8):949–967PubMedCrossRef
Colzato LS, Hommel B, Raffone A (2006) What do we learn from binding features? evidence for multilevel feature integration. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 32:705–716PubMedCrossRef
Crawford T, Muller H (1992) Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements. Vis Res 32(2):293–304PubMedCrossRef
Eckstein MP, Shimozaki SS, Abbey CK (2002) The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images. J Vis 2(1):25–45PubMedCrossRef
Fernandez-Duque D, Johnson ML (1999) Attention metaphors: how metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognit Sci 23(1):83–116CrossRef
Friedman-Hill S, Wolfe JM (1995) Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 21(3):531–551PubMedCrossRef
Hamker FH (2006) Modeling feature-based attention as an active top-down inference process. Biosystems 86(1–3):91–99PubMedCrossRef
Han S, Wan X, Humphreys G (2005) Shifts of spatial attention in perceived 3-d space. Quart J Exp Psychol A 58(12):753–764
Henderickx D, Maetens K, Soetens E (2010) Feature integration and spatial attention: common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting. Psychol Res 74:239–254PubMedCrossRef
Itti L, Koch C, Niebur E (1998) A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20:1254–1259CrossRef
Kawahara JI, Miyatani M (2001) The effect of informative and uninformative cueing of attention on feature integration. J Gen Psychol 128(1):57–75PubMedCrossRef
Kay J, Phillips WA (1997) Activation functions, computational goals, and learning rules for local processors with contextual guidance. Neural Comput 9:895–910CrossRef
Kinchla R, Chen Z, Evert D (1995) Precue effects in visual search: data or resource limited?. Atten Percept Psychophys 57:441–450
Montagna B, Pestilli F, Carrasco M (2009) Attention trades off spatial acuity. Vis Res 49(7):735–745PubMedCrossRef
Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognit Psychol 9:353–383CrossRef
Palmer SE (1999) Vision science: photons to phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Posner C, Snyder MI (1975) Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In: The Ribosomal Database Project (ed) Attention and performance. Academic Press, Massachusetts, pp 669–682
Posner M (1980) Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32:3–25PubMedCrossRef
Prinzmetal W, Presti DE, Posner MI (1986) Does attention affect visual feature integration? J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform pp 361–369
Prinzmetal W, Henderson D, Ivry R (1995) Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 21(6):1362–1375PubMedCrossRef
Sebastiani M, Casagrande M, Martella D, Raffone A (2009) The effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing in a sustained attention task. Cognit Process 10:302–304CrossRef
Shalev D Lilach; Algom (2000) Stroop and garner effects in and out of posner’s beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 26(3):997–1017
Treisman A, Sato S (1990) Conjunction search revisited. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 16(3):459–478PubMedCrossRef
Treisman A, Schmidt H (1982) Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognit Psychol 14(1):107–141PubMedCrossRef
Tsal Y (1989) Further comments on feature integration: a reply to briand and klein. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 15(2):407–410CrossRef
Turk M, Pentland A (1991) Face recognition using eigenfaces. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition, 1991. Proceedings CVPR ’91, IEEE Computer Society Conference, pp 586–591
Vossel S, Thiel CM, Fink GR (2006) Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex. NeuroImage 32(3):1257–1264PubMedCrossRef
Williams D, Reingold E (2001) Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: the effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude. Psychon Bull Rev 8:476–488PubMedCrossRef
Winkler I, Czigler I, Sussman E, Horváth J, Balázs L (2005) Preattentive binding of auditory and visual stimulus features. J Cognit Neurosci 17(2):320–339PubMedCrossRef
Wolfe JM, Cave KR, Franzel SL (1989) Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 15(3):419–433PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A common computational process in cueing and conjunction search tasks
verfasst von
KangWoo Lee
Hyunseung Choo
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Cognitive Processing / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1612-4782
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-4790
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0426-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Cognitive Processing 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Review

Cognitive reserve and its implications for rehabilitation and Alzheimer’s disease

Research Report

Cognitive architecture of perceptual organization: from neurons to gnosons

Research Report

Hindsight bias and causal reasoning: a minimalist approach

Research Report

Semantic associative relations and conceptual processing

Research Report

Episodic and prototype models of category learning

Research Report

The role of temporal properties on the detection of temporal violations: insights from pupillometry

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise