nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Biomass-Based CO₂ Adsorbents for Biogas Upgradation with Pressure Swing Adsorption

verfasst von : Pragyan P. Garnaik, Ranjan R. Pradhan, Yi Wai Chiang, Animesh Dutta

Erschienen in: Climate Change and Green Chemistry of CO2 Sequestration

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Numerous types of adsorbents have been studied and used in industrial scale during upgradation of biogas by employing pressure swing adsorption. This chapter provides an insight into the working principle, efficiency, and energy consumption of this method in comparison with other processes. The most recent advancement includes the addition of subsequent units, omissions of additional stages, and the use of novel adsorbents in the process that determine the productivity, separation efficiency, and cost of the technology. Based on the literature review, research gaps were identified concerning the biogas upgradation to deliver renewable natural gas to the combined heat and power industries or to the natural gas pipelines as a vehicular fuel. The main setbacks for this sustainable sector are initially due to the digester conditions that lower the biomass conversion to methane, inadequate pre-treatment of biogas for removal of other contaminants, followed by production and selection of appropriate low-cost adsorbent in the final upgradation stage to maximize carbon dioxide elimination. In recent years, biowastes have been found to have the potential of transforming into mesoporous and nanoporous adsorbents upon carbonization and activation techniques which would enhance the adsorption activity. Also, reformation of the simple biochemical and thermochemical methods has intensified the methane yield at digester and reactor levels, respectively. Nonetheless, analyzing the effects of the process parameters for upgradation of biogas and production of adsorbents will lead to further investigation and innovative outcomes. Conclusions are drawn to augment the recent developments and sustainable technologies for broader adoption of renewable natural gas.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Mitigating Global Warming Through Carbonic Anhydrase-Mediated Carbon Sequestration

Nächstes Kapitel CO2 Sequestration Through Phytoremediation Techniques with Special Emphasis on Urban Forestry to Mitigate Climate Change Impact

Abatzoglou N, Steve B (2009) A review of biogas purification. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 3:42–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.117CrossRef

Abdeen FRH, Mel M, Jami MS, Ihsan SI, Ismail AF (2016) A review of chemical absorption of carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading. Chinese J Chem Eng 24:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.05.006CrossRef

Adib F, Bagreev A, Bandosz T (1999) Effect of surface characteristics of wood-based activated carbons on adsorption of hydrogen sulfide. J Colloid Interface Sci 214:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6200CrossRef

Agarwal A (2010) Advanced strategies for optimal design and operation of pressure swing adsorption processes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://dynopt.cheme.cmu.edu/content/thesis/anshul_thesis.pdf

Ahmed MJ (2016) Preparation of activated carbons from date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) palm stones and application for wastewater treatments: Review. Process Saf Environ Prot 102:168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.010CrossRef

Alizadeh-Khiavi S, Alvaji JR, McLean C (2013) Low Energy, high recovery, rapid cycle kinetic PSA for biogas. US20130247762A1

Alonso-Vicario A, Ochoa-Gómez JR, Gil-Río S, Gómez-Jiménez-Aberasturi O, Ramírez-López CA, Torrecilla-Soria J, Domínguez A (2010) Microporous and Mesoporous Materials Purification and upgrading of biogas by pressure swing adsorption on synthetic and natural zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 134:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.05.014CrossRef

Álvarez-Gutiérrez N, García S, Gil MV, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2014) Towards bio-upgrading of biogas: biomass waste-based adsorbents. Energy Proc 63:6527–6533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.688CrossRef

Álvarez-Gutiérrez N, Gil MV, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2016) Adsorption performance indicators for the CO₂/CH₄ separation: application to biomass-based activated carbons. Fuel Process Technol 142:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.10.038CrossRef

10.

Askari MB, Fatemeh G, Saman M, Mirhosseiny LM (2015) Advantages and Disadvantages of Biogas Energy. Bull Adv Sci Res 1:132–135

11.

Attia AA, Girgis BS, Khedr SA (2003) Capacity of activated carbon derived from pistachio shells by H₃PO₄ in the removal of dyes and phenolics. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:611–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.743CrossRef

12.

Augelletti R, Conti M, Annesini MC (2017) Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading: a new process configuration for the separation of biomethane and carbon dioxide. J Clean Prod 140:1390–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.013CrossRef

13.

Baeyens J, Appels L, Peng L, Dewil R (2016) The production of bio-energy by microbial (biogas through anaerobic digestion) or thermal (pyrolysis) processes. Renew Energy 96:1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.012CrossRef

14.

Bagreev A, Rahman H, Bandosz TJ (2001) Thermal regeneration of a spent activated carbon previously used as hydrogen sulfide adsorbent. Carbon N Y 39:1319–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00266-9CrossRef

15.

Basso D, Castello D, Baratieri M, Fiori L (2013) Hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass : progress report and prospect. 21st Eur. Biomass Conf. Exhib. Conf. Proc., pp 1478–1487

16.

Bauer F, Persson T, Hulteberg C, Tamm D (2013) Biogas upgrading—technology overview, comparison. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 7:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1423CrossRef

17.

Castellani B, Rossi F, Filipponi M, Nicolini A (2014) Hydrate-based removal of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide from biogas mixtures: Experimental investigation and energy evaluations. Biomass Bioenerg 70:330–338CrossRef

18.

Bong CPC, Lim LY, Lee CT, Klemeš JJ, Ho CS, Ho WS (2018) The characterisation and treatment of food waste for improvement of biogas production during anaerobic digestion—a review. J Clean Prod 172:1545–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.199CrossRef

19.

Botom ML, Poletto P, Junges J, Perondi D, Dettmer A, Godinho M (2017) Preparation and characterization of a metal-rich activated carbon from CCA-treated wood for CO₂ capture. Chem Eng J 321:614–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.004CrossRef

20.

Bradburn K (2014) CanBio report on the status of bioenergy in Canada https://www.fpac.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014_CanBio_Report.pdf. Accessed 26th Nov 2017

21.

Busch G (2013) Biogas technology. In: Yang ST, El-Enshasy HA, Thongchul N (eds), Bioprocessing technologies in biorefinery for sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and polymers. Wiley, pp. 279–291

22.

CAPP (2015) The facts on: Canada’s natural gas https://www.capp.ca/publications-and-statistics/publications/272337. Accessed 21st Nov 2017

23.

Chandra R, Vijay VK, Subbarao PMV (2012) Vehicular quality biomethane production from biogas by using an automated water scrubbing system. ISRN Renew Energy 2012:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/904167CrossRef

24.

Chynoweth DP, Owens JM, Legrand R (2001) Renewable methane from anaerobic digestion of biomass. Renew Energy 22:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00019-7CrossRef

25.

da Silva Santos MP (2011) Advanced modelling of PSA processes for biogas upgrading. (Master’s thesis, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal). Retrieved from https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/61452/1/000149424.pdf

26.

da Silva Santos MP, Grande CA, Rodrigues E (2011) New cycle configuration to enhance performance of kinetic PSA processes. Chem Eng Sci 66:1590–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.032CrossRef

27.

Dahunsi SO, Oranusi S, Efeovbokhan VE (2017) Cleaner energy for cleaner production: modeling and optimization of biogas generation from Carica papayas (Pawpaw) fruit peels. J Clean Prod 156:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.042CrossRef

28.

DeBruyn J, Hilborn D (2015) Anaerobic digestion basics: factsheet. https://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/07-057.htm. Accessed 21st Sept 2016

29.

Do DD (1998) Adsorption analysis: equilibria and kinetics, 1st edn. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRef

30.

Dodevski V, Janković B, Stojmenović M, Krstić S, Popović J, Pagnacco MC, Popović M, Pašalić S (2017) Plane tree seed biomass used for preparation of activated carbons (AC) derived from pyrolysis. Modeling the activation process. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 522:83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.003CrossRef

31.

Duan X, Srinivasakannan C, Wang X, Wang F, Liu X (2017) Synthesis of activated carbon fibers from cotton by microwave induced H₃PO₄ activation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 70:374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.10.036CrossRef

32.

Elmouwahidi A, Bailón-García E, Pérez-Cadenas AF, Maldonado-Hódar FJ, Carrasco-Marín F (2017) Activated carbons from KOH and H₃PO₄-activation of olive residues and its application as supercapacitor electrodes. Electrochim Acta 229:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.152CrossRef

33.

Enbridge Gas Distribution (2018).Gas analysis—January 2018 Ontario https://www.enbridgegas.com/assets/docs/VictoriaSquare Station-Jan. 2018.pdf. Accessed 2nd Feb 2018

34.

European Biogas Association (2015) EBA biomethane & biogas report. https://european-biogas.eu/2015/12/16/biogasreport2015/. Accessed 24th July 2017

35.

Faramawy S, Zaki T, Sakr AA (2016) Natural gas origin, composition, and processing: a review. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 34:34–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.030CrossRef

36.

Favre E, Bounaceur R, Roizard D (2009) Biogas, membranes and carbon dioxide capture. J Memb Sci 328:11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.017CrossRef

37.

Foo KY, Hameed BH (2011) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from sunflower seed oil residue via microwave assisted K₂CO₃ activation. Bioresour Technol 102:9794–9799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.007CrossRef

38.

Grande CA (2012) Advances in pressure swing adsorption for gas separation. ISRN Chem Eng 2012:1–13. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/982934CrossRef

39.

Grande CA (2011) Biogas upgrading by pressure swing adsorption. In: Bernardes DMADS (ed), Biofuel’s engineering process technology. InTech, Oslo, pp 65–84

40.

Grande CA, Cavenati S, Rodrigues AE (2008) Separation column and pressure swing adsorption process for gas purification. WO2008072215A2

41.

Grande CA, Cavenati S, Silva FAD (2005) Carbon molecular sieves for hydrocarbon separations by adsorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:7218–7227. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050376rCrossRef

42.

Grande CA, Ribeiro RPL, Oliveira ELG, Rodrigues AE (2009) Electric swing adsorption as emerging CO₂ capture technique. Energy Proc 1:1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.160CrossRef

43.

Grande CA, Rodrigues AE (2007a) Biogas to fuel by vacuum pressure swing adsorption I. Behavior of equilibrium and kinetic-based adsorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:4595–4605. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061341+

44.

Grande CA, Rodrigues AE (2007b) Layered vacuum pressure-swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. Ind Eng Chem 46:7844–7848. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie070942d

45.

Gratuito MKB, Panyathanmaporn T, Chumnanklang RA, Sirinuntawittaya N, Dutta A (2008) Production of activated carbon from coconut shell: Optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 99:4887–4895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.042CrossRef

46.

Greenlane, Flotech, (2011) Flotech/Greenlane Company Overview https://www2.hamilton.ca/nr/rdonlyres/5d6ba30e-ed94-427a-a21c-132ff9947abd/0/flotechgreenlaneoverviewmarch11woodward1.pdf. Accessed 6th Oct 2016

47.

Guangzhi Y, Jinyu Y, Yuhua Y, Zhihong T, Dengguang Y (2017) Preparation and CO₂ adsorption properties of porous carbon from camphor leaves by hydrothermal carbonization and sequential KOH activation. RSC Adv 7:4152–4160. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA25303BCrossRef

48.

Ham J Van (2008) Canada’s fossil energy future the way forward on carbon capture and storage. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/www/pdf/com/resoress/publications/fosfos/fosfos-eng.pdf. Accessed 8th March 2017

49.

Hamon L, Serre C, Devic T, Loiseau T, Millange F (2009) Comparative study of hydrogen sulfide adsorption in the MIL-53 (Al, Cr, Fe), MIL-47 (V), MIL-100 (Cr), and MIL-101 (Cr) metal—organic frameworks at room temperature. J Am Chem Soc 131:8775–8777. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja901587tCrossRef

50.

Harris SH, Smith RL, Barker CE (2008) Microbial and chemical factors influencing methane production in laboratory incubations of low-rank subsurface coals. Int J Coal Geol 76:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2008.05.019CrossRef

51.

Hicks JC, Drese JH, Fauth DJ, Gray ML, Qi G, Jones CW (2008) Designing adsorbents for CO₂ capture from flue gas-hyperbranched aminosilicas capable of capturing CO₂ reversibly. J Am Chem Soc 130:2902–2903. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja077795vCrossRef

52.

Ho N (2012) Modeling hydrogen sulfide adsorption by activated carbon made from anaerobic digestion by-product (Master’s Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/32575

53.

Holm-nielsen JB, Seadi TA, Oleskowicz-popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100:5478–5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046CrossRef

54.

Horikawa MS, Rossi M, Gimenes ML, Costa CM, da Silva MG (2004) Chemical absorption of H₂S for biogas purification. Brazilian J Chem Eng 21:415–422CrossRef

55.

Hsisheng T, Yeh T-S, Shu L-Y (2012) Preparation of activated carbon from bituminous coal with phosphoric acid activation. Carbon N. Y. 36, pp 1387–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00127-4

56.

IEA (2016) Introduction and scope. World energy outlook 2016. International Energy Agency, Paris, pp 31–55

57.

IEA (2019) Natural Gas Information, Statistics report—September-2019. https://www.iea.org/reports/natural-gas-information-2019

58.

Ioannidou O, Zabaniotou A (2007) Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11:1966–2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013CrossRef

59.

Kadam R, Panwar NL (2017) Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:892–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.167CrossRef

60.

Kajat B (2006) Bioenergy and biofuels: Canadian industry and market opportunities. https://www.compost.org/CCC_Science_Web_Site/pdf/Biogas/BioenergyReport.pdf. Accessed 14th Nov 2016

61.

Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050CrossRef

62.

Kan Y, Yue Q, Li D, Wu Y, Gao B (2017) Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from waste tea by H₃PO₄ activation in different atmospheres for oxytetracycline removal. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 71:494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.012CrossRef

63.

Kasikamphaiboon P, Chungsiriporn J, Bunyakan C, Wiyaratn W (2013) Simultaneous removal of CO₂ and H₂S using MEA solution in a packed column absorber for biogas upgrading. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 35:683–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.014CrossRef

64.

Kelleher Robins (2013) Canadian biogas study technical document. https://www.biogasassociation.ca/bioExp/images/uploads/documents/2014/biogas_study/Canadian_Biogas_Study_Technical_Document_Dec_2013.pdf. Accessed 12th Dec 2016

65.

Kim TH (2013) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Yang ST, El-Enshasy HA, Thongchul N (eds), Bioprocessing technologies in biorefinery for sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and polymers. Wiley, pp 91–109

66.

Knaebel KS, Hill FB (1985) Pressure swing adsorption: development of an equilibrium theory for gas separations. J Chem Eng Sci 40:2351–2360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(85)85139-3CrossRef

67.

Knaebel KS (2008) Adsorption. In: Albright LF (ed) Albright’s chemical engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1119–1172CrossRef

68.

Korres NE (2013) Bioenergy production by anaerobic digestion : using agricultural biomass and organic wastes. In: O’Kiely P, Benzie JAH, West J (eds), New York, pp 137–258

69.

Kwaśny J, Balcerzak W (2016) Sorbents used for biogas desulfurization in the adsorption process. Pol J Environ Stud 25:37–43. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/60259

70.

Lau LC, MohamadNor N, Lee KT, Mohamed AR (2016) Adsorption isotherm, kinetic, thermodynamic and breakthrough curve models of H₂S removal using CeO₂/NaOH/PSAC. Int J Petrochem Sci Eng 1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.15406/ipcse.2016.01.00009

71.

Leonzio G (2016) Upgrading of biogas to bio-methane with chemical absorption process: simulation and environmental impact. J Clean Prod 131:364–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.020CrossRef

72.

Lestinsky P, Vecer M, Navratil P, Stehlik P (2015) The removal of CO₂ from biogas using a laboratory PSA unit: design using breakthrough curves. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0912-2CrossRef

73.

Li H, Larsson E, Thorin E, Dahlquist E, Yu X (2015) Feasibility study on combining anaerobic digestion and biomass gasification to increase the production of biomethane. Energy Convers Manag 100:212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.007CrossRef

74.

Li W, Li Q, Zheng L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Yu Z, Zhang Y (2015) Potential biodiesel and biogas production from corncob by anaerobic fermentation and black soldier fly. Bioresour Technol 194:276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.112CrossRef

75.

Li S, Han K, Li J, Li M, Lu C (2017) Preparation and characterization of super activated carbon produced from gulfweed by KOH activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 243:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.052CrossRef

76.

Lijó L, González-García S, Bacenetti J, Fiala M, Feijoo G, Moreira MT (2014) Assuring the sustainable production of biogas from anaerobic mono-digestion. J Clean Prod 72:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.022CrossRef

77.

Liu J, Reddy KP, Gadkaree PK (2014) Method for making alkali activated carbon. US201408809231B2

78.

Llewellyn PL, Hamon L, Devic T, Ghoufi A, Clet G, Driver G, Beek WV, Jolimaı E (2009) Co-adsorption and separation of CO₂-CH₄ mixtures in the highly flexible MIL-53 (Cr) MOF. J Am Chem Soc 131:17490–17499. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja907556qCrossRef

79.

Lozano-castell D, Lozar JPM, Falco C, Titirici M-M, Amoros DC (2013) Porous biomass-derived carbons : activated carbons. In: Titirici MM (Ed), Sustainable carbon materials from hydrothermal processes. Wiley, pp 75–100

80.

Luo L (2013) Intensification of adsorption process in porous media. In: Heat and mass transfer intensification and shape optimization: a multi-scale approach. pp 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4742-8

81.

Machnikowski J, Kierzek K, Lis K, Machnikowska H, Czepirski L (2010) Tailoring porosity development in monolithic adsorbents made of KOH-activated pitch coke and furfuryl alcohol binder for methane storage. Energy Fuels 24:3410–3414. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901536yCrossRef

82.

Mahmood T, Ali R, Naeem A, Hamayun M, Aslam M (2017) Potential of used Camellia sinensis leaves as precursor for activated carbon preparation by chemical activation with H₃PO₄; optimization using response surface methodology. Process Saf Environ Prot 109:548–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.04.024CrossRef

83.

Mamun MRA, Torii S (2017) Enhancement of methane concentration by removing contaminants from biogas mixtures using combined method of absorption and adsorption. Int J Chem Eng 2017:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7906859CrossRef

84.

Marzbali MH, Esmaieli M, Abolghasemi H, Marzbali MH (2016) Tetracycline adsorption by H₃PO₄-activated carbon produced from apricot nut shells: a batch study. Process Saf Environ Prot 102:700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.05.025CrossRef

85.

Meijden CM Van Der, Drift A Van der, Vreugdenhil BJ, Smit R, Rabou LPLM (2011) Large scale production of Biomethane from wood. In: International gas union research conference. Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Seoul, pp 1–17

86.

Micale C (2015) Bio-methane generation from biogas upgrading by semi-permeable membranes: an experimental, numerical and economic analysis. Energy Proc 82:971–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.854CrossRef

87.

Michel R, Mischler N, Azambre B, Finqueneisel G, Machnikowski J, Rutkowski P, Zimny T, Weber JV (2006) Miscanthus × Giganteus straw and pellets as sustainable fuels and raw material for activated carbon. Environ Chem Lett 4:185–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-006-0043-4CrossRef

88.

Miltner M, Makaruk A, Harasek M (2017) Review on available biogas upgrading technologies and innovations towards advanced solutions. J Clean Prod 161:1329–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.045CrossRef

89.

Molino A, Nanna F, Iovane P (2015) Low pressure biomethane production by anaerobic digestion (AD) for the smart grid injection. Fuel 154:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.054CrossRef

90.

Mopoung S, Moonsri P, Palas W, Khumpai S (2015) Characterization and properties of activated carbon prepared from tamarind seeds by KOH activation for Fe (III) adsorption from aqueous solution. Sci World J 2015:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/415961CrossRef

91.

Nahar G, Mote D, Dupont V (2017) Hydrogen production from reforming of biogas: review of technological advances and an Indian perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.031CrossRef

92.

Niesner J, Jecha D, Stehlík P (2013) Biogas upgrading technologies: state of art review in European region. Chem Eng Trans 35:517–522. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1335086CrossRef

93.

Nock WJ, Walker M, Kapoor R, Heaven S (2014) Modeling the water scrubbing process and energy requirements for CO₂ capture to upgrade biogas to biomethane. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:12783–12792. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie501280pCrossRef

94.

Panjičko M, Zupančič GD, Fanedl L, Logar RM, Tišma M, Zelić B (2017) Biogas production from brewery spent grain as a mono-substrate in a two-stage process composed of solid-state anaerobic digestion and granular biomass reactors. J Clean Prod 166:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.197CrossRef

95.

Pari G, Darmawan S, Prihandoko B (2014) Porous carbon spheres from hydrothermal carbonization and KOH activation on cassava and tapioca flour raw material. Proc Environ Sci 20:342–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.043CrossRef

96.

Petersson A, Wellinger A (2006) Biogas upgrading to vehicle fuel standards and grid, 1st edn. IEA Bioenergy, Stockholm

97.

Petersson A, Wellinger A (2009) Biogas upgrading technologies–developments and innovations, 1st ed. IEA Bioenergy

98.

Plaza-Recobert M, Trautwein G, Pérez-Cadenas M, Alcañiz-Monge J (2017) Preparation of binderless activated carbon monoliths from cocoa bean husk. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 243:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.015CrossRef

99.

Pobeheim H, Munk B, Lindorfer H, Guebitz GM (2011) Impact of nickel and cobalt on biogas production and process stability during semi-continuous anaerobic fermentation of a model substrate for maize silage. Water Res 45:781–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.001CrossRef

100.

Rashed M, Mamun A, Torii S (2015) Removal of H₂S and H₂O by chemical treatment to upgrade methane of biogas generated from anaerobic co-digestion of organic biomass waste. IPASJ Int J Mech Eng 3:42–52

101.

Rasi S (2009) Biogas composition and upgrading to biomethane (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland). Retrieved from https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-3618-1

102.

Rauch R, Hrbek J, Hofbauer H (2014) Biomass gasification for synthesis gas production and applications of the syngas. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev Energy Environ 3:343–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.97

103.

Ray NHS, Swain PR, Mohanty MK, Mohanty RC (2014) A case study of biogas upgradation by water scrubbing: laboratory model for purification and effective storage in LPG cylinders for cooking applications. Int J Adv Eng Res Sci 1:68–75

104.

Rezaei F, Webley P (2010) Structured adsorbents in gas separation processes. Sep Purif Technol 70:243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.004CrossRef

105.

Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M, Vervaeren H (2011) Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenerg 35:1633–1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033CrossRef

106.

Sato A, Terashima H, Takei Y (2014) Monolith adsorbent and method and apparatus for adsorbing samples with the same. US201408795410B2

107.

Saxena R, Singh VK, Kumar EA (2014) Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration by adsorption on activated carbon. Energy Proc 54:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.275CrossRef

108.

Sevilla M, Fuertes AB, Demir-cakan R (2013) Applications of hydrothermal carbon in modern nanotechnology. In: Titirici MM (ed), Sustainable carbon materials from hydrothermal processes. Wiley, pp 213–294

109.

Shah IK, Pre P, Alappat BJ (2013) Steam regeneration of adsorbents: an experimental and technical review. Chem Sci Trans 2:1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.7598/cst2013.545CrossRef

110.

Shahin O, Saka C (2013) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from acorn shell by physical activation with H₂O-CO₂ in two-step pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 136:163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.074CrossRef

111.

Shao P, Dal-cin M, Kumar A, Li H, Paul D (2012) Design and economics of a hybrid membrane—temperature swing adsorption process for upgrading biogas. J Memb Sci 413–414:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.040CrossRef

112.

Shen C, Yu J, Li P, Grande CA, Rodrigues AE (2011) Capture of CO₂ from flue gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption using activated carbon beads. Adsorption 17:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-010-9298-yCrossRef

113.

Shen Y, Linville JL, Urgun-demirtas M, Mintz MM, Snyder SW (2015) An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs ) in the United States: challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.129CrossRef

114.

Silva LA da, Borges SMS, Paulino PN, Fraga MA, Oliva ST de, Marchetti SG, Rangel M do C (2017) Methylene blue oxidation over iron oxide supported on activated carbon derived from peanut hulls. Catal Today 289:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.036

115.

Singhal S, Agarwal S, Arora S, Sharma P, Singhal N (2017) Upgrading techniques for transformation of biogas to bio-CNG : a review. Int J Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3719

116.

Song M, Jin B, Xiao R, Yang L, Wu Y, Zhong Z, Huang Y (2013) The comparison of two activation techniques to prepare activated carbon from corn cob. Biomass Bioenerg 48:250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.11.007CrossRef

117.

Sricharoenchaikul V, Pechyen C, Aht-ong D (2008) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from the pyrolysis of physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.) waste. Energy Fuels 22:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700285uCrossRef

118.

Suhas, Gupta VK, Carrott PJM, Singh R, Chaudhary M, Kushwaha S (2016) Cellulose: a review as natural, modified and activated carbon adsorbent. Bioresour Technol 216:1066–1076. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.106

119.

Sun Q, Li H, Yan J, Liu L, Yu Z, Yu X (2015) Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029CrossRef

120.

Sun Y, Li H, Li G, Gao B, Yue Q, Li X (2016) Characterization and ciprofloxacin adsorption properties of activated carbons prepared from biomass wastes by H₃PO₄ activation. Bioresour Technol 217:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.047CrossRef

121.

Techsci Research (2016) Global Activated Carbon Market Competition Forecast and Opportunities, 2011–2021. https://www.techsciresearch.com/report/global-activated-carbon-market-by-type-powdered-activated-carbon-granular-activated-carbon-and-others-by-raw-material-wood-coconut-shells-coal-and-others-by-application-competition-forecast-and-opportunities-2011-202. Accessed 21st Aug 2017

122.

Thakur GSRS, Kaistha N (2011) Process intensification in PSA processes for upgrading synthetic landfill and lean natural gases. Adsorption 17:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-010-9302-6CrossRef

123.

Tounsadi H, Khalidi A, Machrouhi A, Farnane M, Elmoubarki R, Elhalil A, Sadiq M, Barka N (2016) Highly efficient activated carbon from Glebionis coronaria L. biomass: Optimization of preparation conditions and heavy metals removal using experimental design approach. J Environ Chem Eng 4:4549–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.10.020CrossRef

124.

TransCanada Pipelines, Canadian Pipelines, Canada Alliance, Canadian Mainline, North Baja, Mainline Tariff (2016) Gas Quality Specifications TransCanada and other pipelines, pp 1–2

125.

Tromly K (2001) Renewable energy: an overview https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy01osti/27955.pdf. Accessed 24th Dec 2016

126.

Turco M (2016) Processes of biogas production : anaerobic digestion and thermal gasification. In: Treatment of biogas for feeding high temperature fuel cells. pp 1–29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03215-3

127.

TUV (2012) Biogas To Biomethane Technology Review, 1st edn. Intelligent Energy Europe, Vienna

128.

US Energy (2017a) AEO 2017 with projections to 2050. Annu Energy Outlook 2017 1–127

129.

US Energy (2017b) Renewable natural gas (biomethane) production. https://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels/natural_gas_renewable.html. Accessed 24th Jul 2017

130.

Vemula RR, Kothare MV, Sircar S (2015) Anatomy of a rapid pressure swing adsorption process performance. AIChE 61:2008–2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14779CrossRef

131.

Venkatesan S (2013) Adsorption. In: Ramaswamy S, Huang HJ, Ramarao BV (eds), Separation and purification technologies in biorefineries. Shell Global Solutions International, pp 103–148

132.

Wang D, Ai P, Yu L, Tan Z, Zhang Y (2015) Comparing the hydrolysis and biogas production performance of alkali and acid pretreatments of rice straw using two-stage anaerobic fermentation. Biosyst Eng 132:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.02.007CrossRef

133.

Wang S, Ruan Y, Zhou W, Li Z, Wu J, Liu D (2018) Net energy analysis of small-scale biogas self-supply anaerobic digestion system operated at psychrophilic to thermophilic conditions. J Clean Prod 174:226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.186CrossRef

134.

West Virginia University (2015) Production and application of highly porous activated carbon (HPAC) materials from bioenergy crops https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1007044-production-and-application-of-highly-porous-activated-carbon-hpac-materials-from-bioenergy-crops.html. Accessed 22nd Aug 2017

135.

Wheeldon I, Caners C, Karan K, Peppley B (2007) Utilization of biogas generated from ontario wastewater treatment plants in solid oxide fuel Cell systems: a process modeling study. Int J Green Energy 4:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435070601015585CrossRef

136.

Xebec Adsorption Inc. (2015) Xebec Methane Upgrading https://www.xebecinc.com/pdf/BGX_biogas-brochure_2015_12_single.pdf. Accessed 6th Oct 2016

137.

Xu J, Chen L, Qu H, Jiao Y, Xie J, Xing G (2014) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from reedy grass leaves by chemical activation with H₃PO₄. Appl Surf Sci 320:674–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.178CrossRef

138.

Yang RT (2003) Adsorbents: fundamentals and applications, 1st edn. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRef

139.

Yorgun S, Yıldız D (2015) Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from Paulownia wood by chemical activation with H₃PO₄. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 53:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.02.032CrossRef

140.

Yousef AMI, Eldrainy YA, El-maghlany WM, Attia A (2016) Upgrading biogas by a low-temperature CO₂ removal technique. Alexandria Eng J 55:1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.026CrossRef

141.

Zhang Z, Yan Y, Zhang L, Chen Y, Ran J, Pu G, Qin C (2014) Theoretical study on CO₂ absorption from biogas by membrane contactors: effect of operating parameters. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:14075–14083. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502830kCrossRef

Titel: Biomass-Based CO2 Adsorbents for Biogas Upgradation with Pressure Swing Adsorption
verfasst von: Pragyan P. Garnaik
Ranjan R. Pradhan
Yi Wai Chiang
Animesh Dutta
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Climate Change and Green Chemistry of CO2 Sequestration
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0028-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-0029-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0029-6_14