nach oben

Ethics and Information Technology

Erschienen in:

01.12.2022 | Original Paper

A framework for the application of socio-technical design methodology

verfasst von: Adnan Ahmad, Brian Whitworth, Elisa Bertino

Erschienen in: Ethics and Information Technology | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Socio-technical systems (STS) have become prominent platforms for online social interactions. Yet, they are still struggling to incorporate basic social ideas for many different and new online activities. This has resulted in unintended exposure of users’ personal data and a rise in online threats as users have now become a desirable target for malicious activities. To address such challenges, various researchers have argued that STS should support user-oriented configurations to protect their users from online social abuse. Some methodologies have also been proposed to appreciate the integration of social values in the design of information systems, but they often lack an application mechanism. This paper presents a framework for the application of the socio-technical design methodology to incorporate social standards in the design of STS. The proposed framework exemplifies the socio-technical design approach by considering a list of social standards, followed by their mapping onto corresponding technical specifications. Based on these two sets, the framework highlights various individual, inter-group, and intra-group interactions and their supporting tools for STS governance. A conversation about the integration of social standards in STS is already materializing, therefore, a comprehensive framework to apply these standards in STS is entailed.

Vorheriger Artikel No wheel but a dial: why and how passengers in self-driving cars should decide how their car drives

Nächster Artikel Extended loneliness. When hyperconnectivity makes us feel alone

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

These social standards are considered only to exemplify the working of the framework, and are not meant to be exhaustive in any sense, nor representative of any desired/proposed list. Therefore, they should not be compared with different rights standards proposed by various international organizations, including Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950), Helsinki Final Act (1975), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), etc.

The discussions about norms, how they are developed, spread, got adopted, rejected etc. are out of the scope of this paper.

Without supporting social standards in design, current STS will face the same negativity as portrayed by the P2P file sharing systems, where violations of the copyright law lead to demolishing of this useful tool, altogether.

This paper does not focus on different rights (e.g., right to be forgotten, right to internet access, etc.), rather it proposes a framework through which incorporation of social standards can be made possible in socio-technical design approach.

There are different types of rights such as civil, political, economic, social and liberal etc., however, this distinction and their discussion is out of the scope of this article.

After the receiving party’s consent.

https://www.gnu.org/home.en.html

https://sourceforge.net/

https://creativecommons.org/

For instance, information about operating system processes.

Ahmad, A., Azhar, A., Naqvi, S., Nawaz, A., Arshad, S., & Zeshan, F. (2019a). A methodology for sender-oriented anti-spamming. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(3), 2765–2776. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179562CrossRef

Ahmad, A., Whitworth, B., Zeshan, F., Janczewski, L., Ali, M., Chaudary, M. H., & Friedman, R. (2019b). A relation-aware multiparty access control. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37(1), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179080CrossRef

Ahmad, A., & Whitworth, B. (2011). Distributed access control for social networks. In International conference of information assurance and security (pp. 68–73). Malacca, Malaysia, 5–8 December 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIAS.2011.6122797.

Ahmad, A., Whitworth, B., Zeshan, F., Bertino, E. & Friedman, R. (2017). Extending social networks with delegation. Computers & Security, 70, 546–564, 2017, ISSN 0167-4048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.07.010.

Almeida, V. A. F., Doneda, D. & Rossini, C. (2016). How Do App Stores Challenge the Global Internet Governance Ecosystem? In IEEE internet computing (vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 49–51), Nov.–Dec. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2016.123.

Baraniuk, C. (2017). Google and Facebook duped in huge 'scam'. BBC News, 28th April 2019. Retrieved October 19, 2017, from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39744007

Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations. Sociological Research Online, 12(5).

Beu, D., & Buckley, M. R. (2001). The hypothesized relationship between accountability and ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(1), 57–74.CrossRef

Bird, P. (1973). Accountability: Standards in financial reporting. Accountancy Age Books.

Bonahoom, O. M. (1953). Moral and ethical considerations in tax practice. Marquette Law Review, 37(1), 85.

Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook public accountability. Oxford University Press. Retrieved July 24, 2019, from from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641253

Brandom, R. (2015). Is Facebook’s photo-tagging system violating privacy law?. The Verge, 2015. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from https://www.theverge.com/2015/12/21/10634100/facebook-photo-tagging-lawsuit-biometric-privacy-law

Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2003). Control and legitimation in government accountability processes: The private finance initiative in the UK. Critical Perspectives on Accounting., 14(1–2), 23–48.CrossRef

Cahn, A., Alfeld, S., Barford, P., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2016). An Empirical Study of Web Cookies. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2882991

Cath, C. (2019). Internet governance and human rights: A literature review. In C. Öhman, & D. Watson (Eds.), The 2018 yearbook of the digital ethics lab (pp. 105–132). Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17152-0_8

Cerf, V. (2012). The right to connect and internet censorship. New Perspectives Quarterly., 29(2), 18–23.CrossRef

Chaffey, D. (2020). Global social media research summary August 2020. Smart Insights, 3.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Rome, 4.XI. 1950. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf

Coons, J. E. (1987). Consistency. In California law review, Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Issue (Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 59–113). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3480573

Copyright Law. (2016). Copyright law of the United States. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from https://www.copyright.gov/title17/

DeNardis, L. (2014). The global war for internet governance. Yale University Press.CrossRef

Debbarma, P. (2016). Case study : Reasons why Google’s Orkut failed. Medium Corporation. 2016. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from https://medium.com/@PachaelPhillip/case-study-reasons-why-googles-orkut-failed-after-facebook-was-launched-92dd8a7abf0

Detel, W. (2008). On the concept of basic social norms. Analyse & Kritik, 30(2), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2008-0207CrossRef

Dryer, D. P. (1964). Freedom. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science / Revue Canadienne D’economique Et De Science Politique, 30(3), 444–448.

Dykstra, C. A. (1939). The quest for responsibility. The American Political Science Review, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1949761CrossRef

EC Directive. (2003). The privacy and electronic communications (EC Directive) regulations 2003. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/2426/contents/made

Economides, N. (2008). “Net Neutrality”, non-discrimination, and digital distribution of content through the Internet. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy., 4, 209–233.

Eggenschwiler, J. (2017). Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance. Internet Policy Review, 6(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.3.712CrossRef

Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2010). A bill of privacy rights for social network users. Retrieved January 23, 2021, from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/05/bill-privacy-rights-social-network-users

Facebook Help, How to stop Facebook sending friend requests without my permission? Retrieved December 24, 2019, from https://www.facebook.com/help/community/question/?id=2319753068153651.

Fehr, E., Kremhelmer, S., & Schmidt, K. M. (2008). Fairness and the optimal allocation of ownership rights. The Economic Journal, 118(531), 1262–1284.CrossRef

Fire, M., Goldschmidt, R., & Elovici, Y. (2014). Online social networks: Threats and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(4), 2019–2036.CrossRef

Fried, C. (1968). Privacy. The Yale Law Journal, 77(3), 475–493.CrossRef

Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington technical report (pp. 2–12).

Friedman, B., & Kahn Jr, P. H. (2007). Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1267–1292). CRC Press.

Gao, H., Hu, J., Huang, T., Wang, J., & Chen, Y. (2011). Security issues in online social networks. IEEE Internet Computing, 15(4), 56–63.CrossRef

Geer, D. E. (2015). The right to be unobserved. IEEE Security & Privacy, 13(4).

Gert, B., & Gert, J. (2020). The definition of morality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition). Retrieved October 18, 2021, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/morality-definition/

GCIG (Global Commission on Internet Governance). (2017). Retrieved November 17, 2017, from https://www.cigionline.org/initiatives/global-commission-internet-governance

Greenbaum, J. (1996, November). Back to labor: Returning to labor process discussions in the study of work. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 229–237).

Grudin, J. (1988, January). Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 85–93).

Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law.

Helsinki Final Act, 1 August 1975. https://www.osce.org/helsinki-final-act

Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 91–112.CrossRef

Hu, H., Ahn, G., Zhao, Z., & Yang, D. (2014). Game theoretic analysis of multiparty access control in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies (SACMAT '14) (pp. 93–102). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2613087.2613097

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 16 December 1966. General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966. General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights

ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office).(2017).International enforcement operation finds website privacy notices are too vague and generally inadequate. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2017/10/international-enforcement-operation-finds-website-privacy-notices-are-too-vague-and-generally-inadequate/

Ilia, P., Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., Fragopoulou, P., & Ioannidis, S. (2017). SAMPAC: Socially-aware collaborative multi-party access control. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM on conference on data and application security and privacy (CODASPY '17) (pp. 71–82). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029806.3029834.

Jin, L., Chen, Y., Wang, T., Hui, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). Understanding user behavior in online social networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(9), 144–150.CrossRef

Johnson, D. G. (1985). Computer ethics. Prentice-Hall Inc.

Kash, J. (2018). 10 reasons why most online business startups fail? Design Hill 13-04-2018. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://www.designhill.com/design-blog/reasons-why-most-online-business-startups-fail/

Kelsen, H. (1949). General theory of law and state. Harvard University Press.

Kim, M., Song, C., Kim, H., Park, D., Kwon, Y., Namkung, E., & Carlsson, M. (2019, September). Scam detection assistant: Automated protection from scammers. In 2019 first international conference on societal automation (SA) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

Kling, R. (1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 12(1), 61–110.CrossRef

Korpela, M., Soriyan, H. A., Olufokunbi, K. C., Onayade, A. A., Davies-Adetugbo, A., & Adesanmi, D. (1998). Community participation in health informatics in Africa: An experiment in tripartite partnership in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(3), 339–358.CrossRef

Lee, B., Riche, N., Karlson, A., Carpendale, S., SparkClouds. (2010). Visualizing trends in tag clouds. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1182–1189.CrossRef

Lessig, L. (2006). Code: And other laws of cyberspace, Version 2.0. Basic Books.

Lessig, L. (2012). Against perpetual copyright. The Lessig Wiki.

Littleton, A. C. (1966). Accounting evolution to 1900, 2nd edition, Russell and Russell.

Locke, J. (1963). An essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government: Second of Two Treatises on Government‖ (1690). In J. Somerville & R. E. Santoni (Eds.), Social and political philosophy (pp. 169–204). Anchor.

Masnick, M: Techdirt: Disney Claims House Of Mouse Built With Copyright, Ignores Public Domain Foundation: Techdirt, 11th September, 2012. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120910/02485220325/disney-claims-house-mouse-built-with-copyright-ignores-public-domain-foundation.shtml

Mead, G. H. (1934). 1934. University of Chicago Press.

Mehnaz, S., & Bertino, E. (2019). A fine-grained approach for anomaly detection in file system accesses with enhanced temporal user profiles. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

Mislove, A., Viswanath, B., Gummadi, K. P., & Druschel, P. (2010). You are who you know: inferring user profiles in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 251–260).

Muhammad, T., & Ahmad, A. (2021). A joint sharing approach for online privacy preservation, World Wide Web, (accepted).

Muller, M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 24–28.CrossRef

Muller, M. J. (1997). Ethnocritical heuristics for reflecting on work with users and other interested parties. In Computers and design in context (pp. 349–380).

Musiani, F., Cogburn, D. L., DeNardis, L., & Levinson, N. S. (2015). The turn to infrastructure in internet governance. Palgrave Macmillan US.

Novak, E. & Li, Q. (2012). A survey of security and privacy in online social networks (pp. 1–32), College of William and Mary Computer Science. Technical Report.

O'Flaherty, K. (2021). Is it time to leave WhatsApp—And is Signal the answer? The Guardian 24-01-2021. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/jan/24/is-it-time-to-leave-whatsapp-and-is-signal-the-answer

O'Reilly, L. (2011). Four reasons why MySpace failed to retain the social network crown. Marketing Week 12th Jan 2011. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from https://www.marketingweek.com/2011/01/12/four-reasons-why-myspace-failed-to-retain-the-social-network-crown/

Pang, J., and Zhang, Y. (2015). A new access control scheme for Facebook-style social networks. In Computers & security (Vol. 54, pp. 44–59). ISSN 0167-4048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.04.013.

Pettrachin, A. (2018). Towards a universal declaration on internet rights and freedoms? International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757139CrossRef

Porra, J., & Hirscheim, R. (2007). A lifetime of theory and action on the ethical use of computers. JAIS, 8(9), 467–478.CrossRef

Redeker, D., Gill, L., & Gasser, U. (2018). Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft an internet bill of rights. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757121CrossRef

Ridley, M. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. Harper.

Robertson, A. (2016). Facebook is asking users to judge the truthfulness of news headlines. The Verge 2016. Retrieved July 24, 2019, from https://www.theverge.com/2016/12/5/13849108/facebook-misleading-clickbait-news-headlines-survey

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. The Free Press.

Samreen, A., Ahmad, A., Zeshan, F., Ahmad, F., Ahmed, S., & Khan, Z. A. (2020). A collaborative method for protecting teens against online predators over social networks: A behavioral analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 174375–174393. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007141CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550.CrossRef

Sepuldeva, M., Van Banning, T., & van Genugten, W. J. M. (2004). Human rights reference handbook. University for Peace.

Shah, H. (2011). Accountability: Has it been hollowed out in the modern state? Journal of Political Studies, 18(1), 77–91.

Sidorowicz, R. (2002). Back to the beginning—Core values. Refresher Publications Inc.

Streitfeld, D. (2014). The New York Times, May 13, 2014. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/14/technology/google-should-erase-web-links-to-some-personal-data-europes-highest-court-says.html?_r=0

Suchman, L. (1997). Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. In Human values and the design of computer technology (pp. 91–106).

Suntaxi-Oña, G., & Varadharajan, V. (2015). A comparative analysis of the social graph model and multiparty access control model for online social networks. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, Vol. 4, No. 5.

Tappenden, A. F., and Miller, J. (2014). Automated cookie collection testing. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology. 23, 1, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559936.

TFG (The TypeFace Group). (2020). Social network value per user—How much is your audience worth? TFG website. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://www.thetypefacegroup.co.uk/social-network-value-per-user/

The Madrid Privacy Declaration. (2009). Global privacy standards for a global world. Retrieved January 23, 2021, from https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/contributions/open-consultations/2010-february/394-the-madrid-privacy-declaration/file

Timberg, C., & Dwoskin, E. (2020). Silicon Valley is getting tougher on Trump and his supporters over hate speech and disinformation. The Washington Post. Retrieved February 2, 2021.

Tuomela, R. (1995). The importance of us. MATH

Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (2009). The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(2).

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 10 December 1948, 217 A (III). Retrieved September 26, 2021, from https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html

Vasak, K. (1977). Human rights: A thirty-year struggle: The sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. UNESCO Courier, 30, 29–32.

Voloch, N., Nissim, P., Elmakies, M., & Gudes, E. (2019, July). A role and trust access control model for preserving privacy and image anonymization in social networks. In IFIP international conference on trust management (pp. 19–27). Springer.

Waldron, J. (2016). In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Property and ownership, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/property/

Wenar, L. (2021). "Rights". In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition). Retrieved October 18, 2021, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/rights/

Wentworth, D. (2002). Mickey rattles the bars: The supreme court hearing of Eldred v. Ashcroft, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard.

Whitworth, B., & De Moor, A. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems. Hershey, PA: IGI.” ISBN: 978-1-60566-264-0.

Whitworth, B., & Ahmad, A. (2014). The social design of technical systems: Building technologies for communities. Interaction Design Foundation.

Wilde, D., (2019). Over 1,000 Android apps take your data, even despite permission blocks, 9to5Google 09-07-2019. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://9to5google.com/2019/07/09/android-app-data-permissions/

Young, H. P. (2015). The evolution of social norms. Economics, 7(1), 359–387.

Zajonc, R. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1715944

Zeebaree, S., Ameen, S., & Sadeeq, M. (2020). Social media networks security threats, risks and recommendation: A case study in the kurdistan region. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13, 349–365.

Zhang, J., Gu, Z., Jang, J., Wu, H., Stoecklin, M. P., Huang, H., & Molloy, I. (2018, May). Protecting intellectual property of deep neural networks with watermarking. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Asia conference on computer and communications security (pp. 159–172).

Ziccardi, G. (2019). The right to data oblivion. DATA POLITICS (p. 231).

Titel: A framework for the application of socio-technical design methodology
verfasst von: Adnan Ahmad
Brian Whitworth
Elisa Bertino
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Ethics and Information Technology / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1388-1957
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8439
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09651-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Enforcing ethical goals over reinforcement-learning policies

Conceptualizations of user autonomy within the normative evaluation of dark patterns

Cobots, “co-operation” and the replacement of human skill

The ethics and epistemology of explanatory AI in medicine and healthcare

Explanation and Agency: exploring the normative-epistemic landscape of the “Right to Explanation”

Extended loneliness. When hyperconnectivity makes us feel alone

Premium Partner