Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 6/2014

01.06.2014 | Original Paper

A parallel iterative partitioned coupling analysis system for large-scale acoustic fluid–structure interactions

verfasst von: Shunji Kataoka, Satsuki Minami, Hiroshi Kawai, Tomonori Yamada, Shinobu Yoshimura

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In many engineering fields, dynamic response in fluid–structure interaction (FSI) is important, and some of the FSI phenomena are treated as acoustic FSI (AFSI) problems. Dynamic interactions between fluids and structures may change dynamic characteristics of the structure and its response to external excitation parameters such as seismic loading. This paper describes a parallel coupling analysis system for large-scale AFSI problems using iterative partitioned coupling techniques. We employ an open source parallel finite element analysis system called ADVENTURE, which adopts an efficient preconditioned iterative linear algebraic solver. In addition, we have recently developed a parallel coupling tool called ADVENTURE_Coupler to efficiently handle interface variables in various parallel computing environments. We also employ the Broyden method for updating interface variables to attain robust and fast convergence of fixed-point iterations. This paper describes key features of the coupling analysis system developed, and we perform tests to validate its performance for several AFSI problems. The system runs efficiently in a parallel environment, and it is capable of analyzing three-dimensional-complex-shaped structures with more than 20 million degrees-of-freedom (DOFs). Its numerical results also show good agreement with experimental results.
Vorheriger Artikel What-You-Prescribe-Is-What-You-Get orthotropic hyperelasticity
Nächster Artikel Time-domain BEM for 3-D transient elastodynamic problems with interacting rigid movable disc-shaped inclusions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Fritz RJ (1972) The effect of liquids on the dynamic motions of immersed solids. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 94:167–173CrossRef
2.
Chen SS (1974) Parallel-flow-induced vibrations and instabilities of cylindrical structures. Shock Vib Dig 6(10):2–12CrossRef
3.
Sigrist JF, Broc D (2008) Dynamic analysis of a tube bundle with fluid–structure interaction modeling using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Eng 197:1080–1099CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
4.
Mandel J (2002) An Iterative substructuring method for coupled fluid–solid acoustic problems. J Comput Phys 177(1):95–116CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
5.
Heil M (2004) An efficient solver for the fully-coupled solution of large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1–23CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
6.
Ishihara D, Yoshimura S (2005) A monolithic approach for interaction of incompressible viscous fluid and an elastic body based on fluid pressure Poisson equation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 64:167–203CrossRefMATH
7.
Washio T, Hisada T, Watanabe H, Tezduyar TE (2005) A robust preconditioner for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4027–4047CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
8.
Liew KM, Wang WQ, Zhang LX, He XQ (2007) A computational approach for predicting the hydroelasticity of flexible structures based on the pressure Poisson equation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72:1560–1583CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
9.
Badia S, Quaini A, Quarteroni A (2008) Modular vs. non-modular preconditioners for fluid–structure systems with large added-mass effect. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:4216–5232CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
10.
Minami S, Kawai H, Yoshimura S (2012) A monolithic approach based on balancing domain decomposition method for acoustic fluid–structure interaction. J Appl Mech 79:010906CrossRef
11.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid–structure interactions. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 195:2002–2027CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
12.
13.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid–structure interaction, methods and applications. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefMATH
14.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855–900CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
15.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171–225CrossRefMathSciNet
16.
17.
Manguoglu M, Sameh AH, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2008) A nested iterative scheme for computation of incompressible flows in long domains. Comput Mech 43:73–80CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
18.
Manguoglu M, Takizawa K, Sameh AH, Tezduyar TE (2010) Solution of linear systems in arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement. Comput Mech 46:83– 89
19.
Manguoglu M, Takizawa K, Sameh AH, Tezduyar TE (2011) Nested and parallel sparse algorithms for arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:135–149CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
20.
Felippa CA, Park KC (1980) Staggered transient analysis procedures for coupled mechanical systems: formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 24:61–111CrossRefMATH
21.
Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows: fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21:933–953CrossRefMATH
22.
Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:321–332CrossRefMATH
23.
Le Tallec P, Mouro J (2001) Fluid structure interaction with large structural displacements. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 190(24–25):3039–3067CrossRefMATH
24.
Michler C, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2004) An interface Newton–Krylov solver for fluid–structure interaction. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 47(10–11):1189–1195
25.
Fernandez MA, Moubachir M (2005) A Newton method using exact Jacobians for solving fluid–structure coupling. Comput Struct 83(2–3):127–142CrossRef
26.
Matthies HG, Niekamp R, Steindorf J (2006) Algorithms for strong coupling procedures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2028–2049CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
27.
Yamada T, Yoshimura S (2008) Line search partitioned approach for fluid structure interaction analysis of flapping wing. CMES 24(1):51–60MATH
28.
Minami S, Yoshimura S (2010) Performance evaluation of nonlinear algorithms with line search for partitioned coupling technique for fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64(10–12):1129–1147CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
29.
Joppich W, Kuerschner M (2006) MpCCI—a tool for the simulation of coupled applications. Concurr Comput: Pract Exp 18(2):183–192CrossRef
30.
Bungartz HJ, Benk J, Gatzhammer B, Mehl M, Neckel T (2010) Partitioned simulation of fluid–structure interaction on Cartesian grids. In: Bungartz HJ, Mehl M, Schaefer M (eds) Fluid–structure interaction, modelling, simulation, optimization, Part II. Lecture notes in CSE. Springer, Berlin, pp 255–284
31.
De Cecchis D, Drummond LA, Castillo JE (2013) Design of a distributed coupling toolkit for high performance computing environment. Math Comput Model 57:2267–2278CrossRef
32.
Piacentini A, Morel T, Thevenin A, Duchaine F (2011) Open-PALM : an open source dynamic parallel coupler. In: IV International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering, Kos Island
33.
Duchaine F, Jaure S, Poitou D, Quemerais E, Staffelbach G, Morel T, Gicquel L (2013) High performance conjugate heat transfer with the OPENPALM coupler. In: V International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering, Kos Island
34.
Yoshimura S, Shioya R, Noguchi H, Miyamura T (2002) Advanced general-purpose computational mechanics system for large scale analysis and design. J Comput Appl Math 149:279–296CrossRefMATH
35.
36.
Miyamura T, Yoshimura S (2004) Generalized I/O data format and interface library for module-based parallel finite element analysis system. Adv Softw Eng 35:149–159CrossRef
37.
Ogino M, Shioya R, Kawai H, Yoshimura S (2005) Seismic response analysis of full scale nuclear vessel model with ADVENTURE system on the earth simulator. J Earth Sim 2:41–54
38.
Yoshimura S (2006) Virtual demonstration tests of large-scale and complex artifacts using an open source parallel CAE system, ADVENTURE. J Solid State Phenom 110:133–142CrossRefMathSciNet
39.
Kawai H, Ogino M, Shioya R, Yoshimura S (2011) Large scale elasto-plastic analysis using domain decomposition method optimized for multi-core CPU architecture. Key Eng Mater 462–463:605–610
40.
Watabe M, Shibata H, Sato H, Kawakami S, Ohno T, Ichiki T, Sasaki Y (1989) Preliminary study on seismic proving test of BWR core internals. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on SMiRT, 841–846
41.
Sato H, Suzuki K, Kamata T, Taira T, Niwa H, Nakajima M (1989) Test results on seismic proving test of BWR core internals. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on SMiRT, 847–852
42.
Kataoka S, Minami S, Kawai H, Yoshimura S (2010) Three dimensional FSI simulation of extruded rod bundles immersed in fluid using partitioned coupling technique, PVP2010
43.
44.
Kelley CT (2003) Solving nonlinear equations with Newton’s method. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefMATH
45.
Shioya R, Yagawa G (1994) Parallel finite elements on a massively parallel computer with domain decomposition. Comput Syst Eng 4:495–503
46.
Metadaten
Titel
A parallel iterative partitioned coupling analysis system for large-scale acoustic fluid–structure interactions
verfasst von
Shunji Kataoka
Satsuki Minami
Hiroshi Kawai
Tomonori Yamada
Shinobu Yoshimura
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0973-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Computational Mechanics 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

On the Assumed Natural Strain method to alleviate locking in solid-shell NURBS-based finite elements

Original Paper

Time-domain BEM for 3-D transient elastodynamic problems with interacting rigid movable disc-shaped inclusions

Original Paper

Extended particle difference method for weak and strong discontinuity problems: part II. Formulations and applications for various interfacial singularity problems

Original Paper

Blending moving least squares techniques with NURBS basis functions for nonlinear isogeometric analysis

Review Paper

An adaptive multiscale method for quasi-static crack growth

Original Paper

Two general algorithms for nearly singular integrals in two dimensional anisotropic boundary element method

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise