nach oben

Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering

Erschienen in:

17.02.2023 | Original Article

Automatic pattern-based consistency checking in model refactoring: introducing a formal behavioral preserving method

verfasst von: Saeedeh Ghaedi Heidari, Shohreh Ajoudanian

Erschienen in: Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Evolution is one of the most important parts of the software development process. One of the negative consequences of software development is design erosion. Refactoring is a technique that aims to prevent this issue. Therefore, refactoring is an important software development process to promote software quality without changing its external behavior. Refactoring at the model level is the same as refactoring at the code level and has similar advantages, and the only difference is that refactoring at the model level, due to its formation over the initial steps of software development process, has a greater impact on cost reduction and efficiency improvement. Timely and consistent utilization of this procedure in a software project has extremely positive long-term impacts, especially when this is done by its technical tools. Then, refactoring will be a rapid, easy, and safe way to promote software system quality. The main idea of this study is the automatic checking of consistency in model refactoring in order to retain model behavior using Alloy modeling language. Thus, by employing structural and behavioral patterns as a reusable and well-defined component, as well as consistency rules, this objective can be achieved.

Vorheriger Artikel A certified access control policy language: TEpla

Nächster Artikel Automatic use case classification based on topic grouping for requirements engineering

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abid C et al (2020) 30 years of software refactoring research: a systematic literature review

Akhtar SM et al (2020) A systematic literature review on software-refactoring techniques, challenges, and practices

Alexander C (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Alkhazi B et al (2020) On the value of quality attributes for refactoring ATL model transformations: a multi-objective approach. Inf Softw Technol 120:106243CrossRef

AlOmar EA et al (2021) On preserving the behavior in software refactoring: a systematic mapping study. Inf Softw Technol 140:106675CrossRef

AlOmar EA, Mkaouer MW, Ouni A (2021) Toward the automatic classification of self-affirmed refactoring. J Syst Softw 171:110821CrossRef

Arendt T, Taentzer G (2013) A tool environment for quality assurance based on the eclipse modeling framework. Autom Softw Eng 20(2):141–184CrossRef

Baqais AAB, Alshayeb MJ (2020) Automatic software refactoring: a systematic literature review. Softw Qual J 28(2):459–502CrossRef

Ben Ammar B, Bhiri MT (2015) Pattern-based model refactoring for the introduction association relationship. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 27(2):170–180

10.

Brooks FP (1995) The mythical man-month, chapter no silver bullet-essence and accident in software engineering, vol 15. Addison Wesley Longman Inc., New York, pp 177–203

11.

Cortellessa V, Eramo R, Tucci M (2020) From software architecture to analysis models and back: model-driven refactoring aimed at availability improvement. Inf Softw Technol 127:106362CrossRef

12.

Cunha A, Garis A, Riesco D (2015) Translating between Alloy specifications and UML class diagrams annotated with OCL. Softw Syst Model 14(1):5–25CrossRef

13.

Dennis G et al (2004) Automating commutativity analysis at the design level. SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 29(4):165–174CrossRef

14.

Einarsson HÞ, Neukirchen H (2012) An approach and tool for synchronous refactoring of UML diagrams and models using model-to-model transformations. ACM, New YorkCrossRef

15.

Emmerich W et al (1999) Managing standards compliance. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 25(6):836–851CrossRef

16.

Finkelstein A et al (1993) Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications. In: European software engineering conference. Springer

17.

Fowler M (2018) Refactoring: improving the design of existing code. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston

18.

Gamma E (1995) Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Pearson Education India, Bengaluru

19.

Genero M, Piattini M, Calero C (2005) A survey of metrics for UML class diagrams. J Object Technol 4(9):59–92CrossRef

20.

Georg G, Bieman J, France RB (2001) Using alloy and UML/OCL to specify run-time configuration management: a case study. In: Workshop of the pUML-group held together with the «UML»2001 on practical UML-based rigorous development methods—countering or integrating the eXtremists. GI. pp 128–141

21.

Gheyi R, Massoni T, Borba P (2005) Type-safe refactorings for alloy

22.

http://alloytools.org/

23.

Jackson D (2002) Alloy: a lightweight object modelling notation. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 11(2):256–290MathSciNetCrossRef

24.

Jackson D, Schechter I, Shlyakhter I (2000) Alcoa: the alloy constraint analyzer. In: Proceedings of the 2000 international conference on software engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium

25.

Jackson D, Shlyakhter I, Sridharan M (2001) A micromodularity mechanism. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 26(5):62–73CrossRef

26.

Kim DK (2015) Design pattern based model transformation with tool support. Softw Pract Exp 45(4):473–499CrossRef

27.

Le HA, Dao T-H, Truong N-T (2017) A formal approach to checking consistency in software refactoring. Mob Netw Appl 22(2):356–366CrossRef

28.

Mansoor U et al (2017) Multi-view refactoring of class and activity diagrams using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Softw Qual J 25(2):473–501CrossRef

29.

Markovic S (2008) Model refactoring using transformations. EPFL, Lausanne

30.

Marković S, Baar T (2008) Refactoring OCL annotated UML class diagrams. Softw Syst Model 7(1):25–47CrossRef

31.

Massoni T, Gheyi R, Borba P (2005) Formal refactoring for UML class diagrams

32.

Mens T, Taentzer G, Müller D (2007) Model-driven software refactoring, pp 25–27

33.

Mens T, Tourwe T (2004) A survey of software refactoring. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 30(2):126–139CrossRef

34.

Misbhauddin M, Alshayeb M (2012) Towards a multi-view approach to model-driven refactoring. IEEE

35.

Misbhauddin M, Alshayeb M (2015) UML model refactoring: a systematic literature review. Empir Softw Eng 20(1):206–251CrossRef

36.

Misbhauddin M, Alshayeb M (2019) An integrated metamodel-based approach to software model refactoring. Softw Syst Model 18(3):2013–2050CrossRef

37.

Moeini A, Rafe V, Mahdian F (2010) An approach to refactoring legacy systems. In: 2010 3rd international conference on advanced computer theory and engineering (ICACTE). IEEE

38.

Nissen HW et al (1996) Managing multiple requirements perspectives with metamodels. IEEE Softw 13(2):37–48CrossRef

39.

Nuseibeh B, Kramer J, Finkelstein A (1994) A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 20(10):760–773CrossRef

40.

Pérez-Castillo R, Fernández-Ropero M, Piattini M (2019) Business process model refactoring applying IBUPROFEN. An industrial evaluation. J Syst Softw 147:86–103CrossRef

41.

Ranjini K, Kanthimathi A, Yasmine YJ (2011) Design of adaptive road traffic control system through unified modeling Language. Int J Comput Appl 14(7):36–41

42.

Reimann J, Seifert M, Aßmann U (2010) Role-based generic model refactoring. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

43.

Shlyakhter I et al (2003) Debugging overconstrained declarative models using unsatisfiable cores. In: 18th IEEE international conference on automated software engineering. Proceedings

44.

Sidhu BK, Singh K, Sharma N (2018) Refactoring UML models of object-oriented software: a systematic review. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng 28(09):1287–1319CrossRef

45.

Sidhu BK, Singh K, Sharma N (2020) A machine learning approach to software model refactoring. Int J Comput Appl 44:166–177

46.

Sidhu BK, Singh K, Sharma N (2022) A machine learning approach to software model refactoring. Int J Comput Appl 44(2):166–177

47.

Sloane AM (2006) Software abstractions: logic, language, and analysis by Daniel Jackson. The MIT Press, Cambridge

48.

Sunyé G et al (2001) Refactoring UML models. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

49.

Shah SMA, Anastasakis K, Bordbar B (2002) From UML to alloy and back again. In: Models in software engineering. lecture notes in computer science, vol 6002. Springer

50.

Taghdiri M, Jackson D (2003) A lightweight formal analysis of a multicast key management scheme. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

51.

Tanhaei M (2020) A model transformation approach to perform refactoring on software architecture using refactoring patterns based on stakeholder requirements. AUT J Math Comput 1(2):179–216

52.

Van Der Straeten R, Jonckers V, Mens T (2007) A formal approach to model refactoring and model refinement. Softw Syst Model 6(2):139–162CrossRef

53.

Wallace C (2003) Using Alloy in process modelling. Inf Softw Technol 45(15):1031–1043CrossRef

Titel: Automatic pattern-based consistency checking in model refactoring: introducing a formal behavioral preserving method
verfasst von: Saeedeh Ghaedi Heidari
Shohreh Ajoudanian
Publikationsdatum: 17.02.2023
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1614-5046
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-5054
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-022-00525-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

A certified access control policy language: TEpla

Contract-based specification of mode-dependent timing behavior

Automatic use case classification based on topic grouping for requirements engineering

Model-based design of resilient systems using quantitative risk assessment

Preface to the VECoS 2020 & 2021 special issue of ISSE

Coverage visualization and analysis of net inscriptions in coloured Petri net models

Premium Partner