nach oben

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

Erschienen in:

01.06.2021 | State-of-the-art paper

A state-of-the-art review of vertical ground motion (VGM) characteristics, effects and provisions

verfasst von: Chittaranjan B. Nayak

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Previous earthquake events have shown that the vertical component of strong ground motion has been proved to damage or totally destroy the structures. But in seismic resistant design of structures, effects of horizontal ground motions are mainly considered and effects of vertical ground motions (VGMs) are ignored. However, the field evidence of damaged structures indicates that the VGM was more significant particularly for near-fault earthquakes. Therefore, the addition of vertical component in seismic design has been recognized in the literature. In seismic resistant design of structures, horizontal ground motions are extensively studied and used for designing of structures. However, VGMs are not considered of more importance as horizontal one. But with the past near-fault earthquakes and their damage evidence effects have increased the awareness of VGMs. In this paper, the critical reviews of the literature associated with VGM are explained and reviewed. The important characteristics like vertical response spectra, near-fault influence, frequency influence and time lag between peak vertical and peak horizontal ground motion, vertical response period influence and local site conditions are explained. The provisions in latest national and international standards and the field evidence of damaging effects caused by VGM are also explained. Considering all the above parameters associated with VGM, the past studies on different types of structures are reviewed. Finally, a methodology for identification of critical parameters and future scope on VGM is proposed. This study leads to some important conclusions that VGM needs to be included in analysis and design.

Vorheriger Artikel Risk assessment of horizontal curves using reliability analysis based on Google traffic data

Nächster Artikel Analysis of delay and queue length variation at three-leg signalized intersection under mixed traffic condition

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Shaha P, Kamatchi P, Nayak CB (2018) Effect of vertical ground motions on the response of long span roof truss. In: The 16th symposium on earthquake engineering, Department of Earthquake Engineering, IIT Roorkee, pp 1–9

Nerkar S, Nayak C (2016) Seismic behaviour of elevated storage reservoir by finite element method. Int J Adv Technol Eng Sci 4(1):1188–1197

Wadgave P, Nayak C (2016) Vibrational analysis of chimney equipped with strakes and tune mass damper. Int J Adv Technol Eng Sci 4(1):321–333

Nayak CB, Thakare SB (2017) Seismic behaviour of existing retrofitted elevated water tank after NDT investigations using SAP 2000. In: The 8th International conference on structural engineering and construction management 2017, Earl's Regency Hotel, Kandy, Sri Lanka, pp 1–6

Nayak CB, Thakare SB (2017) Analysis and retrofitting of elevated water tank in Pune district: by Uttarkashi Earthquake. J Eng Tech 6:201–211

Nayak CB, Jain MA, Walke SB (2020) Parametric study of dome with and without opening. J Inst Eng (India): Series A 101(3):463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-020-00447-3

Jagadale UT, Nayak CB, Mankar A, Thakare SB, Deulkar WN (2020) An experimental-based python programming for structural health monitoring of non-engineered RC frame. Innov Infrastruct Solut 5(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-0260-xCrossRef

Nayak CB, Thakare SB (2019) Seismic performance of existing water tank after condition ranking using non-destructive testing. Int J Adv Struct Eng 11:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-00241-xCrossRef

Kare V, Nayak CB, Jagadale UT, Deulkar WN (2019) Earthquake response of 3D frames with strap footing considering soil structure interactions. In: 2nd international conference on advanced technologies for societal applications, in book: Techno-Societal 2018, vol. 1, pp 895–904. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16848-3_81.

10.

Papazoglou AJ, Elnashai AS (1996) Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 25:1109–1137CrossRef

11.

Kunnath SK, Abrahamson N, Chai YH, Erduran E, Yilmaz Z (2008) Development of guidelines for incorporation of vertical ground motion effects in seismic design of highway bridges. Technical report CA/UCD-SESM-08–01, University of California at Davis

12.

Kim SJ, Holub CJ, Elnashai AS (2011) Experimental investigation of the behavior of RC bridge piers subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake motion. Eng Struct 33:2221–2235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.03.013CrossRef

13.

Kim SJ, Holub CJ, Elnashai AS (2011) Analytical assessment of the effect of vertical earthquake motion on RC bridge piers. J Struct Eng 137(2):252–260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000306CrossRef

14.

Kun C, Chen Y, Larkin T, Chouw N (2013) An experimental investigation of the seismic response of a bridge due to simultaneous horizontal and vertical excitations. Australian Earthquake Engineering Society Conference. Hobart, Tasmania, pp 1–8

15.

Matsuzaki H, Kumagai Y, Kawashima, K (2012) Effect of strong vertical excitation on the seismic performance of the RC bridge columns. In: 15th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal

16.

Changfeng W, Jikang Z, Long Z, Yijun B (2016) Effect of vertical excitation on the seismic performance of a seismically isolated bridge with sliding friction bearings. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 15:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0315-3CrossRef

17.

Yang H, Yin X (2015) Transient responses of girder bridges with vertical poundings under near-fault vertical earthquake. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 44:2637–2657. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2601CrossRef

18.

Aryan H, Ghassemieh M (2014) Mitigation of vertical and horizontal seismic excitations on bridges utilizing shape memory alloy system. Adv Mater Res 831:90–94CrossRef

19.

Aryan H, Ghassemieh M (2015) Seismic enhancement of multi-span continuous bridges subjected to three-directional excitations. Smart Mater Struct 24(4):045030. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/4/045030CrossRef

20.

Aryan H, Ghassemieh M (2017) A superelastic protective technique for mitigating the effects of vertical and horizontal seismic excitations on highway bridges. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 28(12):1533–1552. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X16672593CrossRef

21.

Newmark NM (1973) A Study of Vertical and Horizontal Spectra. Report WASH-1255. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Directorate of Licensing

22.

Kawashima K, Aizawa K, Takahashi K (1985) Attenuation of peak ground motion and absolute acceleration response spectra of vertical ground motion. Proc Jpn Soc Civil Eng 2(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1985.362_169CrossRef

23.

Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA (1995) Prediction of vertical response spectra in Europe. Earthquake engineering and Structural dynamics, ESEE-95/1, Research Report, vol 25, pp 401–412. htps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<401::AIDEQE551>3.0.CO;2-B

24.

Mohammadioun G, Mohammadioun B (1996) Vertical/horizontal ratio for strong ground motion in the near-field and soil non-linearity. Memorias, XI World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, CDROM

25.

Tsaparli V, Kontoe S, Taborda DMG, Potts DM (2016) Vertical ground motion and its effects on liquefaction resistance of fully saturated sand deposits. Proc R Soc A. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0434CrossRef

26.

Bovo M, Barbaresi A, Torreggiani D, Tassinari P (2020) Collapse and damage to vernacular buildings induced by 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Eng 18:1049–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00737-7CrossRef

27.

Shrestha B (2009) Vertical ground motions and its effect on engineering structures: a state-of-the-art-review. Int Seminar Hazard Manage Sustain Develop. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2863.6165CrossRef

28.

ATC 63 (2007) Recommended Methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters—75% interim draft report. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City

29.

IS 1893 (Part 1) (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, sixth edition, New Delhi

30.

IS 1893 (Part 1) (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, sixth edition, New Delhi

31.

Silva WJ (1997) Characteristics of vertical strong ground motions for applications to engineering design. In: Procedings Of the FHWA/NCEER Workshop on the Nat=l Representation of Seismic Ground Motion for New and Existing Highway Facilities

32.

UBC (1997) Uniform Building Code .International Council of Building Officials (ICBO), p 2

33.

EN 1998–1 (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization

34.

ECP-201(2012) Egyptian code for loads and forces. Housing and Building Research Center

35.

Bozorgnia Y, Niazi M, Campbell KW (1995) Characteristics of free-field vertical ground motion during the Northridge earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 11(4):515–525. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585825CrossRef

36.

Bozorgnia Y, Niazi M (1993) Distance scaling of vertical and horizontal response spectra of the Lorna Prieta earthquake. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 22(8):695–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220805CrossRef

37.

Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW, Niazi M (2000) Observed spectral characteristics of vertical ground motion recorded during worldwide earthquakes from 1957 to 1995. In: Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hutt, New Zealand, 2000, Paper No. 2671

38.

Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW (2019) Ground motion model for the Vertical-to-Horizontal (V/H) ratios of PGA, PGV, and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 32(2):951–978. https://doi.org/10.1193/100614eqs151mCrossRef

39.

Wilson T, Chen S, Mahmoud H (2015) Analytical case study on the seismic performance of a curved and skewed reinforced concrete bridge under vertical ground motion. Eng Struct 100:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.017CrossRef

40.

Adanur S, Altunisik AC, Bayraktar A, Akkose M (2012) Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges. Nat Hazards 64(1):593–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0259-5CrossRef

41.

Zhang S, Wang G (2013) Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 53:217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014CrossRef

42.

Sevim B, Atamturktur S, Altunisik AC, Bayraktar A (2016) Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 14(1):241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9810-6CrossRef

43.

Ma HB, Zhuo WD, Fiorentino G, Lavorato D, Nuti C, Sun Y (2017) Seismic responses of regular highway bridges under near-fault ground motions. In: 6th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, pp 2119–2129. https://doi.org/10.7712/120117.5554.18034

44.

Ma HB, Zhuo WD, Lavorato D, Fiorentino G, Nuti C, Sabetta F (2017) Seismic response analysis of continuous highway bridges under near-fault ground motions. In: 6th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, pp 2138–2148. https://doi.org/10.7712/120117.5555.18040

45.

Gullu H, Karabekme M (2017) Effect of near-fault and far-fault earthquakes on a historical masonry mosque through 3D dynamic soil-structure interaction. Eng Struct 152:465–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.031CrossRef

46.

Xuan G, Chen W, Jianbing Y (2018) Combined effect of vertical and horizontal ground motions on failure probability of RC chimneys. Adv Civil Eng 2018:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9327403CrossRef

47.

Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA (1978) A seismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105CrossRef

48.

Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near source ground motion and its effects on the flexible buildings. Earthq Spectra 11(4):569–605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828CrossRef

49.

Bozorgnia Y, Campbell KW (2004) The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedure for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. J Earthq Eng 8(2):175–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350486CrossRef

50.

Singh JP (1995) Seismic loading: code versus site specific. Portland Regional Seminar on Seismic Engineering Issues

51.

Campbell KW (1985) Strong motion attenuation relations: a ten-year perspective. Earthq Spectra 1(4):759–804. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585292CrossRef

52.

Nezamabadi MF, Vayeghan FY (2015) Development of seismic criteria for seismic responses of regular and irregular structures in plan considering vertical component of the near field records. J Struct Eng Geotech 5(1):9–20

53.

PEER (2010) Technical report for the PEER ground motion database web application. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley

54.

Elgamal A, Liangcai H (2004) Vertical earthquake ground motion records: an overview. J Earthquake Eng 8(5):663–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350505CrossRef

55.

Collier C, Elnashai A (2001) A procedure and spectra for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effect. J Earthquake Eng 5(4):521–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460109350404CrossRef

56.

Kim SJ, Elnashai AS (2008) Seismic assessment of RC structures considering vertical ground motion. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Ill

57.

Pompei A, Scalia A, Sumbatyan MA (1998) Dynamics of rigid block due to horizontal ground motion. J Eng Mech ASCE 124(7):713–717CrossRef

58.

Zhang J, Makris N (2001) Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. J Eng Mech ASCE 127(5):473–483CrossRef

59.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2014) AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications, seventh edition. Washington, DC

60.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (2013) Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 1.7. Sacramento, CA

61.

Aryan H, Ghassemieh M (2019) Numerical assessment of vertical ground motion effects on highway bridges. Can J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0096CrossRef

62.

Patil RS, Rajakumara HN (2016) Effect of vertical ground acceleration on buildings. Int J Recent Adv Eng Technol (IJRAET) 4(10):19–26

63.

Perea T, Esteva L (2004) Analysis of vertical ground motions of near source records in Mexico. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference of earthquake engineering, paper no.1852, Vancouver, Canada, pp 1–14

64.

AS 1170.4 (2007) Structural design actions Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia. Standards Australia

65.

Kouretzis G, Masia MJ, Allen C (2015) Structural design codes of australia and new zealand: seismic actions. Chapter in book of encyclopedia of earthquake engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_120-1

66.

NZS 1170.5 (2004) Structural design actions part 5: Earthquake Actions-New Zealand. Standards New Zealand

67.

NZS 1170.5 Supplement 1 (2004) Structural design actions Part 5: Earthquake actions –New Zealand-Commentary. Standards New Zealand

68.

ASCE 7–16, Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE Standard, American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Engineering Institute

69.

BSSC BS (2009) NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures: part 1, provisions. Federal Emergency Management Agency (P-750), Washington DC

70.

Bhanu V, Ozcebe A, Smerzini C (2018) A study on vertical component of earthquake ground motion and its effects on a bridge. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, pp 1–12

71.

Obaid L, Alani S, Omar M, Barakat S, Arab M, Leblouba M, Shanableh A, Tahmaz A (2019) The development of a local ground motion prediction equation from recorded data. In: Proceedings of the 4th world congress on civil, structural, and environmental engineering, Rome, Italy, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.11159/icgre19.181

72.

Omar M, Shanableh A, Abduljalil S, Hamad K, Arab M, Leblouba M, Tahmaz A (2019) Geotechnical mapping of seismic risk for Sharjah City, United Arab Emirates. Global Civil Eng Conf Lecture Notes Civil Eng 9:1185–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8016-6_83CrossRef

73.

Hassan A, Pal S (2018) Effect of soil condition on seismic response of isolated base buildings. Int J Adv Struct Eng 10(3):249–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-018-0195-zCrossRef

74.

Rayhani MHT, Naggar MHE, Tabatabaei SH (2008) Nonlinear analysis of local site effects on seismic ground response in the bam earthquake. Geotech Geol Eng 26:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9149-0CrossRef

75.

Trifunac MD (2016) Site conditions and earthquake ground motion-A review. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.003CrossRef

76.

Ghaboussi J, Dikmen SU (1981) Liquefaction analysis for multidirectional shaking. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 107:605–627

77.

Asakereh A, Tajabadipour M (2018) Analysis of local site effects on seismic ground response under various earthquakes. AUT J Civil Eng 2(2):227–240. https://doi.org/10.22060/AJCE.2018.13696.5253CrossRef

78.

Kontoe S, Christopoulos A, May R (2013) Site response analysis for vertical ground motion. In: 4th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4826.9440

79.

Zhao L, Cheng X, Dan H, Tang Z, Zhang Y (2017) Effect of the vertical earthquake component on permanent seismic displacement of soil slopes based on the nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. Soils Found 57:237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.12.002CrossRef

80.

Yang J (2004) Reappraisal of vertical motion effects on soil liquefaction. Geotechnique 54(10):671–676. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.10.671CrossRef

81.

Zhang Z, Bilotta E, Yuan Y, Yu H, Zhao H (2019) Experimental assessment of the effect of vertical earthquake motion on underground metro station. Appl Sci 9:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235182CrossRef

82.

Liu H, Tsai C (2018) Site effect of vertical motion- amplification behavior observed from downhole arrays. J Geol Eng 13(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2018.13(1).4CrossRef

83.

Tsai C, Liu H (2017) Site response analysis of vertical ground motion in consideration of soil nonlinearity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 102:124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.024CrossRef

84.

Peruzzi G, Albarello D (2017) The possible effect of vertical ground motion on the horizontal seismic response at the surface of a sedimentary structure. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 58(4):343–352. https://doi.org/10.4430/bgta0210CrossRef

85.

Tan J, Hu J (2020) A prediction model for vertical-to-horizontal spectral ratios of ground motions on the seafloor for moderate magnitude events for the Sagami Bay region in Japan. J Seismolog. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-020-09932-5CrossRef

86.

Yuqiao Q, Hua T, Qin D, Xiaotao Y, Dongying W (2019) Regional seismic slope assessment improvements considering slope aspect and vertical ground motion. Eng Geol 259:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105148CrossRef

87.

Kim S, Sung JK, Chunho C (2018) Analytical assessment of the effect of vertical ground motion on RC frames designed for gravity loads with various geometric configurations. Adv Civil Eng 2018:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4029142CrossRef

88.

Diotallevi P, Landi L (2000) Effect of the axial force and of the vertical ground motion component on the seismic response of R/C frames. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, pp 1–8

89.

Ghobarah A, Elnashai AS (1998) Contribution of vertical ground motion to the damage of RC buildings. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1–10

90.

Farsangi EN, Tasnimi AA (2016) The influence of coupled horizontal vertical ground excitations on the collapse margins of modern RC-MRFs. Int J Adv Struct Eng 8(2):169–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-016-0122-0CrossRef

91.

Santos SHC, Lima SS, Arai A (2012) Comparative study of codes for seismic design of structures. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Mater 5(6):812–819. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952012000600006CrossRef

92.

Najafi LH, Tehranizadeh M (2015) Ground motion selection and scaling in practice. Period Polytech Civil Eng 59(2):233–248. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.7808CrossRef

93.

Santos SHC, Luca Z, Carmen B, Silvio DL, Arai A (2013) Comparative study of codes for seismic design of structures. Math Model Civil Eng 9(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmce-2013-0001CrossRef

94.

Murthy NT, Patil GR (2015) Effect of vertical ground motion on reinforced concrete structures. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng, pp 33–39

95.

Dana M, Cussen A, Chen YN, Davis C, Greer M, Houston J, Littler P, Roufegarinejad A (2014) Effects of the seismic vertical component on structural behavior—an analytical study of current code practices and potential areas of improvement. In: Proceedings of the 10th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Anchorage, AK, pp 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4231/D3FF3M115

96.

Zou J, Hongjing L, Guangjun S (2018) Analysis of influence factors of P-Δ effect considering vertical ground motion. IOP Conf. Ser Mater Sci Eng 397:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/397/1/012033CrossRef

97.

Gulerce Z, Erduran E, Kunnath SK et al (2012) Seismic demand models for probabilistic risk analysis of near-fault vertical ground motion effects on ordinary highway bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(2):159–175CrossRef

98.

Zhang L (2014) Effects of near-field and far-field ground motion on seismic response to long-span rigid frame bridge. Biotechnol Indian J (BTAIJ) 10(24):15290–15295

99.

Li X, Dou H, Zhu X (2007) Engineering characteristics of near-fault vertical ground motions and their effect on the seismic response of bridges. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 6(4):345–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007-0723-5CrossRef

100.

Shrestha B (2014) Seismic response of long span cable-stayed bridge to near-fault vertical ground motions. KSCE J Civil Eng 19(1):180–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0214-yCrossRef

101.

NBC 105 (1994) Seismic design of buildings in nepal government of Nepal. Ministry of Physical Planning and Works Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Babar Mahal, Kathmandu

102.

Rahai A (2004) Effect of earthquake vertical motion on RC bridge piers. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 3192, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, pp 1–6

103.

Hosseinzadeh N (2008) Vertical component effect of earthquake in seismic performance of reinforced concrete bridge piers. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, pp 1–7

104.

Zhibin J, Shiling P, Xiaozhen L, Hongyan L, Shizhong Q (2016) Effect of vertical ground motion on earthquake-induced derailment of railway vehicles over simply-supported bridges. J Sound Vib 383:277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.06.048CrossRef

105.

Haji-Soltani A, Pezeshk S, Zandieh MM (2017) A study of vertial-to-horizontal ratio of earthquake components in the golf coast region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(5):2055–2066. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160252CrossRef

106.

Bayraktar A, Kudu FN, Sumerkan S, Demirtas B, Akkose M (2020) Near-fault vertical ground motion effects on the seismic response of balanced cantilever bridges, Editorial. Proc Inst Civil Eng Bridge Eng 173(1):17–33. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.19.00007CrossRef

107.

Jin Z, Pei S, Li X, Liu H, Qiang S (2016) Effect of vertical ground motion on earthquake-induced derailment of railway vehicles over simply-supported bridges. J Sound Vib 383:277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.06.048CrossRef

108.

Dehghanpoor A, Thambiratnam D, Taciroglu E, Chan T (2019) Soil-pile-superstructure interaction effects in seismically isolated bridges under combined vertical and horizontal strong ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 126:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105753CrossRef

109.

Abdollahiparsa H, Homami P, Khoshnoudian F (2016) Effect of vertical component of an earthquake on steel frames considering soil-structure interaction. KSCE J Civil Eng 20(7):2790–2801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0687-yCrossRef

110.

Shakib H, Safi R (2012) Behavior evaluation of the eccentric buckling-restrained braced frames under the near-fault ground motions. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference of earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1–10

111.

Yamazaki S, Minami S, Mimura H, Udagawa K (2000) Effect of vertical ground motions on earthquake response of steel frames. In: 12th world conference of earthquake engineering, pp 1–8

112.

Hosseini M, Nezamabadi MF (2004) A study on the effect of vertical ground acceleration on the seismic response of steel buildings. In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, pp 1–8

113.

Ruiz D, Sarria A (2004) Response of large span steel frames subjected to horizontal and vertical seismic motions. In: Proceedings 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper No.-1404, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 1–14

114.

Xiang Y, Luo Y, Huang Q, Shen Z (2018) Vertical ductility demand and residual displacement of roof-type steel structures subjected to vertical earthquake ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 104:259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.10.019CrossRef

115.

Xiang Y, Luo Y, Zhu Z, Shen Z (2017) Estimating the response of steel structures subjected to vertical seismic excitation: Idealized model and inelastic displacement ratio. Eng Struct 148:225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.043CrossRef

116.

Harrington CC, Liel AB (2016) Collapse assessment of moment frame buildings, considering vertical ground shaking. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 45(15):2475–2493. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2776CrossRef

117.

Breccolotti M, Materazzi A (2014) The role of the vertical acceleration component in the seismic response of masonry chimneys. Mater Struct 49:29–44. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0472-7CrossRef

Titel: A state-of-the-art review of vertical ground motion (VGM) characteristics, effects and provisions
verfasst von: Chittaranjan B. Nayak
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00491-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Analytical study of triangular perfobond shear connectors

Liquefaction study of fine-grained soil using computational model

Opportunities and challenges for the building monitoring systems in the age-pandemic of COVID-19: Review and prospects

Experimental and computational response of strip footing resting on prestressed geotextile-reinforced industrial waste

Trace and major minerals of (natural and manufactured) sand: the importance of manufactured sand for construction purposes and the preservation of rivers

Review of methods for predicting soil volume change induced by shrinkage