Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare 1/2015

01.06.2015

A geometric examination of majorities based on difference in support

verfasst von: Richard Baron, Mostapha Diss, Eric Rémila, Philippe Solal

Erschienen in: Social Choice and Welfare | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Reciprocal preferences have been introduced in the literature of social choice theory in order to deal with preference intensities. They allow individuals to show preference intensities in the unit interval among each pair of options. In this framework, majority based on difference in support can be used as a method of aggregation of individual preferences into a collective preference: option \(a\) is preferred to option \(b\) if the sum of the intensities for \(a\) exceeds the aggregated intensity of \(b\) by a threshold given by a real number located between 0 and the total number of voters. Based on a three dimensional geometric approach, we provide a geometric analysis of the non-transitivity of the collective preference relations obtained by majority rule based on difference in support. This aspect is studied by assuming that each individual reciprocal preference satisfies a \(g\)-stochastic transitivity property, which is stronger than the usual notion of transitivity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In this article, we assume that individuals vote sincerely, so that the possibility of strategic voting is not considered.
 
2
By symmetry, we also consider the case \(bP_k a\), \(cP_k b\) and \(\lnot (cP_k a)\).
 
3
Recall that a trirectangular tetrahedron is a tetrahedron where all three face angles at one vertex are right angles.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett CR, Pattanaik PK, Salles M (1986) On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 19:1–10CrossRef Barrett CR, Pattanaik PK, Salles M (1986) On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 19:1–10CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Basu K (1984) Fuzzy revealed preference theory. J Econ Theory 32:212–227CrossRef Basu K (1984) Fuzzy revealed preference theory. J Econ Theory 32:212–227CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook WD, Kress M (1985) Ordinal ranking with intensity of preference. Manag Sci 31:26–32CrossRef Cook WD, Kress M (1985) Ordinal ranking with intensity of preference. Manag Sci 31:26–32CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dasgupta M, Deb R (1996) Transitivity and fuzzy preferences. Soc Choice Welf 13(3):305–318CrossRef Dasgupta M, Deb R (1996) Transitivity and fuzzy preferences. Soc Choice Welf 13(3):305–318CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Baets B, De Meyer H (2005) Transitivity frameworks for reciprocal relations: cycle-transitivity versus FG-transitivity. Fuzzy Sets Syst 152:249–270CrossRef De Baets B, De Meyer H (2005) Transitivity frameworks for reciprocal relations: cycle-transitivity versus FG-transitivity. Fuzzy Sets Syst 152:249–270CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Baets B, De Meyer H, De Schuymer B, Jenei S (2006) Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations. Soc Choice Welf 26:217–238CrossRef De Baets B, De Meyer H, De Schuymer B, Jenei S (2006) Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations. Soc Choice Welf 26:217–238CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Mathematics in science and engineering. Academic Press, New York Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Mathematics in science and engineering. Academic Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat García-Lapresta JL (2006) A general class of simple majority decision rules based on linguistic opinions. Inf Sci 176:352–365CrossRef García-Lapresta JL (2006) A general class of simple majority decision rules based on linguistic opinions. Inf Sci 176:352–365CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat García-Lapresta JL, Llamazares B (2000) Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: some rules of the mean. Soc Choice Welf 17(4):673–690CrossRef García-Lapresta JL, Llamazares B (2000) Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: some rules of the mean. Soc Choice Welf 17(4):673–690CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat García-Lapresta JL, Llamazares B (2001) Majority decisions based on difference of votes. J Math Econ 35:463–481CrossRef García-Lapresta JL, Llamazares B (2001) Majority decisions based on difference of votes. J Math Econ 35:463–481CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat García-Lapresta JL, Llamazares B (2010) Preference intensities and majority decisions based on difference of support between alternatives. Group Decis Negot 19:527–542CrossRef García-Lapresta JL, Llamazares B (2010) Preference intensities and majority decisions based on difference of support between alternatives. Group Decis Negot 19:527–542CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat García-Lapresta JL, Meneses LC (2005) Individual-valued preferences and their aggregation: consistency analysis in a real case. Fuzzy Sets Syst 151(2):269–284CrossRef García-Lapresta JL, Meneses LC (2005) Individual-valued preferences and their aggregation: consistency analysis in a real case. Fuzzy Sets Syst 151(2):269–284CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gehrlein WV, Lepelley D (2012) The value of research based on simple assumptions about voters’ preferences. In: Felsenthal DS, Machover M (eds) Electoral systems: paradoxes, assumptions and procedures. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–200CrossRef Gehrlein WV, Lepelley D (2012) The value of research based on simple assumptions about voters’ preferences. In: Felsenthal DS, Machover M (eds) Electoral systems: paradoxes, assumptions and procedures. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–200CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Houy N (2007) Some further characterizations for the forgotten voting rules. Math Soc Sci 53:111–121CrossRef Houy N (2007) Some further characterizations for the forgotten voting rules. Math Soc Sci 53:111–121CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Llamazares B (2004) Simple and absolute special majorities generated by OWA operators. Eur J Oper Res 158:707–720CrossRef Llamazares B (2004) Simple and absolute special majorities generated by OWA operators. Eur J Oper Res 158:707–720CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Llamazares B (2006) The forgotten decision rules: majority rules based on difference of votes. Math Soc Sci 51:311–326CrossRef Llamazares B (2006) The forgotten decision rules: majority rules based on difference of votes. Math Soc Sci 51:311–326CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Llamazares B (2007) Choosing OWA operator weights in the field of social choice. Inf Sci 177:4745–4756CrossRef Llamazares B (2007) Choosing OWA operator weights in the field of social choice. Inf Sci 177:4745–4756CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Llamazares B, García-Lapresta JL (2003) Voting systems generated by quasiarithmetic means and OWA operators. In: Fodor J, De Baets B (eds) Principles of fuzzy preference modelling and decision making. Academia Press, Ghent, pp 195–213 Llamazares B, García-Lapresta JL (2003) Voting systems generated by quasiarithmetic means and OWA operators. In: Fodor J, De Baets B (eds) Principles of fuzzy preference modelling and decision making. Academia Press, Ghent, pp 195–213
Zurück zum Zitat Llamazares B, García-Lapresta JL (2008) Extension of some voting systems to the field of gradual preferences. In: Bustince H, Herrera F, Montero J (eds) Fuzzy sets and their extensions: representation, aggregation and models. Springer, Berlin, pp 292–310 Llamazares B, García-Lapresta JL (2008) Extension of some voting systems to the field of gradual preferences. In: Bustince H, Herrera F, Montero J (eds) Fuzzy sets and their extensions: representation, aggregation and models. Springer, Berlin, pp 292–310
Zurück zum Zitat Llamazares B, Perez-Asurmendi P, García-Lapresta JL (2013) Collective transitivity in majorities based on difference in support. Fuzzy Sets Syst 216:3–15CrossRef Llamazares B, Perez-Asurmendi P, García-Lapresta JL (2013) Collective transitivity in majorities based on difference in support. Fuzzy Sets Syst 216:3–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McLean I, Urken AB (1995) Classics of social choice. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor McLean I, Urken AB (1995) Classics of social choice. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Zurück zum Zitat Meek BL (1975) A transferable voting system including intensity of preference. Math Sci Hum 50:23–29 Meek BL (1975) A transferable voting system including intensity of preference. Math Sci Hum 50:23–29
Zurück zum Zitat Morales JI (1797) Memoria matemática sobre el cálculo de la opinion en las elecciones. Imprenta Real, Madrid Morales JI (1797) Memoria matemática sobre el cálculo de la opinion en las elecciones. Imprenta Real, Madrid
Zurück zum Zitat Nurmi H (1981) Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6:249–259CrossRef Nurmi H (1981) Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6:249–259CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nurmi H (2008) Fuzzy social choice: a selective retrospect. Soft Comput 12:281–288CrossRef Nurmi H (2008) Fuzzy social choice: a selective retrospect. Soft Comput 12:281–288CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167CrossRef Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155–167CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ovchinnikov SV (1981) Structure of fuzzy binary relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6:169–195CrossRef Ovchinnikov SV (1981) Structure of fuzzy binary relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 6:169–195CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Zurück zum Zitat Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131CrossRef Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh LA (1971) Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Inf Sci 3(2):177–200CrossRef Zadeh LA (1971) Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Inf Sci 3(2):177–200CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A geometric examination of majorities based on difference in support
verfasst von
Richard Baron
Mostapha Diss
Eric Rémila
Philippe Solal
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Social Choice and Welfare / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-015-0870-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Social Choice and Welfare 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe