Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Education and Information Technologies
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 2/2022

28.07.2021

A comparative study of computer and mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The case of university students in Taiwan

verfasst von: En-Minh Lan

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

English pronunciation training for real-world communication tasks is crucial in EFL learning because it is essential to learners’ listening comprehension and speaking competence. As the e-generation emerges, computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) has begun to receive more recognition in academic institutions for pronunciation learning. Despite its prevalence, dubiety still remains in regard to its effectiveness in pronunciation and learners’ perception. This paradox has motivated researchers and language instructors to probe other means of effective pronunciation instruction. In the present study, the researcher aims to explore the effects of mobile-assisted pronunciation training (MAPT) on L2 learners’ pronunciation performance. The results revealed that MAPT learners not only held a more positive attitude toward the training course and the mobile application but also made significant improvements in pronunciation. Moreover, there was a non-significant interaction between learners’ English proficiency level and teaching methods.
Vorheriger Artikel Individualized help for at-risk students using model-agnostic and counterfactual explanations
Nächster Artikel Introduction of two new programming tools in Bengali and measurement of their reception among high-school students in Purba Bardhaman, India with the prototypic inclusion of a vector-biology module

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Agbatogun, A. O. (2013). Interactive digital technologies’ use in southwest Nigerian universities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 333–357.CrossRef
Ambient Insight. (2010). The US market for mobile learning products and services: 2009–2014 forecast and analysis. Monroe, WA.
Arashnia, M., & Shahrokhi, M. (2016). Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation among Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(4), 149–162.
Asiimwe, E. N., & Grönlund, A. (2015). MLCMS actual use, perceived use, and experiences of use. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(1), 101A.
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20.CrossRef
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press.
Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 477–497.CrossRef
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.CrossRef
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.
Dias, J. (2002). Cell phones in the classroom: Boon or bane? C@lling Japan, 10(2), 16–21.
Dickerson, W. B. (2015). Using orthography to teach pronunciation. The Handbook of English Pronunciation, 488–504.
Egbert, J. (2004). Review of connected speech. Language Learning & Technology, January, 8(1), 24–28.
Farhat, P. A., & Dzakiria, H. (2017). Pronunciation barriers and computer assisted language learning (CALL): Coping the demands of 21st century in second language learning classroom in Pakistan.
Ghounane, N. (2019). The attitudes of second year EFL students at Dr Moulay Tahar University towards learning English pronunciation through mobile assisted language Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (5), 110–123.
Grace, P., Blair, G. S., & Samuel, S. (2003). ReMMoC: A reflective middleware to support mobile client interoperability. OTM Confederated International Conferences on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (pp. 1170–1187). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Grant, M. M. (2019). Difficulties in defining mobile learning: Analysis, design characteristics, and implications. Educational Technology Research & Development, 67(2), 361–388.CrossRef
Haggag, H. M. (2018). Teaching phonetics using a mobile-based application in EFL context. European Scientific Journal, 14(14), 189–204.
Haghighi, M., & Rahimy, R. (2017). The effect of L2 minimal pairs practice on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ pronunciation accuracy. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 42–48.CrossRef
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.CrossRef
Henderson, A., Frost, D., & Tergujeff, E. (2012). The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results. Research in Language, 10, 5–27.CrossRef
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2010). A guide to authentic e-learning. Routledge.
Huang, Y. M., Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2011). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273–282.CrossRef
Huang, C. S., Yang, S. J., Chiang, T. H., & Su, A. Y. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 263–276.
Huensch, A. (2019). Pronunciation in foreign language classrooms: Instructors’ training, classroom practices, and beliefs. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 745–764.CrossRef
Hwang, J., & Fu, J. (2019). Trends in the research design and application of mobile language learning: A review of 2007–2016 publications in selected SSCI journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 567–581.CrossRef
Ingels, S. (2011). The effects of self-monitoring strategy use on the pronunciation of learners of English. Urbana, Illinois.
Iyere, T. O. (2012). Teaching spoken english in the ODL system in Nigeria. Department of English, National Open University of Nigeria.
Jing, X. (2017). Application of mobile learning system in phonetics teaching. International conference on E-education, E-business, E-management and E-learning - IC4E ‘17, 19–23.
Kaiser, D. (2018). Mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The iPhone pronunciation app project. IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Journal, 58, 38–52.
Katz, W. F., & Assmann, P. F. (2019). The Routledge handbook of phonetics. Routledge.
Keller, J. M. (1999). Motivation in cyber learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 7–30.
Kim, H., & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 31–57.
Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results. Education Sciences, 9(2), 90.CrossRef
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. Psychology Press.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). Overview of Mobile assisted language learning: Can mobile devices support collaborative practice in speaking and listening? ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.CrossRef
Kumar, B. S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, m-learning and d-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216.CrossRef
Lee, S. T. (2008). Teaching pronunciation of English using computer assisted learning software: An action research study in an institute of technology in Taiwan. Doctoral Dissertation, Australian Catholic University.
Lev-Ari, B. K. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago.
Levis, J. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.
Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2017). Mobilizing instruction in a second-language context: Perceptions of two speech technologies. Languages, 2(3), 1–21.CrossRef
Miqawati, A. H. (2020). Pronunciation learning, participation, and attitude enhancement through Mobile Assisted Language Learning (Mall). English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 211–218.
Munro, M., Derwing, T., & Morton, S. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111–131.CrossRef
Musa, N., & Mohamad, H. E. (2017). Duolingo: A mobile application to assist second language learning (App Review). Teaching English with Technology, 17, 89–98.
Nurani, S., & Rosyada, A. (2015). Improving english pronunciation of adult ESL learners through Reading Aloud Assessments. Lingua Cultura, 9(2).
Parsons, D. (2014). The future of mobile learning and implications for education and training. In A. Mohamed & T. Avgoustous (Eds.), Increasing access through mobile learning (pp. 217–229). Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University Press.
Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2019). English pronunciation teaching and research: Contemporary perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2016). English pronunciation instruction: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 1–6.
Rogerson-Revell, P. M. (2021). Computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT): Current issues and future directions. RELC Journal, 52(1), 189–205.CrossRef
Shirer, N. (2005). My True Voice: Fundamental content, individual capability, social progress. Arts Education Policy Review, 106(4), 25–33.
Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.
Tsai, C. C. (2008). Traditional lecture instruction vs. computer assisted instruction on pronunciation teaching: A pilot study of college students at NKMU. National Kaohsiung Marine University Journal, 22, 185–194.
Uchida, Y., & Sugimoto, J. (2020). Pronunciation goals of Japanese English teachers in the EFL classroom: Ambivalence toward native-like and intelligible pronunciation. The Language Teacher, 44, 3–9.CrossRef
Vygotsky, L. (1997). "Interaction between Learning and Development" Archived 2016-01-25 at the Wayback Machine. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Walesiak, B. (2017). Mobile pron. apps – a personal investigation. Speak out! Journal of the IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group, 57, 16–28.
Metadaten
Titel
A comparative study of computer and mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The case of university students in Taiwan
verfasst von
En-Minh Lan
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10647-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Education and Information Technologies 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Designing and validating an assessment inventory for online language teacher education accountability

OriginalPaper

A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education

OriginalPaper

Systemic model for technology integration in teaching

OriginalPaper

The impact of ICT education on humanistic innovative potential

OriginalPaper

A novel prediction model for educational planning of human resources with data mining approach: a national tax administration case study

OriginalPaper

An intelligent tutoring system architecture based on fuzzy neural network (FNN) for special education of learning disabled learners

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise