Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 4/2015

01.05.2015

A review and a new approach to reduce routing overhead in MANETs

verfasst von: Nabil Nissar, Najib Naja, Abdellah Jamali

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc networks are characterized by a frequently changing in the network topology and the need of an efficient dynamic routing protocol. In this work, we have compared the performance of five ad hoc routing protocols against three different mobility models using NS-2 simulations, the simulated protocols are: AODV, OLSR, DSR, DSDV and ZRP. Furthermore, we examined the impact of traffic load, mobility and density of nodes on the behavior of these protocols. Then we introduced an algorithm for RREQ forwarding probability in order to improve AODV routing protocol performance (PAODV). The five protocols simulations results show that there is no protocol that outperforms all other protocols for all the evaluation criteria. As a result, each protocol has different performance behavior with respect to the considered metrics, including the routing overhead, packets delivery ratio, end-to-end average delay, and average throughput. PAODV simulation results reveal that our proposed algorithm mitigates more network collision and contention, so as to increase the packet delivery ratio and throughput. It eventually decreases the average end-to-end delay, the routing overhead and hence enhances the performance of the on-demand routing protocols.
Vorheriger Artikel Approximating geographic routing using coverage tree heuristics for wireless network
Nächster Artikel An SINR-based routing and MAC design for QoS in wireless ad hoc networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Camp, T., Boleng, J., & Davies, V. (2002). A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2(5), 483–502.CrossRef
3.
Hong, X. et al. (1999, August). A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM international workshop on modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems MSWiM).
4.
Bai, F. & Helmy, A. (2004, June). A survey of mobility models in wireless ad hoc networks. Chapter 2, book on Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks.
5.
Perkins, C. E. & Royer, E. M. (1999, Febraury). Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of 2nd IEEE workshop on mobile computing systems and applications (WMCSA’99), Feb 1999, pp. 90–100.
6.
Clausen, T., & Jacquet, P. (2003, October). Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR)”. Internet Request for Comments RFC 3626, Internet Engineering Task Force.
7.
Johnson, D. B., Maltz, D. A., & Hu, Y.-C. (2003, April) “The dynamic source routing protocol for Mobile Ad hoc networks (DSR)” Internet Draft—draft-ietf-manet-dsr-09.txt, April 2003.
8.
Perkins, C. C. E., & Bhagwat, P. (1994, October) Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers, ACM SIGCOMM’94, October 1994, pp. 234–244.
9.
Mittal, S. & Kaur, P. (2009). Performance comparison of AODV, DSR and ZRP routing protocols in MANET’S international conference on advances in computing, control, and telecommunication technologies 978-0-7695-3915-7/09 © 2009 IEEE.
10.
Badache, N., Djenour, D., Derhab, A., & Lemlouma, T. (2002). Routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. RIST, 12(2), 77–112.
11.
Youssef, M., et al. (2014). Routing metrics of cognitive radio networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(1), 92–109.CrossRef
12.
Cheng, H., et al. (2012). Nodes organization for channel assignment with topology preservation in multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(5), 760–773.CrossRef
13.
Rahman, M. A., Anwar, Naeemand J., & Abedin, M. S. M. (2010, May) “A simulation based performance comparison of routing protocol on mobile ad hoc network (proactive, reactive and hybrid)”. In International conference on computer and communication engineering (ICCCE 2010), 11–13 May 2010, KualaLumpur, Malaysia.
14.
Sarma, S. K., Choudhury, S. D., Ahmed, F. U., & Hannan, A. (2010, June). Efficiency analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks for heterogeneity. International Journal of Computer Networks, 2(1), 1–8.
15.
Li, M., et al. (2013). A survey on topology control in wireless sensor networks: Taxonomy, comparative study, and open issues. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(12), 2538–2557.CrossRef
16.
Usop, N. S. M., Abdullah, A., & Abidin, A. F. A. (2009, July). Performance evaluation of AODV, DSDV & DSR routing protocol in grid environment. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 9(7), 261–268.
17.
Corson, S., & Macker, J. (1999, January). Mobile ad hoc networking (MANET): Routing protocol performance issues and evaluation considerations, University of Maryland, January 1999.
18.
Vasilakos, A., Saltouros, M. P., Atlassis, A. F., & Pedrycz, W. (2003). Optimizing QoS routing in hierarchical ATM networks using computational intelligence techniques. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science, and Cybernetics, Part C, 33, 297–312.CrossRef
19.
Wan, J., et al. (2013). Cloud-enabled wireless body area networks for pervasive healthcare. IEEE Network, 27(5), 56–61.CrossRef
20.
Zhang, J., et al. (2013). A novel multimedia device ability matching technique for ubiquitous computing environments. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2013, 181. doi:10.​1186/​1687-1499-2013-181.CrossRef
21.
Chen, M., et al. (2014). A survey of recent developments in home M2M networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(1), 98–114.CrossRef
22.
Wang, X., Vasilakos, A. V., Chen, M., Liu, Y., & Kwon, T. T. (2012). A survey of green mobile networks: Opportunities and challenges. ACM/Springer MONET, 17(1), 4–20.
23.
Busch, Costas., et al. (2012). Approximating congestion + dilation in networks via “quality of routing” games. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 61(9), 1270–1283.CrossRefMathSciNet
24.
Cianfrani, Antonio., et al. (2012). An OSPF-integrated routing strategy for QoS-aware energy saving in IP backbone networks. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 9(3), 254–267.CrossRef
25.
Liu X., et al. (2011). Compressed data aggregation for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. In SECON 2011, pp. 46–54.
26.
Yao, Y. et al. (2013). EDAL: An energy-efficient, delay-aware, and lifetime-balancing data collection protocol for wireless sensor networks. In MASS 2013, pp. 182–190.
27.
Li, P. et al. (2012). CodePipe: An opportunistic feeding and routing protocol for reliable multicast with pipelined network coding. In INFOCOM 2012, pp. 100–108.
28.
Spyropoulos, T., et al. (2010). Routing for disruption tolerant networks: taxonomy and design. Wireless Networks, 16(8), 2349–2370.CrossRef
29.
Zeng, Y., et al. (2013). Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 161–173.CrossRef
30.
Ishrat, Z., Singh, P., & Ahmad, R. (2013). Performance evaluation of DSDV, DSR and ZRP protocol in MANET. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 2(3), 345–349.CrossRef
31.
Pandey, K., & Swaroop, A. (2011, November). A comprehensive performance analysis of proactive, reactive and hybrid manets routing protocols. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 8(6), 432–437.
32.
Maurya, A. K., & Singh, D. (2010, November). Simulation based performance comparison of AODV, FSR and ZRP Routing protocols in MANET. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975–8887) 12(2), 23–28.
33.
Raju, S. R., Runkana, K., & Mungara, J. (2010). ZRP versus AODV and DSR: A comprehensive study on ZRP performance. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975–8887), 1(12), 35–40.
34.
Sharma, V. K., & Srivastava, R. (2013, April). AODV & DSR routing protocols with a comparative study. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer science and software Engineering, 3(4), 181–185.
35.
Gupta, P., & Dr. Tyagi, R. K. (2013, March). A significant study and comparison of DSDV, AODV and DSR protocols in MANET using NS2. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2(3).
36.
Layuan, L., Chunlin, L., & Peiyan, Y. (2007). Performance evaluation and simulation of routing protocols in ad hoc networks. Computer Communications, 30, 1890–1898.CrossRef
37.
Vijayalaskhmi, M., Patel, A., & Kulkarni, L. (2011). QoS parameter analysis on AODV and DSDV protocols in a wireless network. International Journal of Communication Network & Security, 1(1), 62–70.
38.
Yen, Y.-S., et al. (2011). Flooding-limited and multi-constrained QoS multicast routing based on the genetic algorithm for MANETs. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(11–12), 2238–2250.CrossRef
39.
Chilamkurti, N., Zeadally, S., Vasilakos, A., & Sharma, V. (2009) Cross-layer support for energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2009, 9, Article ID 134165.
40.
Nishat, H., Krishna, V., Dr. Rao, D. S., & Ahmed, S. (2011, January). Performance evaluation of on demand routing protocols AODV and modified AODV (R-AODV) in MANETS. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems (IJDPS), 94–102.
41.
Murty, M. S., & Das, M. V. (2011). Performance evaluation of MANET routing protocol using reference point group mobility and random waypoint models. International Journal of Ad Hoc, Sensor & Ubiquitous Computing, 2(1), 63–71.
42.
Johnson, D. B., & Maltz, D. A. (1996). Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In T. Imielinski & H. Korth (Eds.), Mobile computing (pp. 153–181). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
43.
Lin, G., Noubir, G., & Rajaraman, R. (2004, March). Mobility models for ad hoc network simulation. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (INFOCOM’04), vol. 1, Hongkong, pp. 454–463.
44.
Broch, J., Maltz, D. A., Johnson, D. B., Hu, Y.-C., & Jetcheva, J. (1998, October). A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (Mobicom98), ACM.
45.
Hong, X. et al. (1999, August). A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM international workshop on modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems MSWiM).
46.
47.
Park, V. D., & Corson, M. S. (1997). A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks. In Proceedings of 16th annual joint conference of IEEE computer and communications societies (INFO COM 1997).
48.
49.
50.
Tseng, T., et al. (2002). The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network. Journal of Wireless Networks, 8(2), 153–167.CrossRefMATH
Metadaten
Titel
A review and a new approach to reduce routing overhead in MANETs
verfasst von
Nabil Nissar
Najib Naja
Abdellah Jamali
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0835-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Wireless Networks 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Effect of multi-path fading model on T-ANT clustering protocol for WSN

OriginalPaper

A lossy channel aware parameterisation of a novel security protocol for wireless IP-enabled sensors

OriginalPaper

SIR-based multiple access with cascade yielding avoidance for distributed device-to-device communications

OriginalPaper

Selection of aggregator nodes and elimination of false data in wireless sensor networks

OriginalPaper

High-throughput transmission-quality-aware broadcast routing in cognitive radio networks

OriginalPaper

When D2D communication improves group oriented services in beyond 4G networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise