nach oben

Erschienen in:

07.09.2017

Assessing responsiveness over time of the PROMIS^® pediatric symptom and function measures in cancer, nephrotic syndrome, and sickle cell disease

verfasst von: Bryce B. Reeve, Lloyd J. Edwards, Byron C. Jaeger, Pamela S. Hinds, Carlton Dampier, Debbie S. Gipson, David T. Selewski, Jonathan P. Troost, David Thissen, Vaughn Barry, Heather E. Gross, Darren A. DeWalt

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies provided evidence for the validity of the PROMIS Pediatric measures in cross-sectional studies. This study evaluated the ability of the PROMIS Pediatric measures to detect change over time in children and adolescents with cancer, nephrotic syndrome (NS), or sickle cell disease (SCD).

Methods

Participants (8–17 years) completed measures of fatigue, pain interference, anger, anxiety, depressive symptoms, mobility, upper extremity, and peer relationships at three or four time points (T1–T4). Between T1 and T2, children with cancer received chemotherapy and children with SCD experienced a pain exacerbation. Children with NS were first assessed during active disease (T2), with T3 and T4 conducted at disease remission. For the primary analysis of responsiveness, we expected better scores at T3 (recovery) compared to T2 (event) for all diseases. T1 and T4 are also expected to have better scores than T2. Linear mixed models were used and adjusted for time, gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, comorbid conditions, and disease.

Results

Enrolled were 96 children with cancer, 121 children with SCD, and 127 children with NS. Fatigue, pain interference, mobility, and upper extremity scores worsened from T1 (baseline) to T2 (event) (p < 0.01), and significantly improved from T2 to T3 and T4 (p < 0.01). Similarly, anxiety and depressive symptoms significantly improved from T2 to T3 and T4 (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

This study provides evidence for the responsiveness of seven PROMIS Pediatric measures to clinical disease state in three chronic illnesses. The findings support use of PROMIS Pediatric measures in clinical research.

Vorheriger Artikel Differential item functioning by language on the PROMIS® physical functioning items for children and adolescents

Nächster Artikel Assessing the measurement invariance of the Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale in Chinese and American adolescents

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

DeWitt, E. M., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Langer, M., Varni, J. W., et al. (2011). Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: Built using item response theory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(7), 794–804. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Varni, J. W., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Irwin, D. E., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale: An item response theory analysis of the pediatric pain item bank. The Journal of Pain, 11(11), 1109–1119. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lai, J. S., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Varni, J. W., DeWitt, E. M., Irwin, D. E., et al. (2013). Development and psychometric properties of the PROMIS((R)) pediatric fatigue item banks. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2417–2427. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0357-1.CrossRefPubMed

Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 595–607. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9619-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2012). PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: An item response theory analysis. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 697–706. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9969-5.CrossRefPubMed

Dewalt, D. A., Thissen, D., Stucky, B. D., Langer, M. M., Morgan Dewitt, E., Irwin, D. E., et al. (2013). PROMIS Pediatric Peer Relationships Scale: Development of a peer relationships item bank as part of social health measurement. Health Psychology, 32(10), 1093–1103. doi:10.1037/a0032670.CrossRefPubMed

DeWalt, D. A., Gross, H. E., Gipson, D. S., Selewski, D. T., DeWitt, E. M., Dampier, C. D., et al. (2015). PROMIS((R)) pediatric self-report scales distinguish subgroups of children within and across six common pediatric chronic health conditions. Quality of Life Research, 24(9), 2195–2208. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-0953-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gipson, D. S., Selewski, D. T., Massengill, S. F., Wickman, L., Messer, K. L., Herreshoff, E., et al. (2013). Gaining the PROMIS perspective from children with nephrotic syndrome: A midwest pediatric nephrology consortium study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 30. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hinds, P. S., Nuss, S. L., Ruccione, K. S., Withycombe, J. S., Jacobs, S., DeLuca, H., et al. (2013). PROMIS pediatric measures in pediatric oncology: Valid and clinically feasible indicators of patient-reported outcomes. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 60(3), 402–408. doi:10.1002/pbc.24233.CrossRef

10.

Selewski, D. T., Collier, D. N., MacHardy, J., Gross, H. E., Pickens, E. M., Cooper, A. W., et al. (2013). Promising insights into the health related quality of life for children with severe obesity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 29. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Selewski, D. T., Massengill, S. F., Troost, J. P., Wickman, L., Messer, K. L., Herreshoff, E., et al. (2014). Gaining the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) perspective in chronic kidney disease: A midwest pediatric nephrology consortium study. Pediatric Nephrology(Berlin, Germany), 29(12), 2347–2356. doi:10.1007/s00467-014-2858-8.CrossRef

12.

Menard, J. C., Hinds, P. S., Jacobs, S. S., Cranston, K., Wang, J., DeWalt, D. A., et al. (2014). Feasibility and acceptability of the PROMIS measures in children and adolescents in active cancer treatment and survivorship. Cancer Nursing, 37(1), 66–74. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182a0e23d.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Selewski, D. T., Troost, J. P., Massengill, S. F., Gbadegesin, R. A., Greenbaum, L. A., Shatat, I. F., et al. (2015). The impact of disease duration on quality of life in children with nephrotic syndrome: A midwest pediatric nephrology consortium study. Pediatric Nephrology(Berlin, Germany), 30(9), 1467–1476. doi:10.1007/s00467-015-3074-x.CrossRef

14.

Dampier, C., Barry, V., Gross, H. E., Lui, Y., Thornburg, C. D., DeWalt, D. A., et al. (2016). Initial evaluation of the pediatric PROMIS(R) health domains in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 63(6), 1031–1037. doi:10.1002/pbc.25944.CrossRef

15.

Dampier, C., Jaeger, B., Gross, H. E., Barry, V., Edwards, L., Lui, Y., et al. (2016). Responsiveness of PROMIS(R) pediatric measures to hospitalizations for sickle pain and subsequent recovery. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 63(6), 1038–1045. doi:10.1002/pbc.25931.CrossRef

16.

Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 95–108. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., Yeatts, K., et al. (2010). Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 585–594. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9618-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Thissen, D., Liu, Y., Magnus, B., Quinn, H., Gipson, D. S., Dampier, C., et al. (2016). Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method. Quality of Life Research, 25(1), 13–23. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1058-8.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.CrossRef

21.

Akaike, H. (1974). New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Ac19(6), 716–723. doi:10.1109/Tac.1974.1100705.CrossRef

22.

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136.CrossRef

23.

Edwards, L. J., Muller, K. E., Wolfinger, R. D., Qaqish, B. F., & Schabenberger, O. (2008). An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine, 27(29), 6137–6157. doi:10.1002/sim.3429.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Jaeger, B. (2016). r2glmm: Computes R squared for mixed (multilevel) models (LMMs and GLMMs). (R package version 0.1.0. ed.).

25.

Arvanitis, M., DeWalt, D. A., Martin, C. F., Long, M. D., Chen, W., Jaeger, B., et al. (2016). Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in children with Crohn’s disease. Journal of Pediatrics, 174(153–159), e152. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.069.

26.

Howell, C. R., Thompson, L. A., Gross, H. E., Reeve, B. B., DeWalt, D. A., & Huang, I. C. (2016). Responsiveness to change in PROMIS((R)) measures among children with asthma: A report from the PROMIS((R)) pediatric asthma study. Value Health, 19(2), 192–201. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Assessing responsiveness over time of the PROMIS® pediatric symptom and function measures in cancer, nephrotic syndrome, and sickle cell disease
verfasst von: Bryce B. Reeve
Lloyd J. Edwards
Byron C. Jaeger
Pamela S. Hinds
Carlton Dampier
Debbie S. Gipson
David T. Selewski
Jonathan P. Troost
David Thissen
Vaughn Barry
Heather E. Gross
Darren A. DeWalt
Publikationsdatum: 07.09.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1697-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Measuring what matters MOST: validation of the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment, a patient-reported outcome measure of symptom burden and impact of chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer

Health-related quality of life and its determinants in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Prevalence of patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms and agreement with clinician toxicity assessments in radiation therapy for anal cancer

Presenting comparative study PRO results to clinicians and researchers: beyond the eye of the beholder

Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry

Premium Partner