nach oben

Information Systems Frontiers

Erschienen in:

22.11.2016

A comparative analysis of semi-supervised learning: The case of article selection for medical systematic reviews

verfasst von: Jun Liu, Prem Timsina, Omar El-Gayar

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

While systematic reviews are positioned as an essential element of modern evidence-based medical practice, the creation of these reviews is resource intensive. To mitigate this problem, there have been some attempts to leverage supervised machine learning to automate the article triage procedure. This approach has been proved to be helpful for updating existing systematic reviews. However, this technique holds very little promise for creating new reviews because training data is rarely available when it comes to systematic creation. In this research we assess and compare the applicability of semi-supervised learning to overcome this labeling bottleneck and support the creation of systematic reviews. The results indicated that semi-supervised learning could significantly reduce the human effort and is a viable technique for automating medical systematic review creation with a small-sized training dataset.

Vorheriger Artikel Big Data & Analytics for Societal Impact: Recent Research and Trends

Nächster Artikel The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adeva, G., Atxa, P., Carrillo, U., & Zengotitabengoa, A. (2014). Automatic text classification to support systematic reviews in medicine. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1498–1508.CrossRef

Allen, I., & Olkin, I. (1999). Estimating time to conduct a meta‐analysis from number of citations retrieved. JAMA, 282(7), 634–635.CrossRef

Bekhuis, T., & Demner-Fushman, D. (2012). Screening nonrandomized studies for medical systematic reviews: a comparative study of classifiers. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 55, 197–207.CrossRef

Bennett, K. and Demiriz, A. (1999). Semi-supervised support vector machines. Advances in Neural Information processing systems: 368–374.

Cohen, A. M., Hersh, W. R., Peterson, K., & Yen, P.-Y. (2006). Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 206–219.CrossRef

Cohen, A. M., Ambert, K., & McDonagh, M. (2009). Cross-topic learning for work prioritization in systematic review creation and update. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(5), 690–704.CrossRef

Frunza, O., Inkpen, D. and Matwin, S. (2010). Building Systematic Reviews Using Automatic Text Classification Techniques. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters. Association for Computational Linguistics: 303–311.

Gieseke, F., Airola, A., Pahikkala, T., & Kramer, O. (2014). Fast and simple gradient-based optimization for semi-supervised support vector machines. Neurocomputing, 123, 23–32.CrossRef

Jin, Y., Huang, C., & Zhao, L. (2011). A semi-supervised learning algorithm based on modified self-training SVM. Journal of Computers, 6(7), 1438–1443.CrossRef

Lin, J. S., O’Connor, E., Rossom, R. C., Perdue, L. A., & Eckstrom, E. (2013). Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults: a systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 159(9), 601–612.

Matwin, S., Kouznetsov, A., Inkpen, D., Frunza, O., & O’Blenis, P. (2010). A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(4), 446–453.CrossRef

McGowan, J., & Sampson, M. (2005). Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(1), 74–80.

Murdoch, T., & Detsky, A. (2013). The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA, 309(13), 1351–1352.CrossRef

Robertson, S. (2004). Understanding inverse document frequency: on theoretical arguments for IDF. Journal of Documentation, 60(5), 503–520.CrossRef

Settles, B. (2010). Active learning literature survey. University of Wisconsin, Madison 52(11): 55–66.

Shemilt, I., Simon, A., Hollands, G. J., Marteau, T. M., Ogilvie, D., O’Mara-Eves, A., Kelly, M. P., & Thomas, J. (2013). Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 31–49.CrossRef

Shojania, K. G., Sampson, M., Ansari, M. T. and Garritty, C. (2007). Updating Systematic Reviews. Publication No. AHRQ 07–0087, Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Song, M., Yu, H. and Han, W. S. (2011). Combining active learning and semi-supervised learning techniques to extract protein interaction sentences. BMC bioinformatics 12.

Thomas, J., McNaught, J., & Ananiadou, S. (2011). Applications of text mining within systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 2(1), 1–14.CrossRef

Timsina, P., Liu, J. and El-Gayar, O. (2015). Advanced analytics for the automation of medical systematic reviews. Information Systems Frontiers (A Special Issue on Big Data and Analytics in Healthcare): 1–16.

Tsafnat, G., Glasziou, P., Choong, M., Dunn, A., Galgani, F., & Coiera, E. (2014). Systematic review automation technologies. Systematic Reviews, 3, 74.CrossRef

Wang, S., Li, D., Petrick, N., Sahiner, B., Linguraru, M. G., & Summersa, R. M. (2015). Optimizing area under the ROC curve using semi-supervised learning. Pattern Recognition, 48(1), 276–287.CrossRef

Zhou, D., Bousquet, O., Lal, T. N., Weston, J. and Schölkopf, B. (2004). Learning with Local and Global Consistency. Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

Zhu, X. (2005). Semi-supervised learning literature survey. TR-1530, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Computer Science.

Zhu, X. and Ghahramani, Z. (2002). Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. Technical Report CMU-CALD-02-107, Carnegie Mellon University.

Titel: A comparative analysis of semi-supervised learning: The case of article selection for medical systematic reviews
verfasst von: Jun Liu
Prem Timsina
Omar El-Gayar
Publikationsdatum: 22.11.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9724-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Scaling for agility: A reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies

A multi-objective model for discovering high-quality knowledge based on data quality and prior knowledge

Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study

Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms

Big Data & Analytics for Societal Impact: Recent Research and Trends

Business process flexibility - a systematic literature review with a software systems perspective