Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Production Engineering
Erschienen in: Production Engineering 1/2024

30.08.2023 | Production Management

An adaptive and integrated reference model for supplier selection: application to product development and serialized component supply

verfasst von: Adauto Lucas da Silva, Antonio Carlos Pacagnella Junior, Paulo Sérgio de Arruda Ignácio, Alessandro Lucas da Silva

Erschienen in: Production Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to present an adaptive and integrated reference model for the Supplier Selection Process (SSP) to integrate it into the Product Development Process (PDP) or the serialized component supply. The research methodology adopted a broad literature review on indexed databases and a logical deductive analysis of the identified constructs and factors. The two main results obtained were: compilation and categorization (moderating factors, connecting factors) of critical SSP success factors; and proposal of a reference model so that the SSP can serve the PDP and the serialized component supply. Regarding originality we can mention: (a) this reference model covers all the critical SSP success factors; (b) it makes a clear distinction between moderating and connecting factors (c) while addressing both the PDP and the serialized component supply. The considerable number of factors identified in this research suggests that the vast majority of models proposed in the literature are based on an incomplete set of variables, restricting the conceptual view of the SSP. Finally, the results contribute to reducing the risk of the SSP not adding value to the Original Equipment Manufacturers' (OEMs) strategic purpose or causing losses. Additionally, the proposed model can be adapted according to the company's business strategy.
Vorheriger Artikel Priority-based multi-objective algorithms for green supply chain network design with disruption consideration
Nächster Artikel Correction: An adaptive and integrated reference model for supplier selection: application to product development and serialized component supply

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Herstad S, Asleen HW, Ebersberger B (2014) On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Res Policy 43:495–504CrossRef
3.
Scandura A (2016) University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. Res Policy 45(9):1907–1922CrossRef
4.
Krause DR, Scannell TV (2002) “Supplier development practices: product- and service-based industry comparisons. J Suppl Chain Manag 38(1):13–21CrossRef
5.
Peled M, Dvir D (2012) Towards a contingent approach of customer involvement in defence projects: an exploratory study. Int J Project Manage 30:317–328CrossRef
6.
Rosell DT, Lakemond N, Melander L (2017) Integrating supplier knowledge in new product development projects: decoupled and coupled approaches. J Knowl Manag 21(5):1035–1052CrossRef
7.
Bonner JM, Walker OC (2004) Selecting influential business-to-business customers in new product development: Relational embeddedness and knowledge heterogeneity considerations. J Prod Innov Manag 21:155–169CrossRef
8.
Carbonell P, Rodriguez-Escudero AI, Pujari D (2012) Performance effects of involving lead users and close customers in new service development. J Serv Mark 26:497–509CrossRef
9.
Fang E (2008) Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market. J Marketing 72:90–104CrossRef
10.
Arabsheybani A, Paydar MM, Safaei AS (2018) An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. J Clean Prod 190:577–591CrossRef
11.
Çebi F, Otay I (2016) A two-stage fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and order allocation problem with quantity discounts and lead time. Information Sci 339:143e157CrossRef
12.
Westphal P, Sohal AS (2013) Taxonomy of outsourcing decision models. Prod Plan Control 24(4–5):347–358CrossRef
13.
Cheraghalipour A, Farsad S (2018) A bi-objective sustainable supplier selection and order allocation considering quantity discounts under disruption risks: a case study in plastic industry. Comput Ind Eng 118:237–250CrossRef
14.
Moheb-Alizadeh H, Handfield R (2019) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a novel multi-objective programming model with a hybrid solution approach. Comput Ind Eng 129:192–209CrossRef
15.
Dey PK, Bhattacharya A, Ho W, Clegg B (2015) Strategic supplier performance evaluation: a case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organisation. Int J Prod Econ 166:192–214CrossRef
16.
Lee ABS, Chan FTS, Pu X (2018) Impact of supplier development on supplier’s performance. Ind Manag Data Syst 118(6):1192–1208CrossRef
17.
Talluri S, Narasimhan R, Chung W (2010) Manufacturer cooperation in supplier development under risk. Eur J Oper Res 207:165–173MathSciNetCrossRef
18.
Wowak KD, Craighead CW, Ketchen DJ Jr, Hult GTM (2016) Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for the supplier-enabled fuzzy front end of the new product development process. J Supply Chain Manag 52(1):66–81CrossRef
19.
Mortensen M, Arlbjorn J (2012) Inter-organisational supplier development: the case of customer attractiveness and strategic fit. Supply Chain Manag 17(2):152–171CrossRef
20.
Tan KC, Lyman SB, Wisner JD (2002) Supply chain management: a strategic perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 22(6):614–631CrossRef
21.
Lima Junior FR, Osiro L, Carpinetti LCR (2013) A fuzzy inference and categorization approach for supplier selection using compensatory and non-compensatory decision rules. Appl Soft Comput 13:4133–4147CrossRef
22.
Oinonen M, Ritala P, Jalkala A, Blomqvist K (2018) In search of paradox management capability in supplier–customer codevelopment. Ind Mark Manage 74:102–114CrossRef
23.
Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research, Boston
24.
Akrout H (2015) A process perspective on trust in buyer-supplier relationships. ‘Calculus’ an intrinsic component of trust evolution. Eur Business Rev 27(1):17–33CrossRef
25.
Araujo L, Gadde L-E, Dubois A (2016) Purchasing and supply management and the role of supplier interfaces. IMP J 10(1):2–24CrossRef
26.
Aune T, Gressetvold E (2011) Supplier involvement in innovation processes: a taxonomy. Int J Innov Manag 15(1):121–143CrossRef
27.
Axelsson B, Wynstra F (2002) Buying Business Services, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
28.
Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120
29.
Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
30.
Capaldo A (2007) Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strateg Manag J 28:585–608CrossRef
31.
Day M, Fawcett SE, Fawcett AM, Magnan GM (2013) Trust and relational embeddedness: exploring a paradox of trust pattern development in key supplier relationships. Ind Mark Manage 42:152–165CrossRef
32.
Day M, Magnan GM, Moeller MM (2010) Evaluating the bases of supplier segmentation: a review and taxonomy. Ind Mark Manage 39:625–639CrossRef
33.
Demil B, Lecocq X (2006) Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: the emergence of Bazaar governance. Organ Stud 27(10):1447–1466CrossRef
34.
Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660–680CrossRef
35.
Echtelt FEA, Wynstra F, van Weele AJ, Duysters G (2008) Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a multiple-case study. J Prod Innov Manag 25:180–201CrossRef
36.
Fossas-Olalla M, Minguela-Rata B, López-Sánchez J, Fernández-Menéndez (2015) Product innovation: when should suppliers begin to collaborate? J Business Res 68:1404–1406CrossRef
37.
Handfield RB, Krause DR, Scannell TV, Monczka RM (2000) Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development. Sloan Manag Rev 41(2):37–49
38.
Johnsen TE (2009) Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: taking stock and looking to the future. J Purchasing Suppl Manag 15:187–197CrossRef
39.
Laage-Hellman J, Lind F, Perna A (2014) Customer involvement in product development: an industrial network perspective. J Business Business Marketing 21(4):257–276CrossRef
40.
Melander L, Tell F (2014) Uncertainty in collaborative NPD: effects on the selection of technology and supplier. J Eng Technol Manage 31:103–119CrossRef
41.
Noshad K, Awasthi A (2015) Supplier quality development: a review of literature and industry practices. Int J Prod Res 53(2):466–487CrossRef
42.
Schiele H (2010) Early supplier integration: the dual role of purchasing in new product development. R&D Manag 40:2CrossRef
43.
Caldarelli G, Zardini A, Rossignoli C (2021) Blockchain adoption in the fashion sustainable supply chain: pragmatically addressing barriers. J Organ Chang Manag 34(2):507–524CrossRef
44.
Williamson O (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J Law Econ 22:233–261CrossRef
45.
Adobor H, McMullen RS (2018) Supply chain resilience: a dynamic and multidimensional approach. Int J Logist Manag 29(4):1451–1471CrossRef
46.
Whitehead K, Zacharia Z, Prater E (2019) Investigating the role of knowledge transfer in supply chain collaboration. Int J Logistics Manag 30(1):284–302CrossRef
47.
Delbufalo E, Bastl M (2018) Multi-principal collaboration and supplier’s compliance with codes-of-conduct. Int J Logistics Manag 29(4):1237–1254CrossRef
48.
Koller M (2016) Exploring adaptability in organizations: Where adaptive advantage comes from and what it is based upon. J Organizational Change Manag 29(6):837–854CrossRef
49.
Will MG (2017) Successful organizational change through win-win: how change managers can create mutual benefits. J Model Manag 12(4):671–689
50.
Jayaram J (2008) Supplier involvement in new product development projects: dimensionality and contingency effects. Int J Prod Res 46(13):3717–3735CrossRef
51.
Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Petersen KJ (2002) Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. J Bus Res 55(5):389–400CrossRef
52.
Lui SS, Ngo H-Y (2012) Drivers and outcomes of long-term orientation in cooperative relationships. Br J Manag 23(1):80–95CrossRef
53.
Su J, Gargeya VB (2016) Supplier selection in small- and medium-sized firms: the case of the US textile and apparel industry. Am J Business 31(4):166–186CrossRef
54.
Trautrims A, Maccarthy BL, Okade C (2017) Building an innovation-based supplier portfolio: the use of patent analysis in strategic supplier selection in the automotive sector. Int J Prod Econ 194:228–236CrossRef
55.
Wuyts S, Geyskens I (2005) The formation of buyer-supplier relationships: detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. J Marketing 69(4):103–117CrossRef
56.
Yoo SH, Hin H (2015) PARK, New product development and the effect of supplier involvement. Omega 51:107–120CrossRef
57.
Handfield RB, Bechtel C (2002) The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Ind Mark Manage 31(4):367–382CrossRef
58.
Kou T, Chiang C, Chiang A (2018) Effects of IT-based supply chains on new product development activities and the performance of computer and communication electronics manufacturers. J Business Indust Marketing 33(7):869–882CrossRef
59.
Bai C, Sarkis J (2016) Supplier development investment strategies: a game theoretic evaluation. Ann Oper Res 240:583–615MathSciNetCrossRef
60.
Govindan K, Kannan D, Haq AN (2010) Analyzing supplier development criteria for an automobile industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(1):43–62CrossRef
61.
Worthmann K, Braun P, Proch M, Schlüchtermann J, Pannek J (2016) On contractual periods in supplier development. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49–2:060–065CrossRef
62.
Singh RK, Koul S, Kumar P (2017) Analyzing the interaction of factors for flexibility in supply chains. J Model Manag 12(4):671–689CrossRef
63.
Lau AKW, Yam RCM, Tang EPY (2007) Supply chain product co-development, product modularity and product performance: empirical evidence from Hong Kong manufacturers. Ind Manag Data Syst 107(7):1036–1065CrossRef
64.
Carrera DA, Mayorga RV (2008) Supply chain management: a modular Fuzzy Inference System approach in supplier selection for new product development. J Intell Manuf 19:1–12CrossRef
65.
Mirmousa S, Dehnavi HD (2016) Development of criteria of selecting the supplier by using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 230:281–289CrossRef
66.
Omurca SI (2013) An intelligent supplier evaluation, selection and development system. Appl Soft Comput 13:690–697CrossRef
67.
Ordoobadi SM (2009) Development of a supplier selection model using fuzzy logic. Supply Chain Manag 14(4):314–327CrossRef
68.
Rezaei J, Ortt R (2013) Supplier segmentation using fuzzy logic. Ind Mark Manage 42:507–517CrossRef
69.
Hosseininasab A, Ahmadi A (2015) Selecting a supplier portfolio with value, development, and risk consideration. Eur J Oper Res 245:146–156MathSciNetCrossRef
70.
Li L, Zabinsky ZB (2011) Incorporating uncertainty into a supplier selection problem. Int J Prod Econ 134:344–356CrossRef
71.
Rezaei J, Wang J, Travasszzy L (2015) Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best worst method. Expert Syst Appl 42:9152–9164CrossRef
72.
Prasannavenkatesan S, Goh M (2016) Multi-objective supplier and order allocation under disruption risk. Transp Res Part E 95:124–142CrossRef
73.
Wu DD, Zhang Y, Wu D, Olson DL 2010 Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: a possibility approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 200
74.
Chen L, Ellis SC, Suresh N (2016) A supplier development adoption framework using expectancy theory. Int J Oper Prod Manag 36(5):592–615CrossRef
75.
Chen Y (2011) Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Information Sci 181:1651–1670CrossRef
76.
Noorizadeh A, Rashidi K, Peltokorpi A (2018) Categorizing suppliers for development investments in construction: application of DEA and RFM concept. Constr Manag Econ 36(9):487–506CrossRef
77.
Wagner SM (2010) Indirect and direct supplier development: performance implications of individual and combined effects. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 57(4):536CrossRef
78.
Song M, di Benedetto CA (2008) Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. J Oper Manag 26(1):1–22CrossRef
79.
Venkatesan SP, Goh M (2016) Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. Transp Res Part E 95:124–142CrossRef
80.
Eltantawy RA, Giunipero L, Fox GL (2009) A strategic skill based model of supplier integration and its effect on supply management performance. Ind Mark Manag 38:925–936CrossRef
81.
Park H, Ballamy MA, Basole RC (2018) Structural anatomy and evolution of supply chain alliance networks: a multi-method approach. J Oper Manag 63:79–96CrossRef
82.
Hallikas J, Karvonen I, Pulkkinen U, Virolainen V, Tuominen M (2004) Risk management processes in supplier networks. Int J Prod Econ 90:47–58CrossRef
83.
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin Sci Q 35(1):128–152CrossRef
84.
Hoang H, Rothaemel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad Manag J 48(2):332–345CrossRef
85.
86.
Knell M, Srholec M (2008) Technological collaboration and foreign ownership across firms in Europe. Report, Innovation Watch-Systematic
87.
Vroom VH (1964) Work and Motivation. Wiley, New York
88.
Oinonen M, Falkala AM (2015) Divergent goals in supplier-customer co-development process: an integrated framework. J Bus Ind Mark 30(3/4):290–301CrossRef
89.
Anderson DR, Sweeney DJ, Williams TA (2009) Essentials of statistics for business and economics, 5th edn. Thomson South-Western, Mason
90.
Matook S, Lasch R, Tamaschke R (2009) Supplier development with benchmarking as part of a comprehensive supplier risk management framework. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29(3):241–267CrossRef
91.
Yan T, Ribbink D, Pun H (2018) Incentivizing supplier participation in buyer innovation: experimental evidence of non-optimal contractual behaviors. J Oper Manag 57:36–53CrossRef
92.
Lo H, Liou JJH, Wang H, Tsai Y (2018) An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J Clean Prod 190:339–352CrossRef
93.
Fritsch M, Kauffeld-Monz M (2010) The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. Ann Reg Sci 44:21–38CrossRef
94.
Büchel B, Nieminen L, Armbruster-Domeyer H, Denison D (2013) Managing stakeholders in team-based innovation: the dynamics of knowledge and trust networks. Eur J Innov Manag 16(1):22–49CrossRef
95.
Ozman M (2009) Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature. Econ Innov New Technol 18(1):39–67CrossRef
96.
Roxenhall T (2013) Network structure and innovation in strategic innovation networks. Int J Innov Manag 17:1350002-1–20CrossRef
97.
Li S, Kang M, Haney MH (2017) The effect of supplier development on outsourcing performance: the mediating roles of opportunism and flexibility. Prod Plan Control 28(S68):599–609CrossRef
98.
Wagner SM (2011) Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle. Int J Prod Econ 129:277–283CrossRef
99.
Myers SC (1987) Finance theory and financial strategy. Midl Corp Finance J 5:6–13
Metadaten
Titel
An adaptive and integrated reference model for supplier selection: application to product development and serialized component supply
verfasst von
Adauto Lucas da Silva
Antonio Carlos Pacagnella Junior
Paulo Sérgio de Arruda Ignácio
Alessandro Lucas da Silva
Publikationsdatum
30.08.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Production Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0944-6524
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-7353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-023-01221-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Production Engineering 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Assembly and Automation

Analyzing psychophysical state and cognitive performance in human-robot collaboration for repetitive assembly processes

Production Management

A dynamic availability analysis of an N-component production system with interdependency effects: a fractional-order approach

Processes

Oxidation and wear behavior of CrAlMoN with varied Mo-content for cutting Ti6Al4V

Correction

Correction: An adaptive and integrated reference model for supplier selection: application to product development and serialized component supply

Processes

Experimental investigation of ultrasonic vibration-assisted cryogenic minimum quantity lubrication for milling of Ti-6Al-4V and grinding of Zerodur

Material Properties

Effect of a strain rate dependent material modeling of a steel on the prediction accuracy of a numerical deep drawing process

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise