Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Universal Access in the Information Society
Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society 4/2016

01.11.2016 | Long paper

A review on objective measurement of usage in technology acceptance studies

verfasst von: Sari Walldén, Erkki Mäkinen, Roope Raisamo

Erschienen in: Universal Access in the Information Society | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper reviews objective measurement of usage in user acceptance studies using the technology acceptance model (TAM). The use of objective measurement is quite uncommon in TAM. In addition to its low frequency, another striking phenomenon is the way objective measurement is used. Namely, only a minor potential of the information available is typically used, and, for example, the temporal aspect (changes in time) is almost always neglected. The paper describes the TAM studies where objective measurement of usage has been utilized and ponders the way objective measurements are taken. The ultimate goal of the paper is to improve objective measures used in TAM studies. To this end, several suggestions are given.
Vorheriger Artikel “Learn what we’re going through”: attitudes of older powered chair users towards mixed reality games that involve power mobility
Nächster Artikel Universal Access Index assessment and appropriate optimization strategy

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Benbunan-Fich, R., Adler, R.F., Mavlanova, T.: Measuring multitasking behavior with activity-based metrics. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 18(2), 7 (2011)CrossRef
2.
Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V., Goyal, S.: Expectation confirmation in technology use. Inf. Syst. Res. 23(2), 474–487 (2012)CrossRef
3.
Burton-Jones, A.: New perspectives on the system usage construct. Georgia State University Computer Information Systems Dissertations. Paper 3 (2005)
4.
Carrell, D., Ralston, J.D.: Variation in adoption rates of a patient web portal with a shared medical record by age, gender, and morbidity level. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 871. (2006)
5.
Cheung, E.Y.M., Sachs, J.: Test of the technology acceptance model for a web-based information system in a Hong Kong Chinese sample 1. Psychol. Rep. 99(3), 691–703 (2006)CrossRef
6.
7.
Collopy, F.: Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: an empirical study of computer users. Manag. Sci. 42, 758–767 (1996)MATHCrossRef
8.
Dasgupta, S., Granger, M., McGarry, N.: User acceptance of e-collaboration technology: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Group Decis. Negot. 11(2), 87–100 (2002)CrossRef
9.
Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. PhD Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986)
10.
Davis, F.D., Venkatesh, V.: Toward pre-prototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 51(1), 31–46 (2004)CrossRef
11.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)CrossRef
12.
de Reuver, M., Bouwman, H.: Dealing with self-report bias in mobile Internet acceptance and usage studies. Inf. Manag. 5(3), 287–294 (2015)CrossRef
13.
De Vos, H., Ter Hofte, G.H., De Poot, H.: IM@Work adoption of instant messaging in a knowledge worker organisation. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04), IEEE Computer Society Press (2004)
14.
Devaraj, S., Easley, R.F., Crant, J.M.: Research note-how does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Inf. Syst. Res. 19(1), 93–105 (2008)CrossRef
15.
Dillon, A., Morris, M.G.: User acceptance of information technology: theories and models. In: Williams, M. (ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 31, pp. 3–32. Information Today, Medford, NJ (1996)
16.
Dybå, T., Moe, N.B., Arisholm, E.: Measuring software methodology usage: challenges of conceptualization and operationalization. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE’05), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 447–457. (2005)
17.
Eckhardt, A., Maier, C., Hsieh, J., Chuk, T., Chan, A., Hsiao, J., Buettner, R.: Objective measures of IS usage behavior under conditions of experience and pressure using eye fixation data. In: Proceedings of the Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013). (2013)
18.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975)
19.
20.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Gijselaers, W.: Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 285–292 (2013)CrossRef
21.
Ginzberg, M.J.: Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: promising results and unanswered questions. Manag. Sci. 27(4), 459–478 (1981)CrossRef
22.
Henderson, R., Divett, M.J.: Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 59(3), 383–395 (2003)CrossRef
23.
Holden, R.J., Karsh, B.T.: The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 43(1), 159–172 (2010)CrossRef
24.
Horton, R.P., Buck, T., Waterson, P.E., Clegg, C.W.: Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model. J. Inf. Technol. 16(4), 37–249 (2001)CrossRef
25.
Hsiao, C.H., Yang, C.: The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31(2), 128–136 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
26.
Joo, Y.J., Lim, K.Y., Lim, E.: Investigating the structural relationship among perceived innovation attributes, intention to use and actual use of mobile learning in an online university in South Korea. Australian J. Educ. Technol. 30(4) (2014)
27.
Kaasinen, E., Roto, V., Roloff, K., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Vainio, T., Maehr, W., Shrestha, S.: User experience of mobile internet: analysis and recommendations. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1(4), 4–23 (2009)CrossRef
28.
Kay, J., Thomas, R.C.: Studying long-term system use. Commun. ACM 38(7), 61–69 (1995)CrossRef
29.
Kim, S., Garrison, G.: Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Front. 11(3), 323–333 (2009)CrossRef
30.
King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006)CrossRef
31.
King, W.R., Rodriguez, J.I.: Note—participative design of strategic decision support systems: an empirical assessment. Manag. Sci. 27(6), 717–726 (1981)CrossRef
32.
Klein, R.: Internet-based patient-physician electronic communication applications: patient acceptance and trust. E-Serv. J. 5(2), 27–51 (2006)CrossRef
33.
Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA (2003)
34.
Law, E.L.-C., van Schaik, P.: Modelling user experience—an agenda for research and practice. Interact. Comput. 22, 313–322 (2010)CrossRef
35.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.T.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun. AIS 12(50), 752–780 (2003)
36.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 40(3), 191–204 (2003)CrossRef
37.
Lober, W.B., Zierler, B., Herbaugh, A., Shinstrom, S.E., Stolyar, A., Kim, E.H., Kim, Y.: Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 514–518. (2006)
38.
Lu, H.-P., Gustafson, D.H.: An empirical study of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on computerized support system use over time. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 14, 317–329 (1994)CrossRef
39.
Luo, N., Guo, X., Zhang, J., Chen, G., Zhang, N.: Understanding the continued use of intra-organizational blogs: an adaptive habituation model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 57–65 (2015)CrossRef
40.
Ma, Q., Liu, L.: The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. J. Organ. End User Comput. 16(1), 59–72 (2004)CrossRef
41.
Ma, W., Yuen, A.: E-learning system acceptance and usage pattern. In Technology Acceptance in Education, pp. 201–216. SensePublishers, Dordrecht (2011)CrossRef
42.
Marangunić, N., Granić, A.: Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14, 81–95 (2015)CrossRef
43.
Möller, A., Kranz, M., Schmid, B., Roalter, L., Diewald, S.: Investigating self-reporting behavior in long-term studies. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2931–2940. (2013)
44.
Or, C.K., Karsh, B.T.: A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16(4), 550–555 (2009)CrossRef
45.
Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.A.: Information systems success: the quest for the independent variables. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29(4), 7–62 (2013)CrossRef
46.
Robey, D.: User attitudes and management information system use. Acad. Manag. J. 22(3), 527–538 (1979)CrossRef
47.
Rowe, F.: What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(3), 241–255 (2014)CrossRef
48.
Salovaara, A., Öörni, A., Sokura, B.: Heterogeneous use for multiple purposes: a point of concern to IS use models’ validity. In: Proceedings of the Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013). (2013)
49.
Schewe, C.D.: The management information system user: an exploratory behavioral analysis. Acad. Manag. J. 19(4), 577–590 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRef
50.
Sharp, J.H.: Development, extension, and application: a review of the technology acceptance model. Information Systems. Educ. J. 5(9) (2006)
51.
Shin, D.H.: Ubiquitous computing acceptance model: end user concern about security, privacy and risk. Int. J. Mobile Commun. 8, 169–186 (2010)CrossRef
52.
Srinivasan, A.: Alternative measures of system effectiveness: associations and implications. MIS Q. 9(3), 243–253 (1985)CrossRef
53.
Stoel, L., Lee, K.H.: Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware. Internet Res. 13(5), 364–374 (2003)CrossRef
54.
Straub, D., Limayem, M., Karahanna-Evaristo, E.: Measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing. Manag. Sci. 41(8), 1328–1342 (1995)CrossRef
55.
Szajna, B.: Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Manag. Sci. 42(1), 85–92 (1996)CrossRef
56.
Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2), 144–176 (1995)CrossRef
57.
Townsend, A.M., Demarie, S.M., Hendrickson, A.R.: Desktop video conferencing in virtual workgroups: anticipation, system evaluation and performance. Inf. Syst. J. 11(3), 213–222 (2001)CrossRef
58.
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., Budgen, D.: Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 463–479 (2010)CrossRef
59.
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)CrossRef
60.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)CrossRef
61.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G.: Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, ant their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Q. 24(1), 115–139 (2000)CrossRef
62.
Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., Morris, M.G.: User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decis. Sci. 33(2), 297–316 (2002)CrossRef
63.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)
64.
Walldén, S., Mäkinen, E.: Measuring the long-term voluntary use of an information system. Inf. Syst. Front. (2014, submitted for publication)
65.
Walsh, I.: A strategic path to study IT use through users’ IT culture and IT needs: a mixed-method grounded theory. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23(2), 146–173 (2013)CrossRef
66.
Wu, J., Du, H.: Toward a better understanding of behavioural intention and system usage constructs. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21, 680–698 (2012)CrossRef
67.
Yi, M.Y., Hwang, Y.J.: Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 59(4), 431–449 (2003)CrossRef
68.
Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G.R., Pallister, J.G.: Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 1. J. Model. Manag. 2(3), 251–280 (2007)CrossRef
69.
Zhang, X., Yu, P., Yan, J., Spil, I.T.A.: Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Serv. Res. 15(1), 71 (2015)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A review on objective measurement of usage in technology acceptance studies
verfasst von
Sari Walldén
Erkki Mäkinen
Roope Raisamo
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Universal Access in the Information Society / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1615-5289
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-5297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0443-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Universal Access in the Information Society 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Long paper

An automated technique for real-time production of lifelike animations of American Sign Language

Acknowledgement to Reviewers

Acknowledgement to reviewers for reviews completed between July and December 2014

Long paper

User interface design guidelines for smartphone applications for people with Parkinson’s disease

Long paper

Universal Access Index assessment and appropriate optimization strategy

Editorial

Special issue: recent advances in sign language translation and avatar technology

Long paper

Interaction on-the-go: a fine-grained exploration on wearable PROCAM interfaces and gestures in mobile situations

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise