nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

12.01.2021 | Original Paper

Approaches to Integrate Virtual Reality into K-16 Lesson Plans: an Introduction for Teachers

verfasst von: Aleshia Hayes, Lea Anne Daughrity, Nanxi Meng

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This discourse presents TPACK as a conceptual framework for thinking about the integration of Virtual Reality into the classroom. This content introduces the concept of immersion, explores of the possibilities of VR technology, including the hardware, software, and potential classroom uses. This review also provides heuristics for deciding VR’s fit with the learning objectives. Readers also will learn processes for finding resources, overcoming challenges, and addressing tradeoffs to K16 teachers implementing VR. The methodological approach provides a guide to practitioners for supporting both course learning objectives and student engagement. The TPACK framework, considerations of levels of immersion afforded by different hardware, and access to technology frame the planning and analysis of integration of VR technology. The article closes with content to introduce practitioners and administrators to the range of virtual reality (VR) technology and facilitate decisions on integration of VR into classrooms in order to improve the technological competency of K16 teachers and empower them to integrate VR content into their classrooms effectively.

Vorheriger Artikel Learner-centric Design of a Hand Hygiene Serious Simulation Game for Grade 12 Emerging Health Professional Students

Nächster Artikel Review of: Estrellado, R. A., Freer, E. A., Motsipak, J., Rosenberg, J. M., & Velásquez, I. C. (2021). Data science in education using R. London, England: Routledge

Ahlberg, G., Heikkinen, T., Iselius, L., Leijonmarck, C. E., Rutqvist, J., & Arvidsson, D. (2002). Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 16(1), 126–129.CrossRef

Aiello, P., D’Elia, F., Di Tore, S., & Sibilio, M. (2012). A constructivist approach to virtual reality for experiential learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2012.9.3.317.CrossRef

da Silva, M. M., Teixeira, J. M. X., Cavalcante, P. S., & Teichrieb, V. (2019). Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: A systematic review. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 25(1), 3.CrossRef

Davies, H. (2020). What is the right way to manage virtual reality in the classroom? In ClassVR Retrieved from https://www.classvr.com/what-is-the-right-way-to-manage-virtual-reality-in-the-classroom/.

Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.CrossRef

Dede, C., Salzman, M.C. & Loftin, R.B. (1996). Science space: Virtual realities for learning complex and abstract scientific concepts. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, New York: IEEE Press.

Durbin, J. (2016). A Case Study - The Impact of VR on Academic Performance. 1–20.

Fast, K., Gifford, T., & Yancey, R. (2004). Virtual training for welding. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '04). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 298–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2004.65.

Fauville, G., Queiroz, A. C., Hambrick, L., Brown, B. A., & Bailenson, J. N. (2020). Participatory research on using virtual reality to teach ocean acidification: A study in the marine education community. Environmental education research, 1-25.

Hayes, A., Straub, C., Dieker, L., Hughes, C., & Hynes, M. (2013). Ludic learning: Exploration of TLE TeachLivE and effective teacher training. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulation, 5(2), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2013040102.CrossRef

Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., & Zaki, J. (2018). Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PloS one, 13(10), e0204494.

Huang, Y., Churches, L., & Reilly, B. (2015). A case study on virtual reality American football training. Proceedings of the 2015 Virtual Reality International Conference (pp. 1-5).

Jang, S., Vitale, J. M., Jyung, R. W., & Black, J. B. (2017). Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 106, 150–165.CrossRef

Kassner, K. (2000). One computer can deliver whole-class instruction: It's possible for one computer to meet the needs of an entire class. Here are some ways for teachers to incorporate technology into music courses despite limited resources. Music Educators Journal, 86(6), 34–40.CrossRef

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., & Varshney, A. (2019). Virtual memory palaces: Immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality, 23(1), 1–15.CrossRef

Lindgren, R., & Moshell, J. M. (2011). Supporting children's learning with body-based metaphors in a mixed reality environment. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 177-180). ACM.

Liou, W., Chang, C. (2018) Virtual reality classroom applied to science education, 2018 23rd International Scientific-Professional Conference on Information Technology (IT), Zabljak, pp. 1–4.

Maister, L., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M., & Tsakiris, M. (2015). Changing bodies changes minds: Owning another body affects social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.001.CrossRef

Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Information Systems., E77-D(12), 1321–1329.

Modjeska, D., & Chignell, M. (2003). Individual differences in exploration using desktop VR. J. American Society of Information Science and Technology, 54(3), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10197.CrossRef

Pantelidis, V. S. (2010). Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2, 59–70.

Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797.CrossRef

Segovia, K., & Bailenson, J. (2009). Virtually true: Children's acquisition of false memories in virtual reality. Media Psychology, 12, 371–393.CrossRef

Seymour, N., Gallagher, A., Roman, S., O'Brien, M., Bansal, V., Andersen, D., & Satava, R. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery, 236(4), 458–463 discussion 463-464.CrossRef

Sissons, H., & Cochrane, T. (2019). Introducing immersive reality into the journalism curriculum. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 7–7.CrossRef

Southgate, E., Smith, S. P., Cividino, C., Saxby, S., Kilham, J., Eather, G., & Bergin, C. (2019). Embedding immersive virtual reality in classrooms: Ethical, organisational and educational lessons in bridging research and practice. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 19, 19–29.CrossRef

Spicer, J. I., & Stratford, J. (2001). Student perceptions of a virtual field trip to replace a real field trip. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 345–354.CrossRef

Te, Z. (2015). Oculus Rift vs. GameSpot: Morpheus vs. Vive VR http://www.gamespot.com/articles/oculus-rift-vs-morpheus-vs-vive-vr/1100-6427162/.

Tuthill, G., & Klemm, E. B. (2002). Virtual field trips: Alternatives to actual field trips. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 453.

Weng, C., Rathinasabapathi, A., Weng, A., & Zagita, C. (2019). Mixed reality in science education as a learning support: A revitalized science book. In Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3).

Won, A., Bailey, J. & Yi, S. (2020). Work-in-Progress—Learning about virtual worlds in virtual worlds: How remote learning in a pandemic can inform future teaching, 2020 6th international conference of the immersive learning research network (iLRN), San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, pp. 377–380.

Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2005.297.CrossRef

Titel: Approaches to Integrate Virtual Reality into K-16 Lesson Plans: an Introduction for Teachers
verfasst von: Aleshia Hayes
Lea Anne Daughrity
Nanxi Meng
Publikationsdatum: 12.01.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00572-7

Springer Professional

Approaches to Integrate Virtual Reality into K-16 Lesson Plans: an Introduction for Teachers

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Introduction to the May 2021 Issue

Teachers’ Views Regarding Learning Analytics Usage Based on the Technology Acceptance Model

Embracing Children’s Voice to Support Teachers’ Pedagogical Reasoning and Decision-Making for Technology Enhanced Practices in Early Childhood Classrooms

Review of: Estrellado, R. A., Freer, E. A., Motsipak, J., Rosenberg, J. M., & Velásquez, I. C. (2021). Data science in education using R. London, England: Routledge

Towards Wholeness: Exploring the Transformative Healing of the Creative Process with Dr. Patricia Allen

Exploring the Effectiveness of Digital Games in Producing pro-Environmental Behaviors when Played Collaboratively and Individually: A Mixed Methods Study in India

Premium Partner