Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 8/2022

01.12.2022

Blockchain Technology in 5G Networks: Performance Comparison of Private and Public Blockchains

verfasst von: I. R. Fedorov, A. V. Pimenov, G. A. Panin, S. V. Bezzateev

Erschienen in: Automatic Control and Computer Sciences | Ausgabe 8/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The use of blockchain in 5G networks gives a number of opportunities to improve security, privacy, and quality of service. However, despite all its advantages, blockchain technology has a number of disadvantages associated with low performance and high transaction latency. This article describes an experiment that compares public and private blockchains. The main goal of the experiment is to test the possibility of using private blockchains in mobile networks in order to resolve problems of network performance.
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Maharjan, P.S., Performance analysis of blockchain platforms, UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, 2018, p. 3367. Maharjan, P.S., Performance analysis of blockchain platforms, UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, 2018, p. 3367.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dinh, T.T.A., Wang, Ji, Chen, G., Liu, R., and Ooi, B.Ch., BLOCKBENCH: A framework for analyzing private blockchains, SIGMOD ’17: Proc. 2017 ACM Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Chicago, 2017, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3064033. Dinh, T.T.A., Wang, Ji, Chen, G., Liu, R., and Ooi, B.Ch., BLOCKBENCH: A framework for analyzing private blockchains, SIGMOD ’17: Proc. 2017 ACM Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Chicago, 2017, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 1085–1100. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​3035918.​3064033.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, B.F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., and Sears, R., Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB, SoCC ’10: Proc. 1st ACM Symp. on Cloud Computing, Indianapolis, 2010, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010, pp. 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807128.1807152 Cooper, B.F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., and Sears, R., Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB, SoCC ’10: Proc. 1st ACM Symp. on Cloud Computing, Indianapolis, 2010, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010, pp. 143–154.  https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​1807128.​1807152
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman, J., What proof of work function does Ethereum use?, 2016. http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/ questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October, 17, 2021. Coleman, J., What proof of work function does Ethereum use?, 2016. http://​ethereum.​stackexchange.​com/​ questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October, 17, 2021.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat B. F. Cooper, A. Silberstein, E. Tam, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. Sears. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with ycsb. In SoCC, 2010. B. F. Cooper, A. Silberstein, E. Tam, R. Ramakrishnan, and R. Sears. Benchmarking cloud serving systems with ycsb. In SoCC, 2010.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October 17, 2021. http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/14/what-proof-ofworkfunction-does-ethereum-use. Cited October 17, 2021.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Busygin, A. and Kalinin, M., Criterion of blockchain vulnerability to majority attack based on hashing power distribution assessment, Futuristic Trends in Network and Communication Technologies. FTNCT 2020, Singh, P.K., Veselov, G., Vyatkin, V., Pljonkin, A., Dodero, J.M., and Kumar, Y., Eds., Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1395, Singapore: Springer, 2021, pp. 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1480-4_6 Busygin, A. and Kalinin, M., Criterion of blockchain vulnerability to majority attack based on hashing power distribution assessment, Futuristic Trends in Network and Communication Technologies. FTNCT 2020, Singh, P.K., Veselov, G., Vyatkin, V., Pljonkin, A., Dodero, J.M., and Kumar, Y., Eds., Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1395, Singapore: Springer, 2021, pp. 68–77.  https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-981-16-1480-4_​6
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Busygin, A., Konoplev, A., Kalinin, M., and Zegzhda, D., Floating genesis block enhancement for blockchain based routing between connected vehicles and software-defined VANET security services, SIN ’18: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Security of Information and Networks, Cardiff, UK, 2018, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264437.3264463 Busygin, A., Konoplev, A., Kalinin, M., and Zegzhda, D., Floating genesis block enhancement for blockchain based routing between connected vehicles and software-defined VANET security services, SIN ’18: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Security of Information and Networks, Cardiff, UK, 2018, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018, p. 24.  https://​doi.​org/​10.​1145/​3264437.​3264463
Metadaten
Titel
Blockchain Technology in 5G Networks: Performance Comparison of Private and Public Blockchains
verfasst von
I. R. Fedorov
A. V. Pimenov
G. A. Panin
S. V. Bezzateev
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2022
Verlag
Pleiades Publishing
Erschienen in
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences / Ausgabe 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0146-4116
Elektronische ISSN: 1558-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411622080053

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2022

Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 8/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Neuer Inhalt