Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Einleitung – Psychologie als Wissenschaft Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Auditive Informationsverarbeitung

verfasst von : Prof. Dr. Alexandra Bendixen, Prof. Dr. Erich Schröger

Erschienen in: Allgemeine Psychologie

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel beschäftigt sich mit Wahrnehmung und Informationsverarbeitung in der auditiven Sinnesmodalität. Ausgehend von den physikalischen und physiologischen Grundlagen der Aufnahme und Weiterleitung akustischer Informationen beim Menschen werden psychische Funktionen betrachtet, die für das Hören von zentraler Bedeutung sind: Gedächtnis und Prädiktion, Aufmerksamkeit, Objektbildung sowie der Umgang mit Mehrdeutigkeit. Abschließend werden verschiedene Hörstörungen sowie Anwendungsbeispiele der wahrnehmungspsychologischen Grundlagen erörtert.
Schlüsselwörter: Aufmerksamkeit; Prädiktion; Gedächtnis; Ambiguität; Multistabilität; Auditive Szenenanalyse; Überlagerung; Binaurales Hören; Hörbahn; Audiometrie; Tinnitus; Versteckter Hörverlust

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Visuelle Informationsverarbeitung
Nächstes Kapitel Multisensorische Informationsverarbeitung
Literatur
Ahveninen, J., Hämäläinen, M., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Ahlfors, S. P., Huang, S., Lin, F. H., Raij, T., Sams, M., Vasios, C. E., & Belliveau, J. W. (2011). Attention-driven auditory cortex short-term plasticity helps segregate relevant sounds from noise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 4182–4187.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Alain, C., & McDonald, K. L. (2007). Age-related differences in neuromagnetic brain activity underlying concurrent sound perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1308–1314.PubMedCrossRef
Alain, C., & Winkler, I. (2012). Recording event-related potentials: Application to study auditory perception. In D. Poeppel, T. Overath, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Hrsg.), The Human Auditory Cortex Handbook of Auditory Research. (S. 69–96). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., & Picton, T. W. (2001). Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1072–1089.PubMed
Alho, K., Sainio, K., Sajaniemi, N., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1990). Event-related brain potential of human newborns to pitch change of an acoustic stimulus. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 77, 151–155.PubMedCrossRef
Arnal, L. H., Morillon, B., Kell, C. A., & Giraud, A.-L. (2009). Dual neural routing of visual facilitation in speech processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 13445–13453.PubMedCrossRef
Baess, P., Widmann, A., Roye, A., Schröger, E., & Jacobsen, T. (2009). Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40-Hz response to self-initiated sounds. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 1514–1521.PubMedCrossRef
Baldeweg, T. (2006). Repetition effects to sounds: Evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 93–94.PubMedCrossRef
Best, V., Ozmeral, E. J., Kopčo, N., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 13174–13178.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Bharadwaj, H. M., Verhulst, S., Shaheen, L., Liberman, M. C., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2014). Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Bidet-Caulet, A., Mikyska, C., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Load effects in auditory selective attention: evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms. Neuroimage, 50, 277–284.PubMedCrossRef
Bőhm, T. M., Shestopalova, L., Bendixen, A., Andreou, A. G., Georgiou, J., Garreau, G., Pouliquen, P., Cassidy, A., Denham, S. L., & Winkler, I. (2013). The role of perceived source location in auditory stream segregation: Separation affects sound organization, common fate does not. Learning and Perception, 5, 55–72.CrossRef
Brandenburg, K., Faller, C., Herre, J., Johnston, J. D., & Kleijn, W. B. (2013). Perceptual coding of high-quality digital audio. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101, 1905–1919.CrossRef
Bregman, A. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bronkhorst, A. W. (2015). The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1465–1487.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with 2 ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.CrossRef
Cousineau, M., Oxenham, A. J., & Peretz, I. (2015). Congenital amusia: a cognitive disorder limited to resolved harmonics and with no peripheral basis. Neuropsychologia, 66, 293–301.PubMedCrossRef
Dannenbring, G. L. (1976). Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 30, 99–114.PubMedCrossRef
Dawes, P., Emsley, R., Cruickshanks, K. J., Moore, D. R., Fortnum, H., Edmondson-Jones, M., McCormack, A., & Munro, K. J. (2015). Hearing loss and cognition: the role of hearing aids, social isolation and depression. PLoS One, 10, e0119616.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Denham, S. L., & Winkler, I. (2006). The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 100, 154–170.PubMedCrossRef
Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., & Winkler, I. (2013). Perceptual bi-stability in auditory streaming: how much do stimulus features matter? Learning and Perception, 5, 73–100.CrossRef
Denham, S. L., Bőhm, T. M., Bendixen, A., Szalárdy, O., Kocsis, Z., Mill, R., & Winkler, I. (2014). Stable individual characteristics in the perception of multiple embedded patterns in multistable auditory stimuli. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Deroche, M. L., Culling, J. F., Chatterjee, M., & Limb, C. J. (2014). Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135, 2873–2884.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2012). Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 11854–11859.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Du, Y., He, Y., Ross, B., Bardouille, T., Wu, X., Li, L., & Alain, C. (2011). Human auditory cortex activity shows additive effects of spectral and spatial cues during speech segregation. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 698–707.PubMedCrossRef
Elmer, S., Rogenmoser, L., Kühnis, J., & Jäncke, L. (2015). Bridging the gap between perceptual and cognitive perspectives on absolute pitch. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 366–371.PubMedCrossRef
Escera, C., & Malmierca, M. S. (2014). The auditory novelty system: an attempt to integrate human and animal research. Psychophysiology, 51, 111–123.PubMedCrossRef
Escera, C., Leung, S., & Grimm, S. (2014). Deviance detection based on regularity encoding along the auditory hierarchy: electrophysiological evidence in humans. Brain Topography, 27, 527–538.PubMedCrossRef
Fenn, K. M., Shintel, H., Atkins, A. S., Skipper, J. I., Bond, V. C., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2011). When less is heard than meets the ear: change deafness in a telephone conversation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1442–1456.CrossRef
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91, 1357–1392.PubMedCrossRef
Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 360, 815–836.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138.PubMedCrossRef
Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B. C., & Stone, M. A. (2015). Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 347.PubMedPubMedCentral
Galbraith, G. C., Arbagey, R. B., Comerci, N., & Rector, P. M. (1995). Intelligible speech encoded in the human brain stem frequency-following response. Neuroreport, 6, 2363–2367.PubMedCrossRef
Garde, M. M., & Cowey, A. (2000). „Deaf hearing“: unacknowledged detection of auditory stimuli in a patient with cerebral deafness. Cortex, 36, 71–80.PubMedCrossRef
Getzmann, S., Lewald, J., & Falkenstein, M. (2014). Using auditory pre-information to solve the cocktail-party problem: electrophysiological evidence for age-specific differences. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 413.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gokhale, S., Lahoti, S., & Caplan, L. R. (2013). The neglected neglect: auditory neglect. JAMA Neurology, 70, 1065–1069.PubMedCrossRef
Gourévitch, B., Edeline, J. M., Occelli, F., & Eggermont, J. J. (2014). Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 483–491.PubMedCrossRef
Gregory, R. L. (1980). Perceptions as hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 290, 181–197.PubMedCrossRef
Háden, G. P., Németh, R., Török, M. & Winkler, I. (2015). Predictive processing of pitch trends in newborn infants. Brain Research, 1626, 14–20.
He, C., & Trainor, L. J. (2009). Finding the pitch of the missing fundamental in infants. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7718–8822.PubMedCrossRef
Hedrick, M. S., & Madix, S. G. (2009). Effect of vowel identity and onset asynchrony on concurrent vowel identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 696–705.PubMedCrossRef
Henry, M., & Herrmann, B. (2014). Low-frequency neural oscillations support dynamic attending in temporal context. Timing & Time Perception, 2, 62–68.CrossRef
Henry, M. J., & Obleser, J. (2012). Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 20095–20100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Hill, K. T., Bishop, C. W., Yadav, D., & Miller, L. M. (2011). Pattern of BOLD signal in auditory cortex relates acoustic response to perceptual streaming. BMC Neuroscience, 12, 85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Hohmann, V. (2008). Signal processing in hearing aids. Handbook of Signal Processing in Acoustics, Bd. II, S. 205–212). New York: Springer.
Horváth, J., & Burgyán, A. (2011). Distraction and the auditory attentional blink. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 695–701.CrossRef
Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459–491.PubMedCrossRef
Kaernbach, C. (2003). Auditory sensory memory and short-term memory. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Hrsg.), Psychophysics beyond Sensation: Laws and Invariants of Human Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kam, J. W., Dao, E., Stanciulescu, M., Tildesley, H., & Handy, T. C. (2013). Mind wandering and the adaptive control of attentional resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 952–960.PubMedCrossRef
Kavšek, M. J. (1996). Multidimensionale Skalierung von Farbmustern aus der DIN-Farbenkarte. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 43, 547–570.PubMed
Koch, I., Lawo, V., Fels, J., & Vorländer, M. (2011). Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1140–1147.PubMed
Koelsch, S. (2012). Brain and Music. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kollmeier, B., & Koch, R. (1994). Speech enhancement based on physiological and psychoacoustical models of modulation perception and binaural interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1593–1602.PubMedCrossRef
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 599–605.PubMedCrossRef
Kraus, N., & Nicol, T. (2014). The cognitive auditory system: The role of learning in shaping the biology of the auditory system. In A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Hrsg.), Perspectives on Auditory Research Handbook of Auditory Research. (S. 299–319). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after „temporary“ noise-induced hearing loss. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 14077–14085.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Lakatos, P., Musacchia, G., O’Connel, M. N., Falchier, A. Y., Javitt, D. C., & Schroeder, C. E. (2013). The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention. Neuron, 77, 750–761.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Lange, K. (2009). Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain and Cognition, 69, 127–137.PubMedCrossRef
Lipp, O. V., Neumann, D. L., Pretorius, N. R., & McHugh, M. J. (2003). Attentional blink modulation during sustained and after discrete lead stimuli presented in three sensory modalities. Psychophysiology, 40, 285–290.PubMedCrossRef
Massaro, D. W. (1975). Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Merabet, L. B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010). Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 44–52.PubMedCrossRef
Mesgarani, N., & Chang, E. F. (2012). Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception. Nature, 485, 233–236.PubMedCrossRef
Moon, I. J., Won, J. H., Park, M. H., Ives, D. T., Nie, K., Heinz, M. G., Lorenzi, C., & Rubinstein, J. T. (2014). Optimal combination of neural temporal envelope and fine structure cues to explain speech identification in background noise. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 12145–12154.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Moore, B. C. (2008). The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 9, 399–406.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instruction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 56–60.CrossRef
Morlet, D., & Fischer, C. (2014). MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review. Brain Topography, 27, 467–479.PubMedCrossRef
Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–288.CrossRef
Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313–329.PubMedCrossRef
Okamoto, H., Stracke, H., Stoll, W., & Pantev, C. (2010). Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 1207–1210.PubMedCrossRef
O’Sullivan, J. A., Power, A. J., Mesgarani, N., Rajaram, S., Foxe, J. J., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Slaney, M., Shamma, S. A. & Lalor, E. C. (2015). Attentional selection in a cocktail party environment can be decoded from single-trial EEG. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1697–1706.
Pantev, C., Rudack, C., Stein, A., Wunderlich, R., Engell, A., Lau, P., Wollbrink, A., & Shaykevich, A. (2014). Study protocol: Münster tinnitus randomized controlled clinical trial-2013 based on tailor-made notched music training (TMNMT). BMC Neurology, 14, 40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Partanen, E., Kujala, T., Näätänen, R., Liitola, A., Sambeth, A., & Huotilainen, M. (2013). Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 15145–15150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Pronk, M., Deeg, D. J., Smits, C., Tilburg, T. G. van, Kuik, D. J., Festen, J. M., & Kramer, S. E. (2011). Prospective effects of hearing status on loneliness and depression in older persons: identification of subgroups. International Journal of Audiology, 50, 887–896.PubMedCrossRef
Puschmann, S., Sandmann, P., Ahrens, J., Thorne, J., Weerda, R., Klump, G., Debener, S., & Thiel, C. M. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of auditory change detection and change deafness in complex auditory scenes. Neuroimage, 75, 155–164.PubMedCrossRef
Rahne, T., Rasinski, C., & Neumann, K. (2010). Measuring timbre discrimination with cross-faded synthetic tones. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 189, 176–179.PubMedCrossRef
Ross, B. (2013). Steady-state auditory evoked responses. In G. G. Celesia (Hrsg.), Disorders of peripheral and central auditory processing Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology, (Bd. 10, S. 155–176). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
Roswandowitz, C., Mathias, S. R., Hintz, F., Kreitewolf, J., Schelinski, S., & Kriegstein, K. von (2014). Two cases of selective developmental voice-recognition impairments. Current Biology, 24, 2348–2353.PubMedCrossRef
Roye, A., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2013). Discrimination of personally significant from nonsignificant sounds: A training study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 930–943.CrossRef
Ruggles, D., Bharadwaj, H., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2011). Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 15516–15521.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Sandmann, P., Dillier, N., Eichele, T., Meyer, M., Kegel, A., Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Marcar, V. L., Jäncke, L., & Debener, S. (2012). Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users. Brain, 135, 555–568.PubMedCrossRef
Saupe, K., Schröger, E., Andersen, S. K., & Müller, M. M. (2009). Neural mechanisms of intermodal sustained selective attention with concurrently presented auditory and visual stimuli. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Schaette, R. (2014). Tinnitus in men, mice (as well as other rodents), and machines. Hearing Research, 311, 63–71.PubMedCrossRef
Schaette, R., Turtle, C., & Munro, K. J. (2012). Reversible induction of phantom auditory sensations through simulated unilateral hearing loss. PLoS One, 7, e35238.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Schnupp, J., Nelken, I., & King, A. (2011). Auditory neuroscience: Making sense of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schröger, E. (1998). Measurement and interpretation of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 131–145.CrossRef
Schröger, E. (2007). Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 138–146.CrossRef
Schröger, E., SanMiguel, I., & Bendixen, A. (2013). Prädiktive Modellierung in der auditiven Wahrnehmung. In E. Schröger, & S. Koelsch (Hrsg.), Affektive und Kognitive Neurowissenschaft. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (Serie II: Kognition, (Bd. 5, S. 11–45). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Denham, S. L., Mill, R. W., Böhm, T. M., & Winkler, I. (2014). Predictive regularity representations in violation detection and auditory stream segregation: From conceptual to computational models. Brain Topography, 27, 565–577.PubMedCrossRef
Schröger, E., Marzecová, A., & SanMiguel, I. (2015). Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology. European Journal of Neuroscience, 41, 641–664.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Schwartz, J.-L., Grimault, N., Hupé, J.-M., Moore, B. C. J., & Pressnitzer, D. (2012). Multistability in perception: Binding sensory modalities, an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367, 896–905.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Sergeyenko, Y., Lall, K., Liberman, M. C., & Kujawa, S. G. (2013). Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 13686–13694.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., & Micheyl, C. (2011). Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 34, 114–123.PubMedCrossRef
Sheridan, C. J., Matuz, T., Draganova, R., Eswaran, H., & Preissl, H. (2010). Fetal magnetoencephalography – achievements and challenges in the study of prenatal and early postnatal brain responses: A review. Infant and Child Development, 19, 80–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010). Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds: A tutorial. Ear & Hearing, 31, 302–324.CrossRef
Sussman, E. S. (2007). A new view on the MMN and attention debate: the role of context in processing auditory events. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 164–175.CrossRef
Szalárdy, O., Winkler, I., Schröger, E., Widmann, A., & Bendixen, A. (2013). Foreground-background discrimination indicated by event-related brain potentials in a new auditory multistability paradigm. Psychophysiology, 50, 1239–1250.PubMedCrossRef
Thorne, J., & Debener, S. (2014). Look now and hear what’s coming: On the functional role of cross-modal phase reset. Hearing Research, 307, 144–152.PubMedCrossRef
Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.CrossRef
Warren, R. M. (1968). Verbal transformation effect and auditory perceptual mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 261–270.PubMedCrossRef
Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392–393.PubMedCrossRef
Warzybok, A., Rennies, J., Brand, T., & Kollmeier, B. (2014). Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: a psychoacoustically motivated extension. In Fortschritte der Akustik (S. 351–352). Berlin/Oldenburg: DEGA.
Wetzel, N., & Schröger, E. (2014). On the development of auditory distraction: A review. PsyCh Journal, 3, 72–91.PubMedCrossRef
Winkler, & Czigler, I. (1998). Mismatch negativity: deviance detection or the maintenance of the ’standard’. NeuroReport, 9, 3809–3813.PubMedCrossRef
Winkler, I, & Schröger, E. (2015). Auditory perceptual objects as generative models: Setting the stage for communication by sound. Brain & Language, 148, 1–22.
Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: Predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532–540.PubMedCrossRef
Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., Mill, R., Bőhm, T. M., & Bendixen, A. (2012). Multistability in auditory stream segregation: A predictive coding view. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 367, 1001–1012.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Zion Golumbic, E. M., Poeppel, D., & Schroeder, C. E. (2012). Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: A behavioral and neural perspective. Brain & Language, 122, 151–161.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Auditive Informationsverarbeitung
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. Alexandra Bendixen
Prof. Dr. Erich Schröger
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Allgemeine Psychologie

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53897-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-53898-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_3

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise