Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 5/2016

01.11.2016

A Motivational Approach to Support Healthy Habits in Long-term Child–Robot Interaction

verfasst von: Raquel Ros, Elettra Oleari, Clara Pozzi, Francesca Sacchitelli, Daniele Baranzini, Anahita Bagherzadhalimi, Alberto Sanna, Yiannis Demiris

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We examine the use of role-switching as an intrinsic motivational mechanism to increase engagement in long-term child–robot interaction. The present study describes a learning framework where children between 9 and 11-years-old interact with a robot to improve their knowledge and habits with regards to healthy life-styles. Experiments were carried out in Italy where 41 children were divided in three groups interacting with: (i) a robot with a role-switching mechanism, (ii) a robot without a role-switching mechanism and (iii) an interactive video. Additionally, a control group composed of 43 more children, who were not exposed to any interactive approach, was used as a baseline of the study. During the intervention period, the three groups were exposed to three interactive sessions once a week. The aim of the study was to find any difference in healthy-habits acquisition based on alternative interactive systems, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the role-switch approach as a trigger for engagement and motivation while interacting with a robot. The results provide evidence that the rate of children adopting healthy habits during the intervention period was higher for those interacting with a robot. Moreover, alignment with the robot behaviour and achievement of higher engagement levels were also observed for those children interacting with the robot that used the role-switching mechanism. This supports the notion that role-switching facilitates sustained long-interactions between a child and a robot.
Nächster Artikel An Improved Variable Spring Balance Position Impedance Control for a Complex Docking Structure

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
3
This condition is analogous to the Without Role Switching condition, with the difference that children interact with a video instead of a robot.
 
4
We were informed by the teachers that, during the period in which the study took place, no explicit references to healthy habits were addressed in the involved classes. Therefore, if any information on this topic was provided to children, it had to be out of school lessons/activities.
 
5
A pictorial representation of a 1–5 Likert scale through which respondents identify their answers, feelings or opinions [27].
 
6
Children in the video condition (V) did not filled in these questions.
 
7
Few differences between annotations were found, and these were mainly due to human error, i.e. missing an observable behaviour, rather than disagreement on the classification of the behaviour.
 
8
As already mentioned in the study design, teachers confirmed that children were not having any lessons regarding healthy life styles during the study period.
 
Literatur
1.
Aylett RS, Castellano G, Raducanu B, Paiva A, Hanheide M (2011) Long-term socially perceptive and interactive robot companions: challenges and future perspectives. In: Proceedings of international conference on multimodal, interfaces, pp 323–326
2.
Baroni I, Nalin M, Coti Zelati M, Oleari E, Sanna A (2014) Designing motivational robot: how robots might motivate children to eat fruits and vegetables. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RoMAN)
3.
Belpaeme T, Baxter P, de Greeff J, Kennedy J, Read R, Looije R, Neerincx M, Baroni I, Zelati MC (2013) Child–robot interaction: perspectives and challenges. In: Herrmann G, Pearson MJ, Lenz A, Bremner P, Spiers A, Leonards U (eds) Social robotics, vol 8239. Springer, New York, pp 452–459 Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossRef
4.
Belpaeme T, Baxter PE, Read R, Wood R, Cuayáhuitl Heriberto, Kiefer B, Racioppa S, Kruijff-Korbayová I, Athanasopoulos G, Enescu V et al (2012) Multimodal child–robot interaction: building social bonds. J Hum-Robot Interact 1(2):33–53
5.
Bianchi-Berthouze N (2013) Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. Hum-Comput Interact 28(1):40–75
6.
Bickmore TW, Picard RW (2005) Establishing and maintaining long-term human–computer relationships. Trans Comput Hum Interact 12(2):293–327CrossRef
7.
Cynthia LB (2004) Designing sociable robots. MIT press, Cambridge
8.
Bruce A, Nourbakhsh I, Simmons R (2002) The role of expressiveness and attention in human–robot interaction. In: Robotics and automation. Proceedings ICRA’02 IEEE international conference on, IEEE, vol 4, pp 4138–4142
9.
Martyn C, David K, William H, Kerstin D (1999) Robots in the classroom-tools for accessible education. Assistive technology on the threshold of the new millennium, pp 448–452
10.
11.
Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc B 362(1480):679–704CrossRef
12.
Fasola J Mataric MJ (2010) Robot motivator: Increasing user enjoyment and performance on a physical/cognitive task. In: Development and learning (ICDL), IEEE 9th international conference on, IEEE, pp 274–279
13.
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):143–166CrossRefMATH
14.
Gockley R, Bruce A, Forlizzi J, Michalowski M, Mundell A, Rosenthal S, Sellner B, Simmons R, Snipes K, Schultz AC et al (2005) Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS)
15.
Hanna L, Risden K, Alexander K (1997) Guidelines for usability testing with children. Interactions 4(5):9–14CrossRef
16.
Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N, Ishiguro H (2007) A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction. Robot IEEE Trans 23(5):962–971CrossRef
17.
Kennedy J, Baxter P, Belpaeme T (2015) The robot who tried too hard: social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 67–74
18.
Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2007) A robotic weight loss coach. In: Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on artificial intelligence, vol 2, 1985–1986, AAAI Press, London
19.
Kidd CD, Breazeal C (2008) Robots at home: understanding long-term human–robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS)
20.
Laurent Jeff, Catanzaro Salvatore J, Thomas E Joiner Jr, Karen D Rudolph, Kirsten I Potter, Sharon Lambert, Lori Osborne, Tamara Gathright (1999) A measure of positive and negative affect for children: scale development and preliminary validation. Psychol Assess 11(3):326–338CrossRef
21.
Lee MK, Kiesler S, Forlizzi J (2010) Receptionist or information kiosk: how do people talk with a robot? In: Proceedings of conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp 31–40
22.
Leite I, Martinho C, Pereira A, Paiva A (2009) As time goes by: long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. In: International symposium on robot and human interactive, communication, pp 669–674
23.
Leite I, Martinho C, Paiva A (2013) Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. Int J Soc Robot 5:1–18
24.
Leite I, Pereira A, Castellano G, Mascarenhas S, Martinho C, Paiva A (2011) Social robots in learning environments: a case study of an empathic chess companion. In: Proceedings of the international WS on personalization approaches in learning. Environments 732:8–12
25.
Lewis M, Cañamero L (2014) An affective autonomous robot toddler to support the development of self-efficacy in diabetic children. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN)
26.
Stephen PL, Brian EN, Symen M, Catherine LL (2001) Facilitating active learning with inexpensive mobile robots. J Comput Sci Coll 16(4):21–33
27.
Markopoulos P, Read J, MacFarlane S, Hoysniemi J (2008) Evaluating children’s interactive products: principles and practices for interaction designers. Morgan Kaufmann
28.
Ng-Thow-Hing V, Sarvadevabhatla RK, Okita S (2011) The learning with kids project: retrospective and status report. In: WS on human-robot interaction: perspectives and contributions to robotics from the human sciences
29.
30.
Okita SY, Ng-Thow-Hing V (2009) Learning together: ASIMO developing an interactive learning partnership with children. In: International symposium on robot and human interactive, communication, pp 1125–1130
31.
32.
Park S, Moshkina L, Arkin RC (2010) Recognizing nonverbal affective behavior in humanoid robots. Intell Auton Syst 11: IAS-11, 12–21
33.
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Billard A (2004) Effects of repeated exposure to a humanoid robot on children with autism. In: Designing a more inclusive world, Springer, New York, pp. 225–236
34.
Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2010) Developing play scenarios for tactile interaction with a humanoid robot: a case study exploration with children with autism. In: Social robotics, vol 6414, pp 243–252. Springer, Berlin. Lecture Notes in Computer Science
35.
Ros R, Baroni I, Demiris Y (2014) Adaptive human–robot interaction in sensorimotor task instruction: from human to robot dance tutors. Robot Auton Syst 62(6):707–720CrossRef
36.
Raquel R, Yiannis D (2013) Creative dance: an approach for social interaction between robots and children. In: AlbertAli S, Hayley H, Oya A, Hatice G (eds) Human behavior understanding, vol 8212. Springer, New York, pp 40–51 Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossRef
37.
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 25(1):54–67CrossRef
38.
Sabanovic S, Michalowski MP, Caporael LR (2007) Making friends: building social robots through interdisciplinary collaboration. In: Multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics: papers from the 2007 AAAI spring symposium, technical report SS-07-07, AAAI, pp 71–77
39.
Brian S (1999) Imitation and mechanisms of joint attention: a developmental structure for building social skills on a humanoid robot. In: ChrystopherL N (ed) Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents, vol 1562. Springer, Berlin, pp 176–195 Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossRef
40.
Smith-Autard JM (2002) The art of dance in education. A&C Black Publishers, London
41.
Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan JR (2007) Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(46):17954–17958CrossRef
42.
Tanaka F, Matsuzoe S (2012) Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments at a classroom for vocabulary learning. J Hum–Robot Interact 1(1):78–95
43.
Tanaka F, Movellan JR, Fortenberry B, Kazuki A (2006) Daily hri evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 3–9
44.
Richard J (1984) Vallerand and greg reid. On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: a test of cognitive evaluation theory. J Sport Psychol 6(1):94–102CrossRef
45.
Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Robot therapy in a care house-change of relationship among the residents and seal robot during a 2-month long study. In: Robot and Human interactive communication. RO-MAN 2007. The 16th IEEE international symposium on, IEEE, pp 107–112
46.
Wada K, Shibata T, Musha T, Kimura S (2005) Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by eeg. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), IEEE, pp 1552–1557
47.
Wada K, Shibata T, Musha T, Kimura S (2008) Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia. Eng Med Biol Mag, IEEE 27(4):53–60CrossRef
48.
Wittenburg P, Brugman H, Russel A, Klassmann A, Sloetjes H (2006) ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. In: Proceedings of Fifth international conference on language resources and evaluation, pp 1556–1559
Metadaten
Titel
A Motivational Approach to Support Healthy Habits in Long-term Child–Robot Interaction
verfasst von
Raquel Ros
Elettra Oleari
Clara Pozzi
Francesca Sacchitelli
Daniele Baranzini
Anahita Bagherzadhalimi
Alberto Sanna
Yiannis Demiris
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0356-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

International Journal of Social Robotics 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

An Integrated Decision Making Approach for Adaptive Shared Control of Mobility Assistance Robots

Erratum

Erratum to: Clinical Application of a Humanoid Robot in Pediatric Cancer Interventions

OriginalPaper

Measuring the Effectiveness of Readability for Mobile Robot Locomotion

OriginalPaper

Human Visual Attention Model Based on Analysis of Magic for Smooth Human–Robot Interaction

OriginalPaper

Autonomous Robotic Choreography Creation via Semi-interactive Evolutionary Computation

OriginalPaper

Dynamic Social Zone based Mobile Robot Navigation for Human Comfortable Safety in Social Environments

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise