Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Analysis of the Acoustic Power Emitted by a Physiotherapeutic Ultrasound Equipment Used at the Brazilian Air Force Academy Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Systematic Review on Image Registration in Interventionist Procedures: Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance

verfasst von : G. F. Carniel, A. C. D. Rodas, A. G. Santiago

Erschienen in: XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Medical images are a powerful tool to help the physicians in diagnosis and planning a surgery. Ultrasound (US) and Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) are the most used techniques in the literature with this purpose. Both have their positive points and negative points related to the quality of the image acquisition, some parameters which are looked for are if the same technique, or combination, can give a high-quality definition of the position and fast acquisition of the image. With this worry in mind, this work has the aim to answer a specific question: “Which are the characteristics of ultrasound and magnetic resonance image registration methods for interventional procedures?”. We used the PICOS (Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study) tool to define the search. As the inclusion and exclusion criteria were the year range (from 2013 to 2019) and if the study applied both US and MRI for image registration. As a result, 22 out of 96 articles matched the criteria. It was observed that Urology, Neurology, Hepatology, Cardiology and Gynecology are the medical fields in which the US and MRI combination are most used. There was a preference by the authors for the use of non-rigid transformations for recording US and MRI images. This fact can be justified by the need to consider the difference in the shape of structures in the US and MRI images for registration. The accuracy was the most used metric in the evaluation of image recording methods. The metrics used to assess accuracy varied according to the study field.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Alpha Development of Software for 3D Segmentation and Reconstruction of Medical Images for Use in Pre-treatment Simulations for Electrochemotherapy: Implementation and Case Study
Nächstes Kapitel Application of Autoencoders for Feature Extraction in BCI-SSVEP
Literatur
1.
Zhang S, Jiang S, Yang Z, Liu R (2015) 2D ultrasound and 3D MR image registration of the prostate for brachytherapy surgical navigation. Medicine 94:e1643
2.
Mercier L, Fonov V, Haegelen C, Del Maestro RF, Petrecca K, Collins DL (2012) Comparing two approaches to rigid registration of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance images for neurosurgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7:125–136CrossRef
3.
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A (2012) Beyond PICO. Qualitative Health Res 22:1435–1443CrossRef
4.
Sun Y, Qiu W, Yuan J, Romagnoli C, Fenster A (2015) Three-dimensional nonrigid landmark-based magnetic resonance to transrectal ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate biopsy. J Med Imaging 2
5.
Gong L, Wang H, Peng C et al (2017) Non-rigid MR-TRUS image registration for image-guided prostate biopsy using correlation ratio-based mutual information. BioMedical Eng OnLine 16:8CrossRef
6.
Mayer A, Zholkover A, Portnoy O, Raviv G, Konen E, Symon Z (2016) Deformable registration of trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for focal prostate brachytherapy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11:1015–1023CrossRef
7.
Ven WJM, Hu Y, Barentsz JO, Karssemeijer N, Barratt D, Huisman HJ (2015) Biomechanical modeling constrained surface-based image registration for prostate MR guided TRUS biopsy. Med Phys 42:2470–2481CrossRef
8.
Khallaghi S, Sanchez CA, Rasoulian A et al (2015) Statistical biomechanical surface registration: application to MR-TRUS fusion for prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34:2535–2549CrossRef
9.
Onofrey JA, Staib LH, Sarkar S et al (2017) Learning non-rigid deformations for robust, constrained point-based registration in image-guided MR-TRUS prostate intervention. Med Image Anal 39:29–43CrossRef
10.
Sun Y, Yuan J, Qiu W, Rajchl M, Romagnoli C, Fenster A (2015) Three-dimensional nonrigid MR-TRUS registration using dual optimization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34:1085–1095CrossRef
11.
Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Cifor A, Napolitano R et al (2013) Registration of 3D fetal neurosonography and MRI. Med Image Anal 17:1137–1150CrossRef
12.
Rivaz H, Chen SJ-S, Collins DL (2015) Automatic deformable MR-ultrasound registration for image-guided neurosurgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34:366–380CrossRef
13.
Masoumi N, Xiao Y, Rivaz H (2019) ARENA: inter-modality affine registration using evolutionary strategy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14:441–450CrossRef
14.
Rivaz H, Karimaghaloo Z, Fonov VS, Collins DL (2014) Nonrigid registration of ultrasound and MRI using contextual conditioned mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33:708–725CrossRef
15.
Nigris DD, Collins DL, Arbel T (2013) Fast rigid registration of pre-operative magnetic resonance images to intra-operative ultrasound for neurosurgery based on high confidence gradient orientations. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8:649–661CrossRef
16.
Wein W, Ladikos A, Fuerst B, Shah A, Sharma K, Navab N (2013) Global registration of ultrasound to MRI using the LC2 metric for enabling neurosurgical guidance. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 34–41
17.
Fuerst B, Wein W, Müller M, Navab N (2014) Automatic ultrasound-MRI registration for neurosurgery using the 2D and 3D LC2 metric. Med Image Anal 18:1312–1319CrossRef
18.
Farnia P, Ahmadian A, Shabanian T, Serej ND, Alirezaie J (2014) A hybrid method for non-rigid registration of intra-operative ultrasound images with pre-operative MR images. In: 2014 36th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, pp 5562–5565
19.
Sparks R, Nicolas Bloch B, Feleppa E et al (2015) Multiattribute probabilistic prostate elastic registration (MAPPER): application to fusion of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 42:1153–1163CrossRef
20.
Yang M, Ding H, Kang J, Cong L, Zhu L, Wang G (2016) Local structure orientation descriptor based on intra-image similarity for multimodal registration of liver ultrasound and MR images. Comput Biol Med 76:69–79CrossRef
21.
Yavariabdim A, Bartoli A, Samir C, Artigues M, Canis M (2015) Mapping and characterizing endometrial implants by registering 2D transvaginal ultrasound to 3D pelvic magnetic resonance images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 45:11–25CrossRef
22.
Yavariabdi A, Samir C, Bartoli A, Da Ines D, Bourdel N (2013) Mapping endometrial implants by 2D/2D registration of TVUS to MR images from point correspondences. In: 2013 IEEE 10th international symposium on biomedical imaging. IEEE, pp 576–579
23.
Carvalho DDB, Klein S, Dijk Z, Akkus et al (2014) Joint intensity-and-point based registration of free-hand B-mode ultrasound and MRI of the carotid artery. Med Phys 41
24.
Carvalho DDB, Arias Lorza AM, Niessen WJ, de Bruijne Marleen M, Klein S (2017) Automated registration of freehand B-mode ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of the carotid arteries based on geometric features. Ultrasound Med Biol 43:273–285CrossRef
25.
Hou M, Wang X, Yang M, Li X, Li B, Han Y (2016) Research on optical flow model based large deformation ultrasound-MRI registration. In: 2016 8th international conference on intelligent human-machine systems and cybernetics (IHMSC). IEEE, pp 169–172
Metadaten
Titel
A Systematic Review on Image Registration in Interventionist Procedures: Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance
verfasst von
G. F. Carniel
A. C. D. Rodas
A. G. Santiago
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Buch
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_260

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise