Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Telecommunication Systems
Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems 4/2016

01.04.2016

A practical model for ensemble estimation of QoS and QoE in VoIP services via fuzzy inference systems and fuzzy evidence theory

verfasst von: Taha Mansouri, Ali Nabavi, Ahad Zare Ravasan, Hamid Ahangarbahan

Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, there is an increasing number of Voices over IP (VoIP) services offered in telecommunication networks with specific quality requirements. Such requirements impact upon both the objective quality of service (QoS) of the end-to end connection as well as the subjective quality of experience (QoE) as perceived by the end user. In this study, we have proposed an integrated QoS and QoE evaluation system based on the combination of fuzzy inference systems and fuzzy evidence theory. For quality criteria, we have used QoS as a technical source from the viewpoint of service provider and QoE as the end user approach in front of service. We have divided the positive and negative variables of QoE into two distinct systems. At the same time, a parameter has been proposed as quality, which is the total quality of a service according to the objective and subjective viewpoints. To calculate the parameters mentioned above, a fuzzy inference system has been utilized. In addition, to obtain all data sources as an evidence of quality, Dempster–Shafer evidence theory has been employed. Finally, the proposed approach evaluated through the quality of VoIP services in three real cases and the results are discussed.
Vorheriger Artikel Resource allocation and interference management strategies for inband relaying in LTE-A
Nächster Artikel Game theoretic power allocation for fading MIMO multiple access channels with imperfect CSIR

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Cano, M.-D., & Cerdan, F. (2012). Subjective QoE analysis of VoIP applications in a wireless campus environment. Telecommunication Systems, 49(1), 5–15.CrossRef
3.
ITU-T (1994) Recommendation E.800: Terms and definitions related to quality of service and network performance including dependability. http://​www.​itu.​int/​. Accessed 8 Feb 2014.
4.
Takahashi, A., Hands, D., & Barriac, V. (2008). Standardization activities in the ITU for a QoE assessment of IPTV. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46(2), 78–84.CrossRef
5.
Alben, L. (1996). Defining the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions, 3(3), 11–15.CrossRef
6.
Rifai, H., Mohammed, S., Mellouk, A. (2011). A brief synthesis of QoS-QoE methodologies. In 10th IEEE International Symposium on Programming and Systems (ISPS) (pp. 32–38).
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
Khirman, S., Henriksen, P. (2002). Relationship between quality-of-service and quality-of-experience for public internet service. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Passive and Active Measurement.
13.
Sánchez-Macián, A., López, D., López de Vergara, J., Pastor, E. (2006). A framework for the automatic calculation of quality of experience in telematic services. In Proceedings of the 13th HP-OVUA Workshop, Côte d’Azur, France.
14.
Wang, H.-C., Lee, C.-S., & Ho, T.-H. (2007). Combining subjective and objective QoS factors for personalized web service selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 571–584.CrossRef
15.
Kilkki, K. (2008). Quality of experience in communications ecosystem. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14(5), 615–624.
16.
Hoßfeld, T., & Binzenhöfer, A. (2008). Analysis of skype VoIP traffic in UMTS: End-to-end QoS and QoE measurements. Computer Networks, 52(3), 650–666.CrossRef
17.
Salcedo, O.J., Sierra, F., Hernandez, C. (2009). An approach to quality of service evaluation using computational intelligence. In IEEE International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science, NISS’09. (pp 580–585).
18.
Serral-Gracià, R., Cerqueira, E., Curado, M., Yannuzzi, M., Monteiro, E., Masip-Bruin, X. (2010). An overview of quality of experience measurement challenges for video applications in IP networks. In Wired/Wireless Internet Communications. Springer, (pp 252–263).
19.
Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., & Tran-Gia, P. (2010). A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Network, 24(2), 36–41.CrossRef
20.
Coverdale, P., Möller, S., Raake, A., & Takahashi, A. (2011). Multimedia quality assessment standards in ITU-T SG 12. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28(6), 91–97.CrossRef
21.
Dogman, A., Saatchi, R., & Al-Khayatt, S. (2011). Quality of service evaluation using a combination of fuzzy C-means and regression model. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 7(1), 198–205.
22.
Li, F., He, Y., Hu, W., Wu, L., & Wen, P. (2011). Web service selection based on fuzzy QoS attributes. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 7(1), 198–205.
23.
Day, J., Deters, R. (2004). Selecting the best web service. In Proceedings of the conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research. IBM Press, (pp 293–307).
24.
Maximilien, E. M., & Singh, M. P. (2004). A framework and ontology for dynamic web services selection. IEEE Internet Computing, 8(5), 84–93.CrossRef
25.
Menascé, D. A. (2003). Automatic qos control. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1), 92–95.CrossRef
26.
Ran, S. (2003). A model for web services discovery with QoS. ACM Sigecom Exchanges, 4(1), 1–10.CrossRef
27.
Zadeh, L. (2005). Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)-an outline. Information Sciences, 172(1–2), 1–40.CrossRef
28.
Kulak, O., & Kahraman, C. (2005). Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 170(2–4), 191–210.CrossRef
29.
Leung, L., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 102–113.CrossRef
30.
Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.CrossRef
31.
Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., & Doan, I. (2003). Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences, 157, 135–153.CrossRef
32.
Moalagh, M., & Ravasan, A. Z. (2013). Developing a practical framework for assessing ERP post-implementation success using fuzzy analytic network process. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1236–1257.CrossRef
33.
Liang, G., & Wang, M. (1993). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for robot selection. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 10(4), 267–274.CrossRef
34.
Ding, J., & Liang, G. (2005). Using fuzzy MCDM to select partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping. Information Sciences, 173(1–3), 197–225.CrossRef
35.
Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 1–13.CrossRef
36.
Sugeno, M. (1985). Industrial applications of fuzzy control. New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
37.
Dempster, A. P. (1967). Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38(2), 325–339.CrossRef
38.
Sevastianov, P., Dymova, L., & Bartosiewicz, P. (2012). A framework for rule-base evidential reasoning in the interval setting applied to diagnosing type 2 diabetes. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(4), 4190–4200.CrossRef
39.
Guan, J. W., & Bell, D. A. (1992). Evidence theory and its applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher.
40.
Altınçay, H., & Demirekler, M. (2003). Speaker identification by combining multiple classifiers using Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Speech Communication, 41(4), 531–547.CrossRef
41.
Milisavljević, N., Bloch, I., van den Broek, S., & Acheroy, M. (2003). Improving mine recognition through processing and Dempster–Shafer fusion of ground-penetrating radar data. Pattern Recognition, 36(5), 1233–1250.CrossRef
42.
Hayatle, O., Youssef, A., & Otrok, H. (2012). Dempster–Shafer evidence combining for (Anti)-Honeypot technologies. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 21(6), 306–316.
43.
Lee, C.-S., & Pan, C.-Y. (2004). An intelligent fuzzy agent for meeting scheduling decision support system. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 142(3), 467–488.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A practical model for ensemble estimation of QoS and QoE in VoIP services via fuzzy inference systems and fuzzy evidence theory
verfasst von
Taha Mansouri
Ali Nabavi
Ahad Zare Ravasan
Hamid Ahangarbahan
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Telecommunication Systems / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1018-4864
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-015-0041-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Telecommunication Systems 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Resource allocation and interference management strategies for inband relaying in LTE-A

OriginalPaper

Contextual optimization of location-based routing protocols for multi-hop cellular networks using mobile relays

OriginalPaper

Adaptive multi-polling scheduler for QoS support of video transmission in IEEE 802.11e WLANs

OriginalPaper

Special issue: cellular and wireless sensor networks

OriginalPaper

Bottom-layer solutions for 60 GHz millimeter-wave wireless networks: modulation and multiplexing access techniques

OriginalPaper

Backhaul metro cell-based guard channel in femto/macro cellular heterogeneous networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise