Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Quantitative Economics 4/2020

30.11.2019 | Original Article

A Comparative Study of Alternative Approaches to Estimate Productivity

Erschienen in: Journal of Quantitative Economics | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Theoretically, for single output-single input, annual productivity are expected to be identical across index, non-parametric programming and parametric statistical approaches. The following models within each approach is considered—index (Tornqvist-Theil and Ideal Fisher), the non-parametric programming (Malmquist input, output and graph; Malmquist total factor productivity) and parametric (Input and Output; total factor productivity) regression. Empirically, for single output-single input, this research show differences in annual productivity and productivity growth rate between and within each of the three approaches using Nebraska agriculture data from 1936 to 2004. The annual productivity growth rate from 1936 to 2004 was identical across non-parametric Malmquist output, input, graph and Malmquist total factor productivity, and parametric Malmquist total factor productivity. However annual productivity estimated by parametric Malmquist total factor productivity is identical to Ideal Fisher productivity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Due to discrete annual approximations, the index and the programming approaches are traditionally categorized as non-parametric techniques of productivity estimation.
 
2
Recently, there is integration of the distance function with econometric estimation of production, cost, or profit functions. However, this is more reflective of efficiency rather than productivity. So, we did not explore this approach in the productivity framework.
 
3
The index approach uses exogenous output and input market prices as share weights to construct aggregate index. These shares used as weights are the partial derivatives and equivalent to one under constant returns to scale technology. The shares used are always greater than zero but less than or equal to one. In contrast, the non-parametric programming approach use shadow prices implicit in the linear programming constraints. These shadow prices are recovered from the dual values of the constraint row in the programming problem, since the gradient of the technology frontier is the marginal product and equal to price under perfect competition. The shares in the programming approach range between zero and one, both included. The rate of change in the variables under consideration influences the weights as defined by the implicit shadow prices due to its piece wise linear approximation of the productivity measures.
 
4
For a single economic unit like firm, farm, state or country over time, the technology T represents all the years, i.e., \(t=1,...,T\)
 
5
Rate of growth can be calculated either as rate of change concept or chained logarithmic changes. The logarithmic change is considered as a close discrete approximation to rate of change concept for a continuous change. The difference between the two is quite remarkable if the changes are large enough. Conceptually productivity measurement is built on the rate of change concept, but for discrete yearly data, logarithmic change is used in the computation of output and input indexes.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Avkiran, N.K., and B.R. Parker. 2010. Pushing the DEA Research Envelope. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 44 (1): 1–7.CrossRef Avkiran, N.K., and B.R. Parker. 2010. Pushing the DEA Research Envelope. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 44 (1): 1–7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beveren, I.V. 2012. Total Factor Productivity Estimation: A Practical Review. Journal of Economic Surveys 26 (1): 98–128.CrossRef Beveren, I.V. 2012. Total Factor Productivity Estimation: A Practical Review. Journal of Economic Surveys 26 (1): 98–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bjurek, H. 1996. The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 98: 303–313.CrossRef Bjurek, H. 1996. The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 98: 303–313.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boles, J.N. 1966. Efficiency Squared—Efficient Computation of Efficiency Indexes. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp Boles, J.N. 1966. Efficiency Squared—Efficient Computation of Efficiency Indexes. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp
Zurück zum Zitat Bressler, R.G. 1966. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp 129–136 Bressler, R.G. 1966. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp 129–136
Zurück zum Zitat Capalbo, S.M., and J.M. Antle. 1988. Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation. Washington: Resource for the Future. Capalbo, S.M., and J.M. Antle. 1988. Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation. Washington: Resource for the Future.
Zurück zum Zitat Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and W.E. Diewert. 1982. The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input. Output and Productivity, Econometrica 50: 1393–1414. Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and W.E. Diewert. 1982. The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input. Output and Productivity, Econometrica 50: 1393–1414.
Zurück zum Zitat Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operations Research 2: 429–44.CrossRef Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operations Research 2: 429–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook, W., and L.M. Seiford. 2009. Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research 192 (1): 1–17.CrossRef Cook, W., and L.M. Seiford. 2009. Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research 192 (1): 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diewert, W.E. 1976. Exact and Superlative Index Numbers. Journal of Econometrics 4: 115–146.CrossRef Diewert, W.E. 1976. Exact and Superlative Index Numbers. Journal of Econometrics 4: 115–146.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diewert, W.E. 1978. Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in Aggregation. Econometrica 46: 883–900.CrossRef Diewert, W.E. 1978. Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in Aggregation. Econometrica 46: 883–900.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diewert, W.E. 1992. Fisher Ideal Output, Input and Productivity Indexes Revisited. Journal of Productivity Analysis 3: 211–248.CrossRef Diewert, W.E. 1992. Fisher Ideal Output, Input and Productivity Indexes Revisited. Journal of Productivity Analysis 3: 211–248.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell, M.J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 120: 253–281.CrossRef Farrell, M.J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 120: 253–281.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell, M.J., and M. Fieldhouse. 1962. Estimating Efficient Production Functions under Increasing Returns to Scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 125: 252–267.CrossRef Farrell, M.J., and M. Fieldhouse. 1962. Estimating Efficient Production Functions under Increasing Returns to Scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 125: 252–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell. 1994. Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell. 1994. Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Griliches, Z. 1996. The Discovery of the Residual: A Historical Note. Journal of Economic Literature 34 (3): 1324–1330. Griliches, Z. 1996. The Discovery of the Residual: A Historical Note. Journal of Economic Literature 34 (3): 1324–1330.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, J.S., L.Y.Y. Lu, W. Lu, and B.J.Y. Lin. 2013. Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega 41 (1): 3–15.CrossRef Liu, J.S., L.Y.Y. Lu, W. Lu, and B.J.Y. Lin. 2013. Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega 41 (1): 3–15.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lovell, C.A.K. 1994. Linear Programming Approaches to the Measurement and Analysis of Productive Efficiency. Top 2: 175–224.CrossRef Lovell, C.A.K. 1994. Linear Programming Approaches to the Measurement and Analysis of Productive Efficiency. Top 2: 175–224.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Malmquist, S. 1953. Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces. Trabajos de Estatistica 4: 209–242.CrossRef Malmquist, S. 1953. Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces. Trabajos de Estatistica 4: 209–242.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moorsteen, R.H. 1961. On Measuring Productive Potential and Relative Efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 451–467.CrossRef Moorsteen, R.H. 1961. On Measuring Productive Potential and Relative Efficiency. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 451–467.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samoilenko, S., and K. Osei-Bryson. 2013. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for monitoring efficiency-based performance of productivity-driven organizations: Design and implementation of a decision support system. Omega 41 (1): 131–142.CrossRef Samoilenko, S., and K. Osei-Bryson. 2013. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for monitoring efficiency-based performance of productivity-driven organizations: Design and implementation of a decision support system. Omega 41 (1): 131–142.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shaik, S., A. Mishra, and J.A. Atwood. 2012. Aggregation Issues in the Estimation of Linear Programming Productivity Measures. Journal of Applied Economics XV 1: 169–187.CrossRef Shaik, S., A. Mishra, and J.A. Atwood. 2012. Aggregation Issues in the Estimation of Linear Programming Productivity Measures. Journal of Applied Economics XV 1: 169–187.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seitz, W.D. 1966. Efficiency Measures for Steam-Electric Generating Plants. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp. 143–151. Seitz, W.D. 1966. Efficiency Measures for Steam-Electric Generating Plants. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp. 143–151.
Zurück zum Zitat Shephard, R.W. 1953. Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shephard, R.W. 1953. Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sitorus, B.L. 1966. Productive Efficiency and Redundant Factors of Production in Traditional Agricultural of Underdeveloped Countries: A Note on Measurement, In Proceedings Western Farm Economic Association. Sitorus, B.L. 1966. Productive Efficiency and Redundant Factors of Production in Traditional Agricultural of Underdeveloped Countries: A Note on Measurement, In Proceedings Western Farm Economic Association.
Metadaten
Titel
A Comparative Study of Alternative Approaches to Estimate Productivity
Publikationsdatum
30.11.2019
Erschienen in
Journal of Quantitative Economics / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0971-1554
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-1045
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-019-00191-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Journal of Quantitative Economics 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner