Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies 5/2021

23.06.2021

A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past, Present and Future

verfasst von: Aditya Nigam, Rhitvik Pasricha, Tarishi Singh, Prathamesh Churi

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There have been giant leaps in the field of education in the past 1–2 years.. Schools and colleges are transitioning online to provide more resources to their students. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided students more opportunities to learn and improve themselves at their own pace. Online proctoring services (part of assessment) are also on the rise, and AI-based proctoring systems (henceforth called as AIPS) have taken the market by storm. Online proctoring systems (henceforth called as OPS), in general, makes use of online tools to maintain the sanctity of the examination. While most of this software uses various modules, the sensitive information they collect raises concerns among the student community. There are various psychological, cultural and technological parameters need to be considered while developing AIPS. This paper systematically reviews existing AI and non-AI-based proctoring systems. Through the systematic search on Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC repositories, 43 paper were listed out from the year 2015 to 2021. We addressed 4 primary research questions which were focusing on existing architecture of AIPS, Parameters to be considered for AIPS, trends and Issues in AIPS and Future of AIPS. Our 360-degree analysis on OPS and AIPS reveals that security issues associated with AIPS are multiplying and are a cause of legitimate concern. Major issues include Security and Privacy concerns, ethical concerns, Trust in AI-based technology, lack of training among usage of technology, cost and many more. It is difficult to know whether the benefits of these Online Proctoring technologies outweigh their risks. The most reasonable conclusion we can reach in the present is that the ethical justification of these technologies and their various capabilities requires us to rigorously ensure that a balance is struck between the concerns with the possible benefits to the best of our abilities. To the best of our knowledge, there is no such analysis on AIPS and OPS. Our work further addresses the issues in AIPS in human and technological aspect. It also lists out key points and new technologies that have only recently been introduced but could significantly impact online education and OPS in the years to come.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alessio, H. M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., John Bailer, A., & Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the Effect of Proctoring on Online Test Scores. Alessio, H. M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., John Bailer, A., & Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the Effect of Proctoring on Online Test Scores.
Zurück zum Zitat Arora, P. (2021). Is Remote Proctoring The Future Of Academia? - eLearning Industry. Arora, P. (2021). Is Remote Proctoring The Future Of Academia? - eLearning Industry.
Zurück zum Zitat Beust, P., Duchatelle, I., & Cauchard, V. (2018). Exams taken at the student’s home. Beust, P., Duchatelle, I., & Cauchard, V. (2018). Exams taken at the student’s home.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2020). Online Cheating Amid COVID-19. Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2020). Online Cheating Amid COVID-19.
Zurück zum Zitat Caveon, D. F., Security, T., & Layman, H. (2013). Online Proctoring Systems Compared. Caveon, D. F., Security, T., & Layman, H. (2013). Online Proctoring Systems Compared.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua, S. S., Bondad, J. B., Lumapas, Z. R., & Garcia, J. D. (2019). Online Examination System with Cheating Prevention Using Question Bank Randomization and Tab Locking. Chua, S. S., Bondad, J. B., Lumapas, Z. R., & Garcia, J. D. (2019). Online Examination System with Cheating Prevention Using Question Bank Randomization and Tab Locking.
Zurück zum Zitat Coghlan, S., Miller, T., & Paterson, J. (2020). Good proctor or “Big Brother”? AI Ethics and Online Exam Supervision Technologies. ArXiv Preprint. Coghlan, S., Miller, T., & Paterson, J. (2020). Good proctor or “Big Brother”? AI Ethics and Online Exam Supervision Technologies. ArXiv Preprint.
Zurück zum Zitat Emerging Technology and the Future of Online Proctoring. (2020). Emerging Technology and the Future of Online Proctoring. (2020).
Zurück zum Zitat Joshy, N., Ganesh Kumar, M., Mukhilan, P., Manoj Prasad, V., & Ramasamy, T. (2018). Multi-factor authentication scheme for online examination. Joshy, N., Ganesh Kumar, M., Mukhilan, P., Manoj Prasad, V., & Ramasamy, T. (2018). Multi-factor authentication scheme for online examination.
Zurück zum Zitat Langenfeld, T. (2020). Internet-Based Proctored Assessment: Security and Fairness Issues (Vol. 39, Issue 3). Langenfeld, T. (2020). Internet-Based Proctored Assessment: Security and Fairness Issues (Vol. 39, Issue 3).
Zurück zum Zitat Li, X., Chang, K. M., Yuan, Y., & Hauptmann, A. (2015). Massive open online proctor: Protecting the credibility of MOOCs Certificates. CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675245 Li, X., Chang, K. M., Yuan, Y., & Hauptmann, A. (2015). Massive open online proctor: Protecting the credibility of MOOCs Certificates. CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1129–1137. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​2675133.​2675245
Zurück zum Zitat Metzger, R., & Maudoodi, R. (2020). Using Access Reports and API Logs as Additional Tools to Identify Exam Cheating. Metzger, R., & Maudoodi, R. (2020). Using Access Reports and API Logs as Additional Tools to Identify Exam Cheating.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020). Educational Innovation in Higher Education: Use of Role Playing and Educational Video in Future Teachers’ Training. In Sustainability (Vol. 12, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062558 Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020). Educational Innovation in Higher Education: Use of Role Playing and Educational Video in Future Teachers’ Training. In Sustainability (Vol. 12, Issue 6). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​su12062558
Zurück zum Zitat Norris, M. (2019). University online cheating-how to mitigate the damage. Norris, M. (2019). University online cheating-how to mitigate the damage.
Zurück zum Zitat O’reilly, G., & Creagh, J. (2016). A Categorization of Online Proctoring. O’reilly, G., & Creagh, J. (2016). A Categorization of Online Proctoring.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson, J. (2019). An Analysis of Academic Dishonesty in Online Classes. In ACADEMIC DISHONESTY IN ONLINE CLASSES Mid-Western Educational Researcher · (Vol. 31). Peterson, J. (2019). An Analysis of Academic Dishonesty in Online Classes. In ACADEMIC DISHONESTY IN ONLINE CLASSES Mid-Western Educational Researcher · (Vol. 31).
Zurück zum Zitat Pimple, O. (2021, January). Digital Education For All - Is Mobile Learning The Way Ahead? The Media Bulletin. Pimple, O. (2021, January). Digital Education For All - Is Mobile Learning The Way Ahead? The Media Bulletin.
Zurück zum Zitat Pozo Sánchez, S., López-Belmonte, J., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Sola Reche, J. M., & Fuentes Cabrera, A. (2020). Effect of Bring-Your-Own-Device Program on Flipped Learning in Higher Education Students. In Sustainability (Vol. 12, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093729 Pozo Sánchez, S., López-Belmonte, J., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Sola Reche, J. M., & Fuentes Cabrera, A. (2020). Effect of Bring-Your-Own-Device Program on Flipped Learning in Higher Education Students. In Sustainability (Vol. 12, Issue 9). https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​su12093729
Zurück zum Zitat Prathish S, Narayanan S A, & Bijlani K. (2016). An Intelligent System For Online Exam Monitoring. Prathish S, Narayanan S A, & Bijlani K. (2016). An Intelligent System For Online Exam Monitoring.
Zurück zum Zitat Raj, R. S. V., Narayanan, S. A., & Bijlani, K. (2015). Heuristic-based automatic online proctoring system. Proceedings - IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies: Advanced Technologies for Supporting Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning, ICALT 2015, 458–459. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.127 Raj, R. S. V., Narayanan, S. A., & Bijlani, K. (2015). Heuristic-based automatic online proctoring system. Proceedings - IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies: Advanced Technologies for Supporting Open Access to Formal and Informal Learning, ICALT 2015, 458–459. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​ICALT.​2015.​127
Zurück zum Zitat Slusky, L. (2020). Cybersecurity of Online Proctoring Systems. In Journal of International Technology and Information Management (Vol. 29). Slusky, L. (2020). Cybersecurity of Online Proctoring Systems. In Journal of International Technology and Information Management (Vol. 29).
Zurück zum Zitat Ullah, A., Barker, T., & Xiao, H. (2017). A Focus Group Study: Usability and Security of Challenge Question Authentication in Online Examinations. Ullah, A., Barker, T., & Xiao, H. (2017). A Focus Group Study: Usability and Security of Challenge Question Authentication in Online Examinations.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiner, J. A., & Hurtz, G. M. (2017). A Comparative Study of Online Remote Proctored versus Onsite Proctored High-Stakes Exams. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 18(1), 13–20. Weiner, J. A., & Hurtz, G. M. (2017). A Comparative Study of Online Remote Proctored versus Onsite Proctored High-Stakes Exams. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 18(1), 13–20.
Zurück zum Zitat Woldeab D, & Brothen T. (2019). OnlineProctoring, TestAnxiety, and Student Performance. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(1). Woldeab D, & Brothen T. (2019). OnlineProctoring, TestAnxiety, and Student Performance. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(1).
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, M. Z., Zhang, M. M., Chang, Y., Esche, D. S. K., & Chassapis, D. C. (2016). A Virtual Laboratory System with Biometric Authentication and Remote Proctoring Based on Facial Recognition. Zhang, M. Z., Zhang, M. M., Chang, Y., Esche, D. S. K., & Chassapis, D. C. (2016). A Virtual Laboratory System with Biometric Authentication and Remote Proctoring Based on Facial Recognition.
Metadaten
Titel
A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past, Present and Future
verfasst von
Aditya Nigam
Rhitvik Pasricha
Tarishi Singh
Prathamesh Churi
Publikationsdatum
23.06.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Education and Information Technologies 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner