Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Information Systems Frontiers
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers 1/2022

02.03.2022

Advances on Data Management and Information Systems

verfasst von: Jérôme Darmont, Boris Novikov, Robert Wrembel, Ladjel Bellatreche

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

The research and technological area of data management encompasses various concepts, techniques, algorithms and technologies, including data modeling, data integration and ingestion, transactional data management, query languages, query optimization, physical data storage, data structures, analytical techniques (including On-Line Analytical Processing – OLAP), as well as service creation and orchestration (Garcia-Molina et al., 2009). Data management technologies are core components of every information system, either centralized or distributed, deployed in an on-premise hardware architecture or in a cloud ecosystem. Data management technologies have been used in commercial, mature products for decades. They were originally developed for managing structured data (mainly expressed in the relational data model). …
Nächster Artikel Speeding Up Reachability Queries in Public Transport Networks Using Graph Partitioning

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
Literatur
Abelló, A., Romero, O., Pedersen, T.B., Llavori, R.B., Nebot, V., Cabo, M.J.A., & Simitsis, A. (2015). Using semantic web technologies for exploratory OLAP: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Enginering, 27(2), 571–588.CrossRef
Ali, S.M.F., & Wrembel, R. (2017). From conceptual design to performance optimization of ETL workflows: current state of research and open problems. The VLDB Journal, 26(6), 777–801.CrossRef
Angles, R., Arenas, M., Barcelo, P., Boncz, P., Fletcher, G., Gutierrez, C., Lindaaker, T., Paradies, M., Plantikow, S., Sequeda, J., van Rest, O., & Voigt, H. (2018). G-core: a core for future graph query languages. In ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on management of data (pp. 1421–1432).
Azzini, A.S.B. Jr, Bellandi, V., Catarci, T., Ceravolo, P., Cudré-mauroux, P., Maghool, S., Pokorný, J., Scannapieco, M., Sédes, F., Tavares, G.M., & Wrembel, R. (2021). Advances in data management in the big data era. In Advancing research in information and communication technology, IFIP AICT, (Vol. 600 pp. 99–126). Springer.
Bengio, Y., Lecun, Y., & Hinton, G. (2021). Deep learning for ai. Communcations of the ACM, 64(7), 58–65.CrossRef
Biggio, B., Diaz, C., Paulheim, H., & Saukh, O. (2021). Big minds sharing their vision on the future of ai (panel). In Database and expert systems applications (DEXA), LNCS, Vol. 12923. Springer.
Bilalli, B., Abelló, A., Aluja-banet, T., & Wrembel, R. (2019). PRESISTANT: learning based assistant for data pre-processing. Data & Knowledge Engineering 123.
Bodria, F., Giannotti, F., Guidotti, R., Naretto, F., Pedreschi, D., & Rinzivillo, S. (2021). Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models. arXiv:2102.​13076.
Bogatu, A., Paton, N.W., Fernandes, A.A.A., & Koehler, M. (2019). Towards automatic data format transformations: Data wrangling at scale. The Computer Journal, 62(7), 1044–1060.CrossRef
Bouakkaz, M., Ouinten, Y., Loudcher, S., & Strekalova, Y.A. (2017). Textual aggregation approaches in OLAP context: a survey. Int. Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 684–692.CrossRef
Brdjanin, D., Banjac, D., Banjac, G., & Maric, S. (2018). An online business process model-driven generator of the conceptual database model. In Int. Conf. on web intelligence, mining and semantics.
Chen, H., Wu, B., Deng, S., Huang, C., Li, C., Li, Y., & Cheng, J. (2020). High performance distributed OLAP on property graphs with grasper. In Int. Conf. on management of data, SIGMOD (pp. 2705–2708). ACM.
Codd, E., Codd, S., & Salley, C. (1993). Providing OLAP to User-Analysts: an IT mandate. E.F codd & associates.
Cuzzocrea, A. (2015). Data warehousing and OLAP over Big Data: a survey of the state-of-the-art, open problems and future challenges. Int. Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 7(4), 372–377.CrossRef
Danso, S.O., Zeng, Z., Muniz, G.T., & Ritchie, C. (2021). Developing an explainable machine learning-based personalised dementia risk prediction model: a transfer learning approach with ensemble learning algorithms. Frontiers Big Data, 613047, 4.
Deutsch, A., & Papakonstantinou, Y. (2018). Graph data models, query languages and programming paradigms. Proc. VLDB Endow., 11(12), 2106–2109.CrossRef
Deutsch, A., Xu, Y., Wu, M., & Lee, V.E. (2020). Aggregation support for modern graph analytics in tigergraph. In ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on management of data (pp. 377–392).
Du, M., Liu, N., & Hu, X. (2019). Techniques for interpretable machine learning. Communcations of the ACM, 63(1), 68–77.CrossRef
García-Magariño, I., Rajarajan, M., & Lloret, J. (2019). Human-centric AI for trustworthy iot systems with explainable multilayer perceptrons. IEEE Access, 7, 125562–125574.CrossRef
Garcia-Molina, H., Ullman, J.D., & Widom, J. (2009). Database systems - the complete book. London: Pearson Education.
Ghrab, A., Romero, O., Jouili, S., & Skhiri, S. (2018). Graph BI & analytics: Current state and future challenges. In Int. Conf. on big data analytics and knowledge discovery DAWAK, LNCS, (Vol. 11031 pp. 3–18). Springer.
Ghrab, A., Romero, O., Skhiri, S., & Zimányi, E. (2021). Topograph: an end-to-end framework to build and analyze graph cubes. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(1), 203–226.CrossRef
Giovanelli, J., Bilalli, B., & Abelló, A. (2021). Effective data pre-processing for automl. In Int. Workshop on design, optimization, languages and analytical processing of big data (DOLAP), CEUR workshop proceedings, (Vol. 2840 pp. 1–10).
Goebel, R., Chander, A., Holzinger, K., Lécué, F., Akata, Z., Stumpf, S., Kieseberg, P., & Holzinger, A. (2018). Explainable AI: the new 42?. In IFIP TC 5 Int. Cross-domain conf. on machine learning and knowledge extraction CD-MAKE, LNCS, (Vol. 11015 pp. 295–303). Springer.
Griffith, R.L. (1982). Three principles of representation for semantic networks. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 417–442.
Hai, R., Quix, C., & Jarke, M. (2021). Data lake concept and systems: a survey arXiv:2106.​09592.
Han, J. (1997). OLAP Mining: Integration of OLAP with data mining. In Conf. on database semantics (DS), IFIP conference proceedings, (Vol. 124 pp. 3–20).
Han, J. (2017). OLAP, Spatial, (pp. 809–812). Berlin: Encyclopedia of GIS Springer.
Hernández, A.́B., Pérez, M.S., Gupta, S., & Muntés-mulero, V. (2018). Using machine learning to optimize parallelism in big data applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 86, 1076–1092.CrossRef
Holzschuher, F., & Peinl, R. (2013). Performance of graph query languages: Comparison of cypher, gremlin and native access in neo4j. In Joint EDBT/ICDT workshops (pp. 195–204).
Karimi, M., Wu, D., Wang, Z., & Shen, Y. (2021). Explainable deep relational networks for predicting compound-protein affinities and contacts. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 61(1), 46–66.CrossRef
Kedziora, D.J., Musial, K., & Gabrys, B. (2020). Autonoml: Towards an integrated framework for autonomous machine learning. arXiv:2012.​12600.
Koehler, M., Abel, E., Bogatu, A., Civili, C., Mazilu, L., Konstantinou, N., Fernandes, A.A.A., Keane, J.A., Libkin, L., & Paton, N.W. (2021). Incorporating data context to cost-effectively automate end-to-end data wrangling. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(1), 169–186.CrossRef
Konstantinou, N., & Paton, N.W. (2020). Feedback driven improvement of data preparation pipelines. Information Systems, 92, 101480.CrossRef
Langer, M., Oster, D., Speith, T., Hermanns, H., Kästner, L., Schmidt, E., Sesing, A., & Baum, K. (2021). What do we want from explainable artificial intelligence (xai)? - a stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research. Artifitial Intelligence, 296, 103473.CrossRef
Liang, Y., Li, S., Yan, C., Li, M., & Jiang, C. (2021). Explaining the black-box model: a survey of local interpretation methods for deep neural networks. Neurocomputing, 419, 168–182.CrossRef
Loudcher, S., Jakawat, W., Soriano-Morales, E.P., & Favre, C. (2015). Combining OLAP and information networks for bibliographic data analysis: a survey. Scientometrics, 103(2), 471–487.CrossRef
Mahbooba, B., Timilsina, M., Sahal, R., & Serrano, M. (2021). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to enhance trust management in intrusion detection systems using decision tree model. Complexity, 2021, 6634811:1–6634811:11.
Mahboubi, H., Hachicha, M., & Darmont, J. (2009). XML Warehousing And OLAP, Encyclopedia of Data Warehousing and Mining, Second Edition, vol. IV, pp. 2109–2116 IGI Publishing.
Maniatis, A.S. (2004). The case for mobile OLAP. In Current trends in database technology – EDBT workshops, LNCS, (Vol. 3268 pp. 405–414).
Marketos, G., & Theodoridis, Y. (2010). Ad-hoc OLAP on Trajectory Data. In Int. Conf. on mobile data management (MDM) (pp. 189–198).
McHugh, J., Abiteboul, S., Goldman, R., Quass, D., & Widom, J. (1997). Lore: a database management system for semistructured data. SIGMOD Record, 26(3), 54–66.CrossRef
Meusel, R., Vigna, S., Lehmberg, O., & Bizer, C. (2014). Graph structure in the web — revisited: a trick of the heavy tail. In Int. Conf. on world wide web (pp. 427–432).
Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38.CrossRef
Moldovan, D.I. (1984). An associative array architecture intended for semantic network processing. In Annual conf. of the ACM on the fifth generation challenge (pp. 212–221). ACM.
Moradi, M., & Samwald, M. (2021). Explaining black-box models for biomedical text classification. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 25(8), 3112–3120.CrossRef
Ohana, J., Ohana, S., Benhamou, E., Saltiel, D., & Guez, B. (2021). Explainable AI (XAI) models applied to the multi-agent environment of financial markets. In Explainable and transparent AI and multi-agent systems, lecture notes in computer science, (Vol. 12688 pp. 189–207). Springer.
Peng, P., Zou, L., Özsu, M.T., Chen, L., & Zhao, D. (2016). Processing sparql queries over distributed rdf graphs. The VLDB Journal, 25, 243–268.CrossRef
Pokorný, J. (2016). Conceptual and database modelling of graph databases. In Int. Symp. on database engineering and application systems (IDEAS) (pp. 370–377).
Quemy, A. (2019). Data pipeline selection and optimization. In Int. Workshop on design, optimization, languages and analytical processing of big data, CEUR workshop proceedings, Vol. 2324.
Quemy, A. (2020). Two-stage optimization for machine learning workflow. Information Systems, 92, 101483.CrossRef
Romero, O., & Wrembel, R. (2020). Data engineering for data science: Two sides of the same coin. Int. Conf. on big data analytics and knowledge discovery DAWAK, LNCS, vol. 12393, pp. 157–166. Springer.
Romero, O., Wrembel, R., & Song, I. (2020). An alternative view on data processing pipelines from the DOLAP 2019 perspective. Information Systems 92.
Salka, C. (1998). Ending the MOLAP/ROLAP debate: Usage based aggregation and flexible HOLAP. In Int. Conf. on data engineering (ICDE) (p. 180).
Sardianos, C., Varlamis, I., Chronis, C., Dimitrakopoulos, G., Alsalemi, A., Himeur, Y., Bensaali, F., & Amira, A. (2021). The emergence of explainability of intelligent systems: Delivering explainable and personalized recommendations for energy efficiency. Int. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(2), 656– 680.CrossRef
Sawadogo, P.N., & Darmont, J. (2021). On data lake architectures and metadata management. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 56(1), 97–120.CrossRef
Schuetz, C.G., Bozzato, L., Neumayr, B., Schrefl, M., & Serafini, L. (2021). Knowledge graph OLAP. Semantic Web, 12(4), 649–683.CrossRef
Tsikrika, T., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2016). A retrospective study on the 20 years of the ADBIS conference. In New trends in databases and information systems, communications in computer and information science, (Vol. 637 pp. 1–15). Springer.
Vassiliadis, P., & Sellis, T.K. (1999). A survey of logical models for OLAP databases. SIGMOD Record, 28(4), 64–69.CrossRef
Witt, C., Bux, M., Gusew, W., & Leser, U. (2019). Predictive performance modeling for distributed batch processing using black box monitoring and machine learning. Information Systems, 82, 33–52.CrossRef
Wrembel, R., Abelló, A., & Song, I. (2019). DOLAP Data warehouse research over two decades: Trends and challenges. Information Systems, 85, 44–47.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Advances on Data Management and Information Systems
verfasst von
Jérôme Darmont
Boris Novikov
Robert Wrembel
Ladjel Bellatreche
Publikationsdatum
02.03.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10235-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Information Systems Frontiers 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Using Flow Tools to Enact Control in Software Development Projects: A Cross-case Analysis

OriginalPaper

Analyzing the Quality of Twitter Data Streams

OriginalPaper

Integrated Declarative Process and Decision Discovery of the Emergency Care Process

OriginalPaper

An Empirical Investigation of Intent to Adopt Mobile Payment Systems Using a Trust-based Extended Valence Framework

OriginalPaper

Impact of Provider Prior Use of HIE on System Complexity, Performance, Patient Care, Quality and System Concerns

OriginalPaper

Influence of Habits on Mobile Payment Acceptance: An Ecosystem Perspective

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise